Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
28 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-01-01
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this multicentrical and retrospective study was to describe the clinical and radiological features of patients with CAA-ri and assess long-term prognosis.
METHODS: We reviewed the characteristics of 28 patients with CAA-ri including clinical data, systematic MRI analysis, cerebrospinal fluid results (including Alzheimer's disease biomarkers) and APOE genotype.
HYPOTHESIS: We aimed at describing the clinical and radiological characteristics of a cohort of patients with CAA-ri.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Clinical data For each patient, the following demographic and clinical data were systematically recorded: age, gender, neurological medical history, independence, neurological symptoms, initial evolution at discharge, treatment type and duration and follow-up data. Onset of the disease was defined as acute (\<48h), sub acute (\>48h and \<4weeks) or chronic (\>4weeks) depending on the time elapsed between the manifestation of the first symptoms and time of referral to the treating center. Response to treatment was assessed according to the treating neurologist global opinion. Relapse was defined as a recurrence of symptoms and new/enlarging lesions on cerebral MRI. Disability at the end of follow-up was defined using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) through a review of the last medical record by two neurologists (SC, XA). Outcome was dichotomized into good outcome (mRS 0 to 2) and poor outcome (3 to 6).
2. Laboratory data Laboratory data included ApoE genotype in n=20 patients and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis (n=25 patients). In addition to the standard test, CSF analysis included Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers study: results were compared with series of patients with AD, CAA and control patients (Charamidou, JAD 2016) (Renard, JAD, 2016). Cerebral biopsy was performed in 6 patients.
3. Neuroimaging data MRI examinations were performed either at 1.5 or 3 Tesla for all the patients upon routine clinical care. Sequences included T1-weighted pre and post contrast, T2, Flair, diffusion, T2-Gradient Echo sequencing (T2-GRE). SWI was performed in only 5 patients and was thus not included in the analysis. Imagings of all patients were reviewed by two neurologists (SC, XA) and a neuroradiologist (NM). On the first MRI performed at diagnosis, confluent T2/FLAIR white matter hyperintensity (WMH) Figure 1A, size was characterized using a qualitative score as follow: small (\<50% of one lobe), medium (\>50% of one lobe and less than an entire lobe) and large (the volume of confluent WMH uni or multifocal exceeding one lobe), and mass effect was classified as mild (sulcal effacement), moderate (mass effect on the lateral ventricle) or severe (subfalcine herniation).
The presence and number of lobar intracerebral macrohemorrhage (ICH), cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and cortical superficial siderosis (cSS) were evaluated on T2-GRE. The distribution and severity of cSS was classified as focal (restricted to ≤3 sulci) or disseminated (≥4 sulci) (Roongpiboonsopit, Neurology, 2016).
Localization and number of Dwi-positive cerebral infarcts as well as the presence of contrast enhancement were noticed. Almost all the patients (96%) had at least one follow-up MRI enabling analysis of the evolution of the main lesion, occurrence of infarcts, ICH, the raise CMBs' number and the contrast enhancement Figure 1.
This series comprises only routinely collected clinical, biological and radiological data and was judged not to require formal ethical committee approval.
4. Statistical analysis Data were summarized for continuous variables as mean ±SD (Max, Min) and number (%) for categorical variables. Statistical comparisons were performed by Fisher exact test for categorical variables and non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Comparison of continuous variables between groups was performed using non-parametric. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The relationship between categorical parameters and outcome measures was assessed by non-parametric log-rank test. Finally we use an ANOVA test to compare biomarkers between CAA-ri, Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and controls. For all analyses, a two-tailed p-value \<0.05 was used as the criterion for statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.0.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing). To test the association between MCB's number and clinical outcome we categorized the number of microbleeds in 3 categories: 0 to 99 CMB, 100 to 199 and more than 200 per patient.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of amyloid angiopathy with perivascular inflammatory infiltrate not meeting the criteria for inflammatory amyloid angiopathy cited above.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
OTHER
University Hospital, Toulouse
OTHER
Centre hospitalier de Perpignan
OTHER
Beziers Hospital
OTHER
Narbonne Hospital
OTHER
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Xavier AYRIGNAC, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Montpellier
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RECHMPL17_0149
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id