Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Versus Canagliflozin as add-on to Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT03136484)
NCT ID: NCT03136484
Last Updated: 2020-01-21
Results Overview
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first; and 'In-trial' observation period which started at the date of randomisation and include the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any and ended at the last contact, withdrawal of consent or death, whichever came first.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
788 participants
Week 0, week 52
2020-01-21
Participant Flow
The trial was conducted at 115 sites in Argentina (5), Brazil (2), Canada (8), India (10), Ireland (4), Lebanon (5), Malaysia (5), Mexico (2), Sweden (5), United Kingdom (11) and United States (58).
Study design: Body composition (sub-study) was measured using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in a planned subset of randomised participants.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
Participants received subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
394
|
394
|
|
Overall Study
Exposed
|
392
|
394
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
367
|
372
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
27
|
22
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
Participants received subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
19
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
7
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Versus Canagliflozin as add-on to Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
Total
n=788 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=5 Participants
|
57.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=7 Participants
|
56.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
171 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
193 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
364 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
223 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
201 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
424 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
156 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
293 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
238 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
257 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
495 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : American Indian or Alaska native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : Asian
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : Black or African American
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : White
|
297 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
290 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
587 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : Other
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : Not Applicable
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HbA1c
|
8.3 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants
|
8.2 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=7 Participants
|
8.3 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first; and 'In-trial' observation period which started at the date of randomisation and include the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any and ended at the last contact, withdrawal of consent or death, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in HbA1c
On-treatment without rescue medication
|
-1.7 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
-1.0 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
|
Change in HbA1c
In-trial
|
-1.5 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
-1.0 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in body weight was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Body Weight (kg)
|
-5.7 Kilogram (kg)
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
-4.3 Kilogram (kg)
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in total fat mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Total Fat Mass (kg)
|
-3.72 kg
Standard Deviation 4.50
|
-2.63 kg
Standard Deviation 3.30
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in FPG was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose)
|
-2.54 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.77
|
-2.00 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in SMPG- mean 7-point profile was evaluated. SMPG was recorded at the following 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point profile was defined as the area under the profile, calculated using the trapezoidal method, divided by the measurement time. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in SMPG (Self-measured Plasma Glucose)- Mean 7-point Profile
|
-2.8 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
-1.9 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in SMPG- mean postprandial increment over all meals was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in SMPG- Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals
|
-0.6 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
-0.6 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol
|
0.96 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.3
|
1.03 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting LDL-cholesterol
|
0.96 Ratio of LDL-cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.2
|
1.05 Ratio of LDL-cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting HDL-cholesterol
|
1.04 Ratio of HDL-cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.1
|
1.08 Ratio of HDL-cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in fasting triglycerides (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Triglycerides
|
0.86 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.6
|
0.92 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Vital Signs (Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Systolic blood pressure
|
-3.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.0
|
-5.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.5
|
|
Change in Vital Signs (Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Diastolic blood pressure
|
-1.2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
-2.9 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in body weight was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Body Weight (%)
|
-6.2 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
-4.7 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in BMI was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
-2.0 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
-1.5 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in waist circumference was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Waist Circumference
|
-4.2 Centimeter (cm)
Standard Deviation 6.2
|
-3.0 Centimeter (cm)
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in total fat mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Total Fat Mass (%)
|
-1.55 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
-1.21 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in total lean mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Total Lean Mass (kg)
|
-2.06 kg
Standard Deviation 2.15
|
-1.53 kg
Standard Deviation 2.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in total lean mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Total Lean Mass (%)
|
1.38 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
1.09 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in visceral fat mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Visceral Fat Mass (kg)
|
-0.20 kg
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
-0.13 kg
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in visceral fat mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Visceral Fat Mass (%)
|
-0.81 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 7.30
|
0.16 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 4.36
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in ratio between total fat mass and total lean mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Ratio Between Total Fat Mass and Total Lean Mass
|
-0.04 total fat mass/total lean mass ratio
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.03 total fat mass/total lean mass ratio
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c \< 7.0% (53 millimoles per mole \[mmol/mol\]), ADA target (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol), American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target (Yes/no)
Yes
|
76.1 Percentage of participants
|
50.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol), American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target (Yes/no)
No
|
23.9 Percentage of participants
|
49.2 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol), AACE target (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target (Yes/no)
Yes
|
62.1 Percentage of participants
|
26.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target (Yes/no)
No
|
37.9 Percentage of participants
|
73.2 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Percentage of participants who achieved ≥1% reduction of baseline HbA1c (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (Yes/no)
Yes
|
76.5 Percentage of participants
|
48.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (Yes/no)
No
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
|
51.4 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Percentage of participants losing ≥3% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=298 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)
Yes
|
68.8 Percentage of participants
|
64.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)
No
|
31.2 Percentage of participants
|
35.1 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Percentage of participants losing ≥5% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=298 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)
Yes
|
52.7 Percentage of participants
|
47.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)
No
|
47.3 Percentage of participants
|
53.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Percentage of participants losing ≥10% of baseline body weight is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=298 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)
Yes
|
23.2 Percentage of participants
|
8.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)
No
|
76.8 Percentage of participants
|
91.1 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without severe or blood glucose confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia episodes and no weight gain (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG)-Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)
Yes
|
69.6 Percentage of participants
|
45.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG)-Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)
No
|
30.4 Percentage of participants
|
55.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Percentage of participants who achieved ≥1% reduction of baseline HbA1c and losing ≥3% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)
Yes
|
57.3 Percentage of participants
|
34.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)
No
|
42.7 Percentage of participants
|
65.2 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Percentage of participants who achieved ≥1% reduction of baseline HbA1c and losing ≥5% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)
Yes
|
45.1 Percentage of participants
|
25.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)
No
|
54.9 Percentage of participants
|
74.1 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Percentage of participants who achieved ≥1% reduction of baseline HbA1c and losing ≥10% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)
Yes
|
21.8 Percentage of participants
|
6.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)
No
|
78.2 Percentage of participants
|
93.9 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 0-57Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with onset in the on-treatment observation period (which started at the date of first dose of trial product and included the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluded the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any. TEAEs assessed up to approximately 57 weeks is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
1189 Adverse events
|
1138 Adverse events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in haemoglobin (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haematological Parameter- Haemoglobin
|
0.99 Ratio of haemoglobin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.0
|
1.05 Ratio of haemoglobin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in haematocrit (%) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haematological Parameter- Haematocrit
|
0.99 Ratio of haematocrit
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.8
|
1.04 Ratio of haematocrit
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in erythrocytes (10\^12 cells/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haematological Parameter- Erythrocytes
|
0.99 Ratio of erythrocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.7
|
1.04 Ratio of erythrocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in leukocytes (10\^9 cells/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haematological Parameter- Leukocytes
|
0.97 Ratio of leukocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.3
|
0.98 Ratio of leukocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in thrombocytes (10\^9 cells/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Haematological Parameter- Thrombocytes
|
1.04 Ratio of thrombocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.4
|
1.00 Ratio of thrombocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in amylase (units per liter \[U/L\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Amylase
|
1.16 Ratio of amylase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.5
|
1.09 Ratio of amylase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in lipase (U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Lipase
|
1.25 Ratio of lipase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.5
|
1.01 Ratio of lipase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 51.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- ALT
|
0.79 Ratio of ALT
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.5
|
0.79 Ratio of ALT
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- AST
|
0.89 Ratio of AST
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.5
|
0.86 Ratio of AST
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- ALP
|
0.96 Ratio of ALP
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.6
|
0.95 Ratio of ALP
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in total bilirubin (U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Total Bilirubin
|
1.06 Ratio of total bilirubin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.1
|
1.13 Ratio of total bilirubin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in creatinine (micromoles per liter \[umol/L\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Creatinine
|
1.03 Ratio of creatinine
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11.0
|
1.04 Ratio of creatinine
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meters \[mL/min/1.73m\^2\])is calculated using the equation from the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI). Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in eGFR is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- eGFR
|
0.98 Ratio of eGFR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.4
|
0.96 Ratio of eGFR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 9.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in albumin (g/dL) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Albumin
|
0.99 Ratio of albumin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.4
|
1.00 Ratio of albumin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in calcium (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Calcium
|
1.01 Ratio of calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.5
|
1.02 Ratio of calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in potassium (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Potassium
|
1.00 Ratio of potassium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 9.3
|
1.00 Ratio of potassium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in sodium (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Sodium
|
1.00 Ratio of sodium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.6
|
1.00 Ratio of sodium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in calcitonin (nanograms per liter) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Calcitonin
|
1.08 Ratio of calcitonin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.8
|
1.04 Ratio of calcitonin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in pulse is presented based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pulse
|
2.7 Beats per minute (beats/min)
Standard Deviation 9.5
|
-0.6 Beats per minute (beats/min)
Standard Deviation 8.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) was assessed by the investigator at baseline (week 0) and week 52 and categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each ECG category at baseline and week 52 were presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in ECG
Normal (week 52)
|
222 Participants
|
242 Participants
|
|
Change in ECG
Normal (week 0)
|
263 Participants
|
277 Participants
|
|
Change in ECG
Abnormal NCS (week 0)
|
126 Participants
|
117 Participants
|
|
Change in ECG
Abnormal CS (week 0)
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in ECG
Abnormal NCS (week 52)
|
109 Participants
|
95 Participants
|
|
Change in ECG
Abnormal CS (week 52)
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week -2, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Physical examination parameters are categorised as general appearance; nervous system (central and peripheral); cardiovascular system; gastrointestinal system; skin; respiratory system; lymph node palpation; thyroid gland; left foot; right foot; left leg and right leg. The number of participants assessed as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinically significant (CS) at baseline (week -2) and week 52 is presented based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week -2) Normal
|
383 Participants
|
391 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week 52) Normal
|
321 Participants
|
336 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week -2) Normal
|
390 Participants
|
392 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week 52) Normal
|
325 Participants
|
337 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week -2) Normal
|
390 Participants
|
390 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week 52) Normal
|
326 Participants
|
337 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week -2) Normal
|
343 Participants
|
345 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
47 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week 52) Normal
|
293 Participants
|
303 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
32 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week -2) Normal
|
344 Participants
|
348 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
45 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week 52) Normal
|
289 Participants
|
304 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
34 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week -2) Normal
|
348 Participants
|
358 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
40 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week 52) Normal
|
300 Participants
|
314 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
22 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week -2) Normal
|
350 Participants
|
357 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
37 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
5 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week 52) Normal
|
301 Participants
|
315 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
19 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week -2) Normal
|
345 Participants
|
335 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
46 Participants
|
56 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week 52) Normal
|
294 Participants
|
304 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
30 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week -2) Normal
|
360 Participants
|
370 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
26 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week 52) Normal
|
303 Participants
|
325 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
21 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week-2) Normal
|
376 Participants
|
386 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
15 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week52) Normal
|
318 Participants
|
333 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week -2) Normal
|
369 Participants
|
377 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
22 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week 52) Normal
|
319 Participants
|
331 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
7 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week 52) Abnormal CS
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week -2) Normal
|
330 Participants
|
323 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week -2) Abnormal NCS
|
62 Participants
|
69 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week -2) Abnormal CS
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week 52) Normal
|
286 Participants
|
298 Participants
|
|
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week 52) Abnormal NCS
|
39 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Fundus photography or a dilated fundoscopy was performed by the investigator at baseline (week 0) and week 52. The results of the examination were interpreted for each eye (left/right) are categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each category at baseline and week 52 were presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye Examination
Left eye: Normal (week 0)
|
322 Participants
|
319 Participants
|
|
Eye Examination
Left eye: Abnormal NCS (week 0)
|
65 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
|
Eye Examination
Left eye: Abnormal CS (week 0)
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Eye Examination
Left eye: Normal (week 52)
|
231 Participants
|
228 Participants
|
|
Eye Examination
Left eye: Abnormal NCS (week 52)
|
30 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
|
Eye Examination
Left eye: Abnormal CS (week 52)
|
7 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Eye Examination
Right eye: Normal (week 0)
|
321 Participants
|
319 Participants
|
|
Eye Examination
Right eye: Abnormal NCS (week 0)
|
66 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
|
Eye Examination
Right eye: Abnormal CS (week 0)
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Eye Examination
Right eye: Normal (week 52)
|
225 Participants
|
226 Participants
|
|
Eye Examination
Right eye: Abnormal NCS (week 52)
|
35 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
|
Eye Examination
Right eye: Abnormal CS (week 52)
|
8 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 0-57Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
Hypoglycaemic episodes defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurs within the on-treatment observation period. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
|
25 Episodes
|
6 Episodes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 0-57Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
Number of participants with treatment emergent severe or blood glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes. Hypoglycaemic episodes defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurs within the on-treatment observation period. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants With Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in the sub-domain scores is presented. A positive change score indicate an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Physical Functioning
|
1.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.1
|
2.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.7
|
|
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Role-physical
|
1.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.3
|
2.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.1
|
|
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Bodily pain
|
2.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.9
|
1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7
|
|
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
General health
|
3.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
|
3.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
|
|
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Social functioning
|
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
|
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
|
|
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Role-emotional
|
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2
|
1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
|
|
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Vitality
|
3.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.2
|
2.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.2
|
|
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Mental health
|
1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
|
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain PCS. SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. It consists of 2 component summary measures that further summarize 8 health domain scales. The PCS measure is derived from domain scales of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)
|
2.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.7
|
2.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain MCS. SF- 36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The MCS measure is derived from domain scales of vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)
|
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
|
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
Change from baseline (week 0) in DTSQ was evaluated at week 52. The DTSQs items are scored on a 7-point graded response scale ranging from 6 to 0. Higher scores indicate higher levels of treatment satisfaction for DTSQs items 1, 4 -8. For items 2 and 3 a higher score indicates a higher patient perceived experience of high blood sugars and low blood sugars, respectively. Thus, lower scores indicate a perception of blood glucose levels being "none of the time" unacceptably high (item 2) or low (item 3). The domain score of total treatment satisfaction (total treatment satisfaction score) was computed by adding the six items scores 1, 4-8. The score ranges 0-36. A higher treatment satisfaction score indicates a higher level of treatment satisfaction. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
1) Satisfaction with treatment
|
1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
|
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
2) Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars
|
-2.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
-1.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
|
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
3) Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars
|
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
|
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
4) Convenience of treatment
|
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
|
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
5) Flexibility of current treatment
|
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
|
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
6) Satisfaction with understanding of diabetes
|
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
7) Recommending treatment to others
|
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
|
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
8) Satisfaction to continue with present treatment
|
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
|
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
Total treatment satisfaction score
|
5.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.0
|
4.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
The CoEQ comprised 19 items to assess the intensity and type of food cravings, as well as subjective sensation of appetite and mood, with the 4 domains: 'craving control', 'craving for sweet', 'craving for savoury' and 'positive mood'. The 19 items were scored on an 11-point graded response scale ranging from 10 to 0, with items relating to each of the 4 domains being averaged to create a final score. A low score in the domains 'craving for sweet and 'craving for savoury' represents a low level of craving; whereas a high score in the domains 'craving control' and 'positive mood' represents good control and a good mood, respectively. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ): Domains
Craving control
|
1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
|
Change in Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ): Domains
Craving for sweet
|
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Change in Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ): Domains
Craving for savoury
|
-1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
|
Change in Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ): Domains
Positive mood
|
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 52Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.
The CoEQ comprised 19 items to assess the intensity and type of food cravings, as well as subjective sensation of appetite and mood, with the 4 domains: 'craving control', 'craving for sweet', 'craving for savoury' and 'positive mood'. The 19 items were scored on an 11-point graded response scale ranging from 10 to 0, with items relating to each of the 4 domains being averaged to create a final score. A low score in the domains 'craving for sweet and 'craving for savoury' represents a low level of craving; whereas a high score in the domains 'craving control' and 'positive mood' represents good control and a good mood, respectively. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
How hungry have you felt
|
-1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
-0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
How full have you felt
|
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
How often have you had cravings (last 7 days)
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
-1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
How strong have any cravings been
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
-1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Difficulty to resist cravings
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
-0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Ate in response to cravings
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
-0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Difficulty to control eating
|
-1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
-1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Desire to eat savory food
|
-1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
-1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for dairy foods
|
-0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for starchy foods
|
-1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
-1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for savory foods
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Desire to eat sweet food
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
-1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for chocolate
|
-0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
-0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for other sweets
|
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for fruit or fruit juice
|
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Felt happy
|
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Felt anxious
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Felt alert
|
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
|
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Felt contented
|
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
Adverse Events
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 participants at risk
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 participants at risk
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Airway complication of anaesthesia
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arteriosclerosis
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Bartholin's cyst
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Basal ganglia haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Bipolar disorder
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis gangrenous
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis staphylococcal
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis chronic
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.76%
3/394 • Number of events 3 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Investigations
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids thrombosed
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic cirrhosis
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.51%
2/392 • Number of events 2 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 2 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Patella fracture
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Perirectal abscess
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haematuria
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Prescribed overdose
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer metastatic
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatism
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.51%
2/394 • Number of events 2 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal infarction
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Splenomegaly
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureterolithiasis
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.77%
3/392 • Number of events 3 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vulval abscess
|
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 participants at risk
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
|
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 participants at risk
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
2.8%
11/392 • Number of events 11 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
5.3%
21/394 • Number of events 21 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.1%
20/392 • Number of events 20 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
5.8%
23/394 • Number of events 23 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
6.6%
26/392 • Number of events 26 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
1.5%
6/394 • Number of events 6 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
15.1%
59/392 • Number of events 94 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
9.4%
37/394 • Number of events 58 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
5.6%
22/392 • Number of events 23 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
2.0%
8/394 • Number of events 8 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.6%
26/392 • Number of events 48 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
6.9%
27/394 • Number of events 47 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.9%
23/392 • Number of events 25 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
6.6%
26/394 • Number of events 34 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
22.7%
89/392 • Number of events 127 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
6.6%
26/394 • Number of events 30 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
12.8%
50/392 • Number of events 77 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
2.3%
9/394 • Number of events 9 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
|
Additional Information
Clinical Reporting Anchor and Disclosure (1452)
Novo Nordisk A/S
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee At the end of the trial, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER