Trial Outcomes & Findings for 5 Years Long Term Results After Standalone CyPass-Implantation (NCT NCT03114059)
NCT ID: NCT03114059
Last Updated: 2022-07-14
Results Overview
The Measurement of the intraocular Pressure is a criterion for the Efficacy of CyPass Stent Procedure (success rate). The postoperative target pressure of 15 mmHg, 18 mmHg or 21 mmHg (depends on Glaucoma Status) has to be achieved.
COMPLETED
230 participants
up to 7 years
2022-07-14
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
230
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
230
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=230 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
1 Participants
n=230 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
64 Participants
n=230 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
165 Participants
n=230 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.095 • n=230 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
119 Participants
n=230 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
111 Participants
n=230 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
230 participants
n=230 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 7 yearsPopulation: only 75 study patients were able to visit the clinic and to undergone the 5 year examination, therefore we only could analyse the data of theses75 patients. The number of 230 Patients discribes all patients that fullfil the inclusion criteria.
The Measurement of the intraocular Pressure is a criterion for the Efficacy of CyPass Stent Procedure (success rate). The postoperative target pressure of 15 mmHg, 18 mmHg or 21 mmHg (depends on Glaucoma Status) has to be achieved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=75 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Patients That Achieve Target Intraocular Pressure Measured in mmHg
Target pressure achieved - without medication
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients That Achieve Target Intraocular Pressure Measured in mmHg
Target pressure achieved - with medication
|
45 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients That Achieve Target Intraocular Pressure Measured in mmHg
Target pressure not achieved
|
22 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 7 yearsThe Measurement of the intraocular Pressure change is a criterion for the Efficacy of CyPass Stent Procedure (success rate). The postoperative pressure after 5 to 7 years has to be compared with the preoperative intraocular pressure (in mmHg) The change was calculated only from two time points. (value at the final examination time point minus the value at the preoperative time point
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=75 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Change of Intraocular Pressure in mmHg Preoperatively (at Screening) vs Postoperatively (at Final Examination)
preoperative
|
21.127 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.831
|
|
Change of Intraocular Pressure in mmHg Preoperatively (at Screening) vs Postoperatively (at Final Examination)
postoperative
|
16.553 mmHg
Standard Deviation 6.633
|
|
Change of Intraocular Pressure in mmHg Preoperatively (at Screening) vs Postoperatively (at Final Examination)
change
|
-4.697 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.212
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 7 yearsThe number of additional Glaucoma medication is another criterion to determine the Efficacy of CyPass Stent Procedure (success rate). Up to 4 different active substance can be used to reduce the pressure. The more substances the patient uses postoperatively the lower is the success after implantation of the CyPass-Stent. The postoperative number of medications after 5 years has to be compared with the preoperative number
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=75 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Additional Medication
preoperative
|
1.813 numbers of active substances
Standard Deviation 1.182
|
|
Number of Additional Medication
postoperative
|
2.014 numbers of active substances
Standard Deviation 1.053
|
|
Number of Additional Medication
change
|
0.173 numbers of active substances
Standard Deviation 1.201
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 7 yearsTo determine the efficacy of CyPass Stent procedure completely the number of secondary glaucoma interventions (surgery/ laser) has to be documented
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=230 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Secondary Glaucoma Procedures
|
83 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 7 yearsPopulation: for 7 eyes this examination was not done due to low compliance
The Measurement of the optic nerve (HRT) in comparison to the baseline is needed to evaluate the glaucoma damage and to determine the Longterm success rate and the safety of the CyPass- Stent-Procedure. With papillary tomography you can see the changes in the optic nerve head concerning the permanent failures of retinal vessels , measure them very precisely and compare them with the previous findings.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=68 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of Optic Nerve
stable
|
52 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of Optic Nerve
not stable
|
16 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 7 yearsThe comparison of the preoperative and postoperative Status of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and retinal fundus thickness is another criterion to determine the absolute and relative success.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=75 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness
stable
|
40 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness
worsening
|
35 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 7 yearsPopulation: The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is not consistent with numbers provided in any of the rows in the Participant Flow module. The discrepancy is caused by insufficient cooperation (due to old age or poor general condition) of individual participants to carry out this examination to the end
The parameter of the Visual Field (Mean Deviation) will be measured to evaluate the Safety of the CyPass-Procedure. The visual Field shows the progression of glaucoma defects concerning failures in different parts for example in the center or in the periphery of the visual field.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=73 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of Visual Field
improvement
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of Visual Field
stable
|
49 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of Visual Field
progression
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 7 yearsPopulation: The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is not consistent with numbers provided in any of the rows in the Participant Flow module. The discrepancy is caused by insufficient cooperation (due to old age or poor general condition) of individual participants to carry out this examination to the end
Determination of Stent Position in the angle will be performed to exclude moving of the Stent. The stent could change it's position forward into the anterior chamber or backwards in the suprachorioidal space
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=68 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of Stent Position
Stent is stable
|
43 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of Stent Position
Stent moves deeper
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of Stent Position
Stent emerges
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 7 yearsPopulation: The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is not consistent with numbers provided in any of the rows in the Participant Flow module. The discrepancy is caused by insufficient cooperation (due to old age or poor general condition) of individual participants to carry out this examination to the end
Determination of iris tissue reaction to the stent will be performed. We document slight reaction without involving the opening, iris reaction with involving the opening and complete closure by tissue. The iris Tissue could overgrow the opening of the stent and therfore the function of the stent is disturbed or even failed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=74 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of Stent Tissue Interaction
stable
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of Stent Tissue Interaction
slight adhesions
|
32 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stability of Stent Tissue Interaction
severe adhesions
|
18 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 7 yearsThe number of intra-and postoperative complications are needed to evaluate the safety of the CyPass-procedure
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=230 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
resistance during implantation
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
heavy bleeding (intraoperative)
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
bad stent positioning
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
increase in pressure: early postoperative
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
increase in pressure
|
25 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
increase in pressure: glaucomatous attack
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
hyphema
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
hypotonia
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
early contact to the endothelium
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
age-related macula degeneration
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
gliosis
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
macula edema
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
keratitis
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
dry eyes symptoms
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
fibrin
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
stroke
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
uveitis
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
cataract progression
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
secondary cataract
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
lid tumor
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
pain during operation
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
recurrent neuritis
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
retroiridal cyst
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
total number of complications
|
111 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intra-and Postoperative Complications
total number of affected eyes
|
105 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 7 yearsPopulation: for 12 eyes this examination was not done due to low compliance
The Determination of the suprachoroidal bleb is needed to evaluate the function of the stent and the efficacy of the procedure. The bigger the bleb, the lower the pressure and the better the efficacy of the stent
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=63 Participants
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Suprachoroidal Bleb
none
|
44 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suprachoroidal Bleb
small
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suprachoroidal Bleb
big
|
2 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Standalone CyPass Implantation
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Standalone CyPass Implantation
n=75 participants at risk
patients who have undergone a standalone cypass implantation without cataract surgery more than 3 years ago
Glaucoma diagnostics: Heidelberg, Retinal Topography, Visual field, intraocular pressure, medication anamnesis, Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer Thickness, Pachymetry, Sonography, full ophthalmological determination
|
|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Allergic reaction
|
1.3%
1/75 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place