Trial Outcomes & Findings for To Investigate the Cutaneous and Ocular Local Tolerance of Two Cosmetic Facial Cleanser in Healthy Females With Sensitive Skin (NCT NCT03172364)
NCT ID: NCT03172364
Last Updated: 2019-04-02
Results Overview
The intensity of any visual signs of irritation was recorded according to Dermal response score: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal popular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, and 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Dermatologist also provided a superficial irritation score if the dermal response score \>0. Superficial irritation score was as follow: grade A/score 0=Slight glazed appearance, grade B/score 1=Marked glazing, grade C/score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, grade F/score 3=Glazing with fissures, grade G/score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, and grade H/score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. The combined score was equal the sum of the dermal response score plus the numerical equivalent of the superficial irritation score. Full range 0-10.
COMPLETED
NA
122 participants
After 21 (+2) days of test product use
2019-04-02
Participant Flow
All the participants were enrolled from one center in Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
A total of 190 participants were screened for the study, out of which 122 participants were enrolled and 68 participants were not eligible to meet study criteria. Out of 122 enrolled participants, 113 were randomized. Out of 77 nonrandomized participants, 73 did not meet the study criteria, 1 had an adverse event (AE), and 3 were lost to follow-up.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Test Product 1
All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
Test Product 2
All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
55
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
53
|
57
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Test Product 1
All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
Test Product 2
All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
To Investigate the Cutaneous and Ocular Local Tolerance of Two Cosmetic Facial Cleanser in Healthy Females With Sensitive Skin
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Test Product 1
n=55 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
Test Product 2
n=58 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
Total
n=113 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.54 • n=5 Participants
|
46.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.82 • n=7 Participants
|
46.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.13 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
113 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Japanese Heritage
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic/North African Heritage
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: After 21 (+2) days of test product usePopulation: Intent to Treat (ITT, N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application. No inferential statistic were performed for this outcome.
The intensity of any visual signs of irritation was recorded according to Dermal response score: 0=No evidence of irritation, 1=Minimal erythema; barely perceptible, 2=Definite erythema, readily visible; or minimal edema; or minimal popular response, 3=Erythema and papules, 4=Definite edema, 5=Erythema, edema, and papules, 6=Vesicular eruption, and 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond test site. Dermatologist also provided a superficial irritation score if the dermal response score \>0. Superficial irritation score was as follow: grade A/score 0=Slight glazed appearance, grade B/score 1=Marked glazing, grade C/score 2=Glazing with peeling and cracking, grade F/score 3=Glazing with fissures, grade G/score 3=Film of dried serous exudate covering all or portion of the patch, and grade H/score 3=Small petechial erosions and/or scabs. The combined score was equal the sum of the dermal response score plus the numerical equivalent of the superficial irritation score. Full range 0-10.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product 1
n=55 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
Test Product 2
n=58 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Combined Dermatologist Score
At Day 21, score 1
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Combined Dermatologist Score
At Day 21, Missing
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Combined Dermatologist Score
At Day 21, score 0
|
51 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: After 21 (+2) days of test product usePopulation: ITT (N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application. No inferential statistic were performed for this outcome.
Ocular irritation assessed through the observation of the presence of two factors: Lacrimation Intensity and Conjunctiva Involvement. Conjunctiva involvement score are as follow: 0= None - No involvement, 1= Mild - Conjunctivae (palpebral and bulbar) injected above normal with possible chemosis (swelling); no discharge, 2= Moderate - Conjunctivae injected above normal; obvious swelling; possible discharge, and 3= Severe - Conjunctivae more diffuse, deeper crimson red, individual vessels not easily discernible; excessive swelling and/or discharge. Lacrimal intensity score are as follow: 0= None - No lacrimation observed, 1= Mild-Excessive wetness (no distinct tears), 2= Moderate - A few formed tears (contained in orbit), and 3= Severe - Intense tearing (leaving orbit). The combined ophthalmologist score was calculated in the following way: Combined ophthalmologist score = conjunctiva involvement score + lacrimal intensity score. Full range 0-6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product 1
n=55 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
Test Product 2
n=58 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Combined Ophthalmologist Score
At Day 21, Missing
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Combined Ophthalmologist Score
At Day 21, Score 0
|
54 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Combined Ophthalmologist Score
At Day 21, Score 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: After 21 (+2) days of test product usePopulation: ITT (N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application.
The combined dermatologist and ophthalmologist score was calculated as the sum of the combined dermatologist score (i.e., dermal response score + superficial irritation score) and the combined ophthalmologist score (i.e., conjunctiva involvement score + lacrimal intensity score). No inferential statistic were performed for this endpoint.The full range was from 0 to 13 where lower scores indicated lower dermal irritation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product 1
n=55 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
Test Product 2
n=58 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Combined Dermatologist and Ophthalmologist Score
At Day 21, 1
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Combined Dermatologist and Ophthalmologist Score
At Day 21, Missing
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Combined Dermatologist and Ophthalmologist Score
At Day 21, 0
|
51 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: After 21 (+2) days of test product usePopulation: ITT (N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application.
A modified combined dermatologist and ophthalmologist score was calculated, where the superficial irritation component was removed from the equation. Therefore, the modified combined dermatologist and ophthalmologist score was defined as the dermal response score + the combined ophthalmologist score (i.e., conjunctiva involvement score + lacrimal intensity score). No inferential statistic were performed for this endpoint.The full range was from 0 to 13 where lower scores indicated lower dermal irritation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product 1
n=55 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
Test Product 2
n=58 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Combined Dermatologist and Ophthalmologist Score (Modified)
At Day 21, Missing
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Combined Dermatologist and Ophthalmologist Score (Modified)
At Day 21, 0
|
51 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
|
Combined Dermatologist and Ophthalmologist Score (Modified)
At Day 21, 1
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and after 21 (+2) days of test product usePopulation: ITT (N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application.
Participants asked Subject Self-Assessment questions at Baseline (Visit 2), prior to test product use, 1 hour (± 20 minutes) following first supervised product use, and following 21 (+2) days of product use. Participants scored each symptom asked in the question (Are you experiencing any redness, dryness, burning, itching or stinging of your face?) by using following score: 0= None, 1=Mild, 2= Moderate, and 3= Severe. Combined score face was obtained by summing the 5 subject assessments for face i.e. redness, dryness, burning, itching and stinging. Maximum observed value of this combined score was 3 and maximum possible combined score was 15. Minimum observed value of this combined score was 0 and minimum possible combined score was 0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product 1
n=55 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
Test Product 2
n=58 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face
At Baseline, Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face
At Baseline, 0=None
|
48 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face
At Baseline, 1=Mild
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face
At Baseline, 2=Moderate
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face
At Baseline, 3=Severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face
At Day 21, Missing
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face
At Day 21, 0=None
|
48 Participants
|
45 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face
At Day 21, 1=Mild
|
6 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face
At Day 21, 2=Moderate
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Face
At Day 21, 3=Severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and after 21 (+2) days of test product usePopulation: ITT (N=113) comprised all randomized subjects who had at least 1 cutaneous or ocular assessment following study product application.
Participants asked Subject Self-Assessment questions at Baseline (Visit 2), prior to test product use, 1 hour (± 20 minutes) following first supervised product use, and following 21 (+2) days of product use. Participants scored each symptom asked in the question (Are you experiencing any redness, dryness, burning, itching or stinging of your eyes?) by using following score: 0= None, 1=Mild, 2= Moderate, and 3= Severe. Maximum observed value of this combined score was 3 and maximum possible combined score was 15. Minimum observed value of this combined score was 0 and minimum possible combined score was 0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test Product 1
n=55 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
Test Product 2
n=58 Participants
All the participants in this arm received test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye
At Baseline, Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye
At Baseline, 0
|
55 Participants
|
58 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye
At Baseline, 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye
At Baseline, 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye
At Baseline, 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye
At Day 21, Missing
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye
At Day 21, 0
|
54 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye
At Day 21, 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye
At Day 21, 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Frequency of Participant Self-assessment Combined Score for Question Responses With Regards to Product Use Experience on Eye
At Day 21, 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Test Product 1
Test Product 2
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Test Product 1
n=55 participants at risk
All the participants in this arm will receive test product 1 (micellar cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
Test Product 2
n=58 participants at risk
All the participants in this arm will receive test product 2 (micellar foaming cleanser) at home twice a day (morning and evening) for 21 (±2) days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
RASH MACULAR
|
1.8%
1/55 • Approximately 21 days
|
0.00%
0/58 • Approximately 21 days
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ACNE
|
0.00%
0/55 • Approximately 21 days
|
1.7%
1/58 • Approximately 21 days
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
PAPULE
|
0.00%
0/55 • Approximately 21 days
|
1.7%
1/58 • Approximately 21 days
|
|
Eye disorders
DRY EYE
|
1.8%
1/55 • Approximately 21 days
|
0.00%
0/58 • Approximately 21 days
|
|
Eye disorders
OCULAR HYPERAEMIA
|
1.8%
1/55 • Approximately 21 days
|
0.00%
0/58 • Approximately 21 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
INFLUENZA
|
1.8%
1/55 • Approximately 21 days
|
0.00%
0/58 • Approximately 21 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
ORAL HERPES
|
1.8%
1/55 • Approximately 21 days
|
0.00%
0/58 • Approximately 21 days
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
DRY SKIN
|
1.8%
1/55 • Approximately 21 days
|
1.7%
1/58 • Approximately 21 days
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
SKIN EXFOLIATION
|
0.00%
0/55 • Approximately 21 days
|
1.7%
1/58 • Approximately 21 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
LIP ULCERATION
|
1.8%
1/55 • Approximately 21 days
|
0.00%
0/58 • Approximately 21 days
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
THERMAL BURN
|
1.8%
1/55 • Approximately 21 days
|
0.00%
0/58 • Approximately 21 days
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER