Loteprednol vs. Prednisolone and Fluorometholone

NCT ID: NCT03123614

Last Updated: 2021-05-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

131 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-19

Study Completion Date

2018-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Corneal haze, in which the cornea becomes cloudy, is a well-known and a potentially vision-threatening postoperative complication of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Topical ophthalmic corticosteroids are routinely prescribed by most surgeons postoperatively to help prevent this complication.

Goals of topical steroids use after PRK include effective modulation of the healing response to prevent corneal haze while at the same time minimizing side effects, such as intraocular pressure elevation or cataract formation. Loteprednol etabonate is a corticosteroid that exerts its therapeutic effects and is then quickly changed into inactive metabolites. This relatively fast metabolism of loteprednol gives it a lower side effect profile than other steroids, including a smaller effect on intraocular pressure. In the ophthalmic literature, there is currently no consensus on a standard regimen or which type of corticosteroid should be used after PRK.

Investigators are conducting a prospective, randomized trial to compare the incidence of intraocular pressure rise and visually significant postoperative corneal haze after PRK with the use of loteprednol 0.5% gel compared to the use of earlier generation steroids, prednisolone acetate 1% suspension and fluorometholone 0.1% suspension.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intraocular Pressure Corneal Opacity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Examiners are masked to the treatment arm when obtaining measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) and grading corneal haze.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph Gel

Group 1 will use loteprednol 0.5% gel in both eyes, starting at a frequency of four times per day for the first week and then tapered off based on clinical judgement of the corneal healing response.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph Gel

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisolone acetate 1% Oph Susp

Group 2 will use prednisolone acetate 1% suspension in both eyes, starting at a frequency of four times per day for the first week, then tapered down to a regimen of fluorometholone 0.1% suspension, which will then be tapered off based on clinical judgement of the corneal healing response.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph Susp

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph Gel

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph Susp

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All subjects who are deemed suitable candidates for PRK after routine refractive surgery screening will be considered eligible for participation in this study.
* Subjects must be at least 21 years of age and not pregnant or nursing (due to fluctuations in visual parameters during pregnancy).

Exclusion Criteria

* Selection will be consistent with the current standard of care for PRK. Any patient that is not a suitable candidate for PRK will not be included.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mark Mifflin

Professor, Ophthalmology/Visual Sciences

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark Mifflin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Utah Moran Eye Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Moran Eye Center - Midvalley Location

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB # 75978

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.