Evaluation of the Satisfaction of Patients With Conization Under Local Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT03157752
Last Updated: 2017-12-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-05-31
2017-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main objective of our study is to evaluate the overall satisfaction of patients in the case of conisation under local anesthesia.
The goal is to promote local anesthesia for the management of congested patients, which simplifies overall management, reduces cost and reduces complications associated with general anesthesia.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main objective of our study is to evaluate the overall satisfaction of the patients in the case of conducting conization under local anesthesia. Secondary endpoints are preoperative anxiety assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (EVA) And the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) score, the occurrence of complications during the procedure, surgeon satisfaction, anesthesia tolerance using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale score (ISAIS), and finally A follow-up at 3 months evaluation of secondary complications, margins of resections and persistence of lesions.
This is a prospective multi-centric study (CHU Nîmes and Montpellier). During the day hospitalization, a questionnaire of satisfaction will be given to the patient. The primary outcome measure is the overall satisfaction of the patient assessed as a question. Secondary endpoints are preoperative anxiety assessed using the visual analog scale (EVA) and the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information scale (APAIS) score, the occurrence of complications during gesture, satisfaction of the surgeon , Tolerance of anesthesia using the ISAS score, and finally a 3-month follow-up to evaluate secondary complications, resection margins and lesions persistence. Currently the only study on the subject is a retrospective study of 70 subjects. This study reported a proportion of patients with little or no satisfaction of 11.4%. Recruiting 80 patients will confirm this rate with an accuracy of +/- 7%.
The questionnaire will be given on the day of surgery and completed before surgery, immediately after surgery and before final discharge. Secondarily, the data will be supplemented during a postoperative control visit at 3 months of the intervention. The expected duration of the inclusions is 10 months with follow-up at 3 months
The aim is to promote local anesthesia for the management of congested patients, thus simplifying the overall management, reducing the cost and reducing the complications associated with general anesthesia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Quality of life questionnaire
Quality of life questionnaire
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient requiring conization on the CHU of Montpellier or Nîmes and having chosen a local anesthesia.
* Informed and not opposed to participate in this research
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
OTHER
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elsa MARIS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Montpellier
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Uhmontpellier
Montpellier, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RECHMPL17_0145
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id