Comparison of Pudendal Nerve Block and Caudal Block for Hypospadias in Young Children
NCT ID: NCT03145415
Last Updated: 2022-05-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-17
2019-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pudendal vs Caudal Block for Pediatric Penile Surgery
NCT04840654
Caudal vs. Pudendal Block in Peds GU
NCT05708989
Does Caudal Block Increase the Incidence of Urethrocutaneous Fistula Formation Following Hypospadias Repair in Infants?
NCT02861950
Ultrasound-guided PNB and DPNB for Pediatric Distal Hypospadias Surgery
NCT04668183
"Comparison of USG-Guided Caudal Versus Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block for Pediatric Inguinal Surgeries"
NCT05558748
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In our institution, hypospadias repair is typically done in infants and children ages 6 months to age two. A comparison of the efficacy of pudendal block versus the caudal block has not been undertaken in this younger population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bilateral Pudendal block
0.25 cc per kg of 0.2% ropivacaine will be injected once for right pudendal N block and the same volume for the left pudendal N block before the start of the surgery
Bilateral Pudendal block
0.5 cc per kg of 0.2% ropivicaine. Half of the volume given as a right pudendal block and the remaining volume given on the left pudendal nerve block given prior to the start of surgery
Caudal block
1 cc per kg of 0.2% ropivacaine in the caudal space given before the start of surgery
Caudal block
1 cc per kg of 0.2% ropivicaine in the caudal space given before the start of surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Caudal block
1 cc per kg of 0.2% ropivicaine in the caudal space given before the start of surgery.
Bilateral Pudendal block
0.5 cc per kg of 0.2% ropivicaine. Half of the volume given as a right pudendal block and the remaining volume given on the left pudendal nerve block given prior to the start of surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
6 Months
2 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nemours Children's Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nemours/ duPont Hospital for Children
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Choudhry DK, Heredia L, Brenn BR, Brown M, Carvalho NF, Whaley MC, Shaik SS, Hagerty JA, Bani Hani A. Nerve stimulation guided bilateral pudendal nerve block versus landmark-based caudal block for hypospadias repair in young children: a prospective, randomized, pragmatic trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Dec;47(12):744-748. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103680. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
lh0001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.