Colloid Preload Versus Crystalloid Co-load in Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT03107598
Last Updated: 2017-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
127 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-31
2016-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension
2. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of severe hypotension, total ephedrine dose, nausea and vomiting and neonatal outcome assessed by Apgar scores and umbilical artery blood gas analysis
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combined Colloids And Crystalloids Versus Crystalloids in Women With Preeclampsia Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
NCT03252496
Crystalloid Versus Colloid Rapid Co-load for Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia
NCT03729076
The Effect of the Timing of Colloid and Crystalloid Infusions on Postspinal Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarian Section
NCT02680678
Ultrasound Guided Fluid Loading Before Spinal Anesthesia
NCT07108881
Combined Colloid Preload And Crystalloid Coload Versus Crystalloid Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
NCT02961842
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Aged between 18 and 40 years' old
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II (ASA)
* Full-term singleton pregnancy
* scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Parturients were excluded if :
* participants younger than 18 or older than 40 years
* cardiovascular, cerebrovascular or renal disease
* multiple gestations
* polyhydramnios or known fetal abnormalities
* allergy to local anesthetics or opioids
* emergency Cesarean section or parturient that have failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia
* contraindications for performing spinal anesthesia in this study no premedication was given. Patients entered the operating room and lay supine with 15° of left lateral tilt on the operating table.
Standard monitors of electrocardiography, pulse oximetry (Spo2), and noninvasive blood pressure were applied on the right arm.
Baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DPB) and heart rates (HR) were recorded. An 18 or 16-gauge intravenous cannula was inserted in a large forearm vein.Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: colloid preload (CoP), and crystalloid co-load (CrC).Group CoP: group with colloid preload The preload group received rapid infusion of 15ml/kg of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (6% HES, voluven) administered by gravity at a wide-open rate over a period of 15-30min before induction of spinal anesthesia.Group CrC: group with crystalloid coload received a sodium chloride 0.9% perfusion as rapidly as possible starting at the time of intrathecal injection.
Spinal anesthesia was performed in the sitting position with a 27- or 25-gauge spinal needle at the L3-4 or L2-3 interspace using hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 2 mL), sufentanyl 2.5 µg (0.5 ml) and 100µg morphine (1ml). All patients received the same dose regardless of height or weight. After completing the anesthetic procedure, patients were immediately repositioned to supine with a 15°-30° left lateral tilt. The highest sensory block was checked and confirmed at the level of T3-T5 determined with loss-to-pinprick method bilaterally at 5 minutes and 10 minutes after spinal drug administration. Motor block was measured with modified Bromage scale (0, no block; 1, inability to raise extended leg;2, inability to flex knee; 3, inability to flex ankle and foot).
Oxygen was routinely given: 5 l/min was administrated via a clear facemask. After umbilical cord clamping, prophylactic antibiotic treatment was administrated intravenously whether 2g of cefazolin or 600mg of clindamycin if the parturient was allergic to penicillin.After delivery of the baby, 10 UI of oxytocin was intravenously given, and 15 UI was titrated following lactate ringer's solution.
Hypotension was defined as a 20% reduction of systolic blood pressure from baseline .Severe hypotension defined as SBP \< 80 mmhg.
It was treated with an intravenous ephedrine bolus:
* 70% ≤ SBP \< 80% from baseline value: ephedrine 6mg
* SBP \< 70% from baseline value: ephedrine 9mg
* SBP \< 60% from baseline value: ephedrine 12mg Vasopressor treatment was repeated every 2 minutes if hypotension persisted or recurred.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
colloid preload
Group CoP: group with colloid preload The preload group received rapid infusion of 15ml/kg of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (6% HES) administered by gravity at a wide-open rate over a period of 15-30min before induction of spinal anesthesia.
colloid preload
coparaison between colloid and crystalloide loading in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section
crystalloid coload
Group CrC: group with crystalloid coload The coload group received a sodium chloride 0.9% perfusion as rapidly as possible starting at the time of intrathecal injection for spinal anesthesia.
colloid preload
coparaison between colloid and crystalloide loading in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
colloid preload
coparaison between colloid and crystalloide loading in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II (ASA)
* Full-term singleton pregnancy
* scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
* multiple gestations
* polyhydramnios or known fetal abnormalities
* allergy to local anesthetics or opioids
* emergency Cesarean section or parturient that have failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia
* contraindications for performing spinal anesthesia
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Mahdia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Majdoub Ali MD
head of anesthesia department clinical professor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LCS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.