Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study In Adults With Moderate To Severe Dermatomyositis (NCT NCT03181893)
NCT ID: NCT03181893
Last Updated: 2023-09-14
Results Overview
The treatment effect was defined as the difference (mean chg from baseline at Week12 in the active treatment group minus that in the placebo group) in the mean change of CDASI activity score from baseline at Week 12. The score (range: 0-100) consists of the extent score (ES), Gottorn hands score (GHS), peringual score (PS) and allopecia score (AS). ES (range: 0-90) was obtained by summing up scores for the total erythema (ER \[0-45\], redness of the skin or mucous membranes), scaling (SC \[0-30\], peeling of the skin) and erosion/ulceration (EU \[0-15\], presence of the deeper wound). Total ER, SC and EU scores were calculated as a sum of the contributions from 15 individual areas of the body. GHS characterizes papules (swellings) on hand and is a sum of the papule's characterization score (0-6) and ulceration score (0-1). PS (0-2) characterizes abnormalities around nails. The AS (0-1) characterizes hair loss. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
75 participants
Baseline and Week 12
2023-09-14
Participant Flow
A total of 75 participants were randomized at 19 centers in 5 countries: 32, 9, 16 and 18 participants were treated in Stage 1, Stage 2, Amended Stage 2 and Stage 3, respectively. A fixed sequence design with crossover at Week 12 was employed in Amended Stage 2 and Stage 3 to provide all participants with the opportunity to receive active drug during the treatment period.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 1) PF-06823859 600 mg Intravenous (IV)
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 2. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Baseline to Week 12 (All Stages)
STARTED
|
10
|
22
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
10
|
3
|
9
|
9
|
|
Baseline to Week 12 (All Stages)
COMPLETED
|
9
|
20
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
10
|
3
|
9
|
9
|
|
Baseline to Week 12 (All Stages)
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Weeks 12-24 (Amended Stage 2, Stage 3)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
10
|
3
|
9
|
9
|
|
Weeks 12-24 (Amended Stage 2, Stage 3)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
9
|
2
|
8
|
8
|
|
Weeks 12-24 (Amended Stage 2, Stage 3)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 1) PF-06823859 600 mg Intravenous (IV)
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 2. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Baseline to Week 12 (All Stages)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Baseline to Week 12 (All Stages)
Adverse Event
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Weeks 12-24 (Amended Stage 2, Stage 3)
Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Weeks 12-24 (Amended Stage 2, Stage 3)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Weeks 12-24 (Amended Stage 2, Stage 3)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study In Adults With Moderate To Severe Dermatomyositis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 1) PF-06823859 600 mg Intravenous (IV)
n=22 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8.
After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=1 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=5 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
n=2 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
n=1 Participants
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=10 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
n=9 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=9 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
Total
n=75 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
50.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.054 • n=5 Participants
|
54.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.154 • n=7 Participants
|
42.00 years
n=5 Participants
|
51.60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.726 • n=4 Participants
|
45.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.714 • n=21 Participants
|
64.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.414 • n=8 Participants
|
44 years
n=8 Participants
|
53.90 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.999 • n=24 Participants
|
47.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.115 • n=42 Participants
|
47.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.126 • n=42 Participants
|
42.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.697 • n=42 Participants
|
50.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.793 • n=42 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
18-64 Years
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
65-84 Years
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=85 Years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiracial
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) in Stage 1, Stage 2, and Amended Stage 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in in Stage 1, Stage 2, or Amended Stage 2.
The treatment effect was defined as the difference (mean chg from baseline at Week12 in the active treatment group minus that in the placebo group) in the mean change of CDASI activity score from baseline at Week 12. The score (range: 0-100) consists of the extent score (ES), Gottorn hands score (GHS), peringual score (PS) and allopecia score (AS). ES (range: 0-90) was obtained by summing up scores for the total erythema (ER \[0-45\], redness of the skin or mucous membranes), scaling (SC \[0-30\], peeling of the skin) and erosion/ulceration (EU \[0-15\], presence of the deeper wound). Total ER, SC and EU scores were calculated as a sum of the contributions from 15 individual areas of the body. GHS characterizes papules (swellings) on hand and is a sum of the papule's characterization score (0-6) and ulceration score (0-1). PS (0-2) characterizes abnormalities around nails. The AS (0-1) characterizes hair loss. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=1 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=5 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
n=2 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
n=1 Participants
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=10 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) Activity Score at Week 12 (Stage 1, Stage 2 and Amended Stage 2)
|
-3.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.270
|
-19.62 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.140
|
5.00 Units on a scale
|
-17.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.290
|
-26.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.937
|
-3.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.485
|
3.00 Units on a scale
|
-16.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.835
|
-15.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.028
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 40Population: The safety analysis set in Stage 3 (SAS3) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 3.
Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in any of following outcomes/deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial /prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect and suspected transmission via a Pfizer product of an infectious agent, pathogenic or non-pathogenic. AEs included both serious (if occurred) and all non-serious adverse events. TEAEs are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 40 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=9 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) (Stage 3)
TEAEs
|
7 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) (Stage 3)
SAEs
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 40Population: The safety analysis set in Stage 3 (SAS3) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 3.
Hemoglobin(HGB),hematocrit,erythrocytes(ery.),HDL cholesterol(chl.)\<0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN);reticulocytes (ret.), ret./ery.(%)\<0.5\*LLN,\>1.5\*upper limit of normal (ULN);ery. mean corpuscular(EMC) volume,EMC HGB concentration,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate\<0.9\*LLN,\>1.1\*ULN;platelets\<0.5\*LLN,\>1.75\*ULN; leukocytes(leu.),glucose\<0.6\*LLN,\>1.5\*ULN;lymphocytes(lym.), lym./leu.(%),neutrophils (neu.), neu./leu.(%), protein,albumin\<0.8\*LLN,\>1.2\*ULN;basophils(bas.), bas./leu.(%), eosinophils(eos.), eos./leu., monocytes(mon.), mon./leu.(%), urate\>1.2\*ULN;bilirubin (total, direct,indirect)\>1.5\*ULN;aspartate/alanine aminotransferase,gamma glutamyl transferase,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase\>3.0\*ULN;urea nitrogen,creatinine,triglycerides, chl.\>1.3\*ULN; sodium \<0.95\*LLN,\>1.05\*ULN; creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN;Urine: pH\<4.5,\>8;glucose, ketones,protein, HGB,urobilinogen,bilirubin,nitrite,leukocyte esterase\>=1;ery., leu.\>= 20;hyaline casts\>1;bacteria\>20.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=9 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities (Stage 3)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 40Population: The SAS3 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 3.
Abnormality in vital signs: Sitting pulse rate \<40 beats per minute (bpm) to \>120 bpm, sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \< 50 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90 mmHg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=9 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Stage 3)
Sitting SBP Value <90 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Stage 3)
Sitting DBP Value <50 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Stage 3)
Sitting Pulse Rate Value <40 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Stage 3)
Sitting Pulse Rate Value >120 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 40Population: The SAS3 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 3.
ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) QTc interval adjusted according to Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): \>450, \>480, \>500, increase from baseline \>=30, increase from baseline \>=60; 2) Pulse rate (PR) (msec): \>=300, change from baseline (Chg) \>=25% or 50%; 3) QT (msec): \>=500; 4) QRS (msec): \>=200, Chg \>=25% or 50%. Categories, with at least 1 participant having ECG abnormality in any of the reporting arms, were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=9 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities (Stage 3)
PR Interval Aggregate Value >=300 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities (Stage 3)
QRS Duration Aggregate Value >=200 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities (Stage 3)
QT Interval Aggregate Value >=500 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities (Stage 3)
QTcF Interval Aggregate 450<=Value<480 msec
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities (Stage 3)
QTcF Interval Aggregate 480<=Value<500 msec
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities (Stage 3)
QTcF Interval Aggregate Value >=500 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities (Stage 3)
PR %Chg >=25% or >=50%
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities (Stage 3)
QRS Duration %Chg >=25% or >=50%
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities (Stage 3)
30<=QTcF Chg (msec)<60
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities (Stage 3)
QTcF Chg (msec) >=60
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 28Population: The safety analysis set in Stage 1 (SAS1) and safety analysis set in Stage 2 (SAS2) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 1 and Stage 2, respectively.
AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in any of following outcomes/deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial /prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect and suspected transmission via a Pfizer product of an infectious agent, pathogenic or non-pathogenic. AEs included both serious (if occurred) and all non-serious adverse events. TEAEs are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 28 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=22 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=1 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=5 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEs (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
TEAEs
|
8 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEs (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
SAEs
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 40Population: The safety analysis set in Amended Stage 2 (SASA2) includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in Amended Stage 2.
AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in any of following outcomes/deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial /prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect and suspected transmission via a Pfizer product of an infectious agent, pathogenic or non-pathogenic. AEs included both serious (if occurred) and all non-serious adverse events. TEAEs are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 40 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=2 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=1 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEs (Amended Stage 2)
SAEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With TEAEs and SAEs (Amended Stage 2)
TEAEs
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 28Population: The SAS1 and SAS2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 1 and Stage 2, respectively.
HGB,hematocrit,ery.,HDL chl.\<0.8\*LLN;ret., ret./ery. (%)\<0.5\*LLN,\>1.5\*ULN;EMC volume,EMC HGB,EMC HGB concentration,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate\<0.9\*LLN,\>1.1\*ULN;platelets\<0.5\*LLN,\>1.75\*ULN;leu.,glucose\<0.6\*LLN,\>1.5\*ULN;lym., lym./leu.(%), neu., neu./leu. (%), protein,albumin \<0.8\*LLN,\>1.2\*ULN;bas., bas./leu.(%), eos., eos./leu., mon., mon./leu.(%), urate \>1.2\*ULN;bilirubin (total, direct, indirect)\>1.5\*ULN;aspartate/alanine aminotransferase, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase\>3.0\*ULN;urea nitrogen, creatinine, triglycerides, chl.\>1.3\*ULN; sodium \<0.95\*LLN,\>1.05\*ULN; creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN;Urine: pH\<4.5,\>8;glucose, ketones, protein, HGB, urobilinogen,bilirubin,nitrite,leukocyte esterase\>=1;ery., leu.\>= 20;hyaline casts\>1;bacteria\>20. Clinical significance of laboratory parameters was determined at the investigator's discretion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=22 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=1 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=5 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 40Population: The SASA2 includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in Amended Stage 2.
HGB,hematocrit,ery.,HDL chl.\<0.8\*LLN;ret., ret./ery. (%)\<0.5\*LLN,\>1.5\*ULN;EMC volume,EMC HGB,EMC HGB concentration,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate\<0.9\*LLN,\>1.1\*ULN;platelets\<0.5\*LLN,\>1.75\*ULN;leu.,glucose\<0.6\*LLN,\>1.5\*ULN;lym., lym./leu.(%), neu., neu./leu. (%), protein,albumin \<0.8\*LLN,\>1.2\*ULN;bas., bas./leu.(%), eos., eos./leu., mon., mon./leu.(%), urate \>1.2\*ULN;bilirubin (total, direct, indirect)\>1.5\*ULN;aspartate/alanine aminotransferase, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase\>3.0\*ULN;urea nitrogen, creatinine, triglycerides, chl.\>1.3\*ULN; sodium \<0.95\*LLN,\>1.05\*ULN; creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN;Urine: pH\<4.5,\>8;glucose, ketones, protein, HGB, urobilinogen,bilirubin,nitrite,leukocyte esterase\>=1;ery., leu.\>= 20;hyaline casts\>1;bacteria\>20. Clinical significance of laboratory parameters was determined at the investigator's discretion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=2 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=1 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 28Population: The SAS1 and SAS2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 1 and Stage 2, respectively.
Abnormality in vital signs: Sitting pulse rate \<40 bpm to \>120 bpm, sitting DBP \< 50 mmHg, sitting SBP \<90 mmHg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=22 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=1 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=5 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
Sitting SBP Value <90 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
Sitting DBP Value <50 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
Sitting Pulse Rate Value <40 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
Sitting Pulse Rate Value >120 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 40Population: The SASA2 includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in Amended Stage 2.
Abnormality in vital signs: Sitting pulse rate \<40 bpm to \>120 bpm, sitting DBP \< 50 mmHg, sitting SBP \<90 mmHg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=2 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=1 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
Sitting SBP Value <90 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
Sitting DBP Value <50 mmHg
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
Sitting Pulse Rate Value <40 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
Sitting Pulse Rate Value >120 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 28Population: The SAS1 and SAS2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 1 and Stage 2, respectively.
ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) QTc interval adjusted according to Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): \>450, \>480, \>500, increase from baseline \>=30, increase from baseline \>=60; 2) Pulse rate (PR) (msec): \>=300, change from baseline (Chg) \>=25% or 50%; 3) QT (msec): \>=500; 4) QRS (msec): \>=200, Chg \>=25% or 50%. Categories, with at least 1 participant having ECG abnormality in any of the reporting arms, were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=22 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=1 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=5 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
PR Interval Aggregate Value >=300 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
QRS Duration Aggregate Value >=200 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
QT Interval Aggregate Value >=500 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
QTcF Interval Aggregate 450<=Value<480 msec
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
QTcF Interval Aggregate 480<=Value<500 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
QTcF Interval Aggregate Value >=500 msec
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
PR %Chg >=25% or >=50%
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
QRS Duration %Chg >=25% or >=50%
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
30<=QTcF Chg (msec)<60
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Stage 1 and Stage 2)
QTcF Chg (msec) >=60
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 40Population: The SASA2 includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in Amended Stage 2.
ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) QTc interval adjusted according to Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): \>450, \>480, \>500, increase from baseline \>=30, increase from baseline \>=60; 2) Pulse rate (PR) (msec): \>=300, change from baseline (Chg) \>=25% or 50%; 3) QT (msec): \>=500; 4) QRS (msec): \>=200, Chg \>=25% or 50%. Categories, with at least 1 participant having ECG abnormality in any of the reporting arms, were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=2 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=1 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
PR Interval Aggregate Value >=300 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
QRS Duration Aggregate Value >=200 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
QT Interval Aggregate Value >=500 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
QTcF Interval Aggregate 450<=Value<480 msec
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
QTcF Interval Aggregate 480<=Value<500 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
QTcF Interval Aggregate Value >=500 msec
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
PR %Chg >=25% or >=50%
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
QRS Duration %Chg >=25% or >=50%
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
30<=QTcF Chg (msec)<60
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities (Amended Stage 2)
QTcF Chg (msec) >=60
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8 (except for Week 12 which is a primary outcome measure)Population: The FAS in Stage 1, Stage 2, and Amended Stage 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in in Stage 1, Stage 2, or Amended Stage 2.
The treatment effect was defined as the difference (mean change from baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 8 in the active treatment group minus the mean change from baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 8 in the placebo group) in the mean change of CDASI activity score from baseline at scheduled timepoints. The score (range: 0-100) consists of the ES, GHS, PS and AS. ES (range: 0-90) was obtained by summing up scores for the total erythema (ER \[0-45\], redness of the skin or mucous membranes), scaling (SC \[0-30\], peeling of the skin) and erosion/ulceration (EU \[0-15\], presence of the deeper wound). Total ER, SC and EU scores were calculated as a sum of the contributions from 15 individual areas of the body. GHS characterizes papules (swellings) on hand and is a sum of the papule's characterization score (0-6) and ulceration score (0-1). PS (0-2) characterizes abnormalities around nails. The AS (0-1) characterizes hair loss. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=1 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=5 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
n=2 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
n=1 Participants
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=10 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in CDASI Activity Score at at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (Stage 1, Stage 2 and Amended Stage 2)
Week 1
|
-2.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.326
|
-19.62 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.140
|
1.00 Units on a scale
|
-9.80 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.174
|
-2.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.528
|
-6.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.364
|
0.00 Units on a scale
|
-8.70 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.638
|
-6.67 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.517
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in CDASI Activity Score at at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (Stage 1, Stage 2 and Amended Stage 2)
Week 4
|
-2.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.126
|
-12.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.277
|
3.00 Units on a scale
|
-11.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.986
|
-15.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.550
|
-3.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.071
|
-1.00 Units on a scale
|
-14.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.648
|
-14.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.000
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in CDASI Activity Score at at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (Stage 1, Stage 2 and Amended Stage 2)
Week 8
|
-4.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.942
|
-17.19 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.595
|
4.00 Units on a scale
|
-14.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.020
|
-18.67 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.066
|
-2.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.778
|
-2.00 Units on a scale
|
-17.80 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.540
|
-14.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.000
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12Population: The Full Analysis Set in Stage 3 (FAS3) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 3.
The treatment effect was defined as the difference (mean change from baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 8,12 in the active treatment group minus the mean change from baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 in the placebo group) in the mean change of CDASI activity score from baseline at scheduled timepoints. The score (range: 0-100) consists of the ES, GHS, PS and AS. ES (range: 0-90) was obtained by summing up scores for the total erythema (ER \[0-45\], redness of the skin or mucous membranes), scaling (SC \[0-30\], peeling of the skin) and erosion/ulceration (EU \[0-15\], presence of the deeper wound). Total ER, SC and EU scores were calculated as a sum of the contributions from 15 individual areas of the body. GHS characterizes papules (swellings) on hand and is a sum of the papule's characterization score (0-6) and ulceration score (0-1). PS (0-2) characterizes abnormalities around nails. The AS (0-1) characterizes hair loss. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=9 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in CDASI Activity Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (Stage 3)
Week 1
|
-2.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.808
|
-2.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.522
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in CDASI Activity Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (Stage 3)
Week 4
|
-3.78 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.333
|
-5.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.555
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in CDASI Activity Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (Stage 3)
Week 8
|
-5.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.382
|
-7.78 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.667
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in CDASI Activity Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (Stage 3)
Week 12
|
-5.89 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.177
|
-8.56 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.923
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12Population: The FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in any study stage.
The CDASI activity score (range: 0-100) consists of the ES, GHS, PS and AS. ES (range: 0-90) was obtained by summing up scores for the total erythema (ER \[0-45\], redness of the skin or mucous membranes), scaling (SC \[0-30\], peeling of the skin) and erosion/ulceration (EU \[0-15\], presence of the deeper wound). Total ER, SC and EU scores were calculated as a sum of the contributions from 15 individual areas of the body. GHS characterizes papules (swellings) on hand and is a sum of the papule's characterization score (0-6) and ulceration score (0-1). PS (0-2) characterizes abnormalities around nails. The AS (0-1) characterizes hair loss. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=22 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=1 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=5 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
n=2 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
n=1 Participants
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=10 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
n=9 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=9 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Values of CDASI Activity Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (All Stages)
Baseline
|
31.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.750
|
33.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.323
|
23.00 Units on a scale
|
28.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.017
|
37.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.644
|
26.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.657
|
37.00 Units on a scale
|
35.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.226
|
30.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.937
|
17.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.595
|
12.56 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.095
|
|
Absolute Values of CDASI Activity Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (All Stages)
Week 1
|
28.90 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.982
|
27.68 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.962
|
24.00 Units on a scale
|
18.80 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.535
|
34.67 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.713
|
19.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.707
|
37.00 Units on a scale
|
26.70 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.667
|
23.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.018
|
15.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.846
|
10.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.894
|
|
Absolute Values of CDASI Activity Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (All Stages)
Week 4
|
28.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.136
|
21.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.182
|
26.00 Units on a scale
|
17.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.408
|
22.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.490
|
23.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.414
|
36.00 Units on a scale
|
21.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.677
|
16.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.539
|
13.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.819
|
7.44 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.503
|
|
Absolute Values of CDASI Activity Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (All Stages)
Week 8
|
26.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.892
|
15.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.157
|
27.00 Units on a scale
|
14.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.857
|
18.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.508
|
23.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.121
|
35.00 Units on a scale
|
17.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.895
|
16.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.269
|
12.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.883
|
4.78 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.116
|
|
Absolute Values of CDASI Activity Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (All Stages)
Week 12
|
27.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.903
|
12.86 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.876
|
28.00 Units on a scale
|
11.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.817
|
11.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.464
|
23.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.828
|
40.00 Units on a scale
|
19.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.087
|
14.67 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.504
|
11.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.206
|
4.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.464
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12Population: The FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in any study stage.
The Damage Score (DS) was calculated as a sum of the total poilkiloderma score (POLS), total calcinosis score (CALS) and Gotorn's hands damage score (GHDS). The POLS characterizes specific dispigmentation in the particulal area and calcinosis score characterizes calcification of the skin in the particular area. The POLS and the CALS are summed up over 15 individual areas in the body and each of them has range 0-15. The GHDS has the range 0-2 so that the DS has the range 0-32. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=22 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
n=1 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=5 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
n=2 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
n=1 Participants
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=10 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=3 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
n=9 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
n=9 Participants
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Values of CDASI Damage Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (All Stages)
Baseline
|
4.30 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.397
|
5.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.901
|
3.00 Units on a scale
|
4.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.701
|
7.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.732
|
7.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.950
|
7.00 Units on a scale
|
4.70 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.373
|
7.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.000
|
5.56 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.044
|
2.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.871
|
|
Absolute Values of CDASI Damage Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (All Stages)
Week 1
|
4.90 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.021
|
5.41 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.159
|
4.00 Units on a scale
|
3.80 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.347
|
6.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.215
|
6.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.071
|
7.00 Units on a scale
|
3.90 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.542
|
4.67 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.887
|
6.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.809
|
1.89 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.764
|
|
Absolute Values of CDASI Damage Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (All Stages)
Week 4
|
5.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.278
|
5.23 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.337
|
4.00 Units on a scale
|
3.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.449
|
9.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.732
|
7.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.657
|
7.00 Units on a scale
|
4.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.248
|
6.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.528
|
5.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.631
|
1.56 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.297
|
|
Absolute Values of CDASI Damage Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (All Stages)
Week 8
|
5.89 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.231
|
5.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.427
|
5.00 Units on a scale
|
4.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.881
|
8.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.577
|
5.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.536
|
7.00 Units on a scale
|
3.70 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.945
|
4.67 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.215
|
5.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.859
|
1.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.118
|
|
Absolute Values of CDASI Damage Score at All Scheduled Timepoints Through Week 12 (All Stages)
Week 12
|
6.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.679
|
5.05 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.905
|
6.00 Units on a scale
|
3.60 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.286
|
6.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.528
|
4.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.950
|
7.00 Units on a scale
|
3.10 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.358
|
5.00 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.000
|
5.22 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.019
|
1.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.581
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12Population: The FAS3 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 3.
The TIS was the sum of all 6 improvement scores where higher score indicates worse status (PhGA \[from the MDAAT, 0-20 scale\], PtGA \[0-10 scale\], MMT \[0-35 scale\], HAQ-DI \[0-10 scale\], muscle enzymes \[0-7.5 scale\], and extramuscular global assessment \[0-20 scale\]) associated with the change in each core set measure. A total improvement score between 0 and 100 corresponded to the degree of improvement, with higher scores corresponding to a greater degree of improvement: of ≥20 represented minimal improvement, a score of ≥40 represented moderate improvement, and a score of ≥60 represented major improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=9 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Values for Total Improvement Score (TIS) at Week 12 and Intermediate Scheduled Time Points (Stage 3)
Week 4
|
25.83 Units on a scale
Interval 13.15 to 38.52
|
36.67 Units on a scale
Interval 23.98 to 49.35
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Absolute Values for Total Improvement Score (TIS) at Week 12 and Intermediate Scheduled Time Points (Stage 3)
Week 8
|
36.67 Units on a scale
Interval 23.38 to 49.95
|
49.17 Units on a scale
Interval 35.88 to 62.45
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Absolute Values for Total Improvement Score (TIS) at Week 12 and Intermediate Scheduled Time Points (Stage 3)
Week 12
|
36.94 Units on a scale
Interval 21.93 to 51.96
|
56.39 Units on a scale
Interval 41.38 to 71.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12Population: The Full Analysis Set in Stage 3 (FAS3) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 3.
PhGA: assessment of the severity of disease by the physician. The physician used the visual analog scale and put a mark on 0 cm (best) -10 cm (worst) scale where higher score indicated worse status. EmGA: overall evaluation of disease activity in all extramuscular systems using visual analog scale 0 cm (best) -10 cm (worst) scale where higher score indicated worse status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=9 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Core Set Measures (CSM) of the TIS (Global Disease Activity [PhGA] and Extramuscular Global Assessment [EmGA]) (Stage 3)
PhGA Week 4
|
-1.00 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -1.89 to -0.11
|
-1.68 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -2.57 to -0.79
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Core Set Measures (CSM) of the TIS (Global Disease Activity [PhGA] and Extramuscular Global Assessment [EmGA]) (Stage 3)
PhGA Week 8
|
-1.65 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -2.8 to -0.51
|
-2.76 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -3.9 to -1.61
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Core Set Measures (CSM) of the TIS (Global Disease Activity [PhGA] and Extramuscular Global Assessment [EmGA]) (Stage 3)
PhGA Week 12
|
-2.05 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -3.56 to -0.55
|
-3.40 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -4.9 to -1.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Core Set Measures (CSM) of the TIS (Global Disease Activity [PhGA] and Extramuscular Global Assessment [EmGA]) (Stage 3)
Extramuscular Global Assessment Week 4
|
-1.02 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -2.07 to 0.03
|
-1.55 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -2.6 to -0.49
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Core Set Measures (CSM) of the TIS (Global Disease Activity [PhGA] and Extramuscular Global Assessment [EmGA]) (Stage 3)
Extramuscular Global Assessment Week 8
|
-1.91 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -2.8 to -1.01
|
-2.48 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -3.38 to -1.58
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Core Set Measures (CSM) of the TIS (Global Disease Activity [PhGA] and Extramuscular Global Assessment [EmGA]) (Stage 3)
Extramuscular Global Assessment Week 12
|
-1.59 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -2.64 to -0.53
|
-2.81 Centimeter (cm)
Interval -3.87 to -1.76
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12Population: The FAS3 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 3.
PtGA: assessment of the severity of disease by the participant/participant's guardian, using a visual analog scale from 0 mm (no evidence of disease activity) to 100 mm (extremely active or severe disease activity). Higher score indicated worse status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=9 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (PtGA) (Stage 3)
PtGA Week 4
|
-18.29 Millimeter (mm)
Interval -31.78 to -4.79
|
-17.88 Millimeter (mm)
Interval -30.75 to -5.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (PtGA) (Stage 3)
PtGA Week 8
|
-16.81 Millimeter (mm)
Interval -29.88 to -3.73
|
-32.60 Millimeter (mm)
Interval -45.85 to -19.35
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (PtGA) (Stage 3)
PtGA Week 12
|
-14.04 Millimeter (mm)
Interval -25.91 to -2.17
|
-43.81 Millimeter (mm)
Interval -55.68 to -31.95
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12Population: The FAS3 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 3.
Manual Muscle Testing-8 designated muscle groups (MMT-8): was a set of 8 designated muscles tested unilaterally generally on right side (left side used unless right side cannot be used). Potential score range was from 0 to 80, where higher scores denoted better health status. HAQ-DI: contained eight sections (including dressing \& grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, grip, reach, and activities). Each section had multiple questions that the participant used to rank their functionality and ranged from 0 to 3 where 0 = without any difficulty and 3 = unable to do. For each participant, the average ranking was calculated for each of the eight sections. HAQ-DI had a score range of 0 to 3, where higher score reflected worse status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=9 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (MMT8 and HAQ01-HAQ-DI) (Stage 3)
MMT8 - Derived Week 4
|
7.76 Units on a scale
Interval 1.37 to 14.16
|
8.24 Units on a scale
Interval 1.84 to 14.63
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (MMT8 and HAQ01-HAQ-DI) (Stage 3)
MMT8 - Derived Week 8
|
12.14 Units on a scale
Interval 4.6 to 19.68
|
15.24 Units on a scale
Interval 7.7 to 22.78
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (MMT8 and HAQ01-HAQ-DI) (Stage 3)
MMT8 - Derived Week 12
|
11.65 Units on a scale
Interval 2.29 to 21.01
|
21.24 Units on a scale
Interval 11.87 to 30.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (MMT8 and HAQ01-HAQ-DI) (Stage 3)
HAQ01-HAQ-DI Week 4
|
-0.03 Units on a scale
Interval -0.24 to 0.18
|
-0.20 Units on a scale
Interval -0.39 to 0.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (MMT8 and HAQ01-HAQ-DI) (Stage 3)
HAQ01-HAQ-DI Week 8
|
0.00 Units on a scale
Interval -0.28 to 0.28
|
-0.38 Units on a scale
Interval -0.64 to -0.11
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (MMT8 and HAQ01-HAQ-DI) (Stage 3)
HAQ01-HAQ-DI Week 12
|
-0.06 Units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to 0.28
|
-0.52 Units on a scale
Interval -0.84 to -0.19
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12Population: The FAS3 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized treatment in Stage 3.
The LS mean (with 90% CI) of CSM of the TIS (aldolase and creatine kinase) at weeks 4, 8, 12 were presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
(Stage 1) Placebo
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV (Stage 1)
n=9 Participants
Participants were randomized to receive PF-06823859 600 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 in Stage 1.
|
(Stage 2) Placebo
Participants in this group were randomized to receive placebo on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV
Participants in this group were randomized to receive PF-06823859 150 mg on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 After week 12, participants went into a follow up period.
|
(Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Dosing occurred Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8. After week 12, participants went into a follow-up period.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 150 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 150 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Amended Stage 2) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants then entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) Placebo Then Switched to PF-06823859 600 mg IV at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
(Stage 3) PF-06823859 600 mg IV Then Switched to Placebo at Week 12
Dosing occurred Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. At Week 24, participants entered a 4-month follow-up period or rolled over to the long-term extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (Aldolase and Creatine Kinase) (Stage 3)
Aldolase Week 4
|
-0.19 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -1.34 to 0.96
|
-3.09 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -4.25 to -1.92
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (Aldolase and Creatine Kinase) (Stage 3)
Aldolase Week 8
|
-1.31 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -2.45 to -0.16
|
-3.57 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -4.74 to -2.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (Aldolase and Creatine Kinase) (Stage 3)
Aldolase Week 12
|
-0.66 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -2.18 to 0.86
|
-3.20 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -4.76 to -1.64
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (Aldolase and Creatine Kinase) (Stage 3)
Creatine Kinase Week 4
|
-37.96 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -119.16 to 43.24
|
-157.48 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -238.68 to -76.28
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (Aldolase and Creatine Kinase) (Stage 3)
Creatine Kinase Week 8
|
-70.96 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -137.03 to -4.9
|
-175.93 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -241.99 to -109.86
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the CSM of the TIS (Aldolase and Creatine Kinase) (Stage 3)
Creatine Kinase ) Week 12
|
-39.85 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -125.71 to 46.01
|
-185.77 Units per litre (U/L)
Interval -273.92 to -97.62
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
PF-06823859 150 mg IV
PF-06823859 600 mg IV
Total
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=45 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo in any stage.
|
PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=17 participants at risk
Participants who received PF-06823859 150 mg IV in any stage.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV
n=47 participants at risk
Participants who received PF-06823859 600 mg IV in any stage.
|
Total
n=75 participants at risk
This arm included all participants (32, 9, 16 and 18 participants who were randomized and treated in Stage 1, Stage 2, Amended Stage 2, and Stage 3, respectively) in the safety analysis set
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Cytopenia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis microscopic
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Ocular icterus
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Central nervous system lesion
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=45 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo in any stage.
|
PF-06823859 150 mg IV
n=17 participants at risk
Participants who received PF-06823859 150 mg IV in any stage.
|
PF-06823859 600 mg IV
n=47 participants at risk
Participants who received PF-06823859 600 mg IV in any stage.
|
Total
n=75 participants at risk
This arm included all participants (32, 9, 16 and 18 participants who were randomized and treated in Stage 1, Stage 2, Amended Stage 2, and Stage 3, respectively) in the safety analysis set
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.7%
2/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
6.4%
3/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.3%
4/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
6.4%
3/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
6.7%
5/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
8.9%
4/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
8.0%
6/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.3%
4/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
8.5%
4/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
6.7%
5/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
4.3%
2/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
4.0%
3/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.7%
2/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium decreased
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.7%
2/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Investigations
SARS-CoV-2 test positive
|
8.9%
4/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.3%
4/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
6.4%
3/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
6.7%
5/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Parathyroid tumour benign
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
15.6%
7/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
12.8%
6/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
20.0%
15/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Mental impairment
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper-airway cough syndrome
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.7%
2/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatomyositis
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.7%
2/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
11.1%
5/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
2.1%
1/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
8.0%
6/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rosacea
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
0.00%
0/47 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
1.3%
1/75 • Up to Week 40
The safety analysis set includes all participants who received at least one dose of randomized treatment in any stage. The AEs reported were treatment emergent.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER