Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage and Effect of Geographic Region

NCT ID: NCT03166839

Last Updated: 2017-05-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

20060 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2017-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Maternal deaths occur universally and are largely avoidable. Postpartum haemorrhage accounts for a disproportionate amount of maternal deaths. There remains a great need to expeditiously decrease the rate of postpartum haemorrhage to prevent further mortality.

Methods: This study is a cohort analysis of data collected for the pragmatic international multi-centre randomized double blind placebo controlled design WOMAN Trial. It will present a univariate analysis of patient and delivery characteristics (age, type of delivery, placenta fully delivered, primary cause of haemorrhage, severity of haemorrhage), physiologic characteristics (systolic blood pressure, estimated blood loss, clinical signs of haemodynamic instability) and management characteristics (receipt of blood products, uterotonics). Multivariable logistic regression models and likelihood ratio tests will be used to examine the evidence for interaction between death from PPH and region after adjusting for any independent effects of 1) systolic blood pressure 2)age 3) type of delivery 4) receipt of blood products Discussion: This analysis of the WOMAN trial dataset will explore the relationship between geographical location, patient and environment characteristics and outcomes of postpartum haemorrhage. A protocol and statistical analysis plan is presented here.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Global burden of disease Maternal deaths occur universally and are largely avoidable(1). According to the first publication of the Maternal Health Series published in the Lancet October 2016, approximately 300,000 maternal deaths occurred in the past year. Postpartum haemorrhage was the cause of one tenth of these deaths(2,3). While this number has decreased globally since 1990, haemorrhage still accounts for a disproportionate amount of maternal deaths. There remains a great need to expeditiously decrease the rate of postpartum haemorrhage to prevent further mortality.

Why study postpartum haemorrhage? The most severe outcome of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the death of a mother. The World Health Organization defines maternal death as "death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy" (4). The clinical definition of postpartum haemorrhage refers to more than 500mL of blood loss after a vaginal delivery and more than 1000mL after a caesarean section(5). Haemorrhage is a rapidly fatal condition, most commonly caused by uterine atony, or the inability of the uterus to contract, constricting the network of vessels in the uterine muscle, gradually slowing active bleeding. For this reason, research efforts have been directed at minimizing or preventing uterine atony through preventative or treatment measures targeted at the third stage of labour(6,7). Anti-fibrinolytics have been proposed as an alternative method of slowing bleeding and have been studied both as a prophylactic intervention and a treatment modality(8-11). Risk of death from postpartum haemorrhage increases if the woman is anaemic as she cannot tolerate blood loss to the same extent that her counterparts with normal haemoglobin levels can(3,12). Recent publication of preliminary findings of the woman trial suggest that the anti-fibrinolytic tranexamic acid may reduce maternal mortality from PPH by over one third(13).

Why stratify by region? While the absolute number of maternal deaths around the world is impressive, quoting a global rate does not accurately reflect the burden of illness in different regions of the world. In developed countries like the United States of America, the risk of dying from postpartum haemorrhage after delivering a live baby is 13.4% (pooled, range: 4.7-34.6). This stands in stark contrast to the African experience, where studies have documented maternal death rates from PPH to be as high as 33.9% (pooled, range: 13.3-43.5)(14). There are other reasons why these numbers can vary so broadly. An obvious hypothesis is that more women die from postpartum haemorrhage in developing countries than their counterparts in developed countries because it is more prevalent, more severe or is managed differently than in other parts of the world. It has been proposed, however, that the different rates in fact reflect a paucity of reliable data that is region specific. This is indeed the case when we look at the continent of Africa, where studies done to date capture only the experiences of eight of the 54 countries on the continent (Egypt in the North, Senegal in the West, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe in the East and South)(14). A third factor in estimating deaths from postpartum haemorrhage reflects the different birthing environments across regions. In some countries, up to 50% of women deliver at home with support from a traditional birth attendant and never access a medical clinic or hospital. When most women do not deliver in a hospital or clinic, they do not die in a hospital or clinic so their data goes largely unregistered(9). Despite the fact that the "poorest countries have the poorest data"(12) enough is known about postpartum haemorrhage to inform action and spur further investigation, as many organizations have done(15).

While developing countries carry a higher burden of maternal deaths from postpartum haemorrhage, the impact of maternal death from PPH does not spare the developed world(14). Haemorrhage remains a leading cause of maternal death in countries where the majority of deliveries are performed in hospital with highly skilled support(16). This may be, in part, due to the unpredictability of postpartum haemorrhage, even in low-risk women(12). Risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage are commonly accepted to include previous postpartum haemorrhage, pre-eclampsia, disorders of the placenta, induction or augmentation of labour, perineal trauma, high birthweight and retained products(7)(16). Further, reporting occurrence of postpartum haemorrhage varies due to varying definitions of blood loss, the way blood loss is measured, intra-partum management strategies including uterotonics, uterine massage, and cord traction, interventions including method of delivery as well as the underlying characteristics of the population being studied(6)(3). Much time and resources have been invested in investigating the use of uretonics such as oxytocin to treat the most common causes of postpartum haemorrhage(7).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postpartum Hemorrhage

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Region 1: Africa

Women living in and experiencing PPH in countries located in Africa.

Experiencing PPH

Intervention Type OTHER

No intervention given

Region 2: Asia

Women living in and experiencing PPH in countries located in Africa.

Experiencing PPH

Intervention Type OTHER

No intervention given

Region 3: Europe, NA, SA, Aus

Women living in and experiencing PPH in countries located in Africa.

Experiencing PPH

Intervention Type OTHER

No intervention given

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Experiencing PPH

No intervention given

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women aged 16 years and older
* Clinical diagnosis of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal delivery or caesarean section
* "clinical uncertainty" about benefit of tranexamic acid in addition to routine management of PPH

Exclusion Criteria

\- Women aged 16 years and older with a clinical diagnosis of postpartum haemorrhage with clear indication or contra-indication for tranexamic acid
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ian Roberts

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Graham W, Woodd S, Byass P, Filippi V, Gon G, Virgo S, Chou D, Hounton S, Lozano R, Pattinson R, Singh S. Diversity and divergence: the dynamic burden of poor maternal health. Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2164-2175. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31533-1. Epub 2016 Sep 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27642022 (View on PubMed)

Calvert C, Thomas SL, Ronsmans C, Wagner KS, Adler AJ, Filippi V. Identifying regional variation in the prevalence of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041114. Epub 2012 Jul 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22844432 (View on PubMed)

Carroli G, Cuesta C, Abalos E, Gulmezoglu AM. Epidemiology of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Dec;22(6):999-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Sep 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18819848 (View on PubMed)

Begley CM, Gyte GM, Devane D, McGuire W, Weeks A. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 2;(3):CD007412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007412.pub4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25730178 (View on PubMed)

Mousa HA, Blum J, Abou El Senoun G, Shakur H, Alfirevic Z. Treatment for primary postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 13;2014(2):CD003249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003249.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24523225 (View on PubMed)

Shakur H, Roberts I, Edwards P, Elbourne D, Alfirevic Z, Ronsmans C. The effect of tranexamic acid on the risk of death and hysterectomy in women with post-partum haemorrhage: statistical analysis plan for the WOMAN trial. Trials. 2016 May 17;17(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1332-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27188698 (View on PubMed)

McClure EM, Jones B, Rouse DJ, Griffin JB, Kamath-Rayne BD, Downs A, Goldenberg RL. Tranexamic acid to reduce postpartum hemorrhage: A MANDATE systematic review and analyses of impact on maternal mortality. Am J Perinatol. 2015 Apr;32(5):469-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390347. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25289705 (View on PubMed)

Gohel, M Efficacy of tranexemic acid in decreasing blood loss during and after cesarean section: A randomised case controlled prospective study. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2007;57(3):227-30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Novikova N, Hofmeyr GJ, Cluver C. Tranexamic acid for preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 16;2015(6):CD007872. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007872.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26079202 (View on PubMed)

Mousa HA, Cording V, Alfirevic Z. Risk factors and interventions associated with major primary postpartum hemorrhage unresponsive to first-line conventional therapy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(6):652-61. doi: 10.1080/00016340802087660.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18568465 (View on PubMed)

Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1066-1074. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16581405 (View on PubMed)

Ronsmans C, Graham WJ; Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. 2006 Sep 30;368(9542):1189-200. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69380-X.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17011946 (View on PubMed)

WOMAN Trial Collaborators. Effect of early tranexamic acid administration on mortality, hysterectomy, and other morbidities in women with post-partum haemorrhage (WOMAN): an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 May 27;389(10084):2105-2116. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30638-4. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28456509 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12049

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

rhuFVIIa in Post-partum Hemorrhage
NCT00370877 COMPLETED PHASE4