Comparison: Constant-rate Infusion Plus Demanding Dosing VS Variable-rate Feedback Infusion Plus Demanding Dosing

NCT ID: NCT03102333

Last Updated: 2018-07-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-30

Study Completion Date

2017-12-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the case of the newlys developed PCA, the infusion rate is increased according to the patient's need for bolus button, so that the pain can be controlled more efficiently.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the case of the existing iv-pca, the analgesic drug was injected into the patient at a constant rate (ex. 1 ml / hr) and additional pain was controlled through the bolus dose (1 ml).

As a result, the analgesic effect was insufficient, or the effect was excessive, causing side effects (nausea, vomiting, sedation, dizziness). Especially In spinal surgery, the degree of pain sharply decreases from day 1 to day 2. Classic iv-pca with constant infusion rate can not reflect this result. But in the case of the newlys developed PCA, the infusion rate is increased according to the patient's need for bolus button, so that the pain can be controlled more efficiently. If the bolus button is not pressed for a certain period of time, it is expected that the injection rate will be reduced and the side effect caused by the analgesic agent will be decreased.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Constant-rate Infusion

INTERVENTION : Constant-rate Infusion mode : The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time during a 48 h period

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Constant-rate Infusion mode

Intervention Type DEVICE

The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time during a 48 h period

Variable-rate Feedback Infusion

INTERVENTION : Variable-rate Feedback Infusion mode :The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time. It can increment or decrement rate(0.2ml/hr) by press bolus button during a 48 h period

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Variable-rate Feedback Infusion mode

Intervention Type DEVICE

The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time. It can increment or decrement rate(0.2ml/hr) by press bolus button during a 48 h period

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Variable-rate Feedback Infusion mode

The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time. It can increment or decrement rate(0.2ml/hr) by press bolus button during a 48 h period

Intervention Type DEVICE

Constant-rate Infusion mode

The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time during a 48 h period

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Spine fusion surgery at Chung-Ang University Hospital with IV- PCA under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Unrecorded type of anesthetic agent
* Denial to the study
* Brain disorder
* Cardiopulmonary disease
* Psychiatric disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chongwha Baek

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chung-Ang University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAUH-SP1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CPR Feedback Devices
NCT02293200 UNKNOWN NA
Which Position Is Better For CPR In OHCA Patients?
NCT07002775 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Comparing Foot and Hand CPR
NCT06719401 COMPLETED NA