Lumbar Drain After Endoscopic Surgery of the Skull Base

NCT ID: NCT03163134

Last Updated: 2017-08-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

170 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-02-03

Study Completion Date

2015-04-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall purpose of this study was to assess the necessity of lumbar drain placement after endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) surgery in reducing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak postoperatively and promote a standardization of its use.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the past, reconstructions were performed using fat grafts or fascia lata for EEA surgery. Considerably high postoperative CSF leaks were reported and were a major cause of concern due CSF fistula increasing risk of infection. Since external lumbar drain can lower CSF pressure and is believed to prevent post operative CSF leak, it was used commonly after EEA. With improvements in EEA skull base reconstructions using a nasal septal flap in the recent years, postoperative CSF leaks have been reported in much lower rates. With this improvement in reconstruction techniques, the use of lumbar drain may not be necessary as it may not significantly lower the risk of CSF leak further. In this prospective randomized study, we will randomize subjects at high risk for CSF leak to either receive a prophylactic lumbar drain or to not receive a prophylactic lumbar drain and compare the rate of CSF leaks and other complications in the two groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Quality of Life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No Lumbar Drain Group

Group of patients that did not receive a lumbar drain after surgery

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Lumbar Drain Group

Group of patients that received a lumbar drain after surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lumbar Drain

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lumbar Drain

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or older
* Patients undergoing EEA for resection of brain tumors
* Dural defect greater than 1cm
* Extensive arachnoid dissection
* Dissection into a ventricle or cistern

Exclusion Criteria

* Less than 18 years of age
* Spina Bifida
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paul Gardner

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paul Gardner, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zwagerman NT, Wang EW, Shin SS, Chang YF, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA. Does lumbar drainage reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery? A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg. 2018 Oct 19;131(4):1172-1178. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.JNS172447. Print 2019 Oct 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30485224 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRO10030258

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CE-STAND: Cervical Epidural STimulation After Neurologic Damage
NCT06410001 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
CraniSeal Post Approval Study
NCT06406790 RECRUITING PHASE4
Spine Registration Using 3D-Scanning
NCT06267248 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Spinal Cord Neuromodulation for Spinal Cord Injury
NCT02313194 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2