Evaluation of a Simple Clinical Test to Detect the Risk of Falling in Patients With BPCO and Research for Predictive Factors of Fall Risk.

NCT ID: NCT03152344

Last Updated: 2019-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-02

Study Completion Date

2017-10-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The risk of falling in increased in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. To date, a screening test (the Berg Balance scale, BBS) is used to evaluate this risk but it spends 20 to 30 minutes to complete.

The aim of our study is to evaluate the sensitivity of a more straightforward test (Timed Up and Go, TUG)) to assess the fall risk. The TUG is routinely used in elderly to screen for frailty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We will recruit COPD patients in stable condition (free of exacerbation of the disease for a month), 40 without chronic respiratory failure and 40 with home oxygen therapy.

The patients will be proposed to perform the following tests and to fill in questionnaires:

\- Questionnaires: Elderly Falls Screening Test to quantify the falls in the last year, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale.

Tests:

* Berg Balance Scale measuring balance in 14 different functional tasks (abnormal cut-off value \<56)
* Timed Up and Go evaluating the time to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down (abnormal cut-off value \>12 seconds).
* 6 minute walk test evaluating endurance to submaximal exercise.
* Isokinetic maximal force of the quadriceps at 60°/s
* Balance control: posturography consisting in measuring variations when standing on a force platform.
* Body composition assessment through Dual Xray Absorptiometry (DXA), to measure body muscle mass and more specifically appendicular muscle mass index as a criteria of sarcopenia, and bone mineral density.
* Blood analysis: a blood sample will be withdrawn to measure calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, albumin transthyretin, cell count, C reactive protein.

Analysis of the results:

We will calculate the sensitivity of the TUG test (abnormal test) to detect fall risk as assessed by an abnormal BBS score.

Moreover, in fallers, we will search for predictive factors. More specifically, we will look for the role of a decreased quadriceps force, a reduced muscle mass, a poor tolerance of exercise, the presence of hypoxia (severity of the disease).

Perspectives:

When validated as a screening test for the risk of falling in COPD patients, the TUG test could be used routinely by physiotherapists as a more simple and faster test and will enable to prevent falls through initiation of a balance control training program.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COPD Diagnosed

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

COPD patients without chronic respiratory failure

We will recruit COPD patients in stable condition (free of exacerbation of the disease for a month), 40 without chronic respiratory failure and 40 with home oxygen therapy.

The patients will be proposed to perform the following tests and to fill in questionnaires

Timed Up and Go

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

It's a functional test evaluating the time to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down (abnormal cut-off value \>12 seconds).

COPD patients with home oxygen therapy

We will recruit COPD patients in stable condition (free of exacerbation of the disease for a month), 40 without chronic respiratory failure and 40 with home oxygen therapy.

The patients will be proposed to perform the following tests and to fill in questionnaires

Timed Up and Go

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

It's a functional test evaluating the time to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down (abnormal cut-off value \>12 seconds).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Timed Up and Go

It's a functional test evaluating the time to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down (abnormal cut-off value \>12 seconds).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* COPD confirmed by pulmonary function tests
* Long term oxygen therapy since at least 3 months in the LOT+ subgroup

Exclusion Criteria

* Exacerbation of COPD necessitating an hospitalization or an oral corticosteroid treatment, in the last 4 weeks
* Pulmonary rehabilitation in the last 3 months
* Any neurological disease affecting balance control.
* Inability to perform a walk test
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d'Auvergne

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-A01188-43

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CHU-332

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.