R±CEOP90 Versus R±CEOP75 in Newly Diagnosed Young Patients With Medium/High-risk DLBCL

NCT ID: NCT03151044

Last Updated: 2017-05-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

408 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-31

Study Completion Date

2017-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of R±CEOP90 containing high-dose epirubicin and R±CEOP75 containing standard epirubicin in newly diagnosed young patients with medium/high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Half of the participants receive R±CEOP regimen containing 90mg/m2 epirubicin, while the other half of participants receive R±CEOP regimen containing 75mg/m2 epirubicin. Via exploring whether high-dose epirubicin shall achieve better efficacy and less toxicity, we hope to optimize current treatment choice for young patients with medium/high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

STUDY BACKGROUND Anthracyclines are key drugs in combined chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and R±CHOP has been used as the first-line standard chemotherapy protocol of DLBCL. Epirubicin (EPI) belongs to anthracyclines and its mechanism of action includes directly embedding into DNA base pair, interfering with the transcription process, blocking the formation of mRNA, and thus inhibiting the synthesis of DNA and RNA. In addition, epirubicin also has inhibitory effect on topoisomerase II. Compared with adriamycin, the effect of epirubicin is equal or slightly higher, but with less cardiotoxicity and myelotoxicity.

Although epirubicin has been widely used in chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of multiple types of solid cancer, due to lack of large-scale randomized clinical study, the use of epirubicin in the treatment of lymphoma is greatly limited and epirubicin has not been recommended in internationally recognized guidelines including NCCN, ESMO and ASH. There have been several studies using epirubicin for the treatment of lymphoma, which all indicated comparable efficacy and lower toxicity compared with adriamycin. Because CHOP regimen is often combined with targeted therapy, optimizing anthracyclines in CHOP regimen is quite important for reducing toxicity, especially replacing Adriamycin with epirubicin.

Up to present, there have been studies on elderly patients and low-risk young patients with DLBCL and the results have provided evidences to support R+CHOP21 as the first-line standard therapy for DLBCL. But there still lacks clinical studies on high-risk young DLBCL patients and the treatment for these kinds of patients often follows the therapy of above mentioned studies, and these lack strong support of evidenced medicine. Before the application of Rituximab, several studies have suggested that increasing dosage strength of anthracyclines may bring benefits in overall survival to patients. After the introduction of Rituximab in the treatment of DLBCL, although Rituximab significantly promote overall survival of low-risk patients, young high-risk patients have not been studied.

Based on above background and current knowledge gap, this clinical study shall focus on newly pathologically diagnosed young medium/high-risk Chinese DLBCL patients and investigate whether enhanced epirubicin dosage strength shall achieve higher complete remission rate and longer overall survival.

OBJECTIVES:

1. Evaluate and compare the efficacy of high-dose epirubicin (90mg/m2) and standard-dose epirubicin (75mg/m2) in R±CEOP chemotherapy regimen.
2. Assess toxicity profile of R±CEOP chemotherapy regimen at different dosage of epirubicin, especially difference in cardiotoxicity and hematological toxicity between R±CEOP90 and R±CEOP75.
3. Assess the influence of R±CEOP90 and R±CEOP75 on long-term survival of newly diagnosed young patients with medium/high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

OUTLINE:

Included patients shall be randomly divided into 2 groups: high-dose epirubicin group (90mg/m2) and standard-dose epirubicin group (75mg/m2) given intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle for totally 6 cycles. Patients with CD20 positive proven by pathological examination in both groups shall receive Rituximab. Except for the difference in epirubicin dosage, the administration of Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine and Prednisolone shall follow standard chemotherapy regimen.

Screening shall be completed within 4 weeks before the administration of study drugs. For included patients, treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. During treatment of study drugs, the tests and procedures shall be performed within the first 3 days of each cycle: serum chemistry test, hematological test and body weight measurement. Physical examination, vital sign and WHO performance and ECOG score shall be performed or assess before the administration of study drugs on Day 1 of each cycle. At the end of Cycle 3, 6 and 8 (if applicable) (±14days), physical examination, CT or MRI or PET examination shall be performed. If necessary, bone marrow assessment shall also be performed.

End-of-treatment visit shall be conducted within 4-5 weeks after the last administration of study drug. Patients experiencing toxicity or side effects shall be assessed within 4 weeks after withdrawal of study drugs. After completion of study treatment, patients who have not shown signs of disease progression shall be followed up for 2 year until disease progression, start treatment for another disease or death. Follow-up visit shall be conducted every 12±2 weeks and tumor assessment shall be performed (including neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis CT or MRI).

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 408 patients will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EPI-90

Participants in this arm shall be given high-dose Epirubicin Combined with CVP ± Rituximab for six 21-day cycles:

High-dose Epirubicin 90mg/m2, i.v., Day 1; Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, i.v., Day 1; Vincristine 1.4mg/m2, i.v., Day 1; Prednisolone 100mg/m2, p.o., Day 1-5;

Plus/not plus:

Rituximab 375mg/m2, i.v., Day 0

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High-dose Epirubicin Combined with CVP ± Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Experimental group shall be given high-dose Epirubicin (90mg/m2) combined with standard-dose Cyclophosphamide (750mg/m2), Vincristine (1.4mg/m2) and Prednisolone (100mg/m2) ± Rituximab

EPI-75

Participants in this arm shall be given standard-dose Epirubicin, Combined with CVP ± Rituximab for six 21-day cycles:

Standard-dose Epirubicin 75mg/m2, i.v., Day 1; Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, i.v., Day 1; Vincristine 1.4mg/m2, i.v., Day 1; Prednisolone 100mg/m2, p.o., Day 1-5;

Plus/not plus:

Rituximab 375mg/m2, i.v., Day 0

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard-dose Epirubicin Combined with CVP ± Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Active comparator group shall be given standard-dose Epirubicin and standard-dose Cyclophosphamide (750mg/m2), Vincristine (1.4mg/m2) and Prednisolone (100mg/m2) ± Rituximab

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High-dose Epirubicin Combined with CVP ± Rituximab

Experimental group shall be given high-dose Epirubicin (90mg/m2) combined with standard-dose Cyclophosphamide (750mg/m2), Vincristine (1.4mg/m2) and Prednisolone (100mg/m2) ± Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard-dose Epirubicin Combined with CVP ± Rituximab

Active comparator group shall be given standard-dose Epirubicin and standard-dose Cyclophosphamide (750mg/m2), Vincristine (1.4mg/m2) and Prednisolone (100mg/m2) ± Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

R±CEOP90 R±CEOP75

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. All newly diagnosed patients with histologically proven diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL);
2. There is at least one measurable tumor mass (physical examined long diameter of mass over 2 cm, or 5mmCT-scanned long diameter of mass over 1.5cm and short diameter over 1.0cm);
3. Male or female patients aged no younger than 18 and no elder than 60 years old;
4. aaIPI≥2 (LDH \> normal +ECOG ≤2 + stage III-IV);
5. No involvement of the central nervous system;
6. ECOG score ≤ 2 points and expected survival ≥3 months;
7. During the study period, female subjects must be in menopause, or sterilization or willing to take contraceptive measures. Women with childbearing potential must use medically acceptable contraceptive method and agree to use this contraceptive method 2 weeks before treatment of the study drug, during study drug treatment and 3 months after the completion of study drug treatment;
8. Male subjects are required to take contraceptive measures and agree to use this contraceptive method 2 weeks before treatment of the study drug, during study drug treatment and 3 months after the completion of study drug treatment.
9. The subjects must be able to understand the study and are willing to participate in the study and sign informed consent;
10. The subjects must be able and willing to follow the research plan
11. Echocardiography measured LVEF ≥ 50%
12. Satisfied hematological function (based on the investigator's judgment, except for the DLBCL abnormal conditions) is defined as follows: Hemoglobin ≥9g/dl; absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 \* 10\^9/L; platelet count ≥75 \* 10\^9/L

\-

Exclusion Criteria

1. Primary central nervous system tumors or central nervous system metastasis;
2. previous drug induced cardiotoxicity \> =CTCAE 3.0 Grade 2;
3. Complicated with serious heart disease which may affect this clinical study (e.g., heart failure \[New York Heart Association NYHA Class III or IV, or left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF\<50%\] or with disease history of following diseases: QTc prolongation of clinical significance (for male patients, QTc over 450ms; for female patients, QTc over 470ms), ventricular tachycardia (VT) , atrial fibrillation (AF), heart block, myocardial infarction (MI) within 1 years, congestive heart failure (CHF) and coronary heart disease with symptoms requiring drug treatment;
4. Diagnosis of other malignancies other than diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL);
5. Mental disorders affecting compliance;
6. Unable to obtain informed consent;
7. Previously have received DLBCL treatment, except for biopsy or local radiotherapy;
8. Patients are pregnant or lactating women;
9. Patients have severe infections, medical conditions or psychiatric conditions, and investigators believe that this condition may interfere with the purpose of the study;
10. Patients with known positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), active hepatitis B, or active hepatitis C (positive for anti-HCV antibodies);
11. Existence of following laboratory abnormalities (unless any of these abnormalities are due to underlying lymphoma):

1. Creatinine was greater than 1.5 folds of upper limit of normal (ULN) (except that creatinine clearance is within normal range) or calculated creatinine clearance\<40 mL/min (using Cockcroft - Gault formula)
2. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2.5 folds of ULN
3. Total bilirubin ≥1.5 folds of ULN: if total bilirubin ≤ 3 folds of ULN, patients with diagnosed Gilbert's disease can be included
12. In the absence of anticoagulant therapy, the international normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5 folds of ULN
13. In lupus patients without anticoagulant drug treatment, partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) \> 1.5 folds of ULN
14. Investigators decide that the patient is not suitable for this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese Anti-Cancer Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

FENG Ji-feng

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

FENG Ji-feng

Director of the hospital

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jifeng Feng, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jiangsu Cancer Institute and Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital

Changzhou, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Jiangyin People's hospital

Jiangyin, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Nanjing General Hospital

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Jiangsu Cancer Institute and Hospital

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Jiangsu Province Hospital

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Nantong Tumor Hospital

Nantong, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Wuxi People's hospital

Wuxi, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital

Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jianqiu Wu, Master

Role: CONTACT

8613951671579

Jifeng Feng, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

8613901581264

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Xuzhang Lu, M.D.

Role: primary

8615295189493

Dong Shen, M.D.

Role: primary

8615961663515

Jinghua Wang, M.D.

Role: primary

8613951740778

Jingyan Xu, M.D.

Role: primary

8613951969610

Jianqiu Wu, M.D.

Role: primary

8613951671579

Jifeng Feng, M.D.

Role: backup

8613901581264

Xuemei Sun, M.D.

Role: primary

8613913911666

Xiaohong Xu, M.D.

Role: primary

8618912296003

Xin Zhou, M.D.

Role: primary

8613358111962

Bin He, M.D.

Role: primary

8618932371190

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Economopoulos T, Dimopoulos MA, Mellou S, Pavlidis N, Samantas E, Nicolaides C, Tsatalas C, Papadopoulos A, Papageogriou E, Papasavvas P, Fountzilas G. Treatment of intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using CEOP versus CNOP. Eur J Haematol. 2002 Mar;68(3):135-43. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2002.01620.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12068793 (View on PubMed)

Rossini F, Terruzzi E, Perego D, Miccolis I, Rivolta F, Manca E, Pogliani EM. Long-term follow-up of patients with intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. Cancer. 2004 Jan 15;100(2):350-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11907.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14716771 (View on PubMed)

Chim CS, Kwong YL, Lie AK, Lee CK, Liang R. CEOP treatment results and validity of the International Prognostic Index in Chinese patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Hematol Oncol. 1998 Sep;16(3):117-23. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1069(199809)16:33.0.co;2-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10235070 (View on PubMed)

Lambertenghi Deliliers G, Butti C, Baldini L, Ceriani A, Lombardi F, Luoni M, Montalbetti L, Pavia G, Pinotti G, Pogliani E, et al. A cooperative study of epirubicin with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (CEOP) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Haematologica. 1995 Jul-Aug;80(4):318-24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7590500 (View on PubMed)

Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, Morel P, Van Den Neste E, Salles G, Gaulard P, Reyes F, Lederlin P, Gisselbrecht C. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):235-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011795.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11807147 (View on PubMed)

Pfreundschuh M, Schubert J, Ziepert M, Schmits R, Mohren M, Lengfelder E, Reiser M, Nickenig C, Clemens M, Peter N, Bokemeyer C, Eimermacher H, Ho A, Hoffmann M, Mertelsmann R, Trumper L, Balleisen L, Liersch R, Metzner B, Hartmann F, Glass B, Poeschel V, Schmitz N, Ruebe C, Feller AC, Loeffler M; German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL). Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60). Lancet Oncol. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-16. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70002-0. Epub 2008 Jan 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18226581 (View on PubMed)

Recher C, Coiffier B, Haioun C, Molina TJ, Ferme C, Casasnovas O, Thieblemont C, Bosly A, Laurent G, Morschhauser F, Ghesquieres H, Jardin F, Bologna S, Fruchart C, Corront B, Gabarre J, Bonnet C, Janvier M, Canioni D, Jais JP, Salles G, Tilly H; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. Intensified chemotherapy with ACVBP plus rituximab versus standard CHOP plus rituximab for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LNH03-2B): an open-label randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011 Nov 26;378(9806):1858-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61040-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22118442 (View on PubMed)

Basaran M, Bavbek ES, Sakar B, Eralp Y, Alici S, Tas F, Yaman F, Dogan O O, Camlica H, Onat H. Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with dose-intensified epirubicin in combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CEOP-100): a phase II study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2001 Dec;24(6):570-5. doi: 10.1097/00000421-200112000-00008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11801756 (View on PubMed)

Pronzato P, Lionetto R, Botto F, Pensa F, Tognoni A. High-dose intensity cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone by shortened intervals and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase II study. Br J Cancer. 1998 Sep;78(6):777-80. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.578.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9743300 (View on PubMed)

Zinzani PL, Mazza P, Gherlinzoni F, Zanchini R, Bocchia M, Aitini E, Cavazzini G, Amurri B, Gobbi M, Tura S. CEOP regimen in the treatment of advanced low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: preliminary report. Tumori. 1990 Dec 31;76(6):533-6. doi: 10.1177/030089169007600603.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2284688 (View on PubMed)

Abate G, Comella P, Di Pietro N, Ganzina F, Pergola M, Silvestro P, Basso A, Salvatore M, Zarrilli D. Epirubicin in combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced stage non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Tumori. 1987 Feb 28;73(1):43-7. doi: 10.1177/030089168707300108.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3469805 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015NL-078

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.