Tralokinumab Monotherapy for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis - ECZTRA 2 (ECZema TRAlokinumab Trial no. 2)

NCT ID: NCT03160885

Last Updated: 2025-03-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

794 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-12

Study Completion Date

2019-08-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Primary objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of tralokinumab compared with placebo in treating moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Secondary objectives:

To evaluate the efficacy of tralokinumab on severity and extent of AD, itch, and health related quality of life compared with placebo.

Maintenance objective:

To evaluate maintenance of effect with continued tralokinumab dosing up to 52 weeks compared to placebo for subjects achieving clinical response at Week 16.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subjects found eligible following the screening period were randomized 3:1 to initial treatment with tralokinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or placebo. Randomization was stratified by region (Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America) and disease severity (Investigator's Global Assessment \[IGA\] 3 or 4).

Subjects achieving a clinical response at Week 16 (defined as IGA of 0 or 1 on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 \[clear\] to 4 \[severe\], or at least 75% reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index \[EASI\] score from baseline \[EASI75\]) continued into maintenance treatment that continued until Week 52.

Subjects randomized to tralokinumab in the initial treatment period and who achieved a clinical response at Week 16 (defined by IGA 0 or 1, or EASI75) were re-randomized 2:2:1 to one of the following Q2W maintenance regimens stratified by region (Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America) and IGA response at Week 16 (IGA 0/1 or IGA \>1):

* Tralokinumab 300 mg Q2W.
* Tralokinumab 300 mg Q4W (alternating dose administrations tralokinumab 300 mg and placebo).
* Placebo.

Subjects randomized to placebo in the initial treatment period who achieved a clinical response at Week 16 (defined by IGA 0 or 1, or EASI75) continued to receive placebo Q2W in the maintenance treatment period.

Subjects not achieving a clinical response at Week 16 as well as those who met the criteria listed below during maintenance treatment were transferred to open-label tralokinumab 300 mg Q2W treatment with optional use of topical corticosteroid (TCS) up to Week 52.

Transfer to open-label treatment during maintenance:

Subjects with IGA=0 at Week 16: IGA of at least 2 and not achieved EASI75 over at least a 4-week period (i.e. over 3 consecutive visits).

Subjects with IGA=1 at Week 16: IGA of at least 3 and not achieved EASI75 over at least a 4-week period (i.e. over 3 consecutive visits).

Subjects with IGA \>1 at Week 16: not achieved EASI75 over at least a 4-week period (i.e. over 3 consecutive visits).

Subjects transferring to open-label treatment had the option to self-administer tralokinumab in their home after adequate training (at 3 dosing visits in the open-label period after additional consent has been obtained) by site staff at the investigator's discretion.

After completion of the maintenance treatment period (or open-label treatment), all subjects, except for those who entered the open-label long-term extension trial, continued in a 14-week off-treatment follow-up period for the assessment of safety and anti-drug antibody (ADA).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atopic Dermatitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Neither the subject nor any of the investigator or LEO staff who are involved in the treatment or clinical evaluation and monitoring of the subjects will be aware of the treatment received. The packaging and labelling of the investigational medicinal products (IMPs) will contain no evidence of their identity.

Since tralokinumab and placebo are visually distinct and not matched for viscosity, IMP will be handled and administered by a qualified, unblinded healthcare professional (HCP) at the site who will not be involved in the management of trial subjects and who will not perform any of the assessments.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Initial treatment period - Tralokinumab Q2W

Week 0 to Week 16

Two subcutaneous (SC) injections of tralokinumab as a loading dose on Day 0, followed by a SC injection of tralokinumab Q2W regimen for 16 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tralokinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Tralokinumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody of the IgG4 subclass that specifically binds to human IL-13 and blocks interaction with the IL-13 receptors. It is presented as a liquid formulation for subcutaneous (SC) administration

Initial treatment period - Placebo

Week 0 to Week 16 (Initial treatment period):

Two subcutaneous (SC) injections of placebo as a loading dose on Day 0 followed by a SC injection of placebo Q2W regimen for 16 weeks

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo contains the same excipients, in the same concentration only lacking tralokinumab

Maintenance treatment period - Tralokinumab Q2W

Week 16 to Week 52

Tralokinumab responders from the initial treatment period re-randomised at Week 16 and administered tralokinumab maintenance subcutaneous injection regimen Q2W for 36 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tralokinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Tralokinumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody of the IgG4 subclass that specifically binds to human IL-13 and blocks interaction with the IL-13 receptors. It is presented as a liquid formulation for subcutaneous (SC) administration

Maintenance treatment period - Tralokinumab Q4W

Week 16 to Week 52

Tralokinumab responders from the initial treatment period re-randomised at Week 16 and administered tralokinumab maintenance subcutaneous injection regimen Q4W for 36 weeks.

Participants in this group receive alternating doses of tralokinumab SC injection and placebo SC injection every 2 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tralokinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Tralokinumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody of the IgG4 subclass that specifically binds to human IL-13 and blocks interaction with the IL-13 receptors. It is presented as a liquid formulation for subcutaneous (SC) administration

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo contains the same excipients, in the same concentration only lacking tralokinumab

Maintenance treatment period - Placebo

Week 16 to Week 52

Tralokinumab responders from initial treatment period randomised at Week 16 and administered placebo subcutaneous maintenance injection for 36 weeks

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo contains the same excipients, in the same concentration only lacking tralokinumab

Maintenance treatment period - Placebo (tralokinumab naive)

Week 16 to Week 52

Placebo responders from the initial treatment period re-assigned at Week 16 and administered placebo maintenance subcutaneous injection regimen Q2W for 36 weeks

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo contains the same excipients, in the same concentration only lacking tralokinumab

Open-label treatment - Tralokinumab 300 mg Q2W + optional TCS

Week 16 to Week 52

Subjects receiving initial treatment with tralokinumab Q2W or placebo Q2W assigned to open-label treatment at Week 16 and administered tralokinumab subcutaneous (SC) injection + optional TCS\* regimen Q2W

OR

Subjects receiving maintenance treatment with tralokinumab Q2W/Q4W or placebo assigned to open-label treatment after Week 16 and administered tralokinumab SC injection + optional TCS regimen Q2W

• TCS = topical corticosteroids

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tralokinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Tralokinumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody of the IgG4 subclass that specifically binds to human IL-13 and blocks interaction with the IL-13 receptors. It is presented as a liquid formulation for subcutaneous (SC) administration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tralokinumab

Tralokinumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody of the IgG4 subclass that specifically binds to human IL-13 and blocks interaction with the IL-13 receptors. It is presented as a liquid formulation for subcutaneous (SC) administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo contains the same excipients, in the same concentration only lacking tralokinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Written informed consent and any locally required authorisation obtained from the subject prior to performing any protocol-related procedures, including screening evaluations.
2. Age 18 and above.
3. Diagnosis of AD as defined by the Hanifin and Rajka (1980) criteria for AD (33; Appendix 5).
4. Diagnosis of AD for ≥1 year.
5. Subjects who have a recent history (within 1 year before the screening visit) of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications or for whom topical treatments are otherwise medically inadvisable (e.g., due to important side effects or safety risks).

* Inadequate response is defined as failure to achieve and maintain remission or a low disease activity state (comparable to IGA 0=clear to 2=mild) despite treatment with a daily regimen of TCS of medium to higher potency (±TCI as appropriate), applied for at least 28 days or for the maximum duration recommended by the product prescribing information (e.g., 14 days for super potent TCS), whichever is shorter.
* Subjects with documented systemic treatment for AD in the past year are also considered as inadequate responders to topical treatments and are potentially eligible for treatment with tralokinumab after appropriate washout.
* Important side effects or safety risks are those that outweigh the potential treatment benefits and include intolerance to treatment, hypersensitivity reactions, significant skin atrophy, and systemic effects, as assessed by the investigator or by the subject's treating physician.
6. AD involvement of ≥10% body surface area at screening and baseline (visit 3).
7. An EASI score of ≥12 at screening and 16 at baseline.
8. An IGA score of ≥3 at screening and at baseline.
9. A Worst Daily Pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) average score of ≥4 during the week prior to baseline.

• Worst Daily Pruritus NRS at baseline will be calculated from daily assessments of worst itch severity (Worst Daily Pruritus NRS) during the 7 days immediately preceding randomisation (Day 6 to 0). A minimum of 4 Worst Daily Pruritus NRS scores out of the 7 days is required to calculate the baseline average score. For subjects who do not have at least 4 scores reported during the 7 days immediately preceding the planned randomisation date, randomisation should be postponed until this requirement is met, but without exceeding the 6 weeks maximum duration for screening.
10. Subjects must have applied a stable dose of emollient twice daily (or more, as needed) for at least 14 days before randomisation (refer to exclusion criterion no. 8 for limitations regarding emollients).
11. Women of childbearing potential must use a highly effective\* form of birth control (confirmed by the investigator) throughout the trial and at least for 16 weeks (5 half lives) after last administration of IMP.

* A highly effective method of birth control is defined as one which results in a low failure rate (less than 1% per year) such as bilateral tubal occlusion, intrauterine device (IUD), intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS), combined (oestrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal), progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable), sexual abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual life style of the subject), vasectomised partner (given that the subject is monogamous). The subjects must have used the contraceptive method continuously for at least 1 month prior to the pregnancy test at baseline. A female is defined as not being of child-bearing potential if she is postmenopausal (at least 12 months with no menses without an alternative medical cause prior to screening), or surgically sterile (hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy or bilateral oophorectomy).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Concurrent enrolment in another clinical trial where the subject is receiving an IMP.
2. Previous randomisation in tralokinumab trials.
3. Active dermatologic conditions that may confound the diagnosis of AD or would interfere with assessment of treatment, such as scabies, cutaneous lymphoma, or psoriasis.
4. Known active allergic or irritant contact dermatitis that is likely to interfere with the assessment of severity of AD.
5. Use of tanning beds or phototherapy (narrow band ultraviolet B \[NBUVB\], ultraviolet B \[UVB\], ultraviolet A1 \[UVA1\], psoralen + ultraviolet A \[PUVA\]), within 6 weeks prior to randomisation.
6. Treatment with the following medications within 4 weeks prior to randomisation:

* Systemic immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (e.g. methotrexate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, Janus kinase inhibitors etc.).
* Systemic corticosteroid use (excludes topical, inhaled, or intranasal delivery).
* Three or more bleach baths during any week within the 4 weeks.
7. Treatment with the following medications within 2 weeks prior to randomisation

* TCS.
* TCI.
* Topical PDE 4 inhibitor.
8. Initiation of treatment of AD with prescription emollients or emollients containing additives such as ceramide, hyaluronic acid, urea, or filaggrin degradation products during the screening period (subjects may continue using stable doses of such emollients if initiated before the screening visit).
9. Receipt of live attenuated vaccines 30 days prior to the date of randomisation and during the trial including the safety follow-up period.

• Receipt of inactive/killed vaccinations (e.g. inactive influenza) are allowed, provided they are not administered within 5 days before/after any study visit.
10. Receipt of any marketed (i.e. immunoglobulin, anti-IgE) or investigational biologic agent, including dupilumab:

* Any cell-depleting agents including but not limited to rituximab: within 6 months prior to randomisation, or until lymphocyte count returns to normal, whichever is longer.
* Other biologics: within 3 months or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to randomisation.
11. Receipt of any investigational non-biologic agent within 5 half-lives prior to randomisation.
12. Receipt of blood products within 4 weeks prior to screening.
13. Major surgery within 8 weeks prior to screening, or planned in-patient surgery or hospitalisation during the trial period.
14. Known or suspected allergy or reaction to any component of the IMP formulation.
15. History of any active skin infection within 1 week prior to randomisation.
16. History of a clinically significant infection within 4 weeks prior to randomisation which, in the opinion of the investigator or sponsor's medical expert, may compromise the safety of the subject in the trial, interfere with evaluation of the IMP, or reduce the subject's ability to participate in the trial. Clinically significant infections are defined as:

* a systemic infection.
* a serious skin infection requiring parenteral (intravenous or intramuscular) antibiotics, antiviral, or antifungal medication.
17. A helminth parasitic infection within 6 months prior to the date informed consent is obtained that has not been treated with, or has failed to respond to, standard of care therapy.
18. History of anaphylaxis following any biologic therapy.
19. History of immune complex disease.
20. History of cancer:

* Subjects who have had basal cell carcinoma, localised squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix are eligible provided that the subject is in remission and curative therapy was completed at least 12 months prior to the date informed consent was obtained.
* Subjects who have had other malignancies are eligible provided that the subject is in remission and curative therapy was completed at least 5 years prior to the date informed consent was obtained.
21. Tuberculosis requiring treatment within the 12 months prior to screening. Evaluation will be according to local guidelines as per local standard of care.
22. History of any known primary immunodeficiency disorder including a positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test at screening, or the subject taking antiretroviral medications as determined by medical history and/or subject's verbal report.
23. History of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 12 months prior to screening, or any condition associated with poor compliance as judged by the investigator.
24. History of attempted suicide or is at significant risk of suicide (either in the opinion of the investigator or defined as a "yes" to suicidal ideation questions no. 4 or 5 or answering "yes" to suicidal behaviour on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale \[C-SSRS\] Screening version).
25. Any disorder, including but not limited to, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, musculoskeletal, infectious, endocrine, metabolic, haematological, immunological, psychiatric, or major physical impairment that is not stable, in the opinion of the investigator, and could:

* Affect the safety of the subject throughout the trial.
* Influence the findings of the trial or their interpretations.
* Impede the subject's ability to complete the entire duration of trial.
26. Any clinically significant abnormal findings in physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), haematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis during the screening period, which in the opinion of the investigator, may put the subject at risk because of his/her participation in the trial, or may influence the results of the trial, or the subject's ability to complete entire duration of the trial.
27. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level ≥2.0 times the ULN (upper limit of normal) at screening.
28. Positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) or hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV) serology at screening. Subjects with positive HBsAb may be randomised provided they are hepatitis B vaccinated and have negative HBsAg and HBcAb.
29. Subjects who are not willing to abstain from donating blood and/or plasma from the time of informed consent and for 16 weeks (5 half-lives) after last dose of IMP.
30. Subjects who are legally institutionalised.
31. Pregnant, breastfeeding, or lactating women.
32. Employees of the trial site or any other individuals directly involved with the planning or conduct of the trial, or immediate family members of such individuals.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

LEO Pharma

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eric Simpson, MD, MCR

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Burke Pharmaceutical Research

Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

California dermatology

Encinitas, California, United States

Site Status

Advanced SkinCare Surgery & Med Center

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

USC Department of Dermatology

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Thiele Dermatology Specialists, Inc

Murrieta, California, United States

Site Status

Island Dermatology

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Therapeutics Clinical Research

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Luis Dermatology and Laser Clinic

San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Site Status

Southern California Dermatology, Inc.

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Olympian Clinical Research

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Spotlight Research Center, LLC

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Private Practice - Dr. Tory P. Sullivan

North Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Marietta Dermatology Clinical Research, Inc.

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

MedaPhase, Inc.

Newnan, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

RUSH University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Dawes-Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Kansas City Dermatology, PA

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Beacon Clinical Research

Quincy, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

HFMC New Center One

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

The Grekin Skin Institute

Warren, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Respiratory Medicine Research Institute of Michigan, PLC

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clinical Studies Group

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey

East Windsor, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Corning Center for Clinical Research

Corning, New York, United States

Site Status

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Sadick Dermatology

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati Health Physicians Office

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Wright State Physicians

Fairborn, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Aventiv Research Inc.

Westerville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oregon Dermatology and Research Center

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Paddington Testing Company, Inc.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Yardley Dermatology Associates

Yardley, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Clinical Research Center of the Carolinas

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rivergate Dermatology Clinical Research Center

Goodlettsville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Bellaire Dermatology Associates

Bellaire, Texas, United States

Site Status

Modern Research Associates, PLLC

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin Institute for Clinical Research, Inc.

Pflugerville, Texas, United States

Site Status

Progressive Clinical Research

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Woden Dermatology Pty Ltd.

Phillip, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Site Status

Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia

Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

St. George Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center

Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Veracity Clinical Research

Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Skin & Cancer Foundation Inc.

Carlton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Sinclair Dermatology

East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Burswood Dermatology

Victoria Park, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Enverus Medical Research

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Pacific Derm

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg Clinic

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Wiseman Dermatology Research

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Brunswick Dermatology Centre

Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Nexus Clinical Research

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Eastern Canada Cutaneous Research

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Kingsway Clinical Research

Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Guenther Derm Research Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Lynderm Research Inc.

Markham, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

DermEdge Research

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dermatology & Cosmetic Surgery

North Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Derm Clinic of Dr. Robern

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Skin Centre for Dermatology

Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dermatology & Cosmetic Surgery

Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

K. Papp

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

XLR8 Medical Research

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dr. David Gratton Dermatologue

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CRDQ

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Bispebjerg Hospital

Hellerup, , Denmark

Site Status

Gentofte Hospital

Hellerup, , Denmark

Site Status

Spedali Civili Brescia

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Opedale San Salvatore

L’Aquila, , Italy

Site Status

AOU Pisa

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

IRCCS San Gallicano

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Policlinico "Agostino Gemelli"

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Rozzano, , Italy

Site Status

Centrum Medyczne Gdynia

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Synexus Polska Gdyni

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Synexus Polska Katowicach

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Centrum Medyczne PRATIA

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

"DERMED" Centrum Medyczne Sp.

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Dermoklinika Centrum Medyczne

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Synexus Polska Poznaniu

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Klinika Dermatologii

Rzeszów, , Poland

Site Status

Chelyabinsk Dermat. Dispensary

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Federal State Budgetary Institution State Sci. Ctr.

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

French clinic of skin diseases

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Military Medical Academy

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Pusan National University Hospital

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Chungnam National Univeristy

Daejeon, , South Korea

Site Status

Chonnam National University Hospital

Gwangju, , South Korea

Site Status

Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Korea University Ansan Hospital

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

St. Mary's Hospital

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Inha University Hospital

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Yonsei University Health Syste

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Konkuk University Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Chung-Ang University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Hallym University Kangnam Sacr

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Ninewells Hospital

Dundee, Angus, United Kingdom

Site Status

Salford Royal Hospital

Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom

Site Status

Whipps Cross University Hospital

Leytonstone, London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Harrogate District Hospital

Harrogate, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Hallamshire Hospital

Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

East Surrey Hospital

Redhill, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Victoria Infirmary

Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom

Site Status

Russells Hall Hospital

Dudley, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust

Walsall, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Chapel Allerton Hospital

Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

West Suffolk Hospital

Bury St Edmunds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

The Whittington Hospital NHS

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Guy's Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada Denmark Italy Poland Russia South Korea United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mayo T, Silverberg JI, Armstrong A, Guttman-Yassky E, Blauvelt A, Esdaile B, Kabashima K, Gooderham M, Kircik L, Schneider S, Bennike N, von Eyben R, Martel BC, Ropke MA, Katoh N, Alexis AF. Efficacy and Safety of Tralokinumab Across Racial Subgroups in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase III Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Oct 21. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00985-1. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41118053 (View on PubMed)

Reich K, Langley RG, Salvador JFS, Staumont-Salle D, Costanzo A, Pink AE, Paller AS, Katoh N, Wollenberg A, Warren RB, Blauvelt A, Oland CB, Tindberg AM, Gjerum L, Simpson EL. Safety of tralokinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis followed for up to 4.5 years: an integrated analysis of 8 clinical trials. Br J Dermatol. 2025 Aug 29:ljaf309. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf309. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40879371 (View on PubMed)

Paller AS, Soong W, Boguniewicz M, Geng B, Thyssen JP, Bennike N, Schneider S, Wollenberg A. Effect of tralokinumab on moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in patients with atopic comorbidities. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2025 Oct;135(4):425-433.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2025.06.022. Epub 2025 Jun 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40555305 (View on PubMed)

Chovatiya R, Ribero S, Wollenberg A, Park CO, Silvestre JF, Hong HC, Seneschal J, Saeki H, Thyssen JP, Oland CB, Gjerum L, Maslin D, Blauvelt A. Long-Term Disease Control and Minimal Disease Activity of Head and Neck Atopic Dermatitis in Patients Treated with Tralokinumab up to 4 Years. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Jul;26(4):587-601. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00931-1. Epub 2025 Mar 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40085349 (View on PubMed)

Simpson EL, Blauvelt A, Silverberg JI, Cork MJ, Katoh N, Mark T, Schneider SKR, Wollenberg A. Tralokinumab Provides Clinically Meaningful Responses at Week 16 in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Do Not Achieve IGA 0/1. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 Jan;25(1):139-148. doi: 10.1007/s40257-023-00817-0. Epub 2023 Oct 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37804473 (View on PubMed)

Simpson EL, Pink AE, Blauvelt A, Gooderham M, Armstrong AW, Worm M, Katoh N, Peris K, Puig L, Barbarot S, Mark T, Steffensen LA, Tindberg AM, Wollenberg A. Tralokinumab Efficacy Over 1 Year in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Data from Two Phase III Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Nov;24(6):939-952. doi: 10.1007/s40257-023-00806-3. Epub 2023 Sep 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37682422 (View on PubMed)

Blauvelt A, Gooderham M, Bhatia N, Langley RG, Schneider S, Zoidis J, Kurbasic A, Armstrong A, Silverberg JI. Tralokinumab Efficacy and Safety, with or without Topical Corticosteroids, in North American Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Subanalysis of Phase 3 Trials ECZTRA 1, 2, and 3. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Nov;12(11):2499-2516. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00805-y. Epub 2022 Sep 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36152216 (View on PubMed)

Wollenberg A, Blauvelt A, Guttman-Yassky E, Worm M, Lynde C, Lacour JP, Spelman L, Katoh N, Saeki H, Poulin Y, Lesiak A, Kircik L, Cho SH, Herranz P, Cork MJ, Peris K, Steffensen LA, Bang B, Kuznetsova A, Jensen TN, Osterdal ML, Simpson EL; ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2 study investigators. Tralokinumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase III trials (ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2). Br J Dermatol. 2021 Mar;184(3):437-449. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19574. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33000465 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-004201-13

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LP0162-1326

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tralokinumab for Dupilumab Failures
NCT06773455 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4