A Study of Administering FOLFIRINOX Before Surgery For Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer
NCT ID: NCT03167112
Last Updated: 2017-08-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-07-03
2018-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Because of promising result of this combination in more advanced stage of pancreatic cancer, this study is going to examine its efficiency in earlier stage of pancreatic cancer (localized form). Total number of participant in this study will be 20 patients with localized form of pancreatic cancer without any evidence of cancer in other parts of the body.
Laboratory tests show that it works by slowing down the growth of cancer or may cause cancer cells to die. It is hoped that by shrinking the tumor size, the surgeon will be able to remove the cancer and improve the overall survival.
Procedures start with 2 weeks of comprehensive evaluation. Approximately 20 eligible subjects, based on this study criteria, will receive 6 treatment of this regimen every 2 weeks. Once 6 treatments have been completed, comprehensive re-evaluation procedures will be repeated, and subjects without disease progression or unacceptable toxicity will continue on their treatment based on treating team decision (surgical intervention, radiation therapy or continue FOLFIRINOX or different regimen). Patients then will follow with CT scan, blood test and physical examination every 3 months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer
NCT01359007
A Study of Perioperative Chemotherapy Plus Panitumumab in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
NCT01260415
FOLFIRINOX Plus PF-04136309 in Patients With Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
NCT01413022
Neo-adjuvant FOLF(IRIN)OX for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
NCT02959879
Randomized Study With Oxaliplatin in 2nd Line Pancreatic Cancer
NCT01121848
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Surgical resection represents the standard of care for patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer. However, while surgical morbidity and mortality have improved over the past few decades, overall survival for pancreatic cancer has remained low. Given the increasing survival rates associated with modern chemotherapy regimens, the risks of surgery, the likelihood of R0 resection, the likelihood of subclinical metastatic disease, and the likelihood of receiving postoperative therapy (50% of patients receive post-operative chemotherapy) are our logic to evaluate preoperative chemotherapy as an alternative treatment strategy for these patients.
The main advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in treating pancreatic cancer is that it significantly increases the likelihood of receiving both surgery and chemotherapy. (Winner et al., Seminars in Oncology, 2015). It is well accepted that the best results are achieved when both modalities are used. Recently, the use of FOLFIRINOX has emerged as an alternative in pancreatic cancer. A randomized trial of FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer showed improved median survival from 6.8 to 11.1 months.
According to ACCORD-11 trial,FOLFIRINOX in advanced metastatic disease have demonstrated improved response rates compared with gemcitabine and other historical treatments while maintaining or improving quality of life with the median overall survival was 11.1 months FOLFIRINOX group as compared with 6.8 months in the gemcitabine group. Median progression-free survival was 6.4 months in the study regimen group and 3.3 months in the gemcitabine group, and at 6 months, 31% of the patients FOLFIRINOX group had a definitive degradation of the quality of life versus 66% in the gemcitabine group.
The role of preoperative therapy for patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer is still unclear. The ongoing study (adjuvant gemcitabine versus neoadjuvant gemcitabine/oxaliplatin plus adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable pancreatic cancer) is a prospective randomized clinical trial that is anticipated to clarify the role of preoperative chemotherapy. However, this ongoing clinical trial does not use contemporary chemotherapy regimens with proven efficacy in higher stage settings such as FOLFIRINOX. There are only few studies evaluate this regimen in this setting.The encouraging results reported from ACCORD-11 and consequent clinical investigations prompted our group to evaluate our experience with FOLFIRINOX regimen in a selected population composed of patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer (resectable and borderline resectable).
In this clinical trial, our primary objective is to evaluate and estimate Time to Progression (TTP). However, our secondary objectives are to determine Overall Response Rate (ORR), R0 and R1 Resection Rate, assessment of safety and toxicity associated with study regimen, and finally, to investigate Overall survival (OS).
Pre-treatment procedures start with 2 weeks of comprehensive staging evaluation. Approximately 20 eligible subjects, based on inclusion/exclusion criteria will receive study regimen for 6 treatment every 2 weeks. Once 6 treatments have been completed, comprehensive re-staging procedures will be repeated, and subjects without disease progression or unacceptable toxicity will continue on their treatment contingent upon treating team decision (surgical intervention, radiation therapy or continue chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX or different regimen). Patients then follow with CT scan, cancer antigen 19-9 and physical examination every 3 months.
Subjects will be considered active study participants from enrollment up to survival follow-up period until documented disease progression, withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up, or death (by any cause), whichever is earliest.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FOLFIRINOX
Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, Leucovorin, Fluorouracil
Oxaliplatin
Patients receive Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 over 2 hours.
Irinotecan
Oxaliplatin is followed by Irinotecan (CPT-11) 180 mg/m2 over 90 min.
Leucovorin
Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan is followed by Leucovorin (LV) 400 mg/m2 over 2 hours day1
Fluorouracil
Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan and Leucovorin is followed by Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 bolus day1 and 2,400 mg/m2 46h continuous infusion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oxaliplatin
Patients receive Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 over 2 hours.
Irinotecan
Oxaliplatin is followed by Irinotecan (CPT-11) 180 mg/m2 over 90 min.
Leucovorin
Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan is followed by Leucovorin (LV) 400 mg/m2 over 2 hours day1
Fluorouracil
Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan and Leucovorin is followed by Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 bolus day1 and 2,400 mg/m2 46h continuous infusion.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. ≥ 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form.
2. Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent document prior to any study related assessments/procedures conducted.
3. Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
4. Performance status or Comorbidity condition not currently appropriate (but potentially reversible) for a major abdominal operation.
Acceptable hematology parameters:
1. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1500 cell/mm3
2. Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm3 without transfusion support.
3. Hemoglobin (Hgb) ≥ 9 g/dL
Acceptable blood chemistry levels:
1. Hepatic transaminases (ALT and AST) less than 2.5× the upper limits of normal (ULN)
2. Total bilirubin level less than 1.5 × the upper limits of normal (ULN) or in patient with Biliary stenting less than 2 mg/dL
3. Serum creatinine level less than 1.5 × the upper limits of normal (ULN) or creatinine clearance (Ccr) ≥ 40 mL/min.
4. Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 x ULN
5. Serum albumin \> 3 g/dL
Absence of poorly controlled comorbid conditions:
1. Congestive heart failure (CHF)
2. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
3. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM)
4. Neurologic disorders (not acutely related to pancreatic cancer) or limit function
5. Radio-graphically suspicious but not diagnostic for extra-pancreatic disease,
1. Superior mesenteric vein and portal vein confluence that can be reconstructed even if short segment venous occlusion is present (i.e. a suitable portal vein above, and a suitable Superior mesenteric vein below the area of occlusion);
2. Tumor abutment of the Superior mesenteric artery of ≤180⁰,
3. Short segment encasement of the hepatic artery amenable to resection and reconstruction (this is usually at the origin of the gastroduodenal artery and reconstruction may or may not require interposition grafting with a short segment of reversed saphenous vein).
6. Cancer antigen 19-9 level (in absence of jaundice) ≥ 100u/ml suggestive of disseminated disease.
7. Preoperative treatment is recommended as an alternative for patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer who meet all of the following criteria:
no clinical evidence for metastatic disease, a performance status and comorbidity condition appropriate for a major abdominal operation, no radiographic interface between primary tumor and mesenteric vasculature on imaging, an acceptable Cancer antigen 19-9 level.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Pancreatic tumors of endocrine or mixed origin.
2. Prior anticancer therapy for pancreatic carcinoma.
3. Presence of or history of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
4. Any other malignancy within 5 years prior to enrollment, with the exception of adequately treated in-situ carcinoma of the prostate (Gleason score ≤ 7), cervix, uteri, or non-melanomatous skin cancer (all treatment of which should have been completed 6 months prior to enrollment).
5. Active bacterial, viral, or fungal infection(s) requiring systemic therapy, defined as ongoing signs/symptoms related to the infection without improvement despite appropriate antibiotics, antiviral therapy, and/or other treatment.
6. Known infection with hepatitis B or C, or history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, or subject receiving immunosuppressive or myelo-suppressive medications that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, increase the risk of serious neutropenic complications.
7. History of allergy or hypersensitivity to study regimen or any of their excipients.
8. Peripheral sensory neuropathy Grade \> 1.
9. Clinically significant ascites.
10. Plastic biliary stent. (Metal biliary stent is allowed.)
11. Serious medical risk factors involving any of the major organ systems, or serious psychiatric disorders, which could compromise the subject's safety or the integrity of the study data. These include, but are not limited to:
1. History of connective tissue disorders (e.g., lupus, scleroderma, arteritis nodosa)
2. History of interstitial lung disease, slowly progressive dyspnea and unproductive cough, sarcoidosis, silicosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypersensitivity pneumonitis, or multiple allergies
3. History of the following within 6 months prior to treatment 1 Day 1: a myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina pectoris, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III-IV heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, clinically significant cardiac dysrhythmia or electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, or seizure disorder
12. Enrollment in any other clinical protocol or investigational study with an interventional agent or assessments that may interfere with study procedures.
13. Any significant medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from participating in the study.
14. Any condition including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study.
15. Any condition that confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
16. Unwillingness or inability to comply with study procedures.
17. Pregnant or breast feeding.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Petr Kavan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Petr Kavan
Dr. Petr Kavan,Director,AYA Oncology,Associate Professor,Dept. of Oncology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Petr Kavan, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McGill University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;74(11):2913-21. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155.
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 Mar-Apr;56(2):106-30. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.2.106.
Katz MH, Wang H, Fleming JB, Sun CC, Hwang RF, Wolff RA, Varadhachary G, Abbruzzese JL, Crane CH, Krishnan S, Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Evans DB. Long-term survival after multidisciplinary management of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Apr;16(4):836-47. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0295-2. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
Winter JM, Brennan MF, Tang LH, D'Angelica MI, Dematteo RP, Fong Y, Klimstra DS, Jarnagin WR, Allen PJ. Survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results from a single institution over three decades. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):169-75. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1900-3. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
Katz MH, Marsh R, Herman JM, Shi Q, Collison E, Venook AP, Kindler HL, Alberts SR, Philip P, Lowy AM, Pisters PW, Posner MC, Berlin JD, Ahmad SA. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: need for standardization and methods for optimal clinical trial design. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2787-95. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2886-9. Epub 2013 Feb 23.
Tempero MA, Arnoletti JP, Behrman SW, Ben-Josef E, Benson AB 3rd, Casper ES, Cohen SJ, Czito B, Ellenhorn JD, Hawkins WG, Herman J, Hoffman JP, Ko A, Komanduri S, Koong A, Ma WW, Malafa MP, Merchant NB, Mulvihill SJ, Muscarella P 2nd, Nakakura EK, Obando J, Pitman MB, Sasson AR, Tally A, Thayer SP, Whiting S, Wolff RA, Wolpin BM, Freedman-Cass DA, Shead DA; National Comprehensive Cancer Networks. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, version 2.2012: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012 Jun 1;10(6):703-13. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2012.0073.
Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, Gellert K, Langrehr J, Ridwelski K, Schramm H, Fahlke J, Zuelke C, Burkart C, Gutberlet K, Kettner E, Schmalenberg H, Weigang-Koehler K, Bechstein WO, Niedergethmann M, Schmidt-Wolf I, Roll L, Doerken B, Riess H. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007 Jan 17;297(3):267-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.267.
Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH, Hop WC, Erdmann J, Tran KC, Debois M, van Cutsem E, van Dekken H, Klinkenbijl JH, Jeekel J. Long-term survival and metastatic pattern of pancreatic and periampullary cancer after adjuvant chemoradiation or observation: long-term results of EORTC trial 40891. Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):734-40. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318156eef3.
Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg. 1985 Aug;120(8):899-903. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390320023003.
Klinkenbijl JH, Jeekel J, Sahmoud T, van Pel R, Couvreur ML, Veenhof CH, Arnaud JP, Gonzalez DG, de Wit LT, Hennipman A, Wils J. Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group. Ann Surg. 1999 Dec;230(6):776-82; discussion 782-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199912000-00006.
O'Reilly EM, Perelshteyn A, Jarnagin WR, Schattner M, Gerdes H, Capanu M, Tang LH, LaValle J, Winston C, DeMatteo RP, D'Angelica M, Kurtz RC, Abou-Alfa GK, Klimstra DS, Lowery MA, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Reidy DL, Kingham TP, Allen PJ. A single-arm, nonrandomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with resectable pancreas adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2014 Jul;260(1):142-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000251.
Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Tomlinson JS, Paruch JL, Fleming JB, Talamonti MS, Ko CY, Bentrem DJ. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2014 Aug;260(2):372-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000378.
Wu W, He J, Cameron JL, Makary M, Soares K, Ahuja N, Rezaee N, Herman J, Zheng L, Laheru D, Choti MA, Hruban RH, Pawlik TM, Wolfgang CL, Weiss MJ. The impact of postoperative complications on the administration of adjuvant therapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;21(9):2873-81. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3722-6. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
Yamada S, Fujii T, Sugimoto H, Nomoto S, Takeda S, Kodera Y, Nakao A. Aggressive surgery for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: evaluation of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Pancreas. 2013 Aug;42(6):1004-10. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31827b2d7c.
Bao P, Potter D, Eisenberg DP, Lenzner D, Zeh HJ, Lee Iii KK, Hughes SJ, Sanders MK, Young JL, Moser AJ. Validation of a prediction rule to maximize curative (R0) resection of early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2009 Nov;11(7):606-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00110.x.
Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, Wang H, Wolff RA, Crane CH, Hwang R, Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Evans DB. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007 Jul;246(1):52-60. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000259391.84304.2b.
Willett CG, Lewandrowski K, Warshaw AL, Efird J, Compton CC. Resection margins in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Implications for radiation therapy. Ann Surg. 1993 Feb;217(2):144-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199302000-00008.
Davila JA, Chiao EY, Hasche JC, Petersen NJ, McGlynn KA, Shaib YH. Utilization and determinants of adjuvant therapy among older patients who receive curative surgery for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2009 Jan;38(1):e18-25. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318187eb3f.
Mayo SC, Gilson MM, Herman JM, Cameron JL, Nathan H, Edil BH, Choti MA, Schulick RD, Wolfgang CL, Pawlik TM. Management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: national trends in patient selection, operative management, and use of adjuvant therapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jan;214(1):33-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.09.022. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
Winner M, Goff SL, Chabot JA. Neoadjuvant therapy for non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Semin Oncol. 2015 Feb;42(1):86-97. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.12.008. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, Xiong HQ, Crane CH, Wang H, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Evans DB, Wolff RA. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Aug;13(8):1035-46. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.08.011. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
Katz MH, Shi Q, Ahmad SA, Herman JM, Marsh Rde W, Collisson E, Schwartz L, Frankel W, Martin R, Conway W, Truty M, Kindler H, Lowy AM, Bekaii-Saab T, Philip P, Talamonti M, Cardin D, LoConte N, Shen P, Hoffman JP, Venook AP. Preoperative Modified FOLFIRINOX Treatment Followed by Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Trial A021101. JAMA Surg. 2016 Aug 17;151(8):e161137. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1137. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, Lledo G, Zampino MG, Andre T, Zaniboni A, Ducreux M, Aitini E, Taieb J, Faroux R, Lepere C, de Gramont A; GERCOR; GISCAD. Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3509-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.023.
Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardiere C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Pere-Verge D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M; Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer; PRODIGE Intergroup. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923.
Evans DB, Varadhachary GR, Crane CH, Sun CC, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Vauthey JN, Wang H, Cleary KR, Staerkel GA, Charnsangavej C, Lano EA, Ho L, Lenzi R, Abbruzzese JL, Wolff RA. Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3496-502. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8634.
Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Crane CH, Sun CC, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Vauthey JN, Abdalla E, Wang H, Staerkel GA, Lee JH, Ross WA, Tamm EP, Bhosale PR, Krishnan S, Das P, Ho L, Xiong H, Abbruzzese JL, Evans DB. Preoperative gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3487-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8642.
Heinrich S, Pestalozzi B, Lesurtel M, Berrevoet F, Laurent S, Delpero JR, Raoul JL, Bachellier P, Dufour P, Moehler M, Weber A, Lang H, Rogiers X, Clavien PA. Adjuvant gemcitabine versus NEOadjuvant gemcitabine/oxaliplatin plus adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized multicenter phase III study (NEOPAC study). BMC Cancer. 2011 Aug 10;11:346. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-346.
Paniccia A, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Byers JT, Meguid C, Gajdos C, McCarter MD. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX application in borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(27):e198. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000198.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CODIM-MBM-17-040
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.