Caregiver-Child Interaction and Health Behaviors

NCT ID: NCT03162822

Last Updated: 2020-11-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

158 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-01

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Caregivers and their child are being asked to participate because the investigators are interested in typical caregiver-child interactions and health behaviors. In particular, the investigators are interested in different ways that caregivers react to and understand their young children's behavior, and their health behaviors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

If they decide to participate in this study, caregivers and their child will come visit the laboratory twice at times that are convenient for them. The first visit will take 2.5-3 hours and the second visit will take 2-2.5 hours, so the subject runners will ask them to schedule them at times when their child will be well-rested and fed prior to arrival.

Here is a list of activities that the subject runners will ask caregivers and their child to participate in. These activities will be video-recorded and recordings will be kept digitally on a secure password-protected server. A separate consent form for the video-recording will be provided and caregivers must consent to the video-recording if they wish to participate in this study. Video-recordings will be assigned a random subject ID number.

* Upon arrival at the laboratory during both visits, the subject runners will explain the tasks to caregivers and the subject runners will set them and their child up with the machine that allows us to measure heart rate and skin moisture. This means the subject runners will place nine sensors on their and their child's bodies. These sensors will be placed on the collar bones, the lower left rib cage, the upper and mid-chest, the upper and midback, and the palm of their and their child's non-dominant hand. Caregivers and their child will still be able to move freely around the room.
* Next, the subject runners will either:

* Conduct a short discussion where the subject runners will discuss caregivers' responses to their child's behavior or the intentions behind their child's behavior. A quarter of the research subjects in this study will complete a task where their responses to their child's behaviors are discussed and another quarter of the subjects will complete a task where the reasons for their child's behavior are discussed. Which type of discussion participants have will be "randomly assigned", which means that a computer will generate this decision before they arrive for their visit.
* Or have caregivers complete a short computerized activity where caregivers will look at a series of images and descriptions or will be asked to rate a series of images with facial expressions. A quarter of the research subjects in this study will complete a computerized activity where they will look at a series of images and descriptions and another quarter of the subjects will complete a computerized activity where they will rate a series of images with facial expressions. Which type of activity participants have will be "randomly assigned", which means that a computer will generate this decision before they arrive for their visit.
* After this brief discussion, the subject runners will have caregivers and their child complete a series of tasks that are the sorts of activities they might encounter in daily life. In the first task the subject runners will have caregivers direct their child to clean up toys. In the second task the subject runners will have their child play with some toys while they are occupied on their phone. In the third task the subject runners will give them questionnaires to complete while their child waits on a mat. All three of these tasks will take 25-30 minutes.
* After this task, the subject runners will either:

* Allow caregivers to have a break with their child. The subject runners will provide toys, drinks and snacks during the break. The subject runners will then ask caregivers to brush their child's teeth with a toothbrush that the subject runners provide, as they normally would.
* Or have caregivers complete a task where they will rate what they felt and thought during their interaction with their child while watching a video of their interaction.
* At the end of these tasks the subject runners will provide caregivers with the opportunity to discuss the visit, their child's behaviors, and any other questions or concerns they may have. The subject runners will not ask them to participate in any additional visits or questionnaires after their second visit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Early Childhood Caries Caregiver-Child Coercion

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Caregiver-Child Coercion Early Childhood Caries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Within-subject design over 2 visits
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cognitive Intervention

The cognitive intervention has parents come up with reasons why their children do things they don't like, until they come up with benign attributions for those behaviors.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cognitive Intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

The cognitive intervention has parents come up with reasons why their children do things they don't like, until they come up with benign attributions for those behaviors.

Behavioral Intervention

The behavioral intervention has the parents develop an if-then plan for dealing with conflict and negativity, using strategies to downregulate their own negative emotions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Behavioral Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The behavioral intervention has the parents develop an if-then plan for dealing with conflict and negativity, using strategies to downregulate their own negative emotions.

Interpretation Bias Intervention

The Interpretation Bias intervention has parents look at "morphed" facial expressions and determine whether the face is happy or angry. Positive feedback is given for rating the faces as happy and negative feedback is given for rating the faces as angry.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interpretation Bias Intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

The Interpretation Bias intervention has parents look at "morphed" facial expressions and determine whether the face is happy or angry. Positive feedback is given for rating the faces as happy and negative feedback is given for rating the faces as angry.

Evaluative Conditioning Intervention

The Evaluative Conditioning intervention presents parents with pictures of ambiguous child faces (conditioned stimuli) and pairs them with positive word descriptors (unconditioned stimuli; e.g., sweet; cooperative).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Evaluative Conditioning

Intervention Type OTHER

The Evaluative Conditioning intervention presents parents with pictures of ambiguous child faces (conditioned stimuli) and pairs them with positive word descriptors (unconditioned stimuli; e.g., sweet; cooperative).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Behavioral Intervention

The behavioral intervention has the parents develop an if-then plan for dealing with conflict and negativity, using strategies to downregulate their own negative emotions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Cognitive Intervention

The cognitive intervention has parents come up with reasons why their children do things they don't like, until they come up with benign attributions for those behaviors.

Intervention Type OTHER

Interpretation Bias Intervention

The Interpretation Bias intervention has parents look at "morphed" facial expressions and determine whether the face is happy or angry. Positive feedback is given for rating the faces as happy and negative feedback is given for rating the faces as angry.

Intervention Type OTHER

Evaluative Conditioning

The Evaluative Conditioning intervention presents parents with pictures of ambiguous child faces (conditioned stimuli) and pairs them with positive word descriptors (unconditioned stimuli; e.g., sweet; cooperative).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children between 18 and 36 months of age
* The primary caregiver of the child must be 18 years of age or older
* The primary caregiver must be the child's legal guardian
* The child in the dyad must have history of early childhood caries (ECC), have a sibling with a history of ECC, or be at risk for ECC
* The child in the dyad must qualify on behavioral problems

Exclusion Criteria

-If individuals do not meet the above criteria, they will be excluded from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

36 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

NYU Langone Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Heyman, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NYU Langone Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

New York University School of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Smith Slep AM, Heyman RE, Mitnick DA, Lorber MF, Rhoades KA, Daly KA, Nichols SR, Eddy JM. Do Brief Lab-Based Interventions Decrease Coercive Conflict Within Couples and Parent-Child Dyads? Behav Ther. 2023 Jul;54(4):666-681. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37330256 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1UH2DE025980-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

15-01081

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id