Validation of the Polish Version of BPS (POL-BPS).

NCT ID: NCT03127306

Last Updated: 2017-09-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

59 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-12

Study Completion Date

2017-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Between 40 to 70% of patients with critical illness experience moderate to severe pain. Diagnosing pain and assessing its severity is difficult in non-verbal patients both in an Intensive Care Unit and in Postoperative Unit after a major surgery such as cardiac surgery). In patients who are unable to self-report pain, we use behavioural pain scales, namely BPS - Behavioural Pain Scale.

Aim: The aim of this study was to validate the Polish version of a behavioural pain assessment method - BPS in intubated, sedated patients after cardiac surgery versus self assessment of pain using Numeric rating scale (NRS) in both delirious and non-delirious patients (assessed using Confusion Assessment Method for ICU, CAM-ICU).

Method: A prospective observational cohort study will include 60 patients. The patients will be observed by two trained observers during a nociceptive procedure (position change), both during analgosedation and analgesia. Patients will be observed 5 minutes before, during, and 15 min after the two sets of interventions (six assessments in total). Each BPS assessment will be carried out by two observers blinded to each other. To validate the Polish BPS translation we will use the following methods: calculations of interrater reliability, criterion validity and discriminant validity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients after major surgery, namely cardiac surgery frequently suffer pain during their postoperative stay in the intensive care unit. Nearly 30% of those patients experience pain at rest and up to 50% experience pain during nursing procedures. Pain experienced by critically ill patients falls into four categories that coexist and overlap: pre-existing chronic pain, acute illness-related pain, continuous ICU treatment-related pain or discomfort and intermittent procedural pain. Moreover, acute pain experienced in the ICU may become a chronic problem after discharge from the unit, as a lifelong ICU footprint. Everyday nursing procedures, including position changing performed in the ICU may be a potential source of pain, therefore there is a clinical need for a simple and easy behavioural pain scale to evaluate this condition in patients unable to self assess pain.

Assessment of pain in patients treated in the ICU becomes a daily clinical challenge for the ICU team, also in those units where minimal sedation environment based on analgesia are used. Various guidelines and recommendations exist to guide the ICU care team in the pain management and assessment process. Nevertheless, the gold standard for pain assessment is patient's self-report of pain (using numeric raing scale - NRS), which can be aided with behavioural scales only when the self-report is unreliable or impossible to obtain. Observational pain scales include the Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) and have been recommended for clinical use in the critically ill adults. However, their validation in a given patient population (cardiac, burn, different languages) is strongly recommended and required.

The need to equip critical care teams (intensive care units - ICUs, high dependency unit - HDUs, Post-Operative Units) with dedicated monitoring tools is clear. The BPS has been developed by critical care professionals and validated in various situations, but it has not been translated or validated in Polish until now.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CAM-ICU (+) Delirious patients.

Behavioral: BPS assessment

Polish version of BPS tool validation.

Other Names:

Pain assessment in non-verbal patients

Assessment of Polish version of BPS

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Validation of Polish Version of BPS.

CAM-ICU (-) Non-delirious patients.

Behavioral: BPS assessment

Polish version of BPS tool validation.

Other Names:

Pain assessment in non-verbal patients

Assessment of Polish version of BPS

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Validation of Polish Version of BPS.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Assessment of Polish version of BPS

Validation of Polish Version of BPS.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age above 18 years
* Ability to communicate in the Polish language,
* Intubated and mechanically ventilated patients (controlled modes, spontaneous modes),
* Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) above or equal to -3,
* Unrestricted sight and hearing,
* No limitations for body position changing,
* After Cardiac surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* A medical need for deep sedation - treatment of severe respiratory failure associated with patient-ventilator dyssynchrony, preventing awareness during neuromuscular blockade, status epilepticus, certain surgical conditions requiring immobility , cases of severe brain injury with intracranial hypertension
* Facial trauma (unable to evaluate facial expression),
* Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) -4 or -5
* Neurological or psychiatric disorders,
* Use of neuromuscular blocking agents,
* Regular narcotic users,
* Chronic pain syndrome patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Katarzyna Kotfis

Katarzyna Kotfis M.D. Ph.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Katarzyna L Kotfis, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Pomeranian Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pomeranian Medical University

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

POL-BPS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id