Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Effectiveness-Implementation Trial of SPIRIT in ESRD (NCT NCT03138564)
NCT ID: NCT03138564
Last Updated: 2025-11-05
Results Overview
The Goals-of-Care Tool which includes two scenarios describing medical conditions commonly occurring in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Possible responses to the scenarios are: "The goals of care should focus on delaying my death, and thus I want to continue life-sustaining treatment", "The goals of care should focus on my comfort and peace, and thus I do not want life-sustaining treatment, including dialysis", and "I am not sure". Patients and surrogates complete this tool independently and their responses are compared to determine dyad congruence. A dyad is assigned with "1" if each member of the dyad chose the same response (either comfort care only or continue aggressive care) in both scenarios. In all other cases, the dyad is assigned with "0", which includes: 1) the patient and surrogate responses are the same in one of the two scenarios, 2) the patient and surrogate responses differ in both scenarios, and 3) the patient and surrogate responses are both "I am not sure".
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
852 participants
Baseline, Week 2
2025-11-05
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from multiple dialysis centers in Georgia, New Mexico, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, USA. Participant enrollment began on February 15, 2018, and follow-up assessments for the primary outcome measures at Week 2 were completed on March 24, 2022. Data collection for secondary outcome measures with surrogates three months after the patient's death was completed July 29, 2022.
42 clinics were enrolled with 23 randomized to the SPIRIT and 19 randomized to usual care. One SPIRIT clinic and 2 control clinics were excluded prior to study initiation. There were 557 eligible patients in SPIRIT clinics and 264 dyads consented to participate; of these, 33 dyads withdrew or became ineligible prior to the baseline visit. In control clinics there were 293 eligible patients and 210 dyads consented to participate; 15 dyads withdrew or became ineligible prior to the baseline visit.
Unit of analysis: dialysis clinics
Participant milestones
| Measure |
SPIRIT Clinic
Dialysis clinics randomized to deliver the SPIRIT intervention. SPIRIT is a two-session, 60-minute, structured psychoeducational intervention, targeting both patient and surrogate. Using a provider manual, the care provider follows six steps: 1) assessing illness presentation, 2) identifying gaps and concerns, 3) creating conditions for conceptual change, 4) introducing replacement information, 5) summarizing, and 6) setting goals and planning.
Patients receiving care at SPIRIT clinics were given the option to participate in this study with their surrogate decision-makers.
|
Comparison Condition Clinic
Dialysis clinics randomized to the comparison condition control arm.
The comparison condition is the usual care provided. As required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), written information on advance directives (ADs) is provided to a patient on the first day of dialysis, and a social worker reviews this information with patients and encourages them to complete an AD. This typically takes about 10 minutes.
Patients receiving care at the comparison condition clinics were given the option to participate in this study with their surrogate decision-makers.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
462 22
|
390 17
|
|
Overall Study
Patients Beginning the Study
|
231 22
|
195 17
|
|
Overall Study
Surrogates Beginning the Study
|
231 22
|
195 17
|
|
Overall Study
Patients Completing the Week 2 Assessment
|
182 22
|
192 17
|
|
Overall Study
Surrogates Completing the Week 2 Assessment
|
183 22
|
189 17
|
|
Overall Study
Surrogates Eligible for Post-bereavement Visit
|
54 22
|
35 17
|
|
Overall Study
Surrogates Completing Post-bereavement Visit
|
46 22
|
31 17
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
365 22
|
381 17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
97 0
|
9 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
SPIRIT Clinic
Dialysis clinics randomized to deliver the SPIRIT intervention. SPIRIT is a two-session, 60-minute, structured psychoeducational intervention, targeting both patient and surrogate. Using a provider manual, the care provider follows six steps: 1) assessing illness presentation, 2) identifying gaps and concerns, 3) creating conditions for conceptual change, 4) introducing replacement information, 5) summarizing, and 6) setting goals and planning.
Patients receiving care at SPIRIT clinics were given the option to participate in this study with their surrogate decision-makers.
|
Comparison Condition Clinic
Dialysis clinics randomized to the comparison condition control arm.
The comparison condition is the usual care provided. As required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), written information on advance directives (ADs) is provided to a patient on the first day of dialysis, and a social worker reviews this information with patients and encourages them to complete an AD. This typically takes about 10 minutes.
Patients receiving care at the comparison condition clinics were given the option to participate in this study with their surrogate decision-makers.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death of patient prior to the Week 2 assessment
|
14
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
16
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
48
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
No longer met eligibility criteria
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by investigator due to no availability of SPIRIT champion in the clinic
|
4
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Patient died before surrogate completed Week 2 assessment
|
12
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Surrogate declined to complete the Week 2 assessment but did not withdraw from study
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Death of surrogate prior to Week 2 assessment
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
An Effectiveness-Implementation Trial of SPIRIT in ESRD
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
SPIRIT Clinic - Patients
n=231 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the SPIRIT intervention
|
SPIRIT Clinic - Surrogates
n=231 Participants
Surrogates of patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the SPIRIT intervention
|
Comparison Condition Clinic - Patients
n=195 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the control condition
|
Comparison Condition Clinic - Surrogates
n=195 Participants
Surrogates of patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the control condition
|
Total
n=852 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
222 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
225 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
190 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
185 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
822 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
161 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
159 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
132 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
132 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
584 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
66 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
240 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
231 participants
n=15 Participants
|
231 participants
n=161 Participants
|
195 participants
n=100 Participants
|
195 participants
n=3 Participants
|
852 participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=15 Participants
|
53.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7 • n=161 Participants
|
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 • n=100 Participants
|
54.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1 • n=3 Participants
|
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6 • n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
121 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
168 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
97 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
152 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
538 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
110 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
314 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
9 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=161 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=100 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2Population: The number of participants analyzed reflects the number of persons with ESRD and surrogate dyads (two persons per dyad). This analysis includes dyads who both completed the assessment at the indicated study visit.
The Goals-of-Care Tool which includes two scenarios describing medical conditions commonly occurring in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Possible responses to the scenarios are: "The goals of care should focus on delaying my death, and thus I want to continue life-sustaining treatment", "The goals of care should focus on my comfort and peace, and thus I do not want life-sustaining treatment, including dialysis", and "I am not sure". Patients and surrogates complete this tool independently and their responses are compared to determine dyad congruence. A dyad is assigned with "1" if each member of the dyad chose the same response (either comfort care only or continue aggressive care) in both scenarios. In all other cases, the dyad is assigned with "0", which includes: 1) the patient and surrogate responses are the same in one of the two scenarios, 2) the patient and surrogate responses differ in both scenarios, and 3) the patient and surrogate responses are both "I am not sure".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPIRIT Clinic - Patients
n=231 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the SPIRIT intervention
|
Comparison Condition Clinic - Patients
n=195 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the control condition
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dyad Congruence on Goals-of-Care Tool
Number of Congruent Dyads at Baseline (assigned value = 1)
|
98 dyads
|
76 dyads
|
|
Dyad Congruence on Goals-of-Care Tool
Number of Incongruent Dyads at Baseline (assigned value = 0)
|
133 dyads
|
119 dyads
|
|
Dyad Congruence on Goals-of-Care Tool
Number of Congruent Dyads at 2 Weeks Post-Intervention (assigned value = 1)
|
111 dyads
|
94 dyads
|
|
Dyad Congruence on Goals-of-Care Tool
Number of Incongruent Dyads at 2 Weeks Post-Intervention (assigned value = 0)
|
71 dyads
|
93 dyads
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2Population: This analysis includes patient participants who completed the DCS. One participant in the comparison condition study arm did not answer all items on the scale at the baseline visit and thus their total score could not be computed.
Patient decisional conflict is measured using the 13-item Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), a validated measure in the context of end-of-life decision making. Participants indicate their level of agreement with statements about their plans for their future medical care by selecting (1) Strongly Agree, (2) Agree, (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree, (4) Disagree, or (5) Strongly Disagree. The total score ranges from 13 to 65 with higher scores indicating greater difficulty in weighing benefits and burdens of life-sustaining treatments and decision making.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPIRIT Clinic - Patients
n=231 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the SPIRIT intervention
|
Comparison Condition Clinic - Patients
n=194 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the control condition
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient's Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score
Baseline
|
25.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.22
|
24.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.82
|
|
Patient's Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score
Two Weeks Post-Intervention
|
23.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.94
|
24.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.78
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2Population: This analysis includes participants completing the indicated study visit.
Surrogate decision-making confidence is measured using the 5-item Decision Making Confidence (DMC) scale. Surrogates indicate how confident they are about making medical decisions if the patient becomes unable to make their own decisions by their level of agreement with statements along a scale of (0) "Not confident at all" to (4) "Very confident". Total scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater confidence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPIRIT Clinic - Patients
n=231 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the SPIRIT intervention
|
Comparison Condition Clinic - Patients
n=195 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the control condition
|
|---|---|---|
|
Surrogate's Decision Making Confidence (DMC) Scale Score
Baseline
|
18.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73
|
18.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.59
|
|
Surrogate's Decision Making Confidence (DMC) Scale Score
Two Weeks Post-Intervention
|
18.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
18.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2Population: The number of participants analyzed reflects the number of persons with ESRD and surrogate dyads (two persons per dyad). This analysis includes dyads who both completed the assessments at the indicated study visit.
The composite outcome combines dyad congruence on Goals-of-Care scenarios and surrogate DMC scores. If the dyad congruence is 1 and the surrogate's DMC \>=3, then the composite outcome value for the dyad is "1". In all other cases, the dyad's composite outcome value is "0".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPIRIT Clinic - Patients
n=231 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the SPIRIT intervention
|
Comparison Condition Clinic - Patients
n=195 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the control condition
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Outcome of Dyad Congruence and Surrogate DMC Score
Number of Dyads Where Week 2 Post-Intervention Composite Outcome = 1
|
107 dyads
|
90 dyads
|
|
Composite Outcome of Dyad Congruence and Surrogate DMC Score
Number of Dyads Where Week 2 Post-Intervention Composite Outcome = 0
|
75 dyads
|
97 dyads
|
|
Composite Outcome of Dyad Congruence and Surrogate DMC Score
Number of Dyads Where Baseline Composite Outcome = 1
|
92 dyads
|
74 dyads
|
|
Composite Outcome of Dyad Congruence and Surrogate DMC Score
Number of Dyads Where Baseline Composite Outcome = 0
|
139 dyads
|
121 dyads
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Upon patient death (up to 21 months)The use of intensive procedures during end-of-life treatment will be identified through the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). The use of mechanical ventilation as part of the patient's end-of-life (EOL) treatment will be documented (e.g., mechanical ventilation, feeding tube, dialysis, CPR). The EoL treatment intensity data acquisition will take at least two more years after the participant's death due to the 2-year gap in the administrative data release.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months after patient death (up to 24 months)Population: This analysis includes surrogates from dyads where the patient died during the follow-up period. Per the intent to treat analysis, surrogates of 89 deceased patients were to be analyzed, and baseline values are presented for these participants. Twelve did not complete the post-bereavement survey due to being lost to follow-up or not consenting to participate in the extended follow-up. Baseline and post-bereavement scores are presented for the 77 who completed the post-bereavement assessment.
Surrogate post-bereavement anxiety symptoms were measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety subscale. Surrogates indicate their level of agreement with statements by selecting responses rated from 0 (the problem in the statement is not an issue) to 3 (the problem in the statement is a very big issue). Scores for the anxiety subscale range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. A score of 0-7 indicates "normal", 8-10 indicates "borderline abnormal", and 11-21 indicates "abnormal" levels of anxiety.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPIRIT Clinic - Patients
n=54 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the SPIRIT intervention
|
Comparison Condition Clinic - Patients
n=35 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the control condition
|
|---|---|---|
|
Surrogate's Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Subscale Score
Baseline for all surrogates where the patient died during the follow-up period
|
4.80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
4.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
|
Surrogate's Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Subscale Score
Baseline for surrogates who completed the post-bereavement assessment
|
4.85 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.07
|
4.61 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
|
Surrogate's Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Subscale Score
Post-bereavement assessment (3 months after patient death)
|
5.59 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.58
|
6.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months after patient death (up to 24 months)Population: This analysis includes surrogates from dyads where the patient died during the follow-up period. Per the intent to treat analysis, surrogates of 89 deceased patients were to be analyzed, and baseline values are presented for these participants. Twelve did not complete the post-bereavement survey due to being lost to follow-up or not consenting to participate in the extended follow-up. Baseline and post-bereavement scores are presented for the 77 who completed the post-bereavement assessment.
Surrogate post-bereavement symptoms of depression were measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression subscale. Surrogates indicate their level of agreement with statements by selecting responses rated from 0 (the problem in the statement is not an issue) to 3 (the problem in the statement is a very big issue). Total scores of the depression subscale range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. A score of 0-7 indicates "normal", 8-10 indicates "borderline abnormal", and 11-21 indicates "abnormal" levels of depression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPIRIT Clinic - Patients
n=54 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the SPIRIT intervention
|
Comparison Condition Clinic - Patients
n=35 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the control condition
|
|---|---|---|
|
Surrogate's Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Subscale Score
Baseline for all surrogates where the patient died during the follow-up period
|
3.28 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.62
|
2.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
|
Surrogate's Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Subscale Score
Baseline for surrogates who completed the post-bereavement assessment
|
3.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
2.71 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
|
Surrogate's Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Subscale Score
Post-bereavement assessment (3 months after patient death)
|
4.26 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.94
|
4.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months after patient death (up to 24 months)Population: This analysis includes surrogates from dyads where the patient died during the follow-up period. Per the intent to treat analysis, surrogates of 89 deceased patients were to be analyzed, and baseline values are presented for these participants. Twelve did not complete the post-bereavement survey due to being lost to follow-up or not consenting to participate in the extended follow-up. Baseline and post-bereavement scores are presented for the 77 who completed the post-bereavement assessment.
Surrogate post-bereavement traumatic distress was measured with the Post-Traumatic Symptoms Scale-10 (PTSS-10). Surrogates indicate how often they have experienced symptoms of post-traumatic stress by responding to 10 symptoms on a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 = "never" and 7 = "always". Total scale scores range from 10 to 70 and higher scores indicate more intense symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SPIRIT Clinic - Patients
n=54 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the SPIRIT intervention
|
Comparison Condition Clinic - Patients
n=35 Participants
Patients receiving care at clinics randomized to the control condition
|
|---|---|---|
|
Surrogate's Post-Traumatic Symptoms Scale-10 (PTSS-10) Score
Baseline for all surrogates where the patient died during the follow-up period
|
19.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.24
|
21.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.87
|
|
Surrogate's Post-Traumatic Symptoms Scale-10 (PTSS-10) Score
Baseline for surrogates who completed the post-bereavement assessment
|
19.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.81
|
21.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.26
|
|
Surrogate's Post-Traumatic Symptoms Scale-10 (PTSS-10) Score
Post-bereavement assessment (3 months after patient death)
|
26.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.2
|
29.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.3
|
Adverse Events
Comparison Condition Clinic - Surrogates
SPIRIT Clinic - Patients
SPIRIT Clinic - Surrogates
Comparison Condition Clinic - Patients
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place