Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of INCB018424 Phosphate Cream in Subjects With Vitiligo (NCT NCT03099304)

NCT ID: NCT03099304

Last Updated: 2022-11-17

Results Overview

An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of body surface area \[BSA\]) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

157 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline; Week 24

Results posted on

2022-11-17

Participant Flow

A total of 157 participants with vitiligo were treated at 26 study centers in the United States.

157 participants were randomized to receive 1 of 4 dose strengths of ruxolitinib cream (0.15% once daily \[QD\], 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD, 1.5% twice daily \[BID\]) or vehicle during the 24-week, double-blind (DB), vehicle-controlled treatment period. After the DB period, 11 participants remained on 0.15% QD, and 42 participants who met criteria were re-randomized to 1 of the 3 higher active blinded treatment groups. All other participants remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Cross-over
Participants who were randomized to vehicle cream BID or to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) on Day 1 of the double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period and received ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
STARTED
32
31
31
30
33
0
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
COMPLETED
27
26
30
26
30
0
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
NOT COMPLETED
5
5
1
4
3
0
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
STARTED
0
11
45
44
47
0
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
COMPLETED
0
10
43
37
45
0
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
NOT COMPLETED
0
1
2
7
2
0
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
STARTED
0
0
28
21
28
46
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
COMPLETED
0
0
11
8
12
23
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
17
13
16
23

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Cross-over
Participants who were randomized to vehicle cream BID or to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) on Day 1 of the double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period and received ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
Adverse Event
1
1
0
0
1
0
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
Lost to Follow-up
1
1
0
0
0
0
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
Reason not specified
0
0
0
1
0
0
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
Withdrawal by Subject
3
3
0
2
2
0
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
Protocol Violation
0
0
1
1
0
0
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
Protocol Violation
0
0
1
0
0
0
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
Lost to Follow-up
0
1
1
1
0
0
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
Adverse Event
0
0
0
1
1
0
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
Withdrawal by Subject
0
0
0
4
1
0
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
Reason not specified
0
0
0
1
0
0
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Adverse Event
0
0
1
0
0
0
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Lost to Follow-up
0
0
3
2
1
6
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Physician Decision
0
0
0
0
1
0
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Pregnancy
0
0
0
0
0
1
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Protocol Violation
0
0
0
0
0
1
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Withdrawal by Subject
0
0
9
10
13
15
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Other Reason not specified
0
0
4
1
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

A Study of INCB018424 Phosphate Cream in Subjects With Vitiligo

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Total
n=157 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
46.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.11 • n=5 Participants
45.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.46 • n=7 Participants
53.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.34 • n=5 Participants
46.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.73 • n=4 Participants
49.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.28 • n=21 Participants
48.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.85 • n=10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
15 Participants
n=21 Participants
84 Participants
n=10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
18 Participants
n=21 Participants
73 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
33 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=4 Participants
27 Participants
n=21 Participants
114 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
7 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Captured as "Other"
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
2 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
29 Participants
n=21 Participants
132 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African-American
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
14 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
5 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mexican
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Nigerian/West African
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Cuban
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Spanish
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian, Black, and Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
Facial Body Surface Area (F-BSA) Involvement
1.44 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.838 • n=5 Participants
1.35 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.858 • n=7 Participants
1.40 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.760 • n=5 Participants
1.67 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.953 • n=4 Participants
1.55 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.892 • n=21 Participants
1.48 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.858 • n=10 Participants
Total Body Surface Area (T-BSA) Involvement
23.54 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.960 • n=5 Participants
17.56 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.925 • n=7 Participants
22.96 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.449 • n=5 Participants
24.81 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.056 • n=4 Participants
21.46 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.820 • n=21 Participants
22.05 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.377 • n=10 Participants
Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI)
1.21 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.845 • n=5 Participants
1.19 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.754 • n=7 Participants
1.22 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.705 • n=5 Participants
1.45 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.980 • n=4 Participants
1.26 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.807 • n=21 Participants
1.26 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.817 • n=10 Participants
Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI)
19.40 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.512 • n=5 Participants
14.57 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.049 • n=7 Participants
18.43 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.363 • n=5 Participants
20.55 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.488 • n=4 Participants
16.94 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.256 • n=21 Participants
17.96 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.451 • n=10 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants. Treatment groups were to be defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization regardless of the actual ruxolitinib cream or vehicle cream participants might have applied during their participation in the study. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved responses for visits up to Week 52.

An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of body surface area \[BSA\]) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants Treated With Ruxolitinib Cream Who Achieved a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area and Severity Index Score (F-VASI50) Compared With Participants Treated With Vehicle at Week 24
3.1 percentage of participants
32.3 percentage of participants
25.8 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
45.5 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved F-PhGVA response for visits up to Week 24.

The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) of Clear or Almost Clear
0 percentage of participants
3.2 percentage of participants
9.7 percentage of participants
13.3 percentage of participants
9.1 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 52

Population: ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved responses for visits up to Week 52. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

T-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement from all body regions (percentage of BSA; assessed by the Investigator) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was derived by multiplying the vitiligo involvement values by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing all values (possible range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=10 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=12 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=13 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Full Body Assessment of Vitiligo Area and Severity Index (T-VASI) at Week 52
50 percentage of participants
21.4 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
15.4 percentage of participants
25.8 percentage of participants
30.0 percentage of participants
36.4 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 156 weeks

Population: Based on the data for percentage change from Baseline in F-VASI and T-VASI scores during the treatment periods, the Emax model was not appropriate; therefore, the dose responses were not assessed.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 24 weeks

Population: Safety Population: all participants who applied at least 1 dose of study drug. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1.

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 24
Any TEAE
20 Participants
20 Participants
22 Participants
22 Participants
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 24
Any Grade 3 or higher TEAE
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 52 weeks

Population: Safety Population. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1. Analysis from Day 1 to Week 52 was conducted in participants randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD, ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD, or ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID during the vehicle-controlled period (Day 1 to Week 24).

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 52
Any TEAE
26 Participants
23 Participants
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 52
Any Grade 3 or higher TEAE
2 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24 to Week 52

Population: Safety Population. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1. Analysis was conducted in participants who were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and vehicle groups in the vehicle-controlled period (Day 1 to Week 24) and then had a dose in the continued double-blind period (Week 24 to Week 52).

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 24 to Week 52
Any TEAE
9 Participants
6 Participants
5 Participants
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 24 to Week 52
Any Grade 3 or higher TEAE
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to Week 156

Population: Safety Population. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1. Analysis was only conducted in participants who received ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID on Day 1.

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Number of Participants Who Applied Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID Throughout Study Participation With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE
Any TEAE
26 Participants
Number of Participants Who Applied Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID Throughout Study Participation With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE
Any Grade 3 or higher TEAE
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52 to Week 156

Population: Open-label Evaluable Population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the Open-label Period

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=28 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=21 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=28 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=46 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 52 to Week 156
Any TEAE
15 Participants
16 Participants
13 Participants
25 Participants
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 52 to Week 156
Any Grade 3 or higher TEAE
0 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Mixed-model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) model for post-Baseline measures: (response variable = treatment + stratification factor \[age ≤30 versus \>30\] + visit + treatment\*visit). All post-Baseline visits up to Week 24 were included in the model.

F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Week 24
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
-0.39 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
-0.35 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
-0.63 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
-0.46 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Baseline
0.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.387
1.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.891
1.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.993
1.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.714
1.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.705
1.45 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.980
1.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.808
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 52
-0.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.459
-0.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.811
-1.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.058
-0.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.783
-0.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.578
-0.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.797
-0.76 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.610
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 104
-0.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.444
-0.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.061
-1.79 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.077
-0.87 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.903
-1.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.697
-1.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.961
-0.99 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.817
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 156
-0.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.124
-0.98 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.092
-1.40 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.018
-0.65 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.557
-0.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.490
-0.95 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.949
-1.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.887

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. MMRM model for post-Baseline measures: (response variable = treatment + stratification factor \[age ≤30 versus \>30\] + visit + treatment\*visit). All post-Baseline visits up to Week 24 were included in the model.

F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Week 24
6.02 percent change
Standard Error 7.23
-30.69 percent change
Standard Error 7.39
-29.10 percent change
Standard Error 6.93
-40.00 percent change
Standard Error 7.39
-37.78 percent change
Standard Error 6.89

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
-72.21 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.837
-50.60 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.954
-52.43 percent change
Standard Deviation 36.412
-40.79 percent change
Standard Deviation 37.082
-45.54 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.148
-55.63 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.823
-57.34 percent change
Standard Deviation 50.115
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
-77.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.974
-71.12 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.087
-82.87 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.756
-60.28 percent change
Standard Deviation 64.708
-74.89 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.524
-77.76 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.086
-78.78 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.400
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
-87.95 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.207
-66.83 percent change
Standard Deviation 45.106
-91.25 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.631
-59.16 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.627
-76.25 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.126
-76.76 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.924
-89.52 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.899

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an F-VASI50 at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
90.0 percentage of participants
64.3 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
38.5 percentage of participants
45.2 percentage of participants
43.3 percentage of participants
57.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an F-VASI50 at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
88.9 percentage of participants
87.5 percentage of participants
88.9 percentage of participants
77.8 percentage of participants
78.9 percentage of participants
83.3 percentage of participants
89.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an F-VASI50 at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
100.0 percentage of participants
75.0 percentage of participants
100.0 percentage of participants
60.0 percentage of participants
87.5 percentage of participants
87.5 percentage of participants
100.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

F-BSA involvement was the proportion of the facial body surface area with vitiligo. The area "Face" was defined as including the area on the forehead to the original hairline, on the cheek to the jawline vertically and laterally from the corner of the mouth to the tragus. The area "Face" did not include the surface area of the lips, scalp, ears, or neck, but included the nose and eyelids. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Week 24
6.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.028
-19.82 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.928
-17.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.453
-19.53 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.612
-27.76 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.996

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

F-BSA involvement was the proportion of the facial body surface area with vitiligo. The area "Face" was defined as including the area on the forehead to the original hairline, on the cheek to the jawline vertically and laterally from the corner of the mouth to the tragus. The area "Face" did not include the surface area of the lips, scalp, ears, or neck, but included the nose and eyelids. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
-55.18 percent change
Standard Deviation 36.091
-37.94 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.569
-33.39 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.095
-15.64 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.733
-34.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 37.769
-38.37 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.660
-44.29 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.253
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
-42.86 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.282
-67.61 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.683
-76.57 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.260
-45.65 percent change
Standard Deviation 59.599
-54.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.411
-63.56 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.543
-59.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.186
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
-33.04 percent change
Standard Deviation 6.313
-59.17 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.586
-90.50 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.240
-16.89 percent change
Standard Deviation 56.706
-55.80 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.310
-59.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.106
-72.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.024

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

T-BSA involvement was the proportion of the body surface area with vitiligo. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Week 24
3.35 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.314
-13.97 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.396
-10.83 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.646
-17.19 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.490
-13.60 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.443

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

T-BSA involvement was the proportion of the body surface area with vitiligo. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
-39.53 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.599
-8.72 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.010
-2.72 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.014
-8.73 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.630
-15.13 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.296
-27.33 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.568
-27.59 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.770
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
-42.42 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.208
-30.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 36.289
-30.08 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.717
-21.08 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.323
-33.19 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.127
-33.94 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.573
-32.46 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.190
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
-59.44 percent change
Standard Deviation 51.920
-46.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.723
-34.93 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.391
-37.95 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.651
-29.59 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.261
-10.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 53.863
-46.88 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.304

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. MMRM model for post-Baseline measures: (response variable = treatment + stratification factor \[age ≤30 versus \>30\] + visit + treatment\*visit). All post-Baseline visits up to Week 24 were included in the model.

T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from Baseline (BL) was calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Week 24
0.57 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
-2.27 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.94
-2.18 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.88
-4.51 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.94
-3.52 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.87

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from BL was calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Baseline
9.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.090
13.47 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.655
22.82 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.187
20.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.973
18.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.363
20.55 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.488
16.94 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.256
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 52
-4.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.979
-2.88 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.934
-3.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.536
-3.88 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.642
-3.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.284
-7.37 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.403
-6.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.442
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 104
-6.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.476
-5.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.615
-9.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.398
-6.62 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.054
-7.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.079
-10.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.658
-7.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.927
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 156
-2.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.269
-10.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.533
-11.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.185
-7.82 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.209
-4.72 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.622
-7.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.577
-8.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.996

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100. MMRM model for post-Baseline measures: (response variable = treatment + stratification factor \[age ≤30 versus \>30\] + visit + treatment\*visit). All post-Baseline visits up to Week 24 were included in the model.

T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Week 24
2.65 percent change
Standard Error 4.89
-20.88 percent change
Standard Error 5.00
-15.82 percent change
Standard Error 4.69
-27.16 percent change
Standard Error 4.99
-22.91 percent change
Standard Error 4.65

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.

T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
-50.71 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.310
-25.12 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.556
-19.75 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.484
-20.00 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.264
-24.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.649
-41.90 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.865
-41.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.451
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
-60.96 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.259
-49.35 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.319
-49.07 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.091
-38.70 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.663
-46.44 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.668
-52.14 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.559
-50.03 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.905
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
-71.10 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.448
-59.33 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.055
-47.31 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.610
-49.96 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.555
-44.69 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.718
-14.97 percent change
Standard Deviation 58.982
-62.80 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.904

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Mean Change From Baseline in Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Spreading
Baseline
1.78 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.166
2.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.422
1.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.238
1.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.102
1.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.233
Mean Change From Baseline in Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Spreading
Change from Baseline at Week 24
-1.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.566
-3.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.246
-3.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.532
-3.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.971
-3.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.042

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Spreading
Baseline
2.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.328
2.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.277
1.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.607
2.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.968
1.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.238
1.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.102
1.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.233
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Spreading
Change from Baseline at Week 52
-4.70 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.683
-4.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.592
-3.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.538
-3.85 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.211
-3.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.622
-3.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.395
-3.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.742
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Spreading
Change from Baseline at Week 104
-5.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.153
-4.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.196
-4.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.667
-5.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.371
-3.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.516
-3.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.034
-3.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.034

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Percentage Area
Baseline
22.81 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.843
16.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.006
22.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.878
24.63 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.236
20.79 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.192
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Percentage Area
Change from Baseline at Week 24
0.38 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.329
-1.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.867
-2.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.797
-3.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.744
-2.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.591

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Baseline
9.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.509
16.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.979
24.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.841
24.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.798
22.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.878
24.63 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.236
20.79 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.192
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Change from Baseline at Week 52
-3.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.814
-1.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.905
-1.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.486
-1.92 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.211
-3.93 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.191
-5.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.463
-4.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.127
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Change from Baseline at Week 104
-3.89 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.226
-4.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.994
-5.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.226
-4.44 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.367
-8.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.392
-7.78 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.695
-6.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.682

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.

The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Percentage Area
2.61 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.497
-10.61 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.408
-13.87 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.296
-14.09 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.321
-13.10 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.605

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.

The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Week 52
-32.01 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.629
-7.39 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.571
-10.57 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.300
-7.13 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.967
-19.73 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.730
-22.36 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.593
-25.41 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.049
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Week 104
-39.30 percent change
Standard Deviation 37.071
-23.05 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.233
-34.03 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.992
-18.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 36.527
-35.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.039
-30.40 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.940
-29.19 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.767

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Staging
Baseline
10.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.515
9.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.013
10.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.945
9.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.000
8.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.464
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Staging
Change from Baseline at Week 24
-1.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.184
-1.62 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.282
-1.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.687
-1.96 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.561
-0.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.633

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Baseline
8.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.908
8.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.901
11.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.128
10.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.668
10.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.945
9.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.000
8.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.464
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Change from Baseline at Week 52
-3.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.247
-1.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.301
-2.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.157
-2.62 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.844
-2.41 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.030
-3.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.960
-1.38 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.555
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Change from Baseline at Week 104
-3.44 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.358
-2.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.694
-2.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.866
-2.89 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.537
-2.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.754
-4.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.049
-1.68 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.730

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.

The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Staging
-7.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.740
-17.52 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.267
-13.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.200
-17.00 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.798
-4.46 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.916

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.

The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Week 52
-33.48 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.022
-12.70 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.012
-17.31 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.623
-23.88 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.262
-21.45 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.571
-30.00 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.563
-12.99 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.585
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Week 104
-37.20 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.132
-24.29 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.439
-16.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.268
-32.06 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.311
-27.76 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.202
-35.20 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.904
-14.09 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.969

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved F-PhGVA response for visits up to Week 24.

The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
1
0.0 percentage of participants
3.2 percentage of participants
9.7 percentage of participants
13.3 percentage of participants
9.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
2
6.3 percentage of participants
16.1 percentage of participants
16.1 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
27.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
3
40.6 percentage of participants
64.5 percentage of participants
61.3 percentage of participants
36.7 percentage of participants
54.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
4
34.4 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
9.7 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
3.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
Missing at the visit
18.8 percentage of participants
16.1 percentage of participants
3.2 percentage of participants
13.3 percentage of participants
6.1 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 3
20.0 percentage of participants
71.4 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
46.2 percentage of participants
55.2 percentage of participants
42.9 percentage of participants
31.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 2
33.3 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
36.8 percentage of participants
27.8 percentage of participants
26.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 3
11.1 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
44.4 percentage of participants
26.3 percentage of participants
27.8 percentage of participants
21.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 3
0.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
6.9 percentage of participants
4.8 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 1
20.0 percentage of participants
14.3 percentage of participants
8.3 percentage of participants
7.7 percentage of participants
10.3 percentage of participants
14.3 percentage of participants
24.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 2
60.0 percentage of participants
7.1 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
46.2 percentage of participants
17.2 percentage of participants
28.6 percentage of participants
37.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
7.1 percentage of participants
8.3 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
10.3 percentage of participants
9.5 percentage of participants
6.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
15.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 1
55.6 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
31.6 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
31.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
60.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 1
0.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
60.0 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
55.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 2
100.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
2
11.5 percentage of participants
23.1 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
23.1 percentage of participants
35.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
3
57.7 percentage of participants
76.9 percentage of participants
70.0 percentage of participants
61.5 percentage of participants
58.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
4
30.8 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
6.7 percentage of participants
15.4 percentage of participants
3.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
1
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
3.3 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
3.2 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 1
10.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
10.3 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
6.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 2
50.0 percentage of participants
35.7 percentage of participants
8.3 percentage of participants
7.7 percentage of participants
13.8 percentage of participants
28.6 percentage of participants
55.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 3
40.0 percentage of participants
57.1 percentage of participants
83.3 percentage of participants
84.6 percentage of participants
69.0 percentage of participants
61.9 percentage of participants
31.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 1
50.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
7.1 percentage of participants
8.3 percentage of participants
7.7 percentage of participants
6.9 percentage of participants
9.5 percentage of participants
6.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 1
0.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 2
77.8 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
68.4 percentage of participants
55.6 percentage of participants
63.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 3
22.2 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
44.4 percentage of participants
55.6 percentage of participants
26.3 percentage of participants
27.8 percentage of participants
36.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 2
50.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
60.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
62.5 percentage of participants
66.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 3
0.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
60.0 percentage of participants
40.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved F-PaGVA response for visits up to Week 24.

The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
2
31.3 percentage of participants
38.7 percentage of participants
41.9 percentage of participants
40.0 percentage of participants
27.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
Missing at the visit
15.6 percentage of participants
16.1 percentage of participants
3.2 percentage of participants
13.3 percentage of participants
6.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
1
9.4 percentage of participants
16.1 percentage of participants
12.9 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
3
28.1 percentage of participants
25.8 percentage of participants
35.5 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
24.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
4
15.6 percentage of participants
3.2 percentage of participants
6.5 percentage of participants
10.0 percentage of participants
9.1 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
3.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
3.4 percentage of participants
10.0 percentage of participants
6.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 1
66.7 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
55.6 percentage of participants
42.1 percentage of participants
44.4 percentage of participants
36.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 2
22.2 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
55.6 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
36.8 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
47.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 1
50.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
80.0 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
44.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 2
50.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
80.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 3
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 1
50.0 percentage of participants
21.4 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
30.8 percentage of participants
24.1 percentage of participants
30.0 percentage of participants
44.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 2
40.0 percentage of participants
28.6 percentage of participants
83.3 percentage of participants
46.2 percentage of participants
37.9 percentage of participants
30.0 percentage of participants
24.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 3
10.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
23.1 percentage of participants
34.5 percentage of participants
30.0 percentage of participants
20.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
5.6 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 3
11.1 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
22.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
15.8 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved T-PaGVA response for visits up to Week 24.

The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
3.2 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
1
6.3 percentage of participants
12.9 percentage of participants
9.7 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
15.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
2
37.5 percentage of participants
35.5 percentage of participants
38.7 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
45.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
3
31.3 percentage of participants
29.0 percentage of participants
35.5 percentage of participants
30.0 percentage of participants
21.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
4
9.4 percentage of participants
6.5 percentage of participants
9.7 percentage of participants
6.7 percentage of participants
12.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
Missing at the visit
15.6 percentage of participants
16.1 percentage of participants
3.2 percentage of participants
13.3 percentage of participants
6.1 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 1
20.0 percentage of participants
7.1 percentage of participants
8.3 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
13.8 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
13.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 2
60.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
41.7 percentage of participants
69.2 percentage of participants
48.3 percentage of participants
40.0 percentage of participants
62.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 3
20.0 percentage of participants
42.9 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
23.1 percentage of participants
27.6 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
10.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 2
55.6 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
44.4 percentage of participants
77.8 percentage of participants
42.1 percentage of participants
44.4 percentage of participants
57.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 3
11.1 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
55.6 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
15.8 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
21.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 1
50.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 2
50.0 percentage of participants
75.0 percentage of participants
40.0 percentage of participants
40.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
55.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 3
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
40.0 percentage of participants
40.0 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
7.7 percentage of participants
10.3 percentage of participants
10.0 percentage of participants
13.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 0
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 1
33.3 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
36.8 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
15.8 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=27 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
2
0.0 percentage of participants
19.2 percentage of participants
13.3 percentage of participants
19.2 percentage of participants
22.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
3
22.2 percentage of participants
34.6 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
53.8 percentage of participants
35.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
5
22.2 percentage of participants
11.5 percentage of participants
6.7 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
9.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
1
7.4 percentage of participants
3.8 percentage of participants
6.7 percentage of participants
11.5 percentage of participants
6.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
4
37.0 percentage of participants
26.9 percentage of participants
23.3 percentage of participants
11.5 percentage of participants
25.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
6
11.1 percentage of participants
3.8 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
3.8 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
7
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 1
0.0 percentage of participants
7.1 percentage of participants
8.3 percentage of participants
7.7 percentage of participants
10.3 percentage of participants
4.8 percentage of participants
13.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 2
30.0 percentage of participants
14.3 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
23.1 percentage of participants
20.7 percentage of participants
47.6 percentage of participants
31.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 3
30.0 percentage of participants
42.9 percentage of participants
58.3 percentage of participants
46.2 percentage of participants
55.2 percentage of participants
38.1 percentage of participants
27.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 4
20.0 percentage of participants
7.1 percentage of participants
8.3 percentage of participants
15.4 percentage of participants
6.9 percentage of participants
9.5 percentage of participants
20.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 5
20.0 percentage of participants
28.6 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
7.7 percentage of participants
3.4 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
6.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 6
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
3.4 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 1
11.1 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
10.5 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
21.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 2
33.3 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
44.4 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
36.8 percentage of participants
38.9 percentage of participants
36.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 3
22.2 percentage of participants
62.5 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
47.4 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
36.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 4
22.2 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 5
11.1 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 6
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
5.6 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 7
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 1
50.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 2
50.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
60.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
77.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 3
0.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
40.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
62.5 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 7
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 4
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 5
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 6
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 7
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=27 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants Who Report a PaGIC-V Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 24
7.4 percentage of participants
23.1 percentage of participants
20.0 percentage of participants
30.8 percentage of participants
29.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Percentage of Participants Who Report a PaGIC-V Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
30.0 percentage of participants
21.4 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
30.8 percentage of participants
31.0 percentage of participants
52.4 percentage of participants
44.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Report a PaGIC-V Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
44.4 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
55.6 percentage of participants
55.6 percentage of participants
47.4 percentage of participants
61.1 percentage of participants
57.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Report a PaGIC-V Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
100.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
40.0 percentage of participants
80.0 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
62.5 percentage of participants
88.9 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 52 weeks

Population: ITT Population

An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Time to Achieve an F-VASI50: Number of Days From the Date of the First Application in the Double-Blind Period to the Date of the First Evaluation at Which the Participant Met the F-VASI50 Score
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-VASI50.
197.0 days
Interval 127.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-VASI50.
339.0 days
Interval 195.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-VASI50.
172.0 days
Interval 127.0 to 323.0
170.0 days
Interval 127.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-VASI50.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 52 weeks

Population: ITT Population

A T-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in T-VASI. T-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement from all body regions (percentage of BSA; assessed by the Investigator) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was derived by multiplying the vitiligo involvement values by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing all values (possible range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Time to Achieve a T-VASI50: Number of Days From the Date of the First Application in the Double-Blind Period to the Date of the First Evaluation at Which the Participant Met the T-VASI50 Score
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-VASI50.
NA days
Interval 204.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-VASI50.
NA days
Interval 366.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-VASI50.
NA days
Interval 192.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-VASI50.
376.0 days
Interval 276.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-VASI50.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 52 weeks

Population: ITT Population

The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening. Time to achieve an F-PhGVA response was defined as the number of days from the date of the first application in the Double-Blind Period to the date of the first evaluation at which the participant met the F-PhGVA score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Time to Achieve an F-PhGVA of Clear or Almost Clear
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
372.0 days
Interval 274.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
NA days
Interval 369.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
NA days
Interval 367.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 52 weeks

Population: ITT Population

The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening. Time to achieve a T-PhGVA response was defined as the number of days from the date of the first application in the Double-Blind Period to the date of the first evaluation at which the participant met the T-PhGVA score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Time to Achieve an T-PhGVA of Clear or Almost Clear
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
372.0 days
Interval 274.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
NA days
Interval 369.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 52 weeks

Population: ITT Population

The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse. Time to achieve a PaGIC-V response was defined as the number of days from the date of the first application in the Double-Blind Period to the date of the first evaluation at which the participant met the PaGIC-V score.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Time to Achieve a PaGIC-V of Very Much Improved or Much Improved
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a PaGIC-V of very much improved or much improved.
NA days
Interval 274.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a PaGIC-V of very much improved or much improved.
NA days
Interval 290.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a PaGIC-V of very much improved or much improved.
282.0 days
Interval 169.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved a PaGIC-V of very much improved or much improved.
281.0 days
Interval 178.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved a PaGIC-V of very much improved or much improved.

Adverse Events

Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 14 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% Once Daily (QD)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 19 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 23 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 20 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 45 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 participants at risk
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% Once Daily (QD)
n=31 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD (in the 52-week combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods).
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=45 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD. Treatment was received by participants for 52 weeks in the combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods, and by those participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 0.5% QD for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]).
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=44 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD. Treatment was received by participants for 52 weeks in the combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods, and by those participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 1.5% QD for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]).
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=130 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID. Treatment was received by (1) participants randomized to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID through Week 156, (2) participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 1.5% BID for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]), and (3) participants who were (a) randomized to the vehicle group, (b) to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and achieved 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24, (c) to ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD, and (d) to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD who crossed over to 1.5% BID during the open-label extension period.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery occlusion
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/130 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal achalasia
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/130 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/130 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 participants at risk
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% Once Daily (QD)
n=31 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD (in the 52-week combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods).
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=45 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD. Treatment was received by participants for 52 weeks in the combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods, and by those participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 0.5% QD for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]).
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=44 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD. Treatment was received by participants for 52 weeks in the combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods, and by those participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 1.5% QD for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]).
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=130 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID. Treatment was received by (1) participants randomized to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID through Week 156, (2) participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 1.5% BID for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]), and (3) participants who were (a) randomized to the vehicle group, (b) to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and achieved 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24, (c) to ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD, and (d) to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD who crossed over to 1.5% BID during the open-label extension period.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 7 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
12.9%
4/31 • Number of events 4 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
11.1%
5/45 • Number of events 12 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
9.1%
4/44 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
9.2%
12/130 • Number of events 14 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
General disorders
Application site erythema
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
General disorders
Application site exfoliation
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
General disorders
Application site pruritus
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
19.4%
6/31 • Number of events 8 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.7%
3/45 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 4 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
16.1%
5/31 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
4.6%
6/130 • Number of events 6 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
4.5%
2/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
4.4%
2/45 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.3%
3/130 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 4 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
12.5%
4/32 • Number of events 4 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
12.9%
4/31 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
11.1%
5/45 • Number of events 6 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
11.4%
5/44 • Number of events 6 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
4.6%
6/130 • Number of events 6 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
4.4%
2/45 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/130 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
3.1%
4/130 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
General disorders
Pain
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
4.5%
2/44 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
11.1%
5/45 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
11.4%
5/44 • Number of events 8 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
4.6%
6/130 • Number of events 6 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
4.5%
2/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
4.5%
2/44 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.9%
9/130 • Number of events 11 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin exfoliation
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
9.7%
3/31 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
11.1%
5/45 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.2%
8/130 • Number of events 12 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
4.4%
2/45 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
0.00%
0/130 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.

Additional Information

Incyte Corporation Call Center (US)

Incyte

Phone: 1.855.463.3463

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Clinical Study Agreement
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER