Detection of Deterioration by SNAP40 Versus Standard Monitoring in the ED
NCT ID: NCT03179267
Last Updated: 2018-04-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-25
2017-12-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outcomes of Digital Alerting Systems in Secondary Care
NCT04638738
Detection of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Intensive Care Patients Via Biosensor Watch
NCT03874169
Suitability of Unobtrusive Bed Monitoring and Wrist-worn Heart Rate Monitor for Patient Monitoring
NCT03572751
Use of RDS MultiSense® in Post-ICU Patients in the COVID-19 Era
NCT04661423
Remote Monitoring to Improve Physician Monitoring, Patient Satisfaction, and Predict Readmissions Following Surgery
NCT03800329
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The SNAP40 device also has the potential to free up resources, which can be used to improve patient care and experience in the ED. SNAP40 may reduce clinical staff time taken to record observations enabling them to provide patients with other aspects of care (i.e. analgesia and treatments) more regularly and in a timelier manner. Clinical staff may be able to spend more time with patients allowing better quality communication with them and their relatives. There will potentially be more time for traditional nursing care and personal care.
Whilst there are some other similar medical devices on the market (i.e. www.biovotion.com, www.sensium-healthcare.com, www.vitalconnect.com, http://www.caretakermedical.net) using wristbands, patches or finger cuff technology, currently none are being used in ED clinical practice.
This study will examine the SNAP40 device by comparing its performance to detect physiological deterioration against standard observations taken by clinical staff (nurses, doctors and clinical support workers) within the ED. The study will assess whether the device is able to detect physiological derangement sooner that standard monitoring devices.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SNAP40 monitor
All participants in the study will be fitted with the SNAP40 ambulatory monitoring device as well as usual monitoring as standard care
SNAP40
SNAP40 ambulatory monitoring device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SNAP40
SNAP40 ambulatory monitoring device
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Participant triaged to Majors (High Dependency or Immediate Care) OR Participants who are stepped down from Resuscitation room care to High Dependency or Immediate Care
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous participation in the study
3. Participant in custody
4. Participants deemed high risk for absconding by clinical staff
5. Participants unable to communicate in English
6. Participants who are triaged to immediate resuscitation. These participants may be considered for inclusion once immediate assessment and treatment have been initiated and they are stepped down to High Dependency (HD)/Immediate Care (IC) areas
7. Patients with implantable defibrillators, pacemakers or neurostimulators will be excluded
8. Patients who cannot have blood pressure measured in both arms e.g. patients with renal fistula, a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line or who have had a lymph node clearance
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
SNAP40
UNKNOWN
University of Edinburgh
OTHER
NHS Lothian
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matt Reed
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NHS Lothian
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Reed MJ, McGrath M, Black PL, Lewis S, McCann C, Whiting S, O'Brien R, Grant A, Harrison B, Skyrme L, Odam M. Detection of physiological deterioration by the SNAP40 wearable device compared to standard monitoring devices in the emergency department: the SNAP40-ED study. Diagn Progn Res. 2018 Sep 3;2:18. doi: 10.1186/s41512-018-0040-7. eCollection 2018.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17/SS/0028
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.