Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Versus Canagliflozin as add-on to Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT03136484)

NCT ID: NCT03136484

Last Updated: 2020-01-21

Results Overview

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first; and 'In-trial' observation period which started at the date of randomisation and include the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any and ended at the last contact, withdrawal of consent or death, whichever came first.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

788 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Week 0, week 52

Results posted on

2020-01-21

Participant Flow

The trial was conducted at 115 sites in Argentina (5), Brazil (2), Canada (8), India (10), Ireland (4), Lebanon (5), Malaysia (5), Mexico (2), Sweden (5), United Kingdom (11) and United States (58).

Study design: Body composition (sub-study) was measured using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in a planned subset of randomised participants.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
Participants received subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Overall Study
STARTED
394
394
Overall Study
Exposed
392
394
Overall Study
COMPLETED
367
372
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
27
22

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
Participants received subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
19
14
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
7
8
Overall Study
Death
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Versus Canagliflozin as add-on to Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Total
n=788 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
55.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=5 Participants
57.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=7 Participants
56.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
171 Participants
n=5 Participants
193 Participants
n=7 Participants
364 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
223 Participants
n=5 Participants
201 Participants
n=7 Participants
424 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
156 Participants
n=5 Participants
137 Participants
n=7 Participants
293 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
238 Participants
n=5 Participants
257 Participants
n=7 Participants
495 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : American Indian or Alaska native
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : Asian
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : Black or African American
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : White
297 Participants
n=5 Participants
290 Participants
n=7 Participants
587 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : Other
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race : Not Applicable
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
HbA1c
8.3 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants
8.2 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=7 Participants
8.3 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first; and 'In-trial' observation period which started at the date of randomisation and include the period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation, if any and ended at the last contact, withdrawal of consent or death, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in HbA1c
On-treatment without rescue medication
-1.7 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.1
-1.0 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.0
Change in HbA1c
In-trial
-1.5 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.3
-1.0 Percentage (%) of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in body weight was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Body Weight (kg)
-5.7 Kilogram (kg)
Standard Deviation 5.4
-4.3 Kilogram (kg)
Standard Deviation 4.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in total fat mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Total Fat Mass (kg)
-3.72 kg
Standard Deviation 4.50
-2.63 kg
Standard Deviation 3.30

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in FPG was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose)
-2.54 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.77
-2.00 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.53

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in SMPG- mean 7-point profile was evaluated. SMPG was recorded at the following 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point profile was defined as the area under the profile, calculated using the trapezoidal method, divided by the measurement time. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in SMPG (Self-measured Plasma Glucose)- Mean 7-point Profile
-2.8 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.3
-1.9 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in SMPG- mean postprandial increment over all meals was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in SMPG- Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals
-0.6 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.1
-0.6 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol
0.96 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.3
1.03 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Fasting LDL-cholesterol
0.96 Ratio of LDL-cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.2
1.05 Ratio of LDL-cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Fasting HDL-cholesterol
1.04 Ratio of HDL-cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.1
1.08 Ratio of HDL-cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in fasting triglycerides (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Fasting Triglycerides
0.86 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.6
0.92 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Vital Signs (Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Systolic blood pressure
-3.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.0
-5.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.5
Change in Vital Signs (Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Diastolic blood pressure
-1.2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.8
-2.9 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in body weight was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Percentage Change in Body Weight (%)
-6.2 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 6.1
-4.7 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 4.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in BMI was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
-2.0 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 2.0
-1.5 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 1.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in waist circumference was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Waist Circumference
-4.2 Centimeter (cm)
Standard Deviation 6.2
-3.0 Centimeter (cm)
Standard Deviation 5.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in total fat mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Percentage Change in Total Fat Mass (%)
-1.55 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.76
-1.21 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.64

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in total lean mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Total Lean Mass (kg)
-2.06 kg
Standard Deviation 2.15
-1.53 kg
Standard Deviation 2.21

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in total lean mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Percentage Change in Total Lean Mass (%)
1.38 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.66
1.09 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 2.56

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in visceral fat mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Visceral Fat Mass (kg)
-0.20 kg
Standard Deviation 0.40
-0.13 kg
Standard Deviation 0.32

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in visceral fat mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Percentage Change in Visceral Fat Mass (%)
-0.81 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 7.30
0.16 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 4.36

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: DXA analysis set comprised of all randomised participants who are included in the body composition sub-study. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in ratio between total fat mass and total lean mass was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=90 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Ratio Between Total Fat Mass and Total Lean Mass
-0.04 total fat mass/total lean mass ratio
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.03 total fat mass/total lean mass ratio
Standard Deviation 0.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c \< 7.0% (53 millimoles per mole \[mmol/mol\]), ADA target (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol), American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target (Yes/no)
Yes
76.1 Percentage of participants
50.8 Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol), American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target (Yes/no)
No
23.9 Percentage of participants
49.2 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol), AACE target (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target (Yes/no)
Yes
62.1 Percentage of participants
26.8 Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target (Yes/no)
No
37.9 Percentage of participants
73.2 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Percentage of participants who achieved ≥1% reduction of baseline HbA1c (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (Yes/no)
Yes
76.5 Percentage of participants
48.6 Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% (Yes/no)
No
23.5 Percentage of participants
51.4 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Percentage of participants losing ≥3% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=298 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)
Yes
68.8 Percentage of participants
64.9 Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)
No
31.2 Percentage of participants
35.1 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Percentage of participants losing ≥5% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=298 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)
Yes
52.7 Percentage of participants
47.0 Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)
No
47.3 Percentage of participants
53.0 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Percentage of participants losing ≥10% of baseline body weight is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=298 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)
Yes
23.2 Percentage of participants
8.9 Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)
No
76.8 Percentage of participants
91.1 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without severe or blood glucose confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia episodes and no weight gain (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG)-Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)
Yes
69.6 Percentage of participants
45.0 Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG)-Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)
No
30.4 Percentage of participants
55.0 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Percentage of participants who achieved ≥1% reduction of baseline HbA1c and losing ≥3% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)
Yes
57.3 Percentage of participants
34.8 Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥3% (Yes/no)
No
42.7 Percentage of participants
65.2 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Percentage of participants who achieved ≥1% reduction of baseline HbA1c and losing ≥5% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)
Yes
45.1 Percentage of participants
25.9 Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥5% (Yes/no)
No
54.9 Percentage of participants
74.1 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Percentage of participants who achieved ≥1% reduction of baseline HbA1c and losing ≥10% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=293 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=313 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)
Yes
21.8 Percentage of participants
6.1 Percentage of participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction ≥1% and Weight Loss ≥10% (Yes/no)
No
78.2 Percentage of participants
93.9 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 0-57

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.

A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with onset in the on-treatment observation period (which started at the date of first dose of trial product and included the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excluded the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any. TEAEs assessed up to approximately 57 weeks is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Total Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
1189 Adverse events
1138 Adverse events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in haemoglobin (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Haematological Parameter- Haemoglobin
0.99 Ratio of haemoglobin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.0
1.05 Ratio of haemoglobin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in haematocrit (%) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Haematological Parameter- Haematocrit
0.99 Ratio of haematocrit
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.8
1.04 Ratio of haematocrit
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in erythrocytes (10\^12 cells/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Haematological Parameter- Erythrocytes
0.99 Ratio of erythrocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.7
1.04 Ratio of erythrocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in leukocytes (10\^9 cells/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Haematological Parameter- Leukocytes
0.97 Ratio of leukocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.3
0.98 Ratio of leukocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in thrombocytes (10\^9 cells/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Haematological Parameter- Thrombocytes
1.04 Ratio of thrombocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.4
1.00 Ratio of thrombocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in amylase (units per liter \[U/L\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Amylase
1.16 Ratio of amylase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.5
1.09 Ratio of amylase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in lipase (U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Lipase
1.25 Ratio of lipase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.5
1.01 Ratio of lipase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 51.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- ALT
0.79 Ratio of ALT
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.5
0.79 Ratio of ALT
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- AST
0.89 Ratio of AST
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.5
0.86 Ratio of AST
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- ALP
0.96 Ratio of ALP
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.6
0.95 Ratio of ALP
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in total bilirubin (U/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Total Bilirubin
1.06 Ratio of total bilirubin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.1
1.13 Ratio of total bilirubin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in creatinine (micromoles per liter \[umol/L\]) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Creatinine
1.03 Ratio of creatinine
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11.0
1.04 Ratio of creatinine
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meters \[mL/min/1.73m\^2\])is calculated using the equation from the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI). Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in eGFR is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- eGFR
0.98 Ratio of eGFR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.4
0.96 Ratio of eGFR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 9.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in albumin (g/dL) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Albumin
0.99 Ratio of albumin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.4
1.00 Ratio of albumin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in calcium (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Calcium
1.01 Ratio of calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.5
1.02 Ratio of calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in potassium (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Potassium
1.00 Ratio of potassium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 9.3
1.00 Ratio of potassium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in sodium (mmol/L) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter- Sodium
1.00 Ratio of sodium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.6
1.00 Ratio of sodium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in calcitonin (nanograms per liter) is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Calcitonin
1.08 Ratio of calcitonin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.8
1.04 Ratio of calcitonin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in pulse is presented based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Pulse
2.7 Beats per minute (beats/min)
Standard Deviation 9.5
-0.6 Beats per minute (beats/min)
Standard Deviation 8.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

The electrocardiogram (ECG) was assessed by the investigator at baseline (week 0) and week 52 and categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each ECG category at baseline and week 52 were presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in ECG
Normal (week 52)
222 Participants
242 Participants
Change in ECG
Normal (week 0)
263 Participants
277 Participants
Change in ECG
Abnormal NCS (week 0)
126 Participants
117 Participants
Change in ECG
Abnormal CS (week 0)
3 Participants
0 Participants
Change in ECG
Abnormal NCS (week 52)
109 Participants
95 Participants
Change in ECG
Abnormal CS (week 52)
0 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week -2, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Physical examination parameters are categorised as general appearance; nervous system (central and peripheral); cardiovascular system; gastrointestinal system; skin; respiratory system; lymph node palpation; thyroid gland; left foot; right foot; left leg and right leg. The number of participants assessed as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinically significant (CS) at baseline (week -2) and week 52 is presented based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week 52) Abnormal CS
1 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week -2) Normal
383 Participants
391 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week -2) Abnormal NCS
7 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week -2) Abnormal CS
2 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week 52) Normal
321 Participants
336 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week 52) Abnormal NCS
4 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Respiratory System (week 52) Abnormal CS
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week -2) Normal
390 Participants
392 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week -2) Abnormal NCS
1 Participants
2 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week -2) Abnormal CS
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week 52) Normal
325 Participants
337 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week 52) Abnormal NCS
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Lymph Node Palpation (week 52) Abnormal CS
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week -2) Normal
390 Participants
390 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week -2) Abnormal NCS
2 Participants
4 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week -2) Abnormal CS
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week 52) Normal
326 Participants
337 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week 52) Abnormal NCS
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Thyroid Gland (week 52) Abnormal CS
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week -2) Normal
343 Participants
345 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week -2) Abnormal NCS
47 Participants
44 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week -2) Abnormal CS
2 Participants
5 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week 52) Normal
293 Participants
303 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week 52) Abnormal NCS
32 Participants
34 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left foot (week 52) Abnormal CS
1 Participants
2 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week -2) Normal
344 Participants
348 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week -2) Abnormal NCS
45 Participants
42 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week -2) Abnormal CS
3 Participants
4 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week 52) Normal
289 Participants
304 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week 52) Abnormal NCS
34 Participants
32 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right foot (week 52) Abnormal CS
3 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week -2) Normal
348 Participants
358 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week -2) Abnormal NCS
40 Participants
30 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week -2) Abnormal CS
4 Participants
6 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week 52) Normal
300 Participants
314 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week 52) Abnormal NCS
22 Participants
22 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Left leg (week 52) Abnormal CS
4 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week -2) Normal
350 Participants
357 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week -2) Abnormal NCS
37 Participants
30 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week -2) Abnormal CS
5 Participants
7 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week 52) Normal
301 Participants
315 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week 52) Abnormal NCS
19 Participants
21 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Right leg (week 52) Abnormal CS
6 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week -2) Normal
345 Participants
335 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week -2) Abnormal NCS
46 Participants
56 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week -2) Abnormal CS
1 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week 52) Normal
294 Participants
304 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week 52) Abnormal NCS
30 Participants
33 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
General Appearance (week 52) Abnormal CS
2 Participants
2 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week -2) Normal
360 Participants
370 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week -2) Abnormal NCS
26 Participants
21 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week -2) Abnormal CS
5 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week 52) Normal
303 Participants
325 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week 52) Abnormal NCS
21 Participants
12 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Nervous System (week 52) Abnormal CS
2 Participants
2 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week-2) Normal
376 Participants
386 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week -2) Abnormal NCS
15 Participants
8 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week -2) Abnormal CS
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week52) Normal
318 Participants
333 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week 52) Abnormal NCS
7 Participants
6 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Cardiovascular System (week 52) Abnormal CS
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week -2) Normal
369 Participants
377 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week -2) Abnormal NCS
22 Participants
16 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week -2) Abnormal CS
1 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week 52) Normal
319 Participants
331 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week 52) Abnormal NCS
7 Participants
8 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Gastrointestinal System (week 52) Abnormal CS
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week -2) Normal
330 Participants
323 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week -2) Abnormal NCS
62 Participants
69 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week -2) Abnormal CS
0 Participants
2 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week 52) Normal
286 Participants
298 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
Skin (week 52) Abnormal NCS
39 Participants
40 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Fundus photography or a dilated fundoscopy was performed by the investigator at baseline (week 0) and week 52. The results of the examination were interpreted for each eye (left/right) are categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each category at baseline and week 52 were presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Eye Examination
Left eye: Normal (week 0)
322 Participants
319 Participants
Eye Examination
Left eye: Abnormal NCS (week 0)
65 Participants
71 Participants
Eye Examination
Left eye: Abnormal CS (week 0)
5 Participants
3 Participants
Eye Examination
Left eye: Normal (week 52)
231 Participants
228 Participants
Eye Examination
Left eye: Abnormal NCS (week 52)
30 Participants
40 Participants
Eye Examination
Left eye: Abnormal CS (week 52)
7 Participants
2 Participants
Eye Examination
Right eye: Normal (week 0)
321 Participants
319 Participants
Eye Examination
Right eye: Abnormal NCS (week 0)
66 Participants
70 Participants
Eye Examination
Right eye: Abnormal CS (week 0)
5 Participants
4 Participants
Eye Examination
Right eye: Normal (week 52)
225 Participants
226 Participants
Eye Examination
Right eye: Abnormal NCS (week 52)
35 Participants
44 Participants
Eye Examination
Right eye: Abnormal CS (week 52)
8 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 0-57

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.

Hypoglycaemic episodes defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurs within the on-treatment observation period. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Total Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
25 Episodes
6 Episodes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 0-57

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.

Number of participants with treatment emergent severe or blood glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes. Hypoglycaemic episodes defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurs within the on-treatment observation period. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period which started at the date of first dose of trial product and include the period after initiation of rescue medication, if any and excludes the period after premature trial product discontinuation, if any.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Participants With Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
6 Participants
5 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in the sub-domain scores is presented. A positive change score indicate an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Physical Functioning
1.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.1
2.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.7
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Role-physical
1.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.3
2.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.1
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Bodily pain
2.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.9
1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
General health
3.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
3.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Social functioning
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Role-emotional
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2
1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Vitality
3.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.2
2.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.2
Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36): Sub-domains
Mental health
1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain PCS. SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. It consists of 2 component summary measures that further summarize 8 health domain scales. The PCS measure is derived from domain scales of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)
2.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.7
2.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 52 in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain MCS. SF- 36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The MCS measure is derived from domain scales of vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) in DTSQ was evaluated at week 52. The DTSQs items are scored on a 7-point graded response scale ranging from 6 to 0. Higher scores indicate higher levels of treatment satisfaction for DTSQs items 1, 4 -8. For items 2 and 3 a higher score indicates a higher patient perceived experience of high blood sugars and low blood sugars, respectively. Thus, lower scores indicate a perception of blood glucose levels being "none of the time" unacceptably high (item 2) or low (item 3). The domain score of total treatment satisfaction (total treatment satisfaction score) was computed by adding the six items scores 1, 4-8. The score ranges 0-36. A higher treatment satisfaction score indicates a higher level of treatment satisfaction. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
1) Satisfaction with treatment
1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
2) Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars
-2.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
-1.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
3) Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
4) Convenience of treatment
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
5) Flexibility of current treatment
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
6) Satisfaction with understanding of diabetes
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
7) Recommending treatment to others
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
8) Satisfaction to continue with present treatment
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Summary Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately
Total treatment satisfaction score
5.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.0
4.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

The CoEQ comprised 19 items to assess the intensity and type of food cravings, as well as subjective sensation of appetite and mood, with the 4 domains: 'craving control', 'craving for sweet', 'craving for savoury' and 'positive mood'. The 19 items were scored on an 11-point graded response scale ranging from 10 to 0, with items relating to each of the 4 domains being averaged to create a final score. A low score in the domains 'craving for sweet and 'craving for savoury' represents a low level of craving; whereas a high score in the domains 'craving control' and 'positive mood' represents good control and a good mood, respectively. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ): Domains
Craving control
1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
Change in Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ): Domains
Craving for sweet
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
Change in Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ): Domains
Craving for savoury
-1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
Change in Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ): Domains
Positive mood
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Number analyzed"=participants with available data.

The CoEQ comprised 19 items to assess the intensity and type of food cravings, as well as subjective sensation of appetite and mood, with the 4 domains: 'craving control', 'craving for sweet', 'craving for savoury' and 'positive mood'. The 19 items were scored on an 11-point graded response scale ranging from 10 to 0, with items relating to each of the 4 domains being averaged to create a final score. A low score in the domains 'craving for sweet and 'craving for savoury' represents a low level of craving; whereas a high score in the domains 'craving control' and 'positive mood' represents good control and a good mood, respectively. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
How hungry have you felt
-1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
-0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
How full have you felt
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
How often have you had cravings (last 7 days)
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
-1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
How strong have any cravings been
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
-1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Difficulty to resist cravings
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
-0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Ate in response to cravings
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
-0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Difficulty to control eating
-1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
-1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Desire to eat savory food
-1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
-1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for dairy foods
-0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for starchy foods
-1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
-1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for savory foods
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Desire to eat sweet food
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
-1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for chocolate
-0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
-0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for other sweets
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Craving for fruit or fruit juice
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Felt happy
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Felt anxious
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Felt alert
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
Change in CoEQ: Individual Items
Felt contented
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2

Adverse Events

Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo

Serious events: 18 serious events
Other events: 185 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo

Serious events: 21 serious events
Other events: 120 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 participants at risk
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 participants at risk
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Airway complication of anaesthesia
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Vascular disorders
Arteriosclerosis
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Bartholin's cyst
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Nervous system disorders
Basal ganglia haemorrhage
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Psychiatric disorders
Bipolar disorder
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Eye disorders
Cataract
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis gangrenous
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis staphylococcal
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
General disorders
Chest pain
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis chronic
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.76%
3/394 • Number of events 3 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Investigations
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids thrombosed
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic cirrhosis
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
0.51%
2/392 • Number of events 2 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 2 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Patella fracture
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Perirectal abscess
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haematuria
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Prescribed overdose
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer metastatic
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatism
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.51%
2/394 • Number of events 2 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Eye disorders
Retinal infarction
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Splenomegaly
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Investigations
Transaminases increased
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureterolithiasis
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.77%
3/392 • Number of events 3 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
0.26%
1/392 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/394 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Vulval abscess
0.00%
0/392 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.25%
1/394 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Semaglutide + Canagliflozin Placebo
n=392 participants at risk
Participants received s.c. injection of semaglutide once-weekly for 52 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) during 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg during 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to canagliflozin tablet once-daily for 52 weeks.
Canagliflozin + Semaglutide Placebo
n=394 participants at risk
Participants received canagliflozin tablet once-daily orally for 52 weeks: 100 mg tablet during 0-8 weeks followed by 300 mg tablet during 9-52 weeks. Participants also received placebo matched to semaglutide s.c. injection once-weekly for 52 weeks.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
2.8%
11/392 • Number of events 11 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
5.3%
21/394 • Number of events 21 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
5.1%
20/392 • Number of events 20 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
5.8%
23/394 • Number of events 23 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
6.6%
26/392 • Number of events 26 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
1.5%
6/394 • Number of events 6 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
15.1%
59/392 • Number of events 94 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
9.4%
37/394 • Number of events 58 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
5.6%
22/392 • Number of events 23 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
2.0%
8/394 • Number of events 8 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
6.6%
26/392 • Number of events 48 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
6.9%
27/394 • Number of events 47 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
5.9%
23/392 • Number of events 25 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
6.6%
26/394 • Number of events 34 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
22.7%
89/392 • Number of events 127 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
6.6%
26/394 • Number of events 30 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
12.8%
50/392 • Number of events 77 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
2.3%
9/394 • Number of events 9 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on SAS which comprised of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.

Additional Information

Clinical Reporting Anchor and Disclosure (1452)

Novo Nordisk A/S

Phone: (+1) 866-867-7178

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee At the end of the trial, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER