Trial Outcomes & Findings for Patient-reported Monitoring of Symptoms and Spirometry Via the patientMpower Platform in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (NCT NCT03104322)
NCT ID: NCT03104322
Last Updated: 2019-04-02
Results Overview
Questionnaire-based assessment of response to questions: \[pMp = patientMpower platform\] 1. instructions for using pMp were clear 2. pMp helped me take the correct dose medicines 3. pMp helped me to take my medicines at the correct time 4. pMp helped me to reach my personal exercise goal 5. pMp helped me to walk further 6. pMp gave me a greater sense of control 7. useful to be able to record the impact of lung fibrosis on QoL 8. pMp encouraged me to look at the informational videos 9. preference for using pMp 10. difficulty in using pMp 11. effect of pMp on impact on daily life 12. tiring/irritating to use pMp 13. want to continue using pMp after study 14. would recommend pMp to others Possible responses Q1-8, Q12: strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree Q9: yes/no preference/no Q10: very easy/easy/difficult/very difficult Q11: positive/negative/open text Q13,14: yes/no
COMPLETED
NA
7 participants
single measurement at 8 weeks
2019-04-02
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Observation Sequence
Period 1: patientMpower platform+usual care for 8 weeks; Period 2: usual care alone for 8 weeks
patientMpower platform: electronic health journal for patient to record compliance, spirometry, impact on daily life and symptoms
usual care: usual care
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Patient-reported Monitoring of Symptoms and Spirometry Via the patientMpower Platform in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Observation Sequence
n=7 Participants
Period 1: patientMpower platform+usual care for 8 weeks; Period 2: usual care alone for 8 weeks
patientMpower platform: electronic health journal for patient to record compliance, spirometry, impact on daily life and symptoms
usual care: usual care
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
69 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
white
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: single measurement at 8 weeksPopulation: Patients who completed study and provided response to questionnaire
Questionnaire-based assessment of response to questions: \[pMp = patientMpower platform\] 1. instructions for using pMp were clear 2. pMp helped me take the correct dose medicines 3. pMp helped me to take my medicines at the correct time 4. pMp helped me to reach my personal exercise goal 5. pMp helped me to walk further 6. pMp gave me a greater sense of control 7. useful to be able to record the impact of lung fibrosis on QoL 8. pMp encouraged me to look at the informational videos 9. preference for using pMp 10. difficulty in using pMp 11. effect of pMp on impact on daily life 12. tiring/irritating to use pMp 13. want to continue using pMp after study 14. would recommend pMp to others Possible responses Q1-8, Q12: strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree Q9: yes/no preference/no Q10: very easy/easy/difficult/very difficult Q11: positive/negative/open text Q13,14: yes/no
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Observation Sequence
n=4 Participants
Period 1: patientMpower platform+usual care for 8 weeks; Period 2: usual care alone for 8 weeks
patientMpower platform: electronic health journal for patient to record compliance, spirometry, impact on daily life and symptoms
usual care: usual care
|
|---|---|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
agree instructions clear
|
3 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
agree helped correct dose of meds
|
1 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
agree helped time of meds
|
1 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
agree motivated re exercise
|
4 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
agree helped walk further
|
3 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
agree gave greater sense control
|
3 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
agree useful record impact on QoL
|
3 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
agree helped look at information videos
|
2 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
prefer using patientMpower
|
3 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
easy to use patientMpower
|
2 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
positive effect on impact on daily life
|
3 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
agree tiring/irritating to use patientMpower
|
0 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
want to continue after end study
|
4 Participants
|
|
Acceptability of patientMpower Platform From Patient & Healthcare Professional Perspective
would recommend to others
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: Patients did not record medication compliance during study timeframe.
Compliance recorded by patient via patientMpower platform daily
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline visitPopulation: patients who provided at least 1 IPF-PROM; insufficient data for analysis of time trends; Baseline values reported
12-item questionnaire with 4 domains (psychological experience of dyspnoea, physical experience of dyspnoea, emotional well-being, energy levels). 3 questions/domain asking frequency of symptom or its impact in the time interval since last response. Four possible responses to each question: none of the time/some of the time/most of the time/all of the time. Numerical score assigned to each response 1/2/3/4 (respectively). Impact on domain characterised by mean score for each of 3 questions in that domain. One question on overall quality of life with responses: excellent/good/fair/poor/very poor. Numerical score assigned to each response 1/2/3/4/5 respectively. Low score better outcome; high score worse outcome (for all responses).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Observation Sequence
n=2 Participants
Period 1: patientMpower platform+usual care for 8 weeks; Period 2: usual care alone for 8 weeks
patientMpower platform: electronic health journal for patient to record compliance, spirometry, impact on daily life and symptoms
usual care: usual care
|
|---|---|
|
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patient Reported Outcome Measure (IPF-PROM)
Baseline overall quality of life
|
1.5 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 2.0
|
|
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patient Reported Outcome Measure (IPF-PROM)
Baseline psychological impact of dyspnoea
|
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 1.3 to 2.7
|
|
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patient Reported Outcome Measure (IPF-PROM)
Baseline physical impact of breathlessness
|
1.85 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 2.7
|
|
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patient Reported Outcome Measure (IPF-PROM)
Baseline psychological wellbeing
|
1.35 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 1.7
|
|
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patient Reported Outcome Measure (IPF-PROM)
Baseline energy
|
2.0 score on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 2.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: No data available for analysis due to technical issues (no patient used a FitBit or mobile device with built-in accelerometer)
Activity (steps/day) recorded via FitBit or patient's phone and transmitted to patientMpower platform
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: All entered patients who provided home spirometry data
Forced vital capacity recorded via patientMpower platform daily
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Observation Sequence
n=7 Participants
Period 1: patientMpower platform+usual care for 8 weeks; Period 2: usual care alone for 8 weeks
patientMpower platform: electronic health journal for patient to record compliance, spirometry, impact on daily life and symptoms
usual care: usual care
|
|---|---|
|
Patient-reported Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Baseline FVC (patient-reported)
|
2.40 L
Interval 1.51 to 3.54
|
|
Patient-reported Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
8-week FVC (patient-reported)
|
2.7 L
Interval 2.2 to 3.8
|
Adverse Events
Observation Sequence
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place