Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-11-26
2019-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The full intervention is 4 weeks long and consists of completing the training and food diaries every day and meeting with the researcher twice for EEG recording. Moreover, it involves completing questionnaires at baseline, at intervention completion, and one month after the intervention.
Moreover, healthy control participants will be recruitment to complete baseline questionnaires and take part in one EEG recording session in order to assess baseline differences in brain activation in response to computer tasks.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Computerised Training for Binge-Subtype Eating Disorders
NCT04364659
A fMRI Pilot Study of the Effects of Meal-support in Eating Disorders.
NCT02551445
Neuromodulation with Attention Bias Modification Training for Binge Eating Disorder
NCT04424745
The Neural Bases of Emotion Regulation in Bulimia Nervosa
NCT03781921
Training App for Inhibitory Control Towards Food
NCT07075952
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Upon participants' arrival to the lab, participants will be asked to complete the food rating task. Next, they will learn to complete the training tasks (i.e. food specific go/no-go and general go/no-go) and perform them during EEG recording. They will be offered the opportunity to ask questions relating to the task or the EEG at any time. Their weight will also be measured.
Participants will be asked to complete the training and complete food diaries every day for four weeks. The successful/ unsuccessful attempts at implementation intentions will be assessed weekly by a mentor. A researcher/clinician will discuss setting the implementation intention goals with the participant over email. At the end of the training, participants will enter the lab to re-complete the four tasks while researchers record brain activation using the EEG. They will also be asked to complete the food rating task again and their weight will be re-assessed. Before leaving, they will be asked to complete a feedback sheet in which they can express their experience with the training, in terms of facilitators and barriers and visual analogue scales that will ask participants to rate the acceptability, usefulness and level of burden experienced with training.
Participants will then be followed up at 1 month post-intervention; they will be asked to complete the battery of questionnaires used at baseline and post-intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Food specific inhibitory control training
The stimuli in this task will involve pictures of food.
Food specific Inhibitory control training
It involves a go/no-go task in which participants are requested to respond by clicking a particular button when a specific stimulus appears and requested to withhold their response when another particular stimulus appears. Stimuli in this intervention include photos of food and non-food.
Implementation intentions
It involves designing "if-then" strategies of behaviour. Participants will be asked to describe situations in which they feel they are more prone to behave in a way that is not congruent to their long term goals, and then to plan strategies to behave differently when faced with this situation in the future.
General inhibitory control training
The stimuli in this task will not involve pictures of food, but pictures of stationary and household items.
Implementation intentions
It involves designing "if-then" strategies of behaviour. Participants will be asked to describe situations in which they feel they are more prone to behave in a way that is not congruent to their long term goals, and then to plan strategies to behave differently when faced with this situation in the future.
General inhibitory control training
It involves a go/no-go task in which participants are requested to respond by clicking a particular button when a specific stimulus appears and requested to withhold their response when another particular stimulus appears. Stimuli in this intervention include only non-food pictures.
Baseline brain activation assessment (healthy controls)
This arm is included to assess brain activation using EEG among healthy controls at baseline in order to compare responses to participants with eating disorders.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Food specific Inhibitory control training
It involves a go/no-go task in which participants are requested to respond by clicking a particular button when a specific stimulus appears and requested to withhold their response when another particular stimulus appears. Stimuli in this intervention include photos of food and non-food.
Implementation intentions
It involves designing "if-then" strategies of behaviour. Participants will be asked to describe situations in which they feel they are more prone to behave in a way that is not congruent to their long term goals, and then to plan strategies to behave differently when faced with this situation in the future.
General inhibitory control training
It involves a go/no-go task in which participants are requested to respond by clicking a particular button when a specific stimulus appears and requested to withhold their response when another particular stimulus appears. Stimuli in this intervention include only non-food pictures.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Exeter
OTHER
King's College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rayane Chami, MSc/ PhD Student
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
King's College London
Dr Valentina Cardi, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
King's College London
Professor Janet Treasure
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
King's College London
Dr Grainne McLoughlin
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
King's College London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Eating Disorders Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lowe MR, Friedman MI, Mattes R, Kopyt D, Gayda C. Comparison of verbal and pictorial measures of hunger during fasting in normal weight and obese subjects. Obes Res. 2000 Nov;8(8):566-74. doi: 10.1038/oby.2000.73.
Hunot C, Fildes A, Croker H, Llewellyn CH, Wardle J, Beeken RJ. Appetitive traits and relationships with BMI in adults: Development of the Adult Eating Behaviour Questionnaire. Appetite. 2016 Oct 1;105:356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.024. Epub 2016 May 20.
Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 669-689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. Guilford Press
Kliemann N, Beeken RJ, Wardle J, Johnson F. Development and validation of the Self-Regulation of Eating Behaviour Questionnaire for adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Aug 2;13:87. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0414-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRAS Project ID: 209609
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.