Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
59 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-06-12
2017-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim: The aim of this study was to validate the Polish version of a behavioural pain assessment method - BPS in intubated, sedated patients after cardiac surgery versus self assessment of pain using Numeric rating scale (NRS) in both delirious and non-delirious patients (assessed using Confusion Assessment Method for ICU, CAM-ICU).
Method: A prospective observational cohort study will include 60 patients. The patients will be observed by two trained observers during a nociceptive procedure (position change), both during analgosedation and analgesia. Patients will be observed 5 minutes before, during, and 15 min after the two sets of interventions (six assessments in total). Each BPS assessment will be carried out by two observers blinded to each other. To validate the Polish BPS translation we will use the following methods: calculations of interrater reliability, criterion validity and discriminant validity.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Assessment of pain in patients treated in the ICU becomes a daily clinical challenge for the ICU team, also in those units where minimal sedation environment based on analgesia are used. Various guidelines and recommendations exist to guide the ICU care team in the pain management and assessment process. Nevertheless, the gold standard for pain assessment is patient's self-report of pain (using numeric raing scale - NRS), which can be aided with behavioural scales only when the self-report is unreliable or impossible to obtain. Observational pain scales include the Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) and have been recommended for clinical use in the critically ill adults. However, their validation in a given patient population (cardiac, burn, different languages) is strongly recommended and required.
The need to equip critical care teams (intensive care units - ICUs, high dependency unit - HDUs, Post-Operative Units) with dedicated monitoring tools is clear. The BPS has been developed by critical care professionals and validated in various situations, but it has not been translated or validated in Polish until now.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CAM-ICU (+) Delirious patients.
Behavioral: BPS assessment
Polish version of BPS tool validation.
Other Names:
Pain assessment in non-verbal patients
Assessment of Polish version of BPS
Validation of Polish Version of BPS.
CAM-ICU (-) Non-delirious patients.
Behavioral: BPS assessment
Polish version of BPS tool validation.
Other Names:
Pain assessment in non-verbal patients
Assessment of Polish version of BPS
Validation of Polish Version of BPS.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Assessment of Polish version of BPS
Validation of Polish Version of BPS.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ability to communicate in the Polish language,
* Intubated and mechanically ventilated patients (controlled modes, spontaneous modes),
* Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) above or equal to -3,
* Unrestricted sight and hearing,
* No limitations for body position changing,
* After Cardiac surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Facial trauma (unable to evaluate facial expression),
* Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) -4 or -5
* Neurological or psychiatric disorders,
* Use of neuromuscular blocking agents,
* Regular narcotic users,
* Chronic pain syndrome patients.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Katarzyna Kotfis
Katarzyna Kotfis M.D. Ph.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Katarzyna L Kotfis, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pomeranian Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pomeranian Medical University
Szczecin, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
POL-BPS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id