Remission and Flare in Psoriatic Arthritis: a Prospective 6-month Study With a Double Perspective.
NCT ID: NCT03119805
Last Updated: 2018-10-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
466 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-05-18
2018-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study in Participants With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With Inadequate Response to Glucocorticoids and ≥2 Immunosuppressants
NCT07175285
An Adaptive Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Tolerability of GSK2586184
NCT01777256
Real World Evidence of Anifrolumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Investigator Initiated, Observational, Multicenter Study Evaluating Effectiveness and Safety of Anifrolumab in Active SLE Patients
NCT07215754
Study of Epratuzumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
NCT00111306
European LUpuS Inception-Cohort Developing initiATivE
NCT07209540
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objective is to define cutoffs of the most widely used composite scores and PROs, for levels corresponding to remission/low disease activity and for changes in levels corresponding to flares, in PsA, when remission/low disease activity and flare are defined from the patient and physician perspective.
Methods Design: the ReFlaP (Remission/Flare in PsA) study is a prospective, multicentric international, longitudinal, observational study. It will take place in 2017-18 in 25 centers across Europe, North and South America and Asia. Investigators plan to include a total of 450 patients. The inclusion period will last 6 months; each center will include around 20 patients. Each patient is seen twice at baseline and at 1-6 months (follow-up visit) in the context of usual care.
Patients: Consecutive adult patients with definite PsA (according to ClASsification of Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria and confirmation by a rheumatologist), more than 2 years of disease duration, and will be included after signed informed consent.
Data collection: During each visit, physicians will collect data on the disease and on disease activity: 66 swollen joint counts, 68 tender joint counts, tender entheseal points (Leeds Enthesitis Index) and body surface area of psoriasis. This will allow calculation of most of the usual composite scores of PsA: Arythmetic Mean of Desirability Functions modified (AMDF modified), Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), clinical DAPSA (c-DAPSA), Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS). Well-validated Patient Reported Outcomes will be collected from patients: Patient Global Assessment (PGA), Pain, Health Assessment Quality (HAQ), PSoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PSAID), Psoriatic Arthritis Quality of Life (PsAQoL), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) as well as the recent Flare questionnaire proposed by GRAPPA. Assessment of disease activity status (i.e. remission or flare) will be performed by both physician and patient using global questions.
Planned analysis
To define cutoffs of the most widely used composite scores and PROs, for levels corresponding to remission/low disease activity and for changes in levels corresponding to flares, in PsA:
From the health professional perspective, the gold standard for 'remission' will be MDA and sensitivity analyses will use physician-perceived remission/low disease activity (single questions) and remission in composite scores (DAPSA, c-DAPSA, modified AMDF, PASDAS); for flare the gold standard will be decision of treatment intensification and sensitivity analyses will use: global assessment of flare and increase in category of disease activity in the composite scores.
From the perspective of the patient, the gold standard will be for 'remission', PASS and as sensitivity analysis, patient-perceived remission/low disease single questions yes/no, and for flares, the GRAPPA flare questionnaire, and as sensitivity analyses, flare according to the patient (single question) and the assessment of worsening in MCID.
Investigators will assess what physician-defined remission/low disease activity/flare and patient-defined remission/low disease activity/flare correspond to both on composite 'physician' scores and on all the collected PRO scores. Investigators will use data collected at baseline cross sectionally for remission/low disease activity and changes in scores between the 2 visits for flares.
Cutoff values for each outcome and for each change in outcome will be calculated using ROC curves and 75th percentile analyses. Sensitivity analyses will explore cutoff values found according to patient demographic characteristics and country. Investigators will compare attainment of remission or flare according to the different definitions, using kappa analyses. Rasch analyses will be used as necessary.
Planned outcomes The expected outcomes of this study are a better knowledge of remission/low disease activity and flare in PsA in accordance to the perspectives of patients and physicians. Investigators will define cutoff values for most widely-used scores in PsA, allowing easier interpretation of study results and in the clinic, helping a better communication with patients.
Better knowledge of the important aspects of disease fluctuation and of patient relevant disease targets in PsA should enhance patient care and management in a treat-to-target approach.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Definite PsA according to the ClASsification of Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria and diagnosis confirmed by a rheumatologist. (Taylor2006)
* Willingness to participate and signed informed consent.
* Patients with more than 2 years of disease duration will be included in the study for more homogeneity.
Patient will be included consecutively. A registry will be kept locally to note the age and gender of patients who have been proposed the study but refused to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who don't speak or read the local language or are not comfortable filling in a paper CRF in the local language.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Laure Gossec
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ana- Maria Orbai
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Husni
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Smolen
Vienna, , Austria
Palominos
Porto Alegre, , Brazil
Aydin
Ottawa, , Canada
Sibel Aydin
Ottawa, , Canada
Eder
Toronto, , Canada
Talli
Tallinn, , Estonia
Soubrier
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Dernis
Le Mans, , France
Laure Gossec
Paris, , France
Richette
Paris, , France
Ruyssen-Witrand
Toulouse, , France
Uta Kiltz
Herne, , Germany
Lubrano
Campobasso, , Italy
Rossana Scrivo
Roma, , Italy
Balanescu
Bucharest, , Romania
Inna Gaydukova
Saratov, , Russia
Katy Leung
Singapore, , Singapore
Juan Canete
Barcelona, , Spain
Kalyoncu
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Laura Coates
Oxford, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yazji SM, Helliwell PS, Balanescu A, Dernis E, Kiltz U, Kalyoncu U, Leung YY, Orbai AM, Smolen JS, de Wit M, Gossec L, Coates LC. Association Between Patient Perception of Disease Status and Different Components of the Minimal Disease Activity Criteria in Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2025 Apr 1;52(4):362-367. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-1149.
Leung YY, Eder L, Orbai AM, Coates LC, de Wit M, Smolen JS, Kiltz U, Palominos P, Canete JD, Scrivo R, Balanescu A, Dernis E, Meisalu S, Soubrier M, Kalyoncu U, Gossec L. Association between obesity and likelihood of remission or low disease activity status in psoriatic arthritis applying index-based and patient-based definitions of remission: a cross-sectional study. RMD Open. 2023 Sep;9(3):e003157. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003157.
Lucasson F, Kiltz U, Kalyoncu U, Leung YY, Palominos P, Canete JD, Scrivo R, Balanescu A, Dernis E, Meisalu S, Ryussen-Witrand A, Soubrier M, Aydin SZ, Eder L, Gaydukova I, Lubrano E, Richette P, Husni E, Coates LC, de Wit M, Smolen JS, Orbai AM, Gossec L. Disparities in healthcare in psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of 439 patients from 13 countries. RMD Open. 2022 May;8(1):e002031. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002031.
Coates LC, Robinson DE, Orbai AM, Kiltz U, Leung YY, Palominos P, Canete JD, Scrivo R, Balanescu A, Dernis E, Meisalu S, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Eder L, de Wit M, Smolen JS, Lubrano E, Gossec L. What influences patients' opinion of remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis? Principal component analysis of an international study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Nov 3;60(11):5292-5299. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab220.
Orbai AM, Perin J, Gorlier C, Coates LC, Kiltz U, Leung YY, Palominos PE, Canete JD, Scrivo R, Balanescu A, Dernis E, Talli S, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Soubrier M, Aydin S, Eder L, Gaydukova I, Lubrano E, Kalyoncu U, Richette P, Husni ME, Smolen JS, de Wit M, Gossec L. Determinants of Patient-Reported Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease: An Analysis of the Association With Sex in 458 Patients From Fourteen Countries. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Dec;72(12):1772-1779. doi: 10.1002/acr.24090.
Gorlier C, Orbai AM, Puyraimond-Zemmour D, Coates LC, Kiltz U, Leung YY, Palominos P, Canete JD, Scrivo R, Balanescu A, Dernis E, Talli S, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Soubrier M, Aydin SZ, Eder L, Gaydukova I, Lubrano E, Kalyoncu U, Richette P, Husni ME, de Wit M, Smolen JS, Gossec L. Comparing patient-perceived and physician-perceived remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of 410 patients from 14 countries. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb;78(2):201-208. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214140. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ongoing
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.