Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Risperidone in Situ Microparticle (ISM)® in Patients With Acute Schizophrenia (NCT NCT03160521)

NCT ID: NCT03160521

Last Updated: 2022-02-22

Results Overview

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a 30-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the symptoms of schizophrenia.The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210, with 30 indicating absence of symptoms of schizophrenia and 210 indicating extreme ratings of all 30 symptoms. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvements in symptoms whereas higher scores mean a worse outcome. Endpoint is defined as study day 85 or the last post-baseline assessment if early discontinuation.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

438 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 85 (or the last post-baseline assessment)

Results posted on

2022-02-22

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Risperidone in Situ Microparticle (ISM) 75 mg
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly IM intramuscular (IM) injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Overall Study
STARTED
144
146
147
Overall Study
COMPLETED
107
95
88
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
37
51
59

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Risperidone in Situ Microparticle (ISM)® in Patients With Acute Schizophrenia

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Total
n=390 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.63 • n=5 Participants
42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.14 • n=7 Participants
40.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.35 • n=5 Participants
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.08 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
45 Participants
n=7 Participants
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
133 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
84 Participants
n=7 Participants
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
257 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
123 Participants
n=5 Participants
126 Participants
n=7 Participants
122 Participants
n=5 Participants
371 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
180 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
65 Participants
n=7 Participants
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
205 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
72 participants
n=5 Participants
72 participants
n=7 Participants
76 participants
n=5 Participants
220 participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
57 participants
n=5 Participants
57 participants
n=7 Participants
56 participants
n=5 Participants
170 participants
n=4 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
27.77 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.226 • n=5 Participants
28.26 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.268 • n=7 Participants
28.19 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.715 • n=5 Participants
28.07 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.065 • n=4 Participants
Years since Schizophrenia Diagnosis
16.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.67 • n=5 Participants
15.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43 • n=7 Participants
14.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.74 • n=5 Participants
15.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.29 • n=4 Participants
Time since Acute Exacerbation or relapse (weeks)
3 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.95 • n=5 Participants
3 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.67 • n=7 Participants
3 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.65 • n=5 Participants
3 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.55 • n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 85 (or the last post-baseline assessment)

Population: The efficacy analysis was performed on the modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population containing all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug with a baseline measurement and ≥1 post-baseline evaluation for the PANSS, and for whom blinding was not potentially compromised owing to a one-off error in the interactive web response system (IWRS) used for randomized treatment assignment.

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a 30-item clinician-rated instrument for assessing the symptoms of schizophrenia.The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score is the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210, with 30 indicating absence of symptoms of schizophrenia and 210 indicating extreme ratings of all 30 symptoms. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvements in symptoms whereas higher scores mean a worse outcome. Endpoint is defined as study day 85 or the last post-baseline assessment if early discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
PANSS Total Score Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint
-24.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.51
-24.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.54
-11.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.56

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 85 (or the last post-baseline assessment)

Population: The efficacy analysis was performed on the mITT population containing all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug with a baseline measurement and ≥1 post-baseline evaluation for the PANSS, and for whom blinding was not potentially compromised owing to a one-off error in the interactive web response system (IWRS) used for randomized treatment assignment.

The Clinician Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) score is a 7-point clinician-rated scale for assessing the global severity of the illness. A rating of 1 is equivalent to "Normal, not at all ill" and a rating of 7 is equivalent to "Among the most extremely ill participants". Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in the severity of illness whereas higher scores mean a worse outcome. Endpoint is defined as study day 85 or the last post-baseline assessment if early discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
CGI-S Total Score Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint
-1.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
-1.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 85 (or the last post-baseline assessment)

Population: The efficacy analysis was performed on the mITT population containing all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug with a baseline measurement and ≥1 post-baseline evaluation for the PANSS, and for whom blinding was not potentially compromised owing to a one-off error in the interactive web response system (IWRS) used for randomized treatment assignment.

The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score consists of a single 7-point rating score total improvement, regardless of whether or not the change it is due entirely to drug treatment. Scores are: 1, Very much improved; 2, Much improved; 3, Minimally improved; 4, No change; 5, Minimally worse; 6, Much worse; or 7, Very much worse. Endpoint is defined as study day 85 or the last post-baseline double-blind assessment if early discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
CGI-I Score Mean at Endpoint
2.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
2.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
3.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 85 or the last post-baseline assessment

Population: The efficacy analysis was performed on the mITT population containing all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug with a baseline measurement and ≥1 post-baseline evaluation for the PANSS, and for whom blinding was not potentially compromised owing to a one-off error in the interactive web response system (IWRS) used for randomized treatment assignment.

Overall response was defined as either PANSS total score ≥ 30% decrease from baseline, or CGI-I score of 2 (much improved) or 1 (very much improved). Endpoint is defined as study day 85 or the last post-baseline assessment if early discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Overall Response Rate at Endpoint
59.7 percentage of participants
Interval 50.7 to 68.2
54.3 percentage of participants
Interval 45.3 to 63.1
20.5 percentage of participants
Interval 13.9 to 28.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 85 or the last post-baseline assessment

Population: The efficacy analysis was performed on the mITT population containing all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug with a baseline measurement and ≥1 post-baseline evaluation for the PANSS, and for whom blinding was not potentially compromised owing to a one-off error in the interactive web response system (IWRS) used for randomized treatment assignment.

The definition of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) response was a decrease from baseline in PANSS total score of ≥ 30% (improvement of symptoms). Endpoint is defined as study day 85 or the last post-baseline double-blind assessment if early discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
PANSS Response Rate at Endpoint
41.9 percentage of participants
Interval 33.2 to 50.9
34.9 percentage of participants
Interval 26.7 to 43.8
9.1 percentage of participants
Interval 4.8 to 15.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 85 (or the last post-baseline assessment)

Population: The efficacy analysis was performed on the mITT population containing all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug with a baseline measurement and ≥1 post-baseline evaluation for the PANSS, and for whom blinding was not potentially compromised owing to a one-off error in the interactive web response system (IWRS) used for randomized treatment assignment.

The PANSS consisted of three subscales that contained a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity is rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicated the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicated extremely severe symptoms. In positive subscale, the 7 positive symptom constructs were: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. PANSS Positive Subscale Score ranges from 7 (absence of symptoms) to 49 (extremely severe symptoms). Endpoint is defined as study day 85 or the last post-baseline assessment if early discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
PANSS Positive Subscale Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint
-8.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
-8.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.50
-4.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.50

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 85 (or the last post-baseline assessment)

Population: The efficacy analysis was performed on the mITT population containing all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug with a baseline measurement and ≥1 post-baseline evaluation for the PANSS, and for whom blinding was not potentially compromised owing to a one-off error in the interactive web response system (IWRS) used for randomized treatment assignment.

The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicated- absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicated- extremely severe symptoms. The PANSS negative subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 negative scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 negative symptom constructs were: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive apathetic withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation and stereotyped thinking. PANSS Negative Subscale Score ranges from 7 (absence of symptoms) to 49 (extremely severe symptoms). Endpoint is defined as study day 85 or the last post-baseline assessment if early discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
PANSS Negative Subscale Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint
-3.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.38
-3.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.39
-1.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.40

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 85 (or the last post-baseline assessment)

Population: The efficacy analysis was performed on the mITT population containing all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug with a baseline measurement and ≥1 post-baseline evaluation for the PANSS, and for whom blinding was not potentially compromised owing to a one-off error in the interactive web response system (IWRS) used for randomized treatment assignment.

The PANSS consisted of three subscales that contained a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity is rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicated the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicated extremely severe symptoms. The general psychopathology scale consists of 16 items which measure somatic concern, anxiety, guilt feelings, tension, mannerisms and posturing, depression, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, unusual thought content, disorientation, poor attention, lack of judgment and insight, disturbance of volition, poor impulse control, preoccupation and active social avoidance. PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Score ranges from 16 (absence of symptoms) to 112 (extremely severe symptoms). Endpoint is defined as study day 85 or the last post-baseline assessment if early discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=129 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
PANSS General Psychopathology Subscale Mean Change From Baseline to Endpoint
-12.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.79
-12.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.81
-5.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.82

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline), Days 29, 57 and 85 (or the last post-baseline assessment)

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population (used for analyses of this outcome) consisted of all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug with a baseline measurement and ≥ 1 post-baseline evaluation of the PANSS. Data for both Risperidone ISM doses (75 mg and 100 mg) were pooled because this study was not powered to detect differences between doses at this endpoint and pooling this two arms the sample size increase and therefore the precision around the estimates.

Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) total score mean change from baseline at each post-baseline assessment time point. The PSP is a 100-point single-item rating scale that is based on 4 domains: family and social functioning, self-care, work and socially useful activities, and disturbing and aggressive behaviors. Each domain is rated in 6 degrees of severity (absent, mild, manifest, marked, severe, very severe). On the PSP scale, higher scores indicate better social functioning: 71-100 indicates mild to no functional impairment; 31-70 varying degrees of disability and 1-30, minimal functioning needing intense support and/or supervision. Participants with a PSP total score of 71 to 100 were considered to have mild functional difficulty. Scores of 31 to 70 represented varying degrees of disability (31 to 70) and ratings of 1 to 30 indicated minimal functioning that required intense support and/or supervision.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=288 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=145 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
PSP Total Score From Baseline at Each Post-baseline Assessment Time Point
Baseline
49.93 score on a scale
Interval 49.0 to 51.0
50.46 score on a scale
Interval 49.0 to 52.0
PSP Total Score From Baseline at Each Post-baseline Assessment Time Point
Study Day 29
59.03 score on a scale
Interval 58.0 to 60.0
55.37 score on a scale
Interval 54.0 to 57.0
PSP Total Score From Baseline at Each Post-baseline Assessment Time Point
Study Day 57
61.33 score on a scale
Interval 60.0 to 63.0
57.07 score on a scale
Interval 55.0 to 59.0
PSP Total Score From Baseline at Each Post-baseline Assessment Time Point
Study Day 85
60.60 score on a scale
Interval 59.0 to 62.0
54.54 score on a scale
Interval 53.0 to 56.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline), Days 29, 57 and 85 or the last post-baseline assessment

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population (used for analyses of this outcome) consisted of all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug with a baseline measurement and ≥ 1 post-baseline evaluation of the PANSS. Data for both Risperidone ISM doses (75 mg and 100 mg) were pooled because this study was not powered to detect differences between doses at this endpoint and pooling this two arms the sample size increase and therefore the precision around the estimates.

20-item Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptics Treatment Scale (SWN-20) total score mean change from baseline at each post-baseline assessment time point. The SWN is a 38-item instrument to measure subjective effects of neuroleptic medications in patients with schizophrenia and consists of 20 positive statements and 18 negative statements. The short form of the SWN, the 20-item SWN-20, was developed in order to allow for quick assessment of subjective side effects in a clinical setting. Like in the original SWN, with the SWN-20 the patient is asked to rate well-being items that have been identified as related to antipsychotic treatment on a 6-point scale ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much." The SWN-20 is scored on a scale ranging from 20 to 120, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life (HRQL). The SWN-20 contains five 4-item subscales: mental functioning, self-control, emotional regulation, physical functioning, and social integration. Eac

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=288 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=145 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
SWN-20 Total Score From Baseline at Each Post-baseline Assessment Time Point
Baseline
80.86 score on a scale
Interval 79.0 to 83.0
80.28 score on a scale
Interval 78.0 to 83.0
SWN-20 Total Score From Baseline at Each Post-baseline Assessment Time Point
Day 29
86.90 score on a scale
Interval 85.0 to 89.0
83.23 score on a scale
Interval 81.0 to 86.0
SWN-20 Total Score From Baseline at Each Post-baseline Assessment Time Point
Day 57
88.26 score on a scale
Interval 87.0 to 90.0
86.32 score on a scale
Interval 83.0 to 89.0
SWN-20 Total Score From Baseline at Each Post-baseline Assessment Time Point
Day 85
89.14 score on a scale
Interval 88.0 to 91.0
85.50 score on a scale
Interval 83.0 to 88.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Day 3 and Day 29 after Dose 1, 2 and 3

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included patients in the safety population who have at least 1 measurement plasma concentration value.

Plasma PK Parameters of Risperidone Active Moiety Cmax values are estimated and based on the plasma level of Day 3 for each dosing Interval; Cmin are the trough levels of Day 29, which is at the end of each dosing Interval;

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=144 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=146 Participants
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Plasma PK Parameters
Dose 1/Estimated Cmax/Day 3
27.61 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 19.992
32.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16.802
Plasma PK Parameters
Dose 1/Estimated Cmin/Day 29
19.21 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 13.076
26.71 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 14.960
Plasma PK Parameters
Dose 2/Estimated Cmax/Day 3
38.95 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 22.381
53.44 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 23.840
Plasma PK Parameters
Dose 2/Estimated Cmin/Day 29
17.46 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 13.418
27.23 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 14.070
Plasma PK Parameters
Dose 3/Estimated Cmax/Day 3
37.16 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 19.504
50.09 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 22.242
Plasma PK Parameters
Dose 3/Estimated Cmin/Day 29
20.16 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16.847
26.14 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16.343

Adverse Events

Risperidone ISM 75 mg

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 101 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Risperidone ISM 100 mg

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 119 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 48 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=144 participants at risk
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=146 participants at risk
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
n=147 participants at risk
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.00%
0/144 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.00%
0/146 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.00%
0/146 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.00%
0/147 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/144 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.00%
0/146 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
0.00%
0/144 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.68%
1/146 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.00%
0/147 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.00%
0/144 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.68%
1/146 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.00%
0/147 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
0.00%
0/144 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.68%
1/146 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.00%
0/147 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
0.00%
0/144 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.68%
1/146 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.00%
0/147 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia
0.69%
1/144 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
1.4%
2/146 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.7%
4/147 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Risperidone ISM 75 mg
n=144 participants at risk
Patients assigned to this arm will received 75 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 75 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Risperidone ISM 100 mg
n=146 participants at risk
Patients assigned to this arm will received 100 mg of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Risperidone ISM 100 mg: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Placebo
n=147 participants at risk
Patients assigned to this arm will received placebo of Risperidone ISM during double-blind treatment period. Placebo of Risperidone ISM: Monthly (once every 4 weeks) IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.7%
4/146 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.00%
0/147 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Endocrine disorders
Hyperprolactinaemia
5.6%
8/144 • Number of events 8 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
8.9%
13/146 • Number of events 13 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
2.8%
4/144 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
1.4%
2/146 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
1.4%
2/147 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
General disorders
Injection site pain
5.6%
8/144 • Number of events 10 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.7%
4/146 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
3.4%
5/147 • Number of events 7 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
3.5%
5/144 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.7%
4/146 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.00%
0/147 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
2.8%
4/144 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
4.8%
7/146 • Number of events 7 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
1.4%
2/144 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.7%
4/146 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Investigations
Blood prolactin increased
9.0%
13/144 • Number of events 15 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
14.4%
21/146 • Number of events 22 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.00%
0/147 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
2.8%
4/144 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.1%
3/146 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Investigations
Weight increased
6.9%
10/144 • Number of events 10 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
5.5%
8/146 • Number of events 8 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Nervous system disorders
Akathisia
4.2%
6/144 • Number of events 6 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
7.5%
11/146 • Number of events 13 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.0%
3/147 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
3.5%
5/144 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
4.1%
6/146 • Number of events 6 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.7%
4/147 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Nervous system disorders
Dystonia
2.8%
4/144 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.1%
3/146 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
0.68%
1/147 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
10.4%
15/144 • Number of events 17 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
8.2%
12/146 • Number of events 12 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
3.4%
5/147 • Number of events 6 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
2.8%
4/144 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
5.5%
8/146 • Number of events 8 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.7%
4/147 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
2.8%
4/144 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
4.1%
6/146 • Number of events 8 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
4.1%
6/147 • Number of events 8 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia
2.1%
3/144 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
2.1%
3/146 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.
5.4%
8/147 • Number of events 8 • Adverse event data were collected in all visits of the study, from the patient's signature of informed consent form through the end of study for each subject: Screening visit, Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, 4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 31, 43, 57, 59, 71, 85 and follow-up visit (Day 99).
The analysis was performed in the Safety Population, which includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. 437 patients were included in the safety population.

Additional Information

Director of Medical Department

Laboratorios Farmacéuticos Rovi, S.A.

Phone: 91 375 62 30

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The sponsor does not object to publication by the Institution of the results of the Trial based on information collected/generated by the Institution. The Institution will provide Sponsor an opportunity to review any proposed publication before it is submitted. If the Trial is part of a multi-center trial, the Institution agress that the first publication is to be a joint publication involving all Trials sites.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER