SGLT-2 Inhibitor and Myocardial Perfusion, Function and Metabolism in T2 DM Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk
NCT ID: NCT03151343
Last Updated: 2022-08-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
92 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-03-29
2020-05-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The sodium glucose cotransport-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors were developed as an anti-diabetic therapy reducing blood glucose and weight by decreasing glucose reabsorption in the kidneys, leading to glucose excretion via the urine. However, in 2015 the EMPA-REG study showed that treatment with the SGLT-2 inhibitor empagliflozin significantly reduced the cardiovascular mortality and risk of admission under the diagnosis of heart failure in a population of patients with type 2 diabetes in addition to other risk factors for heart disease. The mechanism behind this surprising result is unknown and warrants further study.
The primary hypothesis of the present study is that treatment with empagliflozin improves the function and blood supply of the heart muscle cells in patients with type 2 diabetes and high risk of heart disease. The investigators will test this hypothesis by enrolling 92 participants with type 2 diabetes and other risk factors for heart disease, and treating them with either empagliflozin or a placebo. During the study period the investigators will monitor the effects of the treatment with various techniques such as heart scans using CT and ultrasound, measurements of the fluid pressures in the heart chambers, body composition measurements and a variety of relevant blood test.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cardiovascular Effects of Empagliflozine
NCT02918591
Cardiovascular Outcomes in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
NCT03249506
Effect of Empagliflozin on Left Atrial Function in Adults at Risk for Heart Failure
NCT06507657
Comparison of the Effects of Dapagliflozin and Gemigliptin on Ketone Metabolism and Cardiac Remodeling in Type 2 Diabetes
NCT05194592
Empagliflozin as a Modulator of Systemic Vascular Resistance and Cardiac Output in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT03132181
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Empagliflozin
Empagliflozin, coated tablets, 25mg, once daily, for 13 weeks
Empagliflozin
Empagliflozin tablet
Placebo
Placebo, coated tablets, once daily, for 13 weeks
Placebo Oral Tablet
Sugar pill, visually identical to active comparator
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Empagliflozin
Empagliflozin tablet
Placebo Oral Tablet
Sugar pill, visually identical to active comparator
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* For patients on background therapy: stable dose of anti-diabetics within 30 days prior to baseline
* HbA1c of ≥6.5% and ≤10% at screening for patients on background therapy or HbA1c of ≥6.5 % and ≤ 9.0% at screening for drug-naïve patients.
* BMI ≤ 45 kg/m2 at screening
* Age ≥18 years
* Negative pregnancy test (fertile women). Fertile women must use safe contraceptives (spiral, hormonal contraceptives) for the duration of the study
* Able to understand the written patient information and to give informed consent
* Patients must have high cardiovascular risk, defined as at least one of the following:
* Albuminuria ( albumin/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/g or plasma NT-proBNP ≥ 70 pg/ml)
* Confirmed history of myocardial infarction (\>2 months prior to baseline)
* Heart failure according to the Framingham Heart Failure Criteria
* Or patient discharged from hospital with a documented diagnosis of unstable angina within 12 months prior to baseline
* Evidence of coronary artery disease by CAG in 1 or more major coronary arteries
OR at least one of the following: a positive noninvasive stress test, or A positive stress echocardiography showing regional systolic wall motion abnormalities, or A positive scintigraphic test showing stress-induced ischemia,
* History of ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke (\>2 months prior to informed consent)
* Presence of peripheral artery disease (symptomatic or not ) documented by either: previous limb angioplasty, stenting or bypass surgery; or previous limb or foot amputation due to circulatory insufficiency; or angiographic evidence of significant (\> 50%) peripheral artery stenosis in at least one limb; or evidence from a non-invasive measurement of significant (\>50% or as reported as hemodynamically significant) peripheral artery stenosis in at least one limb; or ankle brachial index of \< 0.9
Exclusion Criteria
* Treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitor within 3 months prior to baseline
* Impaired kidney function, eGFR ≤ 30 ml/min
* Severe liver insufficiency (Child-Pugh class C)
* ECG showing malign ventricular arrhythmia or prolonged QT-interval (\>500ms)
* Untreated clinical significant heart valve disease
* Planned cardiac surgery or angioplasty within 3 months.
* Myocardial infarction (MI) ≤ 30 days prior to baseline
* Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ≤ 4 weeks prior to baseline
* History of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) ≤ 8 weeks prior to enrollment
* Prior history of heart transplantation
* Unstable angina, known severe left main coronary artery stenosis, severe heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmias, symptomatic hypotension or severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure \< 90 or \> 180 mmHg, respectively), sick sinus syndrome or \> 1st degree atrioventricular block in the absence of a functioning pacemaker
* Requirement of emergent cardiac medical intervention or catheterization
* Treatment with theophylline, or theophylline containing medications
* History of known or suspected bronchoconstrictive or bronchospastic lung disease (e.g., asthma)
* Pregnancy or desire hereof or breastfeeding.
* LVEF ≤ 40 % evaluated at baseline echocardiography
* Inability to perform a VO2 max test
* Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
* Left ventricular assist device
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Danish Heart Foundation
OTHER
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
OTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Caroline M Kistorp
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Caroline M Kistorp
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Caroline M Kistorp, MD, PhD.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Herlev og Gentofte Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Herlev og Gentofte Hospital
Herlev, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gallo LA, Wright EM, Vallon V. Probing SGLT2 as a therapeutic target for diabetes: basic physiology and consequences. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2015 Mar;12(2):78-89. doi: 10.1177/1479164114561992. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, Mattheus M, Devins T, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Inzucchi SE; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
Lin B, Koibuchi N, Hasegawa Y, Sueta D, Toyama K, Uekawa K, Ma M, Nakagawa T, Kusaka H, Kim-Mitsuyama S. Glycemic control with empagliflozin, a novel selective SGLT2 inhibitor, ameliorates cardiovascular injury and cognitive dysfunction in obese and type 2 diabetic mice. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Oct 26;13:148. doi: 10.1186/s12933-014-0148-1.
deKemp RA, Yoshinaga K, Beanlands RS. Will 3-dimensional PET-CT enable the routine quantification of myocardial blood flow? J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):380-97. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.04.006.
Naya M, Murthy VL, Foster CR, Gaber M, Klein J, Hainer J, Dorbala S, Blankstein R, Di Carli MF. Prognostic interplay of coronary artery calcification and underlying vascular dysfunction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 May 21;61(20):2098-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.029. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
Dorbala S, Di Carli MF, Beanlands RS, Merhige ME, Williams BA, Veledar E, Chow BJ, Min JK, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Shaw LJ. Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography: results from a multicenter observational registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 15;61(2):176-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.043. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
Sattar N, McLaren J, Kristensen SL, Preiss D, McMurray JJ. SGLT2 Inhibition and cardiovascular events: why did EMPA-REG Outcomes surprise and what were the likely mechanisms? Diabetologia. 2016 Jul;59(7):1333-1339. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3956-x. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
Hasenfuss G, Hayward C, Burkhoff D, Silvestry FE, McKenzie S, Gustafsson F, Malek F, Van der Heyden J, Lang I, Petrie MC, Cleland JG, Leon M, Kaye DM; REDUCE LAP-HF study investigators. A transcatheter intracardiac shunt device for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (REDUCE LAP-HF): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2016 Mar 26;387(10025):1298-304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00704-2.
Ersboll M, Valeur N, Mogensen UM, Andersen M, Greibe R, Moller JE, Hassager C, Sogaard P, Kober L. Global left ventricular longitudinal strain is closely associated with increased neurohormonal activation after acute myocardial infarction in patients with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction: a two-dimensional speckle tracking study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Oct;14(10):1121-9. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs107. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
Jhund PS, Anand IS, Komajda M, Claggett BL, McKelvie RS, Zile MR, Carson PE, McMurray JJ. Changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an analysis of the I-Preserve study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Aug;17(8):809-17. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.274. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
Sharma S, Adrogue JV, Golfman L, Uray I, Lemm J, Youker K, Noon GP, Frazier OH, Taegtmeyer H. Intramyocardial lipid accumulation in the failing human heart resembles the lipotoxic rat heart. FASEB J. 2004 Nov;18(14):1692-700. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2263com.
Ferrannini E, Muscelli E, Frascerra S, Baldi S, Mari A, Heise T, Broedl UC, Woerle HJ. Metabolic response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Invest. 2014 Feb;124(2):499-508. doi: 10.1172/JCI72227. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
Ferrannini E, Baldi S, Frascerra S, Astiarraga B, Heise T, Bizzotto R, Mari A, Pieber TR, Muscelli E. Shift to Fatty Substrate Utilization in Response to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibition in Subjects Without Diabetes and Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2016 May;65(5):1190-5. doi: 10.2337/db15-1356. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
Mudaliar S, Alloju S, Henry RR. Can a Shift in Fuel Energetics Explain the Beneficial Cardiorenal Outcomes in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Study? A Unifying Hypothesis. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jul;39(7):1115-22. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0542.
Ferrannini E, Mark M, Mayoux E. CV Protection in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial: A "Thrifty Substrate" Hypothesis. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jul;39(7):1108-14. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0330.
Aubert CE, Michel PL, Gillery P, Jaisson S, Fonfrede M, Morel F, Hartemann A, Bourron O. Association of peripheral neuropathy with circulating advanced glycation end products, soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and other risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014 Nov;30(8):679-85. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2529.
Willemsen S, Hartog JW, van Veldhuisen DJ, van der Meer P, Roze JF, Jaarsma T, Schalkwijk C, van der Horst IC, Hillege HL, Voors AA. The role of advanced glycation end-products and their receptor on outcome in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. Am Heart J. 2012 Nov;164(5):742-749.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.027.
Hartog JW, Voors AA, Bakker SJ, Smit AJ, van Veldhuisen DJ. Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and heart failure: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007 Dec;9(12):1146-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2007.09.009.
Oelze M, Kroller-Schon S, Welschof P, Jansen T, Hausding M, Mikhed Y, Stamm P, Mader M, Zinssius E, Agdauletova S, Gottschlich A, Steven S, Schulz E, Bottari SP, Mayoux E, Munzel T, Daiber A. The sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin improves diabetes-induced vascular dysfunction in the streptozotocin diabetes rat model by interfering with oxidative stress and glucotoxicity. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e112394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112394. eCollection 2014.
Jorgensen RM, Levitan J, Halevi Z, Puzanov N, Abildstrom SZ, Messier MD, Huikuri HV, Haarbo J, Thomsen PE, Jons C; CARISMA investigators. Heart rate variability density analysis (Dyx) for identification of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Europace. 2015 Dec;17(12):1848-54. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu394. Epub 2015 Mar 8.
Ruwald AC, Bloch Thomsen PE, Gang U, Jorgensen RM, Huikuri HV, Jons C. New-onset atrial fibrillation predicts malignant arrhythmias in post-myocardial infarction patients--a Cardiac Arrhythmias and RIsk Stratification after acute Myocardial infarction (CARISMA) substudy. Am Heart J. 2013 Nov;166(5):855-63.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.08.017. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
Ridderstrale M, Andersen KR, Zeller C, Kim G, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC; EMPA-REG H2H-SU trial investigators. Comparison of empagliflozin and glimepiride as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 104-week randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Sep;2(9):691-700. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70120-2. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
von Scholten BJ, Hasbak P, Christensen TE, Ghotbi AA, Kjaer A, Rossing P, Hansen TW. Cardiac (82)Rb PET/CT for fast and non-invasive assessment of microvascular function and structure in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2016 Feb;59(2):371-8. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3799-x. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
Wolsk E, Jurgens M, Schou M, Ersboll M, Hasbak P, Kjaer A, Zerahn B, Brandt NH, Gaede PH, Rossing P, Faber J, Inzucchi SE, Kistorp CM, Gustafsson F. Randomized Controlled Trial of the Hemodynamic Effects of Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk: The SIMPLE Trial. Diabetes. 2022 Apr 1;71(4):812-820. doi: 10.2337/db21-0721.
Jurgens M, Schou M, Hasbak P, Kjaer A, Wolsk E, Zerahn B, Wiberg M, Brandt NH, Gaede PH, Rossing P, Faber J, Inzucchi S, Gustafsson F, Kistorp CM. Design of a randomised controlled trial of the effects of empagliflozin on myocardial perfusion, function and metabolism in type 2 diabetes patients at high cardiovascular risk (the SIMPLE trial). BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 27;9(11):e029098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029098.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-003743-10
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2016-775
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.