Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of INCB018424 Phosphate Cream in Subjects With Vitiligo (NCT NCT03099304)
NCT ID: NCT03099304
Last Updated: 2022-11-17
Results Overview
An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of body surface area \[BSA\]) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
COMPLETED
PHASE2
157 participants
Baseline; Week 24
2022-11-17
Participant Flow
A total of 157 participants with vitiligo were treated at 26 study centers in the United States.
157 participants were randomized to receive 1 of 4 dose strengths of ruxolitinib cream (0.15% once daily \[QD\], 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD, 1.5% twice daily \[BID\]) or vehicle during the 24-week, double-blind (DB), vehicle-controlled treatment period. After the DB period, 11 participants remained on 0.15% QD, and 42 participants who met criteria were re-randomized to 1 of the 3 higher active blinded treatment groups. All other participants remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Cross-over
Participants who were randomized to vehicle cream BID or to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) on Day 1 of the double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period and received ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
STARTED
|
32
|
31
|
31
|
30
|
33
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
COMPLETED
|
27
|
26
|
30
|
26
|
30
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
5
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
STARTED
|
0
|
11
|
45
|
44
|
47
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
COMPLETED
|
0
|
10
|
43
|
37
|
45
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
7
|
2
|
0
|
|
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
28
|
21
|
28
|
46
|
|
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
8
|
12
|
23
|
|
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
17
|
13
|
16
|
23
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Cross-over
Participants who were randomized to vehicle cream BID or to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) on Day 1 of the double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period and received ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
Adverse Event
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
Reason not specified
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Day 1 to Week 24
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
|
DB Period: Weeks 24 to 52
Reason not specified
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
6
|
|
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Pregnancy
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
10
|
13
|
15
|
|
104-week Open-Label Extension Period
Other Reason not specified
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of INCB018424 Phosphate Cream in Subjects With Vitiligo
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Total
n=157 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
46.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.11 • n=5 Participants
|
45.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.46 • n=7 Participants
|
53.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.34 • n=5 Participants
|
46.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.73 • n=4 Participants
|
49.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.28 • n=21 Participants
|
48.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.85 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Captured as "Other"
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
132 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African-American
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mexican
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Nigerian/West African
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Cuban
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Spanish
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian, Black, and Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Facial Body Surface Area (F-BSA) Involvement
|
1.44 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.838 • n=5 Participants
|
1.35 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.858 • n=7 Participants
|
1.40 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.760 • n=5 Participants
|
1.67 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.953 • n=4 Participants
|
1.55 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.892 • n=21 Participants
|
1.48 percentage of facial surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.858 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Total Body Surface Area (T-BSA) Involvement
|
23.54 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.960 • n=5 Participants
|
17.56 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.925 • n=7 Participants
|
22.96 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.449 • n=5 Participants
|
24.81 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.056 • n=4 Participants
|
21.46 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.820 • n=21 Participants
|
22.05 percentage of total body surface area
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.377 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Face Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI)
|
1.21 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.845 • n=5 Participants
|
1.19 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.754 • n=7 Participants
|
1.22 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.705 • n=5 Participants
|
1.45 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.980 • n=4 Participants
|
1.26 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.807 • n=21 Participants
|
1.26 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.817 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Total Body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI)
|
19.40 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.512 • n=5 Participants
|
14.57 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.049 • n=7 Participants
|
18.43 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.363 • n=5 Participants
|
20.55 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.488 • n=4 Participants
|
16.94 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.256 • n=21 Participants
|
17.96 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.451 • n=10 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants. Treatment groups were to be defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization regardless of the actual ruxolitinib cream or vehicle cream participants might have applied during their participation in the study. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved responses for visits up to Week 52.
An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of body surface area \[BSA\]) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Treated With Ruxolitinib Cream Who Achieved a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area and Severity Index Score (F-VASI50) Compared With Participants Treated With Vehicle at Week 24
|
3.1 percentage of participants
|
32.3 percentage of participants
|
25.8 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
45.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved F-PhGVA response for visits up to Week 24.
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) of Clear or Almost Clear
|
0 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
9.7 percentage of participants
|
13.3 percentage of participants
|
9.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 52Population: ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved responses for visits up to Week 52. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
T-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement from all body regions (percentage of BSA; assessed by the Investigator) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was derived by multiplying the vitiligo involvement values by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing all values (possible range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=10 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=12 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=13 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Full Body Assessment of Vitiligo Area and Severity Index (T-VASI) at Week 52
|
50 percentage of participants
|
21.4 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
15.4 percentage of participants
|
25.8 percentage of participants
|
30.0 percentage of participants
|
36.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 156 weeksPopulation: Based on the data for percentage change from Baseline in F-VASI and T-VASI scores during the treatment periods, the Emax model was not appropriate; therefore, the dose responses were not assessed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 weeksPopulation: Safety Population: all participants who applied at least 1 dose of study drug. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1.
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 24
Any TEAE
|
20 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 24
Any Grade 3 or higher TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 52 weeksPopulation: Safety Population. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1. Analysis from Day 1 to Week 52 was conducted in participants randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD, ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD, or ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID during the vehicle-controlled period (Day 1 to Week 24).
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 52
Any TEAE
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
26 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 52
Any Grade 3 or higher TEAE
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24 to Week 52Population: Safety Population. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1. Analysis was conducted in participants who were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and vehicle groups in the vehicle-controlled period (Day 1 to Week 24) and then had a dose in the continued double-blind period (Week 24 to Week 52).
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 24 to Week 52
Any TEAE
|
9 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 24 to Week 52
Any Grade 3 or higher TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to Week 156Population: Safety Population. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1. Analysis was only conducted in participants who received ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID on Day 1.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Applied Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID Throughout Study Participation With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE
Any TEAE
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Applied Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID Throughout Study Participation With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE
Any Grade 3 or higher TEAE
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52 to Week 156Population: Open-label Evaluable Population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the Open-label Period
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. A TEAE was an AE reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using CTCAE v4.03 Grades 1 through 4. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=28 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=21 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=28 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=46 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 52 to Week 156
Any TEAE
|
15 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 52 to Week 156
Any Grade 3 or higher TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Mixed-model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) model for post-Baseline measures: (response variable = treatment + stratification factor \[age ≤30 versus \>30\] + visit + treatment\*visit). All post-Baseline visits up to Week 24 were included in the model.
F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Week 24
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.39 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.35 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.63 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.46 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Baseline
|
0.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.387
|
1.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.891
|
1.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.993
|
1.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.714
|
1.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.705
|
1.45 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.980
|
1.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.808
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 52
|
-0.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.459
|
-0.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.811
|
-1.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.058
|
-0.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.783
|
-0.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.578
|
-0.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.797
|
-0.76 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.610
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 104
|
-0.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.444
|
-0.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.061
|
-1.79 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.077
|
-0.87 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.903
|
-1.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.697
|
-1.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.961
|
-0.99 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.817
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 156
|
-0.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.124
|
-0.98 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.092
|
-1.40 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.018
|
-0.65 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.557
|
-0.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.490
|
-0.95 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.949
|
-1.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.887
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. MMRM model for post-Baseline measures: (response variable = treatment + stratification factor \[age ≤30 versus \>30\] + visit + treatment\*visit). All post-Baseline visits up to Week 24 were included in the model.
F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Week 24
|
6.02 percent change
Standard Error 7.23
|
-30.69 percent change
Standard Error 7.39
|
-29.10 percent change
Standard Error 6.93
|
-40.00 percent change
Standard Error 7.39
|
-37.78 percent change
Standard Error 6.89
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
F-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
|
-72.21 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.837
|
-50.60 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.954
|
-52.43 percent change
Standard Deviation 36.412
|
-40.79 percent change
Standard Deviation 37.082
|
-45.54 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.148
|
-55.63 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.823
|
-57.34 percent change
Standard Deviation 50.115
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
|
-77.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.974
|
-71.12 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.087
|
-82.87 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.756
|
-60.28 percent change
Standard Deviation 64.708
|
-74.89 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.524
|
-77.76 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.086
|
-78.78 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.400
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
|
-87.95 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.207
|
-66.83 percent change
Standard Deviation 45.106
|
-91.25 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.631
|
-59.16 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.627
|
-76.25 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.126
|
-76.76 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.924
|
-89.52 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.899
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an F-VASI50 at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
|
90.0 percentage of participants
|
64.3 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
38.5 percentage of participants
|
45.2 percentage of participants
|
43.3 percentage of participants
|
57.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an F-VASI50 at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
|
88.9 percentage of participants
|
87.5 percentage of participants
|
88.9 percentage of participants
|
77.8 percentage of participants
|
78.9 percentage of participants
|
83.3 percentage of participants
|
89.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an F-VASI50 at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
75.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
60.0 percentage of participants
|
87.5 percentage of participants
|
87.5 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
F-BSA involvement was the proportion of the facial body surface area with vitiligo. The area "Face" was defined as including the area on the forehead to the original hairline, on the cheek to the jawline vertically and laterally from the corner of the mouth to the tragus. The area "Face" did not include the surface area of the lips, scalp, ears, or neck, but included the nose and eyelids. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Week 24
|
6.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.028
|
-19.82 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.928
|
-17.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.453
|
-19.53 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.612
|
-27.76 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.996
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
F-BSA involvement was the proportion of the facial body surface area with vitiligo. The area "Face" was defined as including the area on the forehead to the original hairline, on the cheek to the jawline vertically and laterally from the corner of the mouth to the tragus. The area "Face" did not include the surface area of the lips, scalp, ears, or neck, but included the nose and eyelids. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
|
-55.18 percent change
Standard Deviation 36.091
|
-37.94 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.569
|
-33.39 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.095
|
-15.64 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.733
|
-34.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 37.769
|
-38.37 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.660
|
-44.29 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.253
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
|
-42.86 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.282
|
-67.61 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.683
|
-76.57 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.260
|
-45.65 percent change
Standard Deviation 59.599
|
-54.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.411
|
-63.56 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.543
|
-59.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.186
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
|
-33.04 percent change
Standard Deviation 6.313
|
-59.17 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.586
|
-90.50 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.240
|
-16.89 percent change
Standard Deviation 56.706
|
-55.80 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.310
|
-59.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.106
|
-72.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.024
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
T-BSA involvement was the proportion of the body surface area with vitiligo. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Week 24
|
3.35 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.314
|
-13.97 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.396
|
-10.83 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.646
|
-17.19 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.490
|
-13.60 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.443
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
T-BSA involvement was the proportion of the body surface area with vitiligo. Body surface area assessment was performed by the Palmar Method. Body surface area was estimated to the nearest 0.1%. The approximate size of the participant's entire palmar surface (i.e., the palm plus 5 digits) was considered as 1% BSA, and the approximate size of the participant's thumb was considered as 0.1% BSA. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
|
-39.53 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.599
|
-8.72 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.010
|
-2.72 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.014
|
-8.73 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.630
|
-15.13 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.296
|
-27.33 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.568
|
-27.59 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.770
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
|
-42.42 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.208
|
-30.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 36.289
|
-30.08 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.717
|
-21.08 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.323
|
-33.19 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.127
|
-33.94 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.573
|
-32.46 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.190
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
|
-59.44 percent change
Standard Deviation 51.920
|
-46.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.723
|
-34.93 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.391
|
-37.95 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.651
|
-29.59 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.261
|
-10.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 53.863
|
-46.88 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.304
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. MMRM model for post-Baseline measures: (response variable = treatment + stratification factor \[age ≤30 versus \>30\] + visit + treatment\*visit). All post-Baseline visits up to Week 24 were included in the model.
T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from Baseline (BL) was calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Week 24
|
0.57 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
|
-2.27 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.94
|
-2.18 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.88
|
-4.51 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.94
|
-3.52 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement). Change from BL was calculated as the post-BL value minus the BL value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Baseline
|
9.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.090
|
13.47 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.655
|
22.82 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.187
|
20.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.973
|
18.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.363
|
20.55 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.488
|
16.94 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.256
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 52
|
-4.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.979
|
-2.88 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.934
|
-3.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.536
|
-3.88 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.642
|
-3.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.284
|
-7.37 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.403
|
-6.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.442
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 104
|
-6.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.476
|
-5.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.615
|
-9.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.398
|
-6.62 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.054
|
-7.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.079
|
-10.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.658
|
-7.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.927
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Change from Baseline at Week 156
|
-2.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.269
|
-10.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.533
|
-11.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.185
|
-7.82 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.209
|
-4.72 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.622
|
-7.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.577
|
-8.77 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.996
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100. MMRM model for post-Baseline measures: (response variable = treatment + stratification factor \[age ≤30 versus \>30\] + visit + treatment\*visit). All post-Baseline visits up to Week 24 were included in the model.
T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Week 24
|
2.65 percent change
Standard Error 4.89
|
-20.88 percent change
Standard Error 5.00
|
-15.82 percent change
Standard Error 4.69
|
-27.16 percent change
Standard Error 4.99
|
-22.91 percent change
Standard Error 4.65
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.
T-VASI was calculated with contributions from 6 sites. The percentage of vitiligo involvement was estimated in hand units (percentage of BSA estimated to nearest 0.1%) by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate percent BSA vitiligo involvement. The degree of depigmentation for each site was estimated to the nearest percentage: 0% (no depigmentation present), 10% (only specks of depigmentation present), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site and summing the values (range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
|
-50.71 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.310
|
-25.12 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.556
|
-19.75 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.484
|
-20.00 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.264
|
-24.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.649
|
-41.90 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.865
|
-41.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.451
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
|
-60.96 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.259
|
-49.35 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.319
|
-49.07 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.091
|
-38.70 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.663
|
-46.44 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.668
|
-52.14 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.559
|
-50.03 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.905
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
|
-71.10 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.448
|
-59.33 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.055
|
-47.31 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.610
|
-49.96 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.555
|
-44.69 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.718
|
-14.97 percent change
Standard Deviation 58.982
|
-62.80 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.904
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Spreading
Baseline
|
1.78 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.166
|
2.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.422
|
1.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.238
|
1.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.102
|
1.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.233
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Vitiligo European Task Force (VETF) Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Spreading
Change from Baseline at Week 24
|
-1.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.566
|
-3.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.246
|
-3.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.532
|
-3.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.971
|
-3.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.042
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Spreading
Baseline
|
2.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.328
|
2.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.277
|
1.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.607
|
2.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.968
|
1.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.238
|
1.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.102
|
1.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.233
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Spreading
Change from Baseline at Week 52
|
-4.70 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.683
|
-4.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.592
|
-3.83 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.538
|
-3.85 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.211
|
-3.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.622
|
-3.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.395
|
-3.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.742
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Spreading
Change from Baseline at Week 104
|
-5.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.153
|
-4.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.196
|
-4.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.667
|
-5.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.371
|
-3.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.516
|
-3.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.034
|
-3.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.034
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Percentage Area
Baseline
|
22.81 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.843
|
16.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.006
|
22.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.878
|
24.63 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.236
|
20.79 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.192
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Percentage Area
Change from Baseline at Week 24
|
0.38 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.329
|
-1.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.867
|
-2.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.797
|
-3.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.744
|
-2.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.591
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Baseline
|
9.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.509
|
16.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.979
|
24.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.841
|
24.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.798
|
22.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.878
|
24.63 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.236
|
20.79 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.192
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Change from Baseline at Week 52
|
-3.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.814
|
-1.86 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.905
|
-1.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.486
|
-1.92 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.211
|
-3.93 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.191
|
-5.71 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.463
|
-4.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.127
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Change from Baseline at Week 104
|
-3.89 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.226
|
-4.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.994
|
-5.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.226
|
-4.44 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.367
|
-8.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.392
|
-7.78 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.695
|
-6.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.682
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Percentage Area
|
2.61 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.497
|
-10.61 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.408
|
-13.87 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.296
|
-14.09 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.321
|
-13.10 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.605
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Week 52
|
-32.01 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.629
|
-7.39 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.571
|
-10.57 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.300
|
-7.13 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.967
|
-19.73 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.730
|
-22.36 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.593
|
-25.41 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.049
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Percentage Area
Week 104
|
-39.30 percent change
Standard Deviation 37.071
|
-23.05 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.233
|
-34.03 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.992
|
-18.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 36.527
|
-35.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.039
|
-30.40 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.940
|
-29.19 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.767
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Staging
Baseline
|
10.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.515
|
9.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.013
|
10.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.945
|
9.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.000
|
8.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.464
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Staging
Change from Baseline at Week 24
|
-1.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.184
|
-1.62 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.282
|
-1.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.687
|
-1.96 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.561
|
-0.74 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.633
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Baseline
|
8.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.908
|
8.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.901
|
11.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.128
|
10.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.668
|
10.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.945
|
9.97 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.000
|
8.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.464
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Change from Baseline at Week 52
|
-3.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.247
|
-1.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.301
|
-2.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.157
|
-2.62 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.844
|
-2.41 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.030
|
-3.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.960
|
-1.38 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.555
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Change from Baseline at Week 104
|
-3.44 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.358
|
-2.75 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.694
|
-2.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.866
|
-2.89 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.537
|
-2.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.754
|
-4.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.049
|
-1.68 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.730
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Week 24: Total Staging
|
-7.58 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.740
|
-17.52 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.267
|
-13.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.200
|
-17.00 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.798
|
-4.46 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.916
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52 and 104Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Percentage change = (\[post-Baseline value minus Baseline value\]/Baseline value) X 100.
The VETF-proposed system combines analysis of extent (0%-100% BSA), stage of disease (staging), and disease progression (spreading); each component is evaluated and reported independently. Staging is based on cutaneous and hair pigmentation in vitiligo patches. Disease is staged 0 to 4 on the largest macule in each of 5 body regions, except hands and feet, which are assessed separately and globally as 1 unique area. Stage 0=normal pigmentation, Stage 1=incomplete pigmentation, Stage 2=complete depigmentation (a few white hairs do not change stage), Stage 3=partial hair whitening (\<30%), Stage 4=complete hair whitening; total score of 0 (less severe disease) to 20 (more severe disease). Disease progression is based on assessing the largest patch in each of 5 body areas: -1=regressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical repigmentation), 0=similar limits, 1=progressive vitiligo (ongoing subclinical depigmentation); total score of -5 (improving disease) to +5 (more severe disease spread).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Week 52
|
-33.48 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.022
|
-12.70 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.012
|
-17.31 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.623
|
-23.88 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.262
|
-21.45 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.571
|
-30.00 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.563
|
-12.99 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.585
|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline in VETF Scale Scores at Weeks 52 and 104: Total Staging
Week 104
|
-37.20 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.132
|
-24.29 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.439
|
-16.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.268
|
-32.06 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.311
|
-27.76 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.202
|
-35.20 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.904
|
-14.09 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.969
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved F-PhGVA response for visits up to Week 24.
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
1
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
9.7 percentage of participants
|
13.3 percentage of participants
|
9.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
2
|
6.3 percentage of participants
|
16.1 percentage of participants
|
16.1 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
27.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
3
|
40.6 percentage of participants
|
64.5 percentage of participants
|
61.3 percentage of participants
|
36.7 percentage of participants
|
54.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
4
|
34.4 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
9.7 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
3.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
Missing at the visit
|
18.8 percentage of participants
|
16.1 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
13.3 percentage of participants
|
6.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 3
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
71.4 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
46.2 percentage of participants
|
55.2 percentage of participants
|
42.9 percentage of participants
|
31.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 2
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
36.8 percentage of participants
|
27.8 percentage of participants
|
26.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 3
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
44.4 percentage of participants
|
26.3 percentage of participants
|
27.8 percentage of participants
|
21.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 3
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
6.9 percentage of participants
|
4.8 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 1
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
14.3 percentage of participants
|
8.3 percentage of participants
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
10.3 percentage of participants
|
14.3 percentage of participants
|
24.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 2
|
60.0 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
46.2 percentage of participants
|
17.2 percentage of participants
|
28.6 percentage of participants
|
37.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
8.3 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
10.3 percentage of participants
|
9.5 percentage of participants
|
6.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
15.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 1
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
31.6 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
31.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
60.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 1
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
60.0 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PhGVA (F-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 2
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=26 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
2
|
11.5 percentage of participants
|
23.1 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
23.1 percentage of participants
|
35.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
3
|
57.7 percentage of participants
|
76.9 percentage of participants
|
70.0 percentage of participants
|
61.5 percentage of participants
|
58.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
4
|
30.8 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
6.7 percentage of participants
|
15.4 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Week 24
1
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
3.3 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 1
|
10.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
10.3 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
6.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 2
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
35.7 percentage of participants
|
8.3 percentage of participants
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
13.8 percentage of participants
|
28.6 percentage of participants
|
55.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 3
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
57.1 percentage of participants
|
83.3 percentage of participants
|
84.6 percentage of participants
|
69.0 percentage of participants
|
61.9 percentage of participants
|
31.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 1
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 52, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
8.3 percentage of participants
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
6.9 percentage of participants
|
9.5 percentage of participants
|
6.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 1
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 2
|
77.8 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
68.4 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
63.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 3
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
44.4 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
26.3 percentage of participants
|
27.8 percentage of participants
|
36.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 104, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 2
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
60.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
62.5 percentage of participants
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 3
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
60.0 percentage of participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PhGVA (T-PhGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
Week 156, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved F-PaGVA response for visits up to Week 24.
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
2
|
31.3 percentage of participants
|
38.7 percentage of participants
|
41.9 percentage of participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
27.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
Missing at the visit
|
15.6 percentage of participants
|
16.1 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
13.3 percentage of participants
|
6.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
1
|
9.4 percentage of participants
|
16.1 percentage of participants
|
12.9 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
3
|
28.1 percentage of participants
|
25.8 percentage of participants
|
35.5 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
24.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the Patient's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
4
|
15.6 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
6.5 percentage of participants
|
10.0 percentage of participants
|
9.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
3.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
3.4 percentage of participants
|
10.0 percentage of participants
|
6.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 1
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
42.1 percentage of participants
|
44.4 percentage of participants
|
36.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 2
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
36.8 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
47.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 1
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
80.0 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
44.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 2
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
80.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 3
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 1
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
21.4 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
30.8 percentage of participants
|
24.1 percentage of participants
|
30.0 percentage of participants
|
44.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 2
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
28.6 percentage of participants
|
83.3 percentage of participants
|
46.2 percentage of participants
|
37.9 percentage of participants
|
30.0 percentage of participants
|
24.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 3
|
10.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
23.1 percentage of participants
|
34.5 percentage of participants
|
30.0 percentage of participants
|
20.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
5.6 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 3
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
22.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
15.8 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Facial Assessment of the PaGVA (F-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved T-PaGVA response for visits up to Week 24.
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
1
|
6.3 percentage of participants
|
12.9 percentage of participants
|
9.7 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
15.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
2
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
35.5 percentage of participants
|
38.7 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
45.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
3
|
31.3 percentage of participants
|
29.0 percentage of participants
|
35.5 percentage of participants
|
30.0 percentage of participants
|
21.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
4
|
9.4 percentage of participants
|
6.5 percentage of participants
|
9.7 percentage of participants
|
6.7 percentage of participants
|
12.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Week 24
Missing at the visit
|
15.6 percentage of participants
|
16.1 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
13.3 percentage of participants
|
6.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the participant using the PaGVA, which has a 5-point scale. The participant was asked the following: How severe is your vitiligo on your face (or total body) with respect to the area covered by white skin? Responses: 0=no white patches (no vitiligo); 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe; 4=very severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 1
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
8.3 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
13.8 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
13.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 2
|
60.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
41.7 percentage of participants
|
69.2 percentage of participants
|
48.3 percentage of participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
62.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 3
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
42.9 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
23.1 percentage of participants
|
27.6 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
10.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 2
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
44.4 percentage of participants
|
77.8 percentage of participants
|
42.1 percentage of participants
|
44.4 percentage of participants
|
57.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 3
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
15.8 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
21.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 1
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 2
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
75.0 percentage of participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 3
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
10.3 percentage of participants
|
10.0 percentage of participants
|
13.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 0
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Total Body Assessment of the PaGVA (T-PaGVA) Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 1
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
36.8 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
15.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=27 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
2
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
19.2 percentage of participants
|
13.3 percentage of participants
|
19.2 percentage of participants
|
22.6 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
3
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
34.6 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
53.8 percentage of participants
|
35.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
5
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
11.5 percentage of participants
|
6.7 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
9.7 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
1
|
7.4 percentage of participants
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
6.7 percentage of participants
|
11.5 percentage of participants
|
6.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
4
|
37.0 percentage of participants
|
26.9 percentage of participants
|
23.3 percentage of participants
|
11.5 percentage of participants
|
25.8 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
6
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Impression of Change for Vitiligo (PaGIC-V) Category at Week 24
7
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 1
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
8.3 percentage of participants
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
10.3 percentage of participants
|
4.8 percentage of participants
|
13.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 2
|
30.0 percentage of participants
|
14.3 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
23.1 percentage of participants
|
20.7 percentage of participants
|
47.6 percentage of participants
|
31.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 3
|
30.0 percentage of participants
|
42.9 percentage of participants
|
58.3 percentage of participants
|
46.2 percentage of participants
|
55.2 percentage of participants
|
38.1 percentage of participants
|
27.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 4
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
8.3 percentage of participants
|
15.4 percentage of participants
|
6.9 percentage of participants
|
9.5 percentage of participants
|
20.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 5
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
28.6 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
3.4 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
6.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 6
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
3.4 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 1
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
10.5 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
21.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 2
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
44.4 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
36.8 percentage of participants
|
38.9 percentage of participants
|
36.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 3
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
62.5 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
47.4 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
36.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 4
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 5
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
5.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 6
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
5.6 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104, 7
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 1
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 2
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
60.0 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
77.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 3
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
62.5 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52, 7
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 4
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 5
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 6
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each PaGIC-V Category at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156, 7
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=27 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=26 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Report a PaGIC-V Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 24
|
7.4 percentage of participants
|
23.1 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
30.8 percentage of participants
|
29.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=11 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=14 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Report a PaGIC-V Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 52
|
30.0 percentage of participants
|
21.4 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
30.8 percentage of participants
|
31.0 percentage of participants
|
52.4 percentage of participants
|
44.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Report a PaGIC-V Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 104
|
44.4 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
55.6 percentage of participants
|
47.4 percentage of participants
|
61.1 percentage of participants
|
57.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Report a PaGIC-V Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Weeks 52, 104, and 156
Week 156
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
80.0 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
62.5 percentage of participants
|
88.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 52 weeksPopulation: ITT Population
An F-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in F-VASI, measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement (percentage of BSA) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment), or 100% (no pigment). The percentage of BSA (hand unit) vitiligo involvement was estimated to the nearest 0.1% by the Investigator using the Palmar Method. The Investigator used his/her hand to mimic the participant's hand size to evaluate the percentage of BSA vitiligo involvement. F-VASI was then derived by multiplying the values assessed for the vitiligo involvement by the percentage of affected skin for each site on the face and summing the values of all sites (possible range: 0-3; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Achieve an F-VASI50: Number of Days From the Date of the First Application in the Double-Blind Period to the Date of the First Evaluation at Which the Participant Met the F-VASI50 Score
|
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-VASI50.
|
197.0 days
Interval 127.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-VASI50.
|
339.0 days
Interval 195.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-VASI50.
|
172.0 days
Interval 127.0 to 323.0
|
170.0 days
Interval 127.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-VASI50.
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 52 weeksPopulation: ITT Population
A T-VASI50 responder achieved at least 50% improvement from Baseline in T-VASI. T-VASI was measured by the percentage of vitiligo involvement from all body regions (percentage of BSA; assessed by the Investigator) and the degree of depigmentation: 0% (no depigmentation), 10% (only specks of depigmentation), 25% (pigmented area exceeded depigmented area), 50% (depigmented and pigmented area was equal), 75% (depigmented area exceeded pigmented area), 90% (specks of pigment present), 100% (no pigment present). T-VASI was derived by multiplying the vitiligo involvement values by the percentage of affected skin for each body site and summing all values (possible range: 0-100; lower scores indicate increased improvement).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Achieve a T-VASI50: Number of Days From the Date of the First Application in the Double-Blind Period to the Date of the First Evaluation at Which the Participant Met the T-VASI50 Score
|
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-VASI50.
|
NA days
Interval 204.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-VASI50.
|
NA days
Interval 366.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-VASI50.
|
NA days
Interval 192.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-VASI50.
|
376.0 days
Interval 276.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-VASI50.
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 52 weeksPopulation: ITT Population
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening. Time to achieve an F-PhGVA response was defined as the number of days from the date of the first application in the Double-Blind Period to the date of the first evaluation at which the participant met the F-PhGVA score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Achieve an F-PhGVA of Clear or Almost Clear
|
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
|
372.0 days
Interval 274.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
|
NA days
Interval 369.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
|
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
|
NA days
Interval 367.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved an F-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 52 weeksPopulation: ITT Population
The severity of vitiligo was assessed by the physician using the PhGVA, which has a 5-point scale. 0=clear, no signs of vitiligo; 1=almost clear, only specks of depigmentation present; 2=mild disease, pigmented and depigmented areas are equal; 3=moderate disease, more or complete depigmentation (may include \< 30% hair whitening); 4=severe disease, complete depigmentation plus \> 30% hair whitening. Time to achieve a T-PhGVA response was defined as the number of days from the date of the first application in the Double-Blind Period to the date of the first evaluation at which the participant met the T-PhGVA score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Achieve an T-PhGVA of Clear or Almost Clear
|
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
|
372.0 days
Interval 274.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
|
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
|
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
|
NA days
Interval 369.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a T-PhGVA of clear or almost clear.
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 52 weeksPopulation: ITT Population
The PaGIC-V is an assessment of improvement by the participant. It is a 7-point scale comparing the vitiligo areas at Baseline with the participant's treated areas of vitiligo at the study visit. The participant answered the following: "Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your vitiligo in areas treated with the study drug is: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse. Time to achieve a PaGIC-V response was defined as the number of days from the date of the first application in the Double-Blind Period to the date of the first evaluation at which the participant met the PaGIC-V score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 Participants
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 24 or 52 weeks. Those who did not achieve a 25% improvement in F-VASI score were re-randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening), or 1.5% BID for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period). All participants applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in the 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=31 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=30 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=33 Participants
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD: 1.5 % BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD in the morning (vehicle cream in the evening) for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID: 1.5% BID
Ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID for 52 weeks (combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Achieve a PaGIC-V of Very Much Improved or Much Improved
|
NA days
The median and the upper and lower limits of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a PaGIC-V of very much improved or much improved.
|
NA days
Interval 274.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a PaGIC-V of very much improved or much improved.
|
NA days
Interval 290.0 to
The median and the upper limit of the confidence interval were not estimable because too few participants achieved a PaGIC-V of very much improved or much improved.
|
282.0 days
Interval 169.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved a PaGIC-V of very much improved or much improved.
|
281.0 days
Interval 178.0 to
The upper limit of the confidence interval was not estimable because too few participants achieved a PaGIC-V of very much improved or much improved.
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% Once Daily (QD)
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 participants at risk
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% Once Daily (QD)
n=31 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD (in the 52-week combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods).
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=45 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD. Treatment was received by participants for 52 weeks in the combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods, and by those participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 0.5% QD for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]).
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=44 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD. Treatment was received by participants for 52 weeks in the combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods, and by those participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 1.5% QD for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]).
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=130 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID. Treatment was received by (1) participants randomized to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID through Week 156, (2) participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 1.5% BID for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]), and (3) participants who were (a) randomized to the vehicle group, (b) to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and achieved 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24, (c) to ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD, and (d) to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD who crossed over to 1.5% BID during the open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery occlusion
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal achalasia
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Vehicle Twice Daily (BID)
n=32 participants at risk
Vehicle cream BID for 24 weeks (double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period), followed by re-randomization to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID, 1.5% once daily (QD), or 0.5% QD for Weeks 24 to 52 (continued double-blind treatment period), followed by ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID in a 104-week open-label extension period.
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.15% Once Daily (QD)
n=31 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD (in the 52-week combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods).
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 0.5% QD
n=45 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD. Treatment was received by participants for 52 weeks in the combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods, and by those participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 0.5% QD for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]).
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD
n=44 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD. Treatment was received by participants for 52 weeks in the combined vehicle-controlled and continued double-blind periods, and by those participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 1.5% QD for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]).
|
Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID
n=130 participants at risk
All participants who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID. Treatment was received by (1) participants randomized to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID through Week 156, (2) participants who were randomized to the vehicle group or were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and did not achieve 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24 and crossed over to 1.5% BID for 28 weeks (Week 24 to Week 52 \[continued double-blind treatment period\]), and (3) participants who were (a) randomized to the vehicle group, (b) to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and achieved 25% improvement in F-VASI score at Week 24, (c) to ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD, and (d) to ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD who crossed over to 1.5% BID during the open-label extension period.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 7 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
12.9%
4/31 • Number of events 4 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
11.1%
5/45 • Number of events 12 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
9.1%
4/44 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
9.2%
12/130 • Number of events 14 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
General disorders
Application site erythema
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
General disorders
Application site exfoliation
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
General disorders
Application site pruritus
|
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
19.4%
6/31 • Number of events 8 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.7%
3/45 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 4 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
16.1%
5/31 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
4.6%
6/130 • Number of events 6 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
4.5%
2/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.3%
3/130 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 4 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
12.5%
4/32 • Number of events 4 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
12.9%
4/31 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
11.1%
5/45 • Number of events 6 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
11.4%
5/44 • Number of events 6 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
4.6%
6/130 • Number of events 6 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
3.1%
4/130 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
4.5%
2/44 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
11.1%
5/45 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
11.4%
5/44 • Number of events 8 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
4.6%
6/130 • Number of events 6 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
4.5%
2/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
4.5%
2/44 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.9%
9/130 • Number of events 11 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin exfoliation
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
9.7%
3/31 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/44 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
11.1%
5/45 • Number of events 5 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.2%
8/130 • Number of events 12 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Number of events 2 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 3 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
0.00%
0/130 • Up to 180 weeks (156-week treatment period plus 6-month follow-up period)
157 participants received 1 of 4 doses of ruxolitinib cream or vehicle during the 24-week, DB period. After the DB period, 11 stayed on 0.15% QD and 42 were re-randomized to 1 of 3 higher groups. All others remained on the same treatment regimen through Week 52. 47 randomized to the 1.5% BID arm during Week 52 stayed during the OL period and 83 from the 3 lower dose arms (0.15% QD, 0.5% QD, and 1.5% QD) crossed over to the 1.5% BID arm during the OL period, totaling 130 at risk at data cut-off.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Clinical Study Agreement
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER