Trial Outcomes & Findings for QP ExCELs: MultiPole Pacing (MPP) Sub-Study (NCT NCT03155724)
NCT ID: NCT03155724
Last Updated: 2021-03-08
Results Overview
Count of participants who are classified as "Improved", where responder classification is derived from a clinical composite score (CCS) based on changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, Heart Failure (HF) hospitalization, and cardiovascular death. Responder classification at 6 months (evaluated compared to MPP Enrollment Visit) : * "Improved" * No HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, AND * NYHA class is improved * "Unchanged" * No HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, AND * NYHA class is unchanged * "Worsened" * HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death has occurred, OR * NYHA class is worsened
COMPLETED
NA
53 participants
Enrollment to 6 Months
2021-03-08
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
MultiPole Pacing
Traditional biventricular pacing CRT non-responders at the 3 or 6 month QP ExCELs study follow-up.
MultiPole Pacing: CRT non-responders are programmed with MultiPole pacing ON.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
53
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
42
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
MultiPole Pacing
Traditional biventricular pacing CRT non-responders at the 3 or 6 month QP ExCELs study follow-up.
MultiPole Pacing: CRT non-responders are programmed with MultiPole pacing ON.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Study closure
|
7
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
MultiPole Pacing
n=53 Participants
Traditional biventricular pacing CRT non-responders at the 3 or 6 month QP ExCELs study follow-up.
MultiPole Pacing: CRT non-responders are programmed with MultiPole pacing ON.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
69.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.13 • n=53 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
42 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
|
Height
|
68.5 in
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.0 • n=53 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
212.7 Pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 52.69 • n=53 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment to 6 MonthsPopulation: Participants who have completed the MultiPole Pacing (MPP) Sub-study 6-Month follow-up visit or experienced a qualifying outcome event as of January 23, 2020.
Count of participants who are classified as "Improved", where responder classification is derived from a clinical composite score (CCS) based on changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, Heart Failure (HF) hospitalization, and cardiovascular death. Responder classification at 6 months (evaluated compared to MPP Enrollment Visit) : * "Improved" * No HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, AND * NYHA class is improved * "Unchanged" * No HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, AND * NYHA class is unchanged * "Worsened" * HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death has occurred, OR * NYHA class is worsened
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MultiPole Pacing
n=45 Participants
Traditional biventricular pacing CRT non-responders at the 3 or 6 month QP ExCELs study follow-up.
MultiPole Pacing: CRT non-responders are programmed with MultiPole pacing ON.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Responder Status With the MPP Feature
Improved
|
16 Participants
|
|
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Responder Status With the MPP Feature
Unchanged
|
23 Participants
|
|
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Responder Status With the MPP Feature
Worsened
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment to 6 MonthsPopulation: Evaluable participants for Secondary Endpoint 1 include all participants who have been enrolled into the MPP Sub-Study.
Evaluate adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve specifically related to the MPP feature. These adverse events include any software issues related to MPP programming or any adverse event that occurs while MPP is enabled and that may be attributed to the use of the MPP feature. Outcome was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MultiPole Pacing
n=53 Participants
Traditional biventricular pacing CRT non-responders at the 3 or 6 month QP ExCELs study follow-up.
MultiPole Pacing: CRT non-responders are programmed with MultiPole pacing ON.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Without MPP System Related Adverse Events Requiring Additional Invasive Intervention to Resolve at 6 Months.
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 93.28 to 100.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment to 6 MonthsPopulation: Participants who have completed the MPP Sub-Study 6-Month follow-up visit or experienced a qualifying outcome event as of January 23, 2020.
Evaluate a modified CCS, determining a responder classification based on changes in NYHA class, PGA, HF hospitalization, and cardiovascular death, where the PGA will ask participantss to assess how their overall status has changed since prior to receiving CRT therapy (markedly better, better, unchanged, worse, markedly worse). Modified responder classification (CCS + PGA) at 6 months (evaluated compared to MPP Enrollment Visit): * "Improved" * No HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, AND * Neither NYHA class is worsened or PGA is worsened ("worse" or "markedly worse"), AND * NYHA class is improved or PGA is improved ("better" or "markedly better") * "Unchanged" * No HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, AND * NYHA class is unchanged, AND * PGA is unchanged ("unchanged") * "Worsened" * HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death has occurred, OR * NYHA class is worsened or PGA is worsened ("worse" or "markedly worse")
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MultiPole Pacing
n=45 Participants
Traditional biventricular pacing CRT non-responders at the 3 or 6 month QP ExCELs study follow-up.
MultiPole Pacing: CRT non-responders are programmed with MultiPole pacing ON.
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Composite Score (CCS) + Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Responder Status Utilizing a Modified CCS That Incorporates the PGA
Improved
|
27 Participants
|
|
Clinical Composite Score (CCS) + Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Responder Status Utilizing a Modified CCS That Incorporates the PGA
Unchanged
|
11 Participants
|
|
Clinical Composite Score (CCS) + Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Responder Status Utilizing a Modified CCS That Incorporates the PGA
Worsened
|
7 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment to 6 MonthsPopulation: Participants who have completed the MPP Sub-Study 6-Month follow-up visit or experienced a qualifying outcome event as of January 23, 2020.
Evaluate a modified CCS with an expanded responder classification where "Improved" and "Unchanged" are considered responders. Responder classification at 6 months (evaluated compared to MPP Enrollment Visit) : * "Improved" * No HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, AND * NYHA class is improved * "Unchanged" * No HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, AND * NYHA class is unchanged * "Worsened" * HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death has occurred, OR * NYHA class is worsened
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MultiPole Pacing
n=45 Participants
Traditional biventricular pacing CRT non-responders at the 3 or 6 month QP ExCELs study follow-up.
MultiPole Pacing: CRT non-responders are programmed with MultiPole pacing ON.
|
|---|---|
|
CCS Responder Status Utilizing an Expanded Responder Classification
Responder
|
39 Participants
|
|
CCS Responder Status Utilizing an Expanded Responder Classification
Non-Responder
|
6 Participants
|
Adverse Events
MultiPole Pacing
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
MultiPole Pacing
n=53 participants at risk
Traditional biventricular pacing CRT non-responders at the 3 or 6 month QP ExCELs study follow-up.
MultiPole Pacing: CRT non-responders are programmed with MultiPole pacing ON.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Heart Failure Hospitalization
|
5.7%
3/53 • 6 months
Sites were required to report any cardiovascular hospitalizations and any other hospitalizations in which cardiovascular symptoms occur on or before the date of the MPP 6-Month follow-up. These hospitalizations were categorized as Heart Failure Hospitalization, Non-Heart Failure Hospitalization, or if applicable, Non-system related/non-protocol defined. Extracardiac stimulation was assessed/categorized however other specific adverse event terms were not assessed.
|
|
General disorders
Non-Heart failure Hospitalization
|
5.7%
3/53 • 6 months
Sites were required to report any cardiovascular hospitalizations and any other hospitalizations in which cardiovascular symptoms occur on or before the date of the MPP 6-Month follow-up. These hospitalizations were categorized as Heart Failure Hospitalization, Non-Heart Failure Hospitalization, or if applicable, Non-system related/non-protocol defined. Extracardiac stimulation was assessed/categorized however other specific adverse event terms were not assessed.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
MultiPole Pacing
n=53 participants at risk
Traditional biventricular pacing CRT non-responders at the 3 or 6 month QP ExCELs study follow-up.
MultiPole Pacing: CRT non-responders are programmed with MultiPole pacing ON.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Non-system related/ Non Protocol-defined
|
3.8%
2/53 • Number of events 2 • 6 months
Sites were required to report any cardiovascular hospitalizations and any other hospitalizations in which cardiovascular symptoms occur on or before the date of the MPP 6-Month follow-up. These hospitalizations were categorized as Heart Failure Hospitalization, Non-Heart Failure Hospitalization, or if applicable, Non-system related/non-protocol defined. Extracardiac stimulation was assessed/categorized however other specific adverse event terms were not assessed.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Extracardiac stimulation
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • 6 months
Sites were required to report any cardiovascular hospitalizations and any other hospitalizations in which cardiovascular symptoms occur on or before the date of the MPP 6-Month follow-up. These hospitalizations were categorized as Heart Failure Hospitalization, Non-Heart Failure Hospitalization, or if applicable, Non-system related/non-protocol defined. Extracardiac stimulation was assessed/categorized however other specific adverse event terms were not assessed.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place