Trial Outcomes & Findings for To Assess the Cutaneous Irritation and Sensitization Potential of a Cosmetic Facial Product Using a Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (HRIPT) in Healthy Participants (NCT NCT03175562)
NCT ID: NCT03175562
Last Updated: 2019-02-15
Results Overview
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
COMPLETED
NA
272 participants
At Day 3
2019-02-15
Participant Flow
All participants were enrolled at one center in Brazil.
A total of 294 participants were screened,out of which 240 participants were randomized and 54 participants were not randomized. Out of 54 participants, 22 participants did not meet study criteria, 5 participants were lost to follow-up, 26 participants withdrew their consent, 1 participant was not randomized for other reasons (not specified).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Participants
Included all participants who were randomized to receive the study treatment. In this study, the test product and the negative control (saline solution) were randomly applied to 2 different cells in a single semi-occlusive patch that was applied on a subject's dorsum.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
240
|
|
Overall Study
Test Product
|
240
|
|
Overall Study
Negative Control
|
240
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
224
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
16
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
All Participants
Included all participants who were randomized to receive the study treatment. In this study, the test product and the negative control (saline solution) were randomly applied to 2 different cells in a single semi-occlusive patch that was applied on a subject's dorsum.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Other (Not Specified)
|
5
|
Baseline Characteristics
To Assess the Cutaneous Irritation and Sensitization Potential of a Cosmetic Facial Product Using a Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (HRIPT) in Healthy Participants
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Overall Participants
n=240 Participants
All the participants who received any application of study products were included for baseline evaluation
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.44 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
196 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
234 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 3Population: The Intent to treat (ITT, N=238) population included all participants who were randomized into the study and have skin irritation scores from at least one of the test sites available.
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were test product was applied.
|
Reference Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were negative control was applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 3
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 5Population: The ITT (N=238) population included all participants who were randomized into the study and have skin irritation scores from at least one of the test sites available.
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were test product was applied.
|
Reference Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were negative control was applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 5
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 8Population: The ITT (N=238) population included all participants who were randomized into the study and have skin irritation scores from at least one of the test sites available.
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were test product was applied.
|
Reference Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were negative control was applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 8
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 10Population: The ITT (N=238) population included all participants who were randomized into the study and have skin irritation scores from at least one of the test sites available.
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were test product was applied.
|
Reference Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were negative control was applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 10
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 12Population: The ITT (N=238) population included all participants who were randomized into the study and have skin irritation scores from at least one of the test sites available.
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were test product was applied.
|
Reference Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were negative control was applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 12
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Error 0
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Error 0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 15Population: The ITT (N=238) population included all participants who were randomized into the study and have skin irritation scores from at least one of the test sites available.
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were test product was applied.
|
Reference Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were negative control was applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 15
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 17Population: The ITT (N=238) population included all participants who were randomized into the study and have skin irritation scores from at least one of the test sites available.
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were test product was applied.
|
Reference Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were negative control was applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 17
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 19Population: The ITT (N=238) population included all participants who were randomized into the study and have skin irritation scores from at least one of the test sites available.
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were test product was applied.
|
Reference Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were negative control was applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Induction Phase at Day 19
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 6 after 30 minutes (maximum 1 hour) post patch removalPopulation: The ITT (N=238) population included all participants who were randomized into the study and have skin irritation scores from at least one of the test sites available.
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were test product was applied.
|
Reference Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were negative control was applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Challenge Phase at Week 6 After 30 Minutes (Maximum 1 Hour) Post Patch Removal
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 6 after 24 (±2) hours post patch removalPopulation: The ITT (N=238) population included all participants who were randomized into the study and have skin irritation scores from at least one of the test sites available.
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were test product was applied.
|
Reference Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were negative control was applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Challenge Phase at Week 6 After 24 (±2) Hours Post Patch Removal
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 6 after 48 (±2) hours post patch removalPopulation: The ITT (N=238) population included all participants who were randomized into the study and have skin irritation scores from at least one of the test sites available.
A trained assessor assessed all patch sites. The following scores were used to express the response observed at the time of examination: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal papular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Other features indicative irritation (Superficial irritation) scores were: Grade A/Score 0=Slight glazed appearance, Grade B/Score 1=Marked glazing, Grade C/Score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, Grade F/Score 3=Glazing with fissures, Grade G/Score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, Grade H/Score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. Superficial irritation scores were only provided if there was a dermal response score \>0. Full range was 0-10. Lower score indicates better tolerability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were test product was applied.
|
Reference Product
n=238 Participants
This arm included data from all the test sites were negative control was applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Skin Irritation (Dermal Response) and Superficial Irritation (Other Effects) Scores at Challenge Phase at 6 Week 48 (±2) Hours, Post Patch Removal
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
Adverse Events
All Participants
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
All Participants
n=240 participants at risk
Safety population (N=240), the Safety population included all participants who received any application of the study products.
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
INFLUENZA
|
1.2%
3/240 • Approximately 45 days
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
|
0.42%
1/240 • Approximately 45 days
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MYALGIA
|
0.42%
1/240 • Approximately 45 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
TONSILLITIS BACTERIAL
|
0.42%
1/240 • Approximately 45 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITING
|
0.42%
1/240 • Approximately 45 days
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER