Trial Outcomes & Findings for Occurrence of Potential Bacterial and Viral Pathogens in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and During Acute Exacerbations of the Disease, in Asia Pacific (NCT NCT03151395)
NCT ID: NCT03151395
Last Updated: 2021-06-14
Results Overview
The proportion of sputum samples obtained at each visit (confirmed stable or AECOPD visits) and positive for specific bacterial pathogens by bacteriological methods (overall and by bacterial species). Numerator is the number of sputum samples positive for a given pathogen and denominator is the number of visits with a sputum sample tested for a given pathogen. Proportion is computed with 95% confidence intervals. A confirmed stable visit is defined as a scheduled study visit for which the investigator confirms that the subject is stable/ has recovered from a previous exacerbation. Bacterial pathogens include Haemophilus influenzae (Hi), Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi), non-Haemophilus influenzae (Non-Hi), Moraxella catarrhalis (M. catarrhalis), Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pseumoniae), Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii).
COMPLETED
NA
197 participants
Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)
2021-06-14
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Total Group
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
197
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
182
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
15
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Total Group
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
CONSENT WITHDRAWAL NOT DUE TO ADV. EVENT
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Subjects could not perform last visit before study completion date due to local COVID19 restrictions
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Unspecified reason
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Occurrence of Potential Bacterial and Viral Pathogens in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and During Acute Exacerbations of the Disease, in Asia Pacific
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Total Group
n=197 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
187 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
ASIAN - EAST ASIAN HERITAGE
|
126 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
ASIAN - SOUTH EAST ASIAN HERITAGE
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
The proportion of sputum samples obtained at each visit (confirmed stable or AECOPD visits) and positive for specific bacterial pathogens by bacteriological methods (overall and by bacterial species). Numerator is the number of sputum samples positive for a given pathogen and denominator is the number of visits with a sputum sample tested for a given pathogen. Proportion is computed with 95% confidence intervals. A confirmed stable visit is defined as a scheduled study visit for which the investigator confirms that the subject is stable/ has recovered from a previous exacerbation. Bacterial pathogens include Haemophilus influenzae (Hi), Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi), non-Haemophilus influenzae (Non-Hi), Moraxella catarrhalis (M. catarrhalis), Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pseumoniae), Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=196 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Any, Any stable visit
|
74.2 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 70.4 to 77.7
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Any, Any AECOPD visit
|
78 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 72.1 to 83.2
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Hi, Any stable visit
|
94.6 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 84.2 to 99.1
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Hi, Any AECOPD visit
|
94.1 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 76.6 to 99.7
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
NTHi, Any stable visit
|
94.6 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 84.2 to 99.1
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
NTHi, Any AECOPD visit
|
94.1 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 76.6 to 99.7
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Non-Hi, Any stable visit
|
5.4 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.9 to 15.8
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Non-Hi, Any AECOPD visit
|
5.9 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.3 to 23.4
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
M. catarrhalis, Any stable visit
|
0.9 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.3 to 1.9
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
M. catarrhalis, Any AECOPD visit
|
3.3 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 1.5 to 6.4
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
S. pneumoniae, Any stable visit
|
2.5 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 1.4 to 4.1
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
S. pneumoniae, Any AECOPD visit
|
2.4 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.9 to 5.1
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
S. aureus, Any stable visit
|
3.1 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 1.8 to 4.7
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
S. aureus, Any AECOPD visit
|
3.3 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 1.5 to 6.4
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
P. aeruginosa, Any stable visit
|
8.5 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 6.4 to 11.0
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
P. aeruginosa, Any AECOPD visit
|
14.4 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 10.0 to 19.5
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
K. pneumoniae, Any stable visit
|
26.4 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 22.8 to 30.1
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
K. pneumoniae, Any AECOPD visit
|
24.9 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 19.3 to 31.0
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
A. baumannii, Any stable visit
|
2.2 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 1.2 to 3.6
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
A. baumannii, Any AECOPD visit
|
4.3 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 2.1 to 7.6
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Other bacteria, Any stable visit
|
47.7 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 43.5 to 51.8
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, in Any Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Other bacteria, Any AECOPD visit
|
45 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 38.3 to 51.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
The proportion of sputum samples obtained at each visit (confirmed stable visits and AECOPD visits) and positive for specific viral pathogens by PCR (overall and by viral species). The numerator is the number of sputum samples positive for a given pathogen and the denominator is the number of visits with a sputum sample tested for a given pathogen. The proportion is calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Viral pathogens, as identified by PCR, include respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza virus, enterovirus, human rhinovirus (HRV), metapneumovirus, influenza virus, adenovirus, bocavirus and coronavirus.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=195 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Any, Any stable visit
|
15 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 12.2 to 18.2
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Any, Any AECOPD visit
|
35.6 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 29.1 to 42.5
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
RSV, Any stable visit
|
0.9 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.3 to 2.0
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
RSV, Any AECOPD visit
|
1 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.2 to 3.1
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Parainfluenza virus, Any stable visit
|
0.7 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.2 to 1.7
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Parainfluenza virus, Any AECOPD visit
|
4.7 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 2.3 to 8.2
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Enterovirus, Any stable visit
|
0.6 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.1 to 1.4
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Enterovirus, Any AECOPD visit
|
0 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.0 to 1.9
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
HRV, Any stable visit
|
8.1 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 6.0 to 10.6
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
HRV, Any AECOPD visit
|
16.6 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 11.8 to 22.3
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Metapneumovirus, Any stable visit
|
0 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.0 to 0.7
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Metapneumovirus, Any AECOPD visit
|
0 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.0 to 1.9
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Influenza virus, Any stable visit
|
0.7 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.2 to 1.7
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Influenza virus, Any AECOPD visit
|
8.2 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 4.9 to 12.7
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Adenovirus, Any stable visit
|
2 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 1.1 to 3.4
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Adenovirus, Any AECOPD visit
|
4.1 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 1.9 to 7.6
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Bocavirus, Any stable visit
|
0.2 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.0 to 0.8
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Bocavirus, Any AECOPD visit
|
0 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.0 to 1.9
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Coronavirus, Any stable visit
|
2.6 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 1.5 to 4.1
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens as Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs
Coronavirus, Any AECOPD visit
|
5.7 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 3.0 to 9.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
The proportion of sputum samples obtained at each confirmed stable/AECOPD visit and positive for specific bacterial pathogens as measured by real-time qualitative PCR/quantitative PCR, (overall and by bacterial species,) are computed with 95% confidence intervals. The numerator is the number of sputum samples positive for a given pathogen and the denominator is the number of visits with a sputum sample tested for a given pathogen. The bacterial pathogens include H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and S. pyogenes. A confirmed stable visit is defined as a scheduled study visit for which the investigator confirms that the subject is stable / has recovered from a previous exacerbation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=195 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
Any, Any stable visit
|
67 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 63.0 to 70.9
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
Any, Any AECOPD visit
|
74.7 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 68.3 to 80.5
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
H. influenzae, Any stable visit
|
42.9 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 38.7 to 47.0
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
H. influenzae, Any AECOPD visit
|
39.7 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 33.0 to 46.7
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
M. catarrhalis, Any stable visit
|
13.7 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 11.0 to 16.8
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
M. catarrhalis, Any AECOPD visit
|
26.8 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 20.9 to 33.3
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
S. pneumoniae, Any stable visit
|
16.8 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 13.9 to 20.1
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
S. pneumoniae, Any AECOPD visit
|
19.1 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 14.0 to 25.0
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
S. aureus, Any stable visit
|
10.6 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 8.2 to 13.4
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
S. aureus, Any AECOPD visit
|
9.3 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 5.7 to 13.9
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
P. aeruginosa, Any stable visit
|
16.3 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 13.4 to 19.6
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
P. aeruginosa, Any AECOPD visit
|
16.5 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 11.7 to 22.1
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
S. pyogenes, Any stable visit
|
0.4 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.1 to 1.1
|
|
Percentage of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens in Stable COPD Patients and During AECOPDs, as Identified by PCR
S. pyogenes, Any AECOPD visit
|
1 Percentage of sputum samples
Interval 0.2 to 3.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the sputum samples taken from Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Concordance between bacteriological methods (culture) and PCR sputum results are described for all the combinations of bacterial presence by both measures. Each category name includes the following parameters: Bacteria species-Culture (yes/no)- PCR (yes/no). Concordance is expressed as the number of sputum samples in a given category among the total number of sputum samples assessed for the presence of bacterial pathogens by both culture and PCR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=740 Sputum samples
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
H. influenzae, Culture No, PCR No
|
425 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
H. influenzae, Culture No, PCR Yes
|
260 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
H. influenzae, Culture Yes, PCR No
|
4 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
H. influenzae, Culture Yes, PCR Yes
|
51 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
M. catarrhalis, Culture No, PCR No
|
613 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
M. catarrhalis, Culture No, PCR Yes
|
115 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
M. catarrhalis, Culture Yes, PCR No
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
M. catarrhalis, Culture Yes, PCR Yes
|
12 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
S. pneumoniae, Culture No, PCR No
|
610 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
S. pneumoniae, Culture No, PCR Yes
|
111 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
S. pneumoniae, Culture Yes, PCR No
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
S. pneumoniae, Culture Yes, PCR Yes
|
18 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
S. aureus, Culture No, PCR No
|
655 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
S. aureus, Culture No, PCR Yes
|
62 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
S. aureus, Culture Yes, PCR No
|
9 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
S. aureus, Culture Yes, PCR Yes
|
14 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
P. aeruginosa, Culture No, PCR No
|
599 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
P. aeruginosa, Culture No, PCR Yes
|
67 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
P. aeruginosa, Culture Yes, PCR No
|
20 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples in a Given Category Relative to All Combinations for Each Bacterial Pathogen, When Identified by Bacteriological Methods or PCR, at Any Visit
P. aeruginosa, Culture Yes, PCR Yes
|
54 Sputum samples
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the sputum samples taken from Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Number of sputum samples obtained at each confirmed stable visit, and positive for bacterial pathogens by bacteriological methods (overall and by bacterial species). The spirometric classification of airflow limitation in COPD patients is based on post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and can be divided into four GOLD grades \[GOLD, 2013\]: GOLD 1 (MILD): FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted; GOLD 2 (Moderate)= 50% ≤ FEV1 \< 80% predicted; GOLD 3 (Severe) = 30% ≤ FEV1 \< 50% predicted; GOLD 4 (Very Severe) = FEV1 \< 30% predicted.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=280 Sputum samples
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Any, GOLD 2
|
150 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Any, GOLD 3
|
217 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Any, GOLD 4
|
44 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Hi, GOLD 2
|
12 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Hi, GOLD 3
|
20 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Hi, GOLD 4
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
NTHi, GOLD 2
|
12 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
NTHi, GOLD 3
|
20 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
NTHi, GOLD 4
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Non-Hi, GOLD 2
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Non-Hi, GOLD 3
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Non-Hi, GOLD 4
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
S. pneumoniae, GOLD 2
|
4 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
M. catarrhalis, GOLD 2
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
M. catarrhalis, GOLD 3
|
5 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
M. catarrhalis, GOLD 4
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
S. pneumoniae, GOLD 3
|
10 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
S. pneumoniae, GOLD 4
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
S. aureus, GOLD 2
|
7 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
S. aureus, GOLD 3
|
6 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
S. aureus, GOLD 4
|
4 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
P. aeruginosa, GOLD 2
|
14 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
P. aeruginosa, GOLD 3
|
24 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
P. aeruginosa, GOLD 4
|
9 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
K. pneumoniae, GOLD 2
|
70 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
K. pneumoniae, GOLD 3
|
60 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
K. pneumoniae, GOLD 4
|
16 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
A. baumannii, GOLD 2
|
2 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
A. baumannii, GOLD 3
|
9 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
A. baumannii, GOLD 4
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Other bacteria, GOLD 2
|
87 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Other bacteria, GOLD 3
|
149 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods, and Classified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Grade
Other bacteria, GOLD 4
|
28 Sputum samples
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the sputum samples taken from Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Number of sputum samples obtained at each confirmed stable visit, and positive for bacterial pathogens by PCR (overall and by bacterial species). The spirometric classification of airflow limitation in COPD patients is based on post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and can be divided into four GOLD grades \[GOLD, 2013\]: GOLD 1 (MILD): FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted; GOLD 2 (Moderate)= 50% ≤ FEV1 \< 80% predicted; GOLD 3 (Severe) = 30% ≤ FEV1 \< 50% predicted; GOLD 4 (Very Severe) = FEV1 \< 30% predicted.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=277 Sputum samples
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Any, GOLD 2
|
146 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Any, GOLD 3
|
184 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Any, GOLD 4
|
36 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
H. influenzae, GOLD 2
|
95 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
H. influenzae, GOLD 3
|
120 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
H. influenzae, GOLD 4
|
19 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
M. catarrhalis, GOLD 2
|
30 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
M. catarrhalis, GOLD 3
|
42 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
M. catarrhalis, GOLD 4
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
S. pneumoniae, GOLD 2
|
39 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
S. pneumoniae, GOLD 3
|
47 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
S. pneumoniae, GOLD 4
|
6 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
S. aureus, GOLD 2
|
33 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
S. aureus, GOLD 3
|
20 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
S. aureus, GOLD 4
|
5 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
P. aeruginosa, GOLD 2
|
33 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
P. aeruginosa, GOLD 3
|
44 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
P. aeruginosa, GOLD 4
|
12 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
S. pyogenes, GOLD 2
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
S. pyogenes, GOLD 3
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
S. pyogenes, GOLD 4
|
0 Sputum samples
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the sputum samples taken from Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Number of sputum samples obtained at each confirmed stable visit, and positive for virus pathogens by PCR (overall and by viral species). The spirometric classification of airflow limitation in COPD patients is based on post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and can be divided into four GOLD grades \[GOLD, 2013\]: GOLD 1 (MILD): FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted; GOLD 2 (Moderate)= 50% ≤ FEV1 \< 80% predicted; GOLD 3 (Severe) = 30% ≤ FEV1 \< 50% predicted; GOLD 4 (Very Severe) = FEV1 \< 30% predicted.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=277 Sputum samples
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Any, GOLD 2
|
25 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Any, GOLD 3
|
52 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Any, GOLD 4
|
5 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
RSV, GOLD 2
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
RSV, GOLD 3
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
RSV, GOLD 4
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Parainfluenza virus, GOLD 2
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Parainfluenza virus, GOLD 3
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Parainfluenza virus, GOLD 4
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Enterovirus, GOLD 2
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Enterovirus, GOLD 3
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Enterovirus, GOLD 4
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
HRV, GOLD 2
|
14 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
HRV, GOLD 3
|
27 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
HRV, GOLD 4
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Metapneumovirus, GOLD 2
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Metapneumovirus, GOLD 3
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Metapneumovirus, GOLD 4
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Influenza virus, GOLD 2
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Influenza virus, GOLD 3
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Influenza virus, GOLD 4
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Adenovirus, GOLD 2
|
6 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Adenovirus, GOLD 3
|
5 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Adenovirus, GOLD 4
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Bocavirus, GOLD 2
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Bocavirus, GOLD 3
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Bocavirus, GOLD 4
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Coronavirus, GOLD 2
|
2 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Coronavirus, GOLD 3
|
11 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in Stable COPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by GOLD Grade
Coronavirus, GOLD 4
|
1 Sputum samples
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the sputum samples taken from Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Number of sputum samples obtained at each AECOPD visit, and positive for bacterial pathogens by bacteriological methods (overall and by bacterial species). Classification of severity of AECOPD as follows: Mild = controlled with an increase in dosage of regular medications; Moderate = requires treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics; Severe = requires hospitalization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=209 Sputum samples
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
M. catarrhalis, Moderate AECOPD
|
6 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Any, Mild AECOPD
|
9 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Any, Moderate AECOPD
|
138 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Any, Severe AECOPD
|
16 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Hi, Mild AECOPD
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Hi, Moderate AECOPD
|
11 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Hi, Severe AECOPD
|
2 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
NTHi, Mild AECOPD
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
NTHi, Moderate AECOPD
|
11 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
NTHi, Severe AECOPD
|
2 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Non-Hi, Mild AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Non-Hi, Moderate AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Non-Hi, Severe AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
M. catarrhalis, Mild AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
M. catarrhalis, Severe AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. pneumoniae, Mild AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. pneumoniae, Moderate AECOPD
|
5 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. pneumoniae, Severe AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. aureus, Mild AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. aureus, Moderate AECOPD
|
5 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. aureus, Severe AECOPD
|
2 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
P. aeruginosa, Mild AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
P. aeruginosa, Moderate AECOPD
|
26 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
P. aeruginosa, Severe AECOPD
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
K. pneumoniae, Mild AECOPD
|
4 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
K. pneumoniae, Moderate AECOPD
|
43 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
K. pneumoniae, Severe AECOPD
|
5 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
A. baumannii, Mild AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
A. baumannii, Moderate AECOPD
|
8 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
A. baumannii, Severe AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Other bacteria, Mild AECOPD
|
4 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Other bacteria, Moderate AECOPD
|
84 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by Bacteriological Methods and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Other bacteria, Severe AECOPD
|
6 Sputum samples
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the sputum samples taken from Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Number of sputum samples obtained at each AECOPD visit, and positive for bacterial pathogens by PCR (overall and by bacterial species). Classification of severity of AECOPD is as follows: Mild = controlled with an increase in dosage of regular medications; Moderate = requires treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics; Severe = requires hospitalization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=194 Sputum samples
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. pyogenes, Mild AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Any, Mild AECOPD
|
13 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Any, Moderate AECOPD
|
117 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Any, Severe AECOPD
|
15 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
H. influenzae, Mild AECOPD
|
10 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
H. influenzae, Moderate AECOPD
|
62 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
H. influenzae, Severe AECOPD
|
5 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
M. catarrhalis, Mild AECOPD
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
M. catarrhalis, Moderate AECOPD
|
44 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
M. catarrhalis, Severe AECOPD
|
5 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. pneumoniae, Mild AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. pneumoniae, Moderate AECOPD
|
32 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. pneumoniae, Severe AECOPD
|
4 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. aureus, Mild AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. aureus, Moderate AECOPD
|
15 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. aureus, Severe AECOPD
|
2 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
P. aeruginosa, Mild AECOPD
|
2 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
P. aeruginosa, Moderate AECOPD
|
24 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
P. aeruginosa, Severe AECOPD
|
6 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. pyogenes, Moderate AECOPD
|
2 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Bacterial Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
S. pyogenes, Severe AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the sputum samples taken from Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Number of sputum samples obtained at each AECOPD visit, and positive for viral pathogens by PCR (overall and by viral species). Classification of severity of AECOPD is as follows: Mild = controlled with an increase in dosage of regular medications; Moderate = requires treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics; Severe = requires hospitalization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=194 Sputum samples
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Enterovirus, Mild AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Enterovirus, Moderate AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Enterovirus, Severe AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
HRV, Mild AECOPD
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
HRV, Moderate AECOPD
|
26 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Any, Mild AECOPD
|
6 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Any, Moderate AECOPD
|
56 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Any, Severe AECOPD
|
7 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
RSV, Mild AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
RSV, Moderate AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
RSV, Severe AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Parainfluenza virus, Mild AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Parainfluenza virus, Moderate AECOPD
|
6 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Parainfluenza virus, Severe AECOPD
|
2 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
HRV, Severe AECOPD
|
3 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Metapneumovirus, Mild AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Metapneumovirus, Moderate AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Metapneumovirus, Severe AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Influenza virus, Mild AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Influenza virus, Moderate AECOPD
|
14 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Influenza virus, Severe AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Adenovirus, Mild AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Adenovirus, Moderate AECOPD
|
7 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Adenovirus, Severe AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Bocavirus, Mild AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Bocavirus, Moderate AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Bocavirus, Severe AECOPD
|
0 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Coronavirus, Mild AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Coronavirus, Moderate AECOPD
|
9 Sputum samples
|
|
Number of Sputum Samples Positive for Viral Pathogens (Overall and by Species) in AECOPD Patients, as Identified by PCR, and Classified by Severity of AECOPD
Coronavirus, Severe AECOPD
|
1 Sputum samples
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Incidence rate is estimated by the mean number of exacerbations per subject and per year from Negative Binomial model (or Poisson model in case of under dispersion) without covariates and computed with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confirmed AECOPDs include AECOPD events plus missed AECOPD events (i.e.: all morning alerts confirmed by phone call (as well as cases with no morning alert) for which there has been no site visit but for which AECOPD medical records are available). Potential AECOPDs include all morning alert confirmed by phone call for which there has been no site visit and for which no medical records are available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=197 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Incidence Rate (Per Subject Per Year) of Confirmed and Confirmed Plus Potential AECOPDs, Overall and by GOLD Grade
Total, Confirmed AECOPDs
|
1.27 AECOPDs per person-year
Interval 1.04 to 1.54
|
|
Incidence Rate (Per Subject Per Year) of Confirmed and Confirmed Plus Potential AECOPDs, Overall and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 2, Confirmed AECOPDs
|
0.78 AECOPDs per person-year
Interval 0.54 to 1.14
|
|
Incidence Rate (Per Subject Per Year) of Confirmed and Confirmed Plus Potential AECOPDs, Overall and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 3, Confirmed AECOPDs
|
1.51 AECOPDs per person-year
Interval 1.17 to 1.94
|
|
Incidence Rate (Per Subject Per Year) of Confirmed and Confirmed Plus Potential AECOPDs, Overall and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 4, Confirmed AECOPDs
|
1.99 AECOPDs per person-year
Interval 1.37 to 2.89
|
|
Incidence Rate (Per Subject Per Year) of Confirmed and Confirmed Plus Potential AECOPDs, Overall and by GOLD Grade
Total, Confirmed AECOPDs plus potential AECOPDs
|
1.3 AECOPDs per person-year
Interval 1.07 to 1.58
|
|
Incidence Rate (Per Subject Per Year) of Confirmed and Confirmed Plus Potential AECOPDs, Overall and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 2, Confirmed AECOPDs plus potential AECOPDs
|
0.81 AECOPDs per person-year
Interval 0.56 to 1.16
|
|
Incidence Rate (Per Subject Per Year) of Confirmed and Confirmed Plus Potential AECOPDs, Overall and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 3, Confirmed AECOPDs plus potential AECOPDs
|
1.56 AECOPDs per person-year
Interval 1.2 to 2.01
|
|
Incidence Rate (Per Subject Per Year) of Confirmed and Confirmed Plus Potential AECOPDs, Overall and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 4, Confirmed AECOPDs plus potential AECOPDs
|
1.99 AECOPDs per person-year
Interval 1.37 to 2.89
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Classification of severity of AECOPD is as follows: Mild- Controlled AECOPD with an increase in dosage of regular medications; Moderate- Requires treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/ or antibiotics; Severe- Requires hospitalisation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=197 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Mild AECOPD, 0
|
181 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Moderate AECOPD, 0
|
115 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Severe AECOPD, 0
|
168 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Mild AECOPD, 1
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Moderate AECOPD, 1
|
38 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Severe AECOPD, 1
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Mild AECOPD, 2
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Moderate AECOPD, 2
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Severe AECOPD, 2
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Mild AECOPD, 3
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Moderate AECOPD, 3
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Severe AECOPD, 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Mild AECOPD, 4
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Moderate AECOPD, 4
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Severe AECOPD, 4
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Mild AECOPD, >4
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Moderate AECOPD, >4
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by Severity of AECOPD
Severe AECOPD, >4
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
The spirometric classification of airflow limitation in COPD patients is based on post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and can be divided into four GOLD grades \[GOLD, 2013\]: GOLD 1 (MILD): FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted; GOLD 2 (Moderate)= 50% ≤ FEV1 \< 80% predicted; GOLD 3 (Severe) = 30% ≤ FEV1 \< 50% predicted; GOLD 4 (Very Severe) = FEV1 \< 30% predicted.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=99 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 2, 0
|
48 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 2, 1
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 2, 2
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 2, 3
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 2, 4
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 2, >4
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 3, 0
|
42 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 3, 1
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 3, 2
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 3, 3
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 3, 4
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 3, >4
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 4, 0
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 4, 1
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 4, 2
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 4, 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 4, 4
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With AECOPDs, Classified by Number of Exacerbations and by GOLD Grade
GOLD 4, >4
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) on the number of days of AECOPD episodes are presented, overall and by AECOPD severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=227 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Days of AECOPD Episodes, Overall and by AECOPD Severity
Any Severity
|
14.3 Days
Standard Deviation 9.0
|
|
Number of Days of AECOPD Episodes, Overall and by AECOPD Severity
Mild
|
20.3 Days
Standard Deviation 11.1
|
|
Number of Days of AECOPD Episodes, Overall and by AECOPD Severity
Moderate
|
12.6 Days
Standard Deviation 6.3
|
|
Number of Days of AECOPD Episodes, Overall and by AECOPD Severity
Severe
|
21.5 Days
Standard Deviation 16.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Month 0, Month 6 and Month 12Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
The CAT is a patient-completed instrument to assess the heath-related quality of life (HRQOL) and symptom burden in patients with COPD. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) on the CAT scores are tabulated at each stable visit. The CAT index is derived as the sum of the ratings recorded for each of the eight individual items. Each of these items has 6 possible scores (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5), leading to a range of 0 (best score) to 40 (worst score) for CAT score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=197 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score in Stable COPD Patients
Month 0
|
11.78 Units on the CAT scale
Standard Deviation 5.56
|
|
COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score in Stable COPD Patients
Month 6
|
12.56 Units on the CAT scale
Standard Deviation 6.08
|
|
COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score in Stable COPD Patients
Month 12
|
13.71 Units on the CAT scale
Standard Deviation 6.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start: (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
The CAT is a patient-completed instrument to assess the HRQOL and symptom burden in patients with COPD. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) on the CAT scores are tabulated by frequency of exacerbations). The CAT index is derived as the sum of the ratings recorded for each of the eight individual items. Each of these items has 6 possible scores (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5), leading to a range of 0 (best score) to 40 (worst score) for CAT score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=41 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
CAT Score by Frequency of Exacerbations
1 exacerbation
|
2.05 Units on the CAT scale
Standard Deviation 5.62
|
|
CAT Score by Frequency of Exacerbations
2 or 3 exacerbations
|
3.08 Units on the CAT scale
Standard Deviation 5.01
|
|
CAT Score by Frequency of Exacerbations
>3 exacerbations
|
3.79 Units on the CAT scale
Standard Deviation 4.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Month 0, Month 6 and Month 12Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
The SGRQ-C is designed to assess HRQOL and current health of the patients. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) on the SGRQ-C scores are tabulated at each stable visit. The SGRQ-C total score is derived as the weighted sum of the forty individual items leading to a range of 0 (best score) to 100 (worst score) as detailed in the reference manual \[St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD patients, version 1.3, 2016\].
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=197 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD Patients (SGRQ-C) Score in Stable COPD Patients
Month 0
|
35.22 Units on the SGRQ-C scale
Standard Deviation 17.21
|
|
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD Patients (SGRQ-C) Score in Stable COPD Patients
Month 6
|
34.38 Units on the SGRQ-C scale
Standard Deviation 16.52
|
|
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD Patients (SGRQ-C) Score in Stable COPD Patients
Month 12
|
35.1 Units on the SGRQ-C scale
Standard Deviation 17.86
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Pre-Month 0 (screening visit) and Month 12.Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Summary statistics (mean, standard deviation) on post bronchodilator FEV1% of predicted normal value is tabulated at enrolment and final visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=197 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Post-bronchodilator FEV1 Percentage of Predicted Normal Value in Stable COPD Patients
Pre-Month 0
|
47.83 Percentage of FEV1
Standard Deviation 13.94
|
|
Post-bronchodilator FEV1 Percentage of Predicted Normal Value in Stable COPD Patients
Month 12
|
46.93 Percentage of FEV1
Standard Deviation 14.93
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Healthcare utilization includes all unscheduled visits to a physician office, visits to urgent care, visits to emergency department, and hospitalizations. The impact of AECOPD on healthcare utilization is assessed during the stable periods. Hospitalizations that were associated with the disease being studied were not collected as Adverse Events (AEs) or as serious AEs (SAEs) as per protocol.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=197 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Healthcare Utilisation During Stable Periods
Physician's office consultations
|
135 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Healthcare Utilisation During Stable Periods
Urgent care
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Healthcare Utilisation During Stable Periods
Emergency department
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Healthcare Utilisation During Stable Periods
Hospitalization
|
26 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Over the course of one year from the study start (Month 0 to Month 12)Population: Analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set which included all screened subjects who were enrolled except for those subjects who discontinued the study at Month 0 visit.
Healthcare utilization includes all unscheduled visits to a physician office, visits to urgent care, visits to emergency department, and hospitalizations. The impact of AECOPD on healthcare utilization is assessed during exacerbation periods. Hospitalizations that were associated with the disease being studied were not collected as AEs or as SAEs as per protocol.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total Group
n=104 Participants
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Healthcare Utilisation During Exacerbation Periods
Physician's office consultations
|
48 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Healthcare Utilisation During Exacerbation Periods
Urgent care
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Healthcare Utilisation During Exacerbation Periods
Emergency department
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Healthcare Utilisation During Exacerbation Periods
Hospitalization
|
20 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Total Group
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Total Group
n=197 participants at risk
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia necrotizing
|
0.51%
1/197 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events and serious adverse events (SAE) related to study procedures have been collected during the whole study period (from Month 0 to Month 12.
In the Participant flow section, there are 2 participants reported with "adverse event" reason for not completed: 1 was for SAE described in the Serious Adverse Events section below, and the other one was for a SAE not related to study procedure, and hence, no information (System Organ Class \& Preferred Term) was collected, as per protocol, for this SAE. Hospitalizations that were associated with the disease being studied were not collected as AEs or as SAEs as per protocol.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Total Group
n=197 participants at risk
Moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients with at least 1 documented moderate or severe Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) in the year before enrolment and for whom sputum and blood samples are collected during specified visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.51%
1/197 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events and serious adverse events (SAE) related to study procedures have been collected during the whole study period (from Month 0 to Month 12.
In the Participant flow section, there are 2 participants reported with "adverse event" reason for not completed: 1 was for SAE described in the Serious Adverse Events section below, and the other one was for a SAE not related to study procedure, and hence, no information (System Organ Class \& Preferred Term) was collected, as per protocol, for this SAE. Hospitalizations that were associated with the disease being studied were not collected as AEs or as SAEs as per protocol.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER