Internet-delivered ACT for Chronic Pain

NCT ID: NCT03105908

Last Updated: 2019-01-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

113 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-16

Study Completion Date

2018-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall aim of the present study is to evaluate an internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment therapy treatment (iACT) for patients with chronic pain. More specifically, the study will evaluate if 1) iACT is effective in improving functioning and quality of life in comparison to a waitlist condition, 2) if iACT is cost-effective, 3) factors that influence treatment outcome (i.e. predictors, moderators or characteristics of treatment responders), 4) if psychological variables mediates the effects of treatment on outcome, and 5) if subgroups of patients varies in change processes (i.e. moderated mediation).

The main hypothesis is that iACT will improve functioning and quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic pain affects 12-30% of the population and often results in depression, disability, and reduced quality of life. Medical strategies are often ineffective or insufficient to alleviate symptoms and increase functioning. Instead, the empirical support for cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is today well established, and such interventions are commonly seen as critically important for patients with chronic pain. However, modest effects sizes calls for further improvements. Recent developments within CBT, particularly Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), have suggested the utility of acceptance and mindfulness strategies to manage pain and distress. The body of evidence for ACT has grown rapidly during the past decade, and ACT is today listed by the American Psychological Association as a treatment for chronic pain, with strong empirical support.

Internet-delivered ACT

Despite the increased empirical support for ACT the availability is still very limited, and a large number of patients do not receive this treatment. In other domains, the accessibility of empirically supported treatments has increased during the past decade due to the development of methods to deliver the treatment via internet. For example, a large number of studies illustrate the utility of internet-delivered CBT for anxiety, insomnia and depression, with treatment effects similar to those obtained in studies with face-to-face treatment. Few studies have yet evaluated internet-delivered ACT (iACT) for chronic pain, but a recent pilot study from our group with participants suffering from fibromyalgia (n=41) illustrated very promising results that warrant further studies to evaluate the effects of this treatment.

Moderators and mediators of treatment outcome

If iACT shows to be effective, it is vital to identify for whom this treatment works. For example, it is possible that factors such as age, pain duration or depression may moderate the effects of treatment. Also, it is likely that some individuals who respond well to regular face-to-face treatment do not benefit from internet-delivered interventions. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that acceptance of pain and distress may be a more important mediator of change than e.g. pain intensity, catastrophizing or anxiety. However, no study has to our knowledge yet explored if subgroups of patients (e.g. men and women) improve via different change processes (i.e. moderated mediation). More information regarding moderators and mediators of change will make it possible to adjust and tailor interventions to meet specific individual needs, and thereby increase the effects of treatment.

Recruitment

Patients will be recruited through self referral. Thus, information regarding the study will be provided through newspapers and social media, as well as in direct communication with pain clinics and primary care units, including instructions regarding e.g. eligibility and how to sign up. Once patients have been found eligible and expressed interest in study participation they will be assessed by a psychologist, and when needed by a pain physician, via semi-structured interviews to confirm eligibility and to ensure that the patient meet the study criteria. Informed consent is obtained from all participants prior to the assessment.

Statistical methods

Evaluations of treatment effects are primarily based on intent-to-treat analyses. The statistical approach will primarily be based on linear multilevel modeling (LMM), which takes into account dependencies between repeated measures and differences between patients in pre-treatment status and treatment response (i.e. random effects modeling) and also provide means of handling missing data. More traditional methods, such as ANOVA and hierarchical regression, may also be utilized when appropriate. Analyses of change processes (mediation, moderation, moderated mediation) will follow guidelines and recommendations (e.g. cross-product of coefficients approach, bootstrapping). The main health economic outcomes will be the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which is a measure of the relationship between the cost of the treatment and the incremental value it provides in terms of functioning, compared to the control condition.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment

Internet delivered Acceptance and Commitment therapy, supported by a psychologist/psychology student under supervision.

Group Type OTHER

Internet delivered Acceptance and Commitment therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The main component in the treatment is exposure to symptoms and feared situations. The iACT program is adapted from the evidence based face-to-face treatment at the Behavioral Medicine unit at Karolinska University Hospital. The iACT program has a different structure but is equal in content to face-to-face treatment, and is to be completed within ten weeks. Participants receive texts, audio files, movies and exercises and have online contact with their psychologist via an internet platform or a smart phone application. The treatment aims to encourage valued behaviors in the presence of inner discomfort.

Waiting list control condition

Participants receive no treatment for ten weeks, i.e. waiting list condition. Following post-assessment, the control condition receive unguided iACT (i.e. the same content and structure as iACT but without systematic therapist communication).

Group Type OTHER

Waiting list control condition

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

After a ten week wait list period, the control condition receive same treatment as the intervention group, but without therapist support.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Internet delivered Acceptance and Commitment therapy

The main component in the treatment is exposure to symptoms and feared situations. The iACT program is adapted from the evidence based face-to-face treatment at the Behavioral Medicine unit at Karolinska University Hospital. The iACT program has a different structure but is equal in content to face-to-face treatment, and is to be completed within ten weeks. Participants receive texts, audio files, movies and exercises and have online contact with their psychologist via an internet platform or a smart phone application. The treatment aims to encourage valued behaviors in the presence of inner discomfort.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Waiting list control condition

After a ten week wait list period, the control condition receive same treatment as the intervention group, but without therapist support.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

iACT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* a pain duration of ≥ 6 months;
* are able to communicate in Swedish
* have access to computer and internet in their home environment.
* have access to a cell phone with the possibility of receiving text messages
* no planned changes in medication use, or any other changes in interventions for their pain planned

Exclusion Criteria

* injury or illness that require immediate assessment or different treatment, or that is expected to progress significantly during the next 6 months
* unstable medication (planned changes in medication during next 4 months)
* previous ACT or CBT treatment during the past 3 months
* severe psychiatric co-morbidity (e.g. high risk of suicide) as assessed by the psychologist in a semi-structured interview
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AFA Insurance

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rikard Wicksell

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rikard Wicksell

Director of Functional Area Medical Psychology, Karolinska Univ Hospital, assoc professor and head of research group Behavior Medcine, Karolinska Institutet

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rikard Wicksell, PhD, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Karolinska Institutet

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karolinska Institutet

Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gentili C, Zetterqvist V, Rickardsson J, Holmstrom L, Ljotsson B, Wicksell R. Examining predictors of treatment effect in digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic pain. Cogn Behav Ther. 2023 Jul;52(4):380-396. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2023.2191826. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36971108 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015/1638-31/2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.