Interest of Serratus Plane Block in Postoperative Analgesia for Robot-assisted Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03110120

Last Updated: 2017-10-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-31

Study Completion Date

2017-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare the analgesia provided by the serratus plane block with local infiltration of the orifices of the trocars after thoracic robot-assisted surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In our hospital, the current practice to provide post operative analgesia for patients scheduled for robot-assisted mitral repair or oncological thoracic surgery is to dispense local anesthetics at the orifices of the trocars at the end of the surgery and to give a Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA). Some of these patients are not comfortable and we observe a large percentage of chronic pain. Recently we tried to use the Serratus plane block realised before the beginning of the surgery, and it seemed that patients were more comfortable with a lower consumption of morphine. So we decided to perform a double blind, randomized study in this population of patients to compare the analgesia provided by the serratus plane block realized before the beginning of the surgery and the local infiltration of the wound at the end of the surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Analgesia Robotic Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Compare the efficacy of the serratus plane block with local infiltration after thoracic robot-assisted surgery
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
The patient where randomized by the investigator after inform consent was signed The investigator prepared the syringes named "serratus" and "local" with levobupivacaine 0.25 or saline according to randomization The care provider injected the prepared syringes respectively in the serratus plane or locally without knowing their contents The outcome assessor evaluated the post operative pain and the 3 months followup without knowing the randomization

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

serratus

Serratus plane block and local control

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with 10 ml of physiological saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Serratus plane block realized with a mixture of 10 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with 10 ml of physiological saline

0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with physiological saline

Intervention Type DRUG

local infiltration of the wound with 20 ml of injectable solution of physiological saline

local

serratus control and local anesthesia

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with 10 ml of physiological saline

Intervention Type DRUG

local infiltration of the wound with a mixture of 10 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with 10 ml of physiological saline

0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with physiological saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Serratus plane block realized with 20 ml of injectable solution of physiological saline

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with 10 ml of physiological saline

Serratus plane block realized with a mixture of 10 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with 10 ml of physiological saline

Intervention Type DRUG

0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with 10 ml of physiological saline

local infiltration of the wound with a mixture of 10 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with 10 ml of physiological saline

Intervention Type DRUG

0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with physiological saline

Serratus plane block realized with 20 ml of injectable solution of physiological saline

Intervention Type DRUG

0.5% levobupivacaine injectable solution with physiological saline

local infiltration of the wound with 20 ml of injectable solution of physiological saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

serratus plane block local anesthesia local serratus local control

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* mitral repair, coronary artery revascularization or thoracic surgery scheduled robot-assisted surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* non robot-assisted surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christine Watremez, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Watremez Christine

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015/07JAN/008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id