Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Long-term Safety Study of QMF149 in Japanese Participants With Asthma (NCT NCT03100500)
NCT ID: NCT03100500
Last Updated: 2020-02-07
Results Overview
A TEAE is any adverse event that started on or after the time of the first inhalation of study drug but not later than 7 days (30 days in the case of a SAE) after the last administration. A SAE is described as any adverse event that leads to death, is life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, causes or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, or any other important medical event which is medically significant.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
51 participants
Up to 52 weeks
2020-02-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
QMF-149 150/320 μg
QMF-149 150/320 μg delivered as powder in hard capsules, once daily via Concept1 inhaler.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
51
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
51
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Long-term Safety Study of QMF149 in Japanese Participants With Asthma
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
QMF-149 150/320 μg
n=51 Participants
QMF-149 150/320 μg delivered as powder in hard capsules, once daily via Concept1 inhaler.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
51.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.45 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
East Asian
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 52 weeksPopulation: Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
A TEAE is any adverse event that started on or after the time of the first inhalation of study drug but not later than 7 days (30 days in the case of a SAE) after the last administration. A SAE is described as any adverse event that leads to death, is life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, causes or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, or any other important medical event which is medically significant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
QMF-149 150/320 μg
n=51 Participants
QMF-149 150/320 μg delivered as powder in hard capsules, once daily via Concept1 inhaler.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
TEAEs
|
40 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 26 and 52Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who entered the treatment epoch of this study and received at least one dose of study medication during this study. Participants with a value at both baseline and the respective day are included.
The pre-dose FEV1 was defined as the mean of the pre-dose 45 and 15 min FEV1 values prior to evening dose. FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. A positive change from baseline in FEV1 indicates improvement in lung function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
QMF-149 150/320 μg
n=51 Participants
QMF-149 150/320 μg delivered as powder in hard capsules, once daily via Concept1 inhaler.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline of Pre-Dose Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Measured After 26 And 52 Weeks Treatment
Baseline
|
2.1565 liters (L)
Standard Deviation 0.58074
|
|
Change From Baseline of Pre-Dose Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Measured After 26 And 52 Weeks Treatment
Change at Week 26
|
0.2417 liters (L)
Standard Deviation 0.26361
|
|
Change From Baseline of Pre-Dose Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Measured After 26 And 52 Weeks Treatment
Change at Week 52
|
0.1827 liters (L)
Standard Deviation 0.26627
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52Population: FAS consisted of all participants who entered the treatment epoch of this study and received at least one dose of study medication during this study. Participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline month are included.
PEF is the greatest airflow rate achieved during forced exhalation with lungs fully inflated. PEF was analyzed separately in the morning and evening using an electronic Peak Flow Meter (ePEF). A positive change from baseline in PEF indicates improvement in lung function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
QMF-149 150/320 μg
n=51 Participants
QMF-149 150/320 μg delivered as powder in hard capsules, once daily via Concept1 inhaler.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline of Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) During 52 Weeks Treatment
Change through Weeks 1-52, Evening PEF
|
9.34 liters/minute (L/min)
Standard Deviation 42.685
|
|
Change From Baseline of Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) During 52 Weeks Treatment
Baseline, Morning PEF
|
342.88 liters/minute (L/min)
Standard Deviation 94.656
|
|
Change From Baseline of Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) During 52 Weeks Treatment
Change through Weeks 1-52, Morning PEF
|
15.49 liters/minute (L/min)
Standard Deviation 49.089
|
|
Change From Baseline of Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) During 52 Weeks Treatment
Baseline, Evening PEF
|
352.65 liters/minute (L/min)
Standard Deviation 92.624
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 26 and 52Population: FAS consisted of all participants who entered the treatment epoch of this study and received at least one dose of study medication during this study. Participants with a value at both baseline and the respective day are included.
The ACQ-7 is a seven-item disease-specific instrument developed and validated to assess asthma control in participants. It consists of five items to assess symptoms and activity limitations, one question to assess rescue medication use, and one question to assess airway caliber (FEV1% predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question (question 7) was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in lung function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
QMF-149 150/320 μg
n=51 Participants
QMF-149 150/320 μg delivered as powder in hard capsules, once daily via Concept1 inhaler.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline of Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) After 26 And 52 Weeks Treatment
Baseline
|
1.983 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5381
|
|
Change From Baseline of Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) After 26 And 52 Weeks Treatment
Change at Week 26
|
-0.689 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6268
|
|
Change From Baseline of Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) After 26 And 52 Weeks Treatment
Change at Week 52
|
-0.830 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6852
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 26 and 52Population: FAS consisted of all participants who entered the treatment epoch of this study and received at least one dose of study medication during this study. Number analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at Weeks 26 and 52.
The ACQ-7 is a seven-item disease-specific instrument developed and validated to assess asthma control in participants. It consists of five items to assess symptoms and activity limitations, one question to assess rescue medication use, and one question to assess airway caliber (FEV1% predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question (question 7) was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. The proportion of participants who achieved an improvement of at least 0.5 in ACQ-7 (i.e. decrease of ACQ-7 score of at least 0.5 from baseline) at post-baseline visits were analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
QMF-149 150/320 μg
n=51 Participants
QMF-149 150/320 μg delivered as powder in hard capsules, once daily via Concept1 inhaler.
|
|---|---|
|
Responder Rate of Participants Achieving the Minimal Important Difference (MID) of ACQ-7 ≥ 0.5 After 26 And 52 Weeks Treatment
Week 26
|
66.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Responder Rate of Participants Achieving the Minimal Important Difference (MID) of ACQ-7 ≥ 0.5 After 26 And 52 Weeks Treatment
Week 52
|
72.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52Population: FAS consisted of all participants who entered the treatment epoch of this study and received at least one dose of study medication during this study. Participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline month are included.
Based on the electronic-diary data, the total number of puffs of rescue medication per day over the 52 weeks were calculated and divided by the total number of days to derive the mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication taken for the participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
QMF-149 150/320 μg
n=51 Participants
QMF-149 150/320 μg delivered as powder in hard capsules, once daily via Concept1 inhaler.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline of Rescue Medication Use During 52 Weeks Treatment
Baseline
|
0.56 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 1.382
|
|
Change From Baseline of Rescue Medication Use During 52 Weeks Treatment
Change through Weeks 1-52
|
-0.18 puffs/day
Standard Deviation 0.499
|
Adverse Events
QMF149 150/320 µg
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
QMF149 150/320 µg
n=51 participants at risk
QMF-149 150/320 μg delivered as powder in hard capsules, once daily via Concept1 inhaler.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
3.9%
2/51 • Up to 52 weeks
Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
11.8%
6/51 • Up to 52 weeks
Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
29.4%
15/51 • Up to 52 weeks
Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
3.9%
2/51 • Up to 52 weeks
Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
3.9%
2/51 • Up to 52 weeks
Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection bacterial
|
5.9%
3/51 • Up to 52 weeks
Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
3.9%
2/51 • Up to 52 weeks
Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
5.9%
3/51 • Up to 52 weeks
Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
5.9%
3/51 • Up to 52 weeks
Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
54.9%
28/51 • Up to 52 weeks
Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
3.9%
2/51 • Up to 52 weeks
Safety Set consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication during this study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of pooled data (i.e.,data from all sites) in clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER