Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Pirfenidone in Patients With Unclassifiable Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (NCT NCT03099187)
NCT ID: NCT03099187
Last Updated: 2021-01-13
Results Overview
Rate of decline in FVC was measured in mL by daily handheld spirometer. The analyses were repeated due to an additional independent review of the home spirometry data.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
253 participants
Up to Week 24
2021-01-13
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Open-Label Treatment (Pirfenidone)
After participants completed the double-blind treatment period and the follow-up visit at Week 28, they were offered the option to receive open-label pirfenidone within the trial protocol in a safety follow-up period of up to 12 months. A final follow-up visit was performed at the end of the safety period, 28 days after the last open-label dose.
|
Open-Label Treatment (Placebo)
After participants completed the double-blind treatment period and the follow-up visit at Week 28, they were offered the option to receive open-label pirfenidone within the trial protocol in a safety follow-up period of up to 12 months. A final follow-up visit was performed at the end of the safety period, 28 days after the last open-label dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind Treatment
STARTED
|
127
|
126
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment
COMPLETED
|
94
|
110
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment
NOT COMPLETED
|
33
|
16
|
0
|
0
|
|
12-month Safety Follow-up
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
94
|
110
|
|
12-month Safety Follow-up
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
75
|
84
|
|
12-month Safety Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
19
|
26
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Open-Label Treatment (Pirfenidone)
After participants completed the double-blind treatment period and the follow-up visit at Week 28, they were offered the option to receive open-label pirfenidone within the trial protocol in a safety follow-up period of up to 12 months. A final follow-up visit was performed at the end of the safety period, 28 days after the last open-label dose.
|
Open-Label Treatment (Placebo)
After participants completed the double-blind treatment period and the follow-up visit at Week 28, they were offered the option to receive open-label pirfenidone within the trial protocol in a safety follow-up period of up to 12 months. A final follow-up visit was performed at the end of the safety period, 28 days after the last open-label dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind Treatment
Adverse Event
|
19
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment
Death
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment
Physician Decision
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment
Withdrawal by Subject
|
9
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment
Lung transplantation
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment
Non-compliance with study drug
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment
Disease progression
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment
Randomization error
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double-blind Treatment
Non-compliance with Protocol procedure
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
12-month Safety Follow-up
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
12
|
|
12-month Safety Follow-up
Death
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
9
|
|
12-month Safety Follow-up
Lung transplantation
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
|
12-month Safety Follow-up
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
12-month Safety Follow-up
Symptomatic deterioration
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
12-month Safety Follow-up
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
|
12-month Safety Follow-up
Due to hospitalization
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Pirfenidone in Patients With Unclassifiable Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24. After participants completed the double-blind treatment period and the follow-up visit at Week 28, they were offered the option to receive open-label pirfenidone within the trial protocol in a safety follow-up period of up to 12 months. A final follow-up visit was performed at the end of the safety period, 28 days after the last open-label dose.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24. After participants completed the double-blind treatment period and the follow-up visit at Week 28, they were offered the option to receive open-label pirfenidone within the trial protocol in a safety follow-up period of up to 12 months. A final follow-up visit was performed at the end of the safety period, 28 days after the last open-label dose.
|
Total
n=253 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=93 Participants
|
67.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=4 Participants
|
67.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
57 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
70 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
139 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
7 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
115 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
112 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
227 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
120 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
123 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
243 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses. Only participants for whom data were collected are included in the analysis.
Rate of decline in FVC was measured in mL by daily handheld spirometer. The analyses were repeated due to an additional independent review of the home spirometry data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Decline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Over the 24-week Double-blind Treatment Period
Primary Analysis in 2019
|
-17.9 milliliter (mL)
Interval -311.7 to 275.9
|
116.6 milliliter (mL)
Interval -451.9 to 685.2
|
|
Rate of Decline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Over the 24-week Double-blind Treatment Period
Final Analysis in 2020
|
-90.3 milliliter (mL)
Interval -157.0 to -23.7
|
125.6 milliliter (mL)
Interval -458.4 to 709.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses. Only participants for whom data were collected are included in the analysis.
FVC was measured in liter (L) by spirometry. The analyses were repeated due to additional data cleaning activities that were not conducted during the primary analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Percent Predicted FVC
Baseline (Day 1)
|
73.95 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 18.815
|
73.95 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 19.974
|
|
Change in Percent Predicted FVC
Week 4
|
74.04 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 19.009
|
74.55 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 21.223
|
|
Change in Percent Predicted FVC
Week 8
|
73.98 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 19.324
|
73.50 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 20.168
|
|
Change in Percent Predicted FVC
Week 12
|
73.96 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 19.493
|
73.91 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 20.856
|
|
Change in Percent Predicted FVC
Week 16
|
74.56 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 20.299
|
72.65 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 22.479
|
|
Change in Percent Predicted FVC
Week 20
|
73.94 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 21.000
|
71.99 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 21.673
|
|
Change in Percent Predicted FVC
Week 24
|
72.95 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 20.819
|
73.55 Percent predicted (%)
Standard Deviation 22.383
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses. Only participants for whom data were collected are included in the analysis.
FVC was measured in liter (L) by spirometry. The analyses were repeated due to additional data cleaning activities that were not conducted during the primary analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in FVC
Baseline
|
2.36 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.793
|
2.38 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.747
|
|
Change in FVC
Week 4
|
2.37 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.818
|
2.37 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.786
|
|
Change in FVC
Week 8
|
2.37 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.822
|
2.36 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.816
|
|
Change in FVC
Week 12
|
2.37 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.820
|
2.35 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.773
|
|
Change in FVC
Week 16
|
2.41 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.860
|
2.31 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.782
|
|
Change in FVC
Week 20
|
2.40 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.866
|
2.30 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.796
|
|
Change in FVC
Week 24
|
2.37 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.863
|
2.34 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 0.773
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses.
Categorical change in FVC was measured both by daily spirometry as well as by spirometry during clinical visits. Only the site spirometry data were used as the daily spirometry data were not normally distributed. The analyses were repeated due to additional data cleaning activities that were not conducted during the primary analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Categorical Change in FVC of >5%
Primary Analysis in 2019
|
47 Number of Participants
|
74 Number of Participants
|
|
Categorical Change in FVC of >5%
Final Analysis in 2020
|
47 Number of Participants
|
73 Number of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses.
Categorical change in FVC was measured both by daily spirometry as well as by spirometry during clinical visits. Only the site spirometry data were used as the daily spirometry data were not normally distributed. The analyses were repeated due to additional data cleaning activities that were not conducted during the primary analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Categorical Change in FVC of >10%
Primary Analysis in 2019
|
18 Number of Participants
|
34 Number of Participants
|
|
Categorical Change in FVC of >10%
Final Analysis in 2020
|
18 Number of Participants
|
33 Number of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses. Only participants for whom data were collected are included in the analysis.
The DLco is a pulmonary function test that measures the capacity for the lung to carry out gas exchange between the inhaled breath and the pulmonary capillary blood vessels and the DLco %-predicted represents the DLco expressed as a percentage of the expected normal valued based on the participant's age, height, gender and ethnicity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco)
Baseline (Day 1)
|
46.19 % predicted
Standard Deviation 12.403
|
49.57 % predicted
Standard Deviation 13.931
|
|
Change in Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco)
Change from Baseline at Week 12 (Primary Analysis in 2019)
|
-0.52 % predicted
Standard Deviation 6.193
|
-0.56 % predicted
Standard Deviation 8.807
|
|
Change in Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco)
Change from Baseline at Week 24 (Primary Analysis in 2019)
|
-0.65 % predicted
Standard Deviation 7.113
|
-2.47 % predicted
Standard Deviation 8.833
|
|
Change in Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco)
Change from Baseline at Week 12 (Final Analysis in 2020)
|
-0.52 % predicted
Standard Deviation 6.193
|
-0.89 % predicted
Standard Deviation 9.407
|
|
Change in Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLco)
Change from Baseline at Week 24 (Final Analysis in 2020)
|
-0.65 % predicted
Standard Deviation 7.113
|
-2.48 % predicted
Standard Deviation 8.893
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses. Only participants for whom data were collected are included in the analysis.
Comparison of 6-minute walk distance before beginning and after completing study therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
Baseline
|
391.6 meter (m)
Standard Deviation 114.93
|
394.0 meter (m)
Standard Deviation 108.09
|
|
Change in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
Change from Baseline at Week 12
|
-14.8 meter (m)
Standard Deviation 66.23
|
-7.7 meter (m)
Standard Deviation 57.60
|
|
Change in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
Change from Baseline at Week 24
|
-2.0 meter (m)
Standard Deviation 68.11
|
-26.7 meter (m)
Standard Deviation 79.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses. Only participants for whom data were collected are included in the analysis.
University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ) consists of 24-item on a scale of 0 to 5 with 0=not at all and 5=maximal or unable to do because of breathlessness. The total scores were calculated by summation of the 24 items scores and transformed into 0-100, with 0= poor quality of life , and 100= excellent quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in University of California, San Diego-Shortness of Breath Questionnaire Score
Baseline
|
44.17 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 25.204
|
48.89 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 23.441
|
|
Change in University of California, San Diego-Shortness of Breath Questionnaire Score
Change from Baseline at Week 12
|
1.47 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.707
|
2.24 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.617
|
|
Change in University of California, San Diego-Shortness of Breath Questionnaire Score
Change from Baseline at Week 24
|
5.21 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.701
|
5.30 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 22.078
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses. Only participants for whom data were collected are included in the analysis.
The Leicester Cough Questionnaire is a patient-reported questionnaire evaluating the impact of cough on quality of life. The questionnaire comprises 19 items. Each item assesses symptoms, or the impact of symptoms, over the last 2 weeks on a seven-point Likert scale. Scores in three domains (physical, psychological and social) were calculated as a mean for each domain (range 1 to 7). A total score (range 3 to 21) was also calculated by adding the domain scores together. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Score in Leicester Cough Questionnaire Score
Baseline
|
16.13 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 3.711
|
15.15 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 3.928
|
|
Change in Score in Leicester Cough Questionnaire Score
Change from Baseline at Week 12 (Primary Analysis in 2019)
|
0.35 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.903
|
-0.23 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 3.654
|
|
Change in Score in Leicester Cough Questionnaire Score
Change from Baseline at Week 24 (Primary Analysis in 2019)
|
0.36 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.889
|
0.04 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 3.702
|
|
Change in Score in Leicester Cough Questionnaire Score
Change from Baseline at Week 12 (Final Analysis in 2020)
|
0.35 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.903
|
-0.23 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 3.654
|
|
Change in Score in Leicester Cough Questionnaire Score
Change from Baseline at Week 24 (Final Analysis in 2020)
|
0.35 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.884
|
0.04 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 3.702
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses. Only participants for whom data were collected are included in the analysis.
Cough VAS are 100-mm linear scales on which participants indicate the severity of their cough; 0 mm represents no cough and 100 mm the worst cough ever.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Cough Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Baseline
|
35.60 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 27.497
|
37.18 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 26.270
|
|
Change in Cough Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Change from Baseline at Week 12
|
-4.33 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 20.017
|
3.32 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 26.429
|
|
Change in Cough Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Change from Baseline at Week 24
|
-2.52 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 26.720
|
0.78 millimeter (mm)
Standard Deviation 30.121
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses. Only participants for whom data were collected are included in the analysis.
The SGRQ is a 50-item questionnaire developed to measure health status (quality of life) in participants with diseases of airways obstruction. Three component scores are: Symptoms (respiratory symptoms and severity); Activity (activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness); Impacts (social functioning and psychological disturbances due to airway disease). Each component sub-scores are calculated from the summed weights for the positive responses to questions. Total score summaries the impact of disease on overall health status. Scores are expressed as a percentage of overall impairment where 100 represents worst possible health status and 0 indicates best possible health status. It is calculated by summing all positive responses in the questionnaire and expressing the result as a percentage of the total weight for the questionnaire.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Symptoms sub-score - Baseline
|
49.28 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 21.687
|
53.10 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 21.450
|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Change from Baseline in Symptoms sub-score at Week 12
|
-2.60 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.173
|
0.86 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.212
|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Change from Baseline in Symptoms sub-score at Week 24
|
-1.69 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.186
|
-0.66 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.407
|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Activities sub-score - Baseline
|
63.93 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.388
|
66.96 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.615
|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Change from Baseline in Activities sub-score at Week 12
|
1.17 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 13.376
|
1.13 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 13.704
|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Change from Baseline in Activities sub-score at Week 24
|
1.25 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 14.629
|
2.22 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 13.110
|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Impacts sub-score - Baseline
|
37.12 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.484
|
41.47 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.520
|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Change from Baseline in Impacts sub-score at Week 12
|
0.29 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.826
|
0.33 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 13.888
|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Change from Baseline in Impacts sub-score at Week 24
|
-0.18 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 13.884
|
1.07 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.539
|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Total score - Baseline
|
47.37 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.465
|
51.46 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.699
|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Change from Baseline in Total score at Week 12
|
-0.17 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 13.633
|
0.53 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 11.724
|
|
Change in Total and Sub-scores of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Change from Baseline in Total score at Week 24
|
0.05 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 12.549
|
0.85 Scores of a Scale
Standard Deviation 13.383
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses.
Participants with non-elective hospitalization are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Non-elective Hospitalization, Both Respiratory and All Cause
All-cause hospitalization
|
16 Number of Participants
|
13 Number of Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Non-elective Hospitalization, Both Respiratory and All Cause
Respiratory-related hospitalization
|
5 Number of Participants
|
5 Number of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses.
Percentage of participants with acute exacerbation arereported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Investigator-reported Acute Exacerbations
|
3.9 Percentage of Participants
|
5.6 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses.
Time to first investigator reported acute exacerbations from start of treatment are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Investigator-reported Acute Exacerbations
|
NA Weeks
The end point could not be analyzed due to the limited number of events.
|
NA Weeks
The end point could not be analyzed due to the limited number of events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses.
PFS is defined as the time to the first occurrence of a \>10% absolute decline in percent predicted FVC, a \>50 m decline of 6MWD, or death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
|
25.14 Week
Interval 24.14 to
The end point could not be analyzed due to the limited number of events.
|
24.71 Week
Interval 24.14 to
The end point could not be analyzed due to the limited number of events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses.
PFS is defined as the time to the first occurrence of a \>10% relative decline in percent predicted FVC, non-elective respiratory hospitalization, or death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
|
NA Week
Interval 24.86 to
The median was not reached in this analysis, thus an estimate cannot be calculated. In order to calculate the median time at least 50% of participants should report an event and this is not the case in this analysis due to low event number.
|
NA Week
Interval 24.14 to
The median was not reached in this analysis, thus an estimate cannot be calculated. In order to calculate the median time at least 50% of participants should report an event and this is not the case in this analysis due to low event number.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses.
Time to first documented death from start of treatment is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Death From Any Cause
|
NA Week
The end point could not be analyzed due to the limited number of events.
|
NA Week
The end point could not be analyzed due to the limited number of events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants. The ITT population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses.
Time to first documented death due to respiratory diseases from start of treatment will be reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Death From Respiratory Diseases
|
NA Week
The end point could not be analyzed due to the limited number of events.
|
NA Week
The end point could not be analyzed due to the limited number of events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28Population: The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=124 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
120 Participants
|
101 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From administration of the first dose of study drug to Week 24Population: The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
Number of participants with dose reduction and treatment interruptions are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=124 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Treatment Interruptions During the Double-Blind Period
Participants with at least one dose modification
|
51 Number of Participants
|
34 Number of Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Treatment Interruptions During the Double-Blind Period
Participants with at least one dose interruption
|
40 Number of Participants
|
12 Number of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 MonthsPopulation: The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
Number of participants with dose reduction and treatment interruptions are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=94 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=110 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Treatment Interruptions During the 12-month Safety Follow-up
Participants with at least one dose modification
|
41 Number of Participants
|
60 Number of Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Treatment Interruptions During the 12-month Safety Follow-up
Participants with at least one dose interruption
|
24 Number of Participants
|
34 Number of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24Population: The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
Number of participants withdrawn from trial treatment or trial discontinuations are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=124 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Withdrawn From Trial Treatment or Trial Discontinuations During the Double-Blind Period
|
25 Number of Participants
|
12 Number of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 MonthsPopulation: The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
Number of participants withdrawn from trial treatment or trial discontinuations are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=94 Participants
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=110 Participants
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Withdrawn From Trial Treatment or Trial Discontinuations During the 12-month Safety Follow-up
|
19 Number of Participants
|
26 Number of Participants
|
Adverse Events
Pirfenidone
Placebo
Open-Label Treatment (Pirfenidone)
Open-Label Treatment (Placebo)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 participants at risk
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=124 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Open-Label Treatment (Pirfenidone)
n=94 participants at risk
After participants completed the double-blind treatment period and the follow-up visit at Week 28, they were offered the option to receive open-label pirfenidone within the trial protocol in a safety follow-up period of up to 12 months. A final follow-up visit was performed at the end of the safety period, 28 days after the last open-label dose.
|
Open-Label Treatment (Placebo)
n=110 participants at risk
After participants completed the double-blind treatment period and the follow-up visit at Week 28, they were offered the option to receive open-label pirfenidone within the trial protocol in a safety follow-up period of up to 12 months. A final follow-up visit was performed at the end of the safety period, 28 days after the last open-label dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
3.2%
3/94 • Number of events 3 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericarditis
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Lung transplant rejection
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Campylobacter gastroenteritis
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
3.6%
4/110 • Number of events 6 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Parainfluenzae virus infection
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.4%
3/124 • Number of events 3 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
5.5%
6/110 • Number of events 6 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection bacterial
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal fracture
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wrist fracture
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.8%
2/110 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.6%
2/124 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 3 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.7%
3/110 • Number of events 3 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
1.6%
2/127 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
3.2%
4/124 • Number of events 4 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
5.3%
5/94 • Number of events 7 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.7%
3/110 • Number of events 4 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 3 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary fibrosis
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.81%
1/124 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.8%
2/110 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory disorder
|
0.79%
1/127 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Atrial septal defect
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
General disorders
Polyp
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
General disorders
Sudden death
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Atypical pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive airways disease
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia influenzal
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia viral
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Toxocariasis
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Varicella zoster pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Varicella zoster virus infection
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Investigations
Influenza A virus test positive
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma of colon
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Spinal cord compression
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Product Issues
Device occlusion
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypercapnia
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 4 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.91%
1/110 • Number of events 3 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.8%
2/110 • Number of events 3 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Pirfenidone
n=127 participants at risk
Participants received pirfenidone 267 mg capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Placebo
n=124 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo capsule three times a day from Day 1 to 7 followed by 2 capsules three times a day from Day 8 to 14 then 3 capsules three times a day from Day 15 up to Week 24.
|
Open-Label Treatment (Pirfenidone)
n=94 participants at risk
After participants completed the double-blind treatment period and the follow-up visit at Week 28, they were offered the option to receive open-label pirfenidone within the trial protocol in a safety follow-up period of up to 12 months. A final follow-up visit was performed at the end of the safety period, 28 days after the last open-label dose.
|
Open-Label Treatment (Placebo)
n=110 participants at risk
After participants completed the double-blind treatment period and the follow-up visit at Week 28, they were offered the option to receive open-label pirfenidone within the trial protocol in a safety follow-up period of up to 12 months. A final follow-up visit was performed at the end of the safety period, 28 days after the last open-label dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.5%
7/127 • Number of events 7 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
3.2%
4/124 • Number of events 4 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
6.4%
6/94 • Number of events 6 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.7%
3/110 • Number of events 5 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
18.1%
23/127 • Number of events 27 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
18.5%
23/124 • Number of events 24 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
9.6%
9/94 • Number of events 16 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
13.6%
15/110 • Number of events 15 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
13.4%
17/127 • Number of events 21 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
5.6%
7/124 • Number of events 7 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
5.3%
5/94 • Number of events 5 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
7.3%
8/110 • Number of events 9 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
7.9%
10/127 • Number of events 10 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
4.8%
6/124 • Number of events 7 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
7.4%
7/94 • Number of events 8 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
6.4%
7/110 • Number of events 7 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
31.5%
40/127 • Number of events 49 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
7.3%
9/124 • Number of events 10 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
16.0%
15/94 • Number of events 18 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
27.3%
30/110 • Number of events 39 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
11.0%
14/127 • Number of events 17 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
4.8%
6/124 • Number of events 7 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
4.3%
4/94 • Number of events 6 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
16.4%
18/110 • Number of events 25 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
16.5%
21/127 • Number of events 22 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
15.3%
19/124 • Number of events 20 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
5.3%
5/94 • Number of events 5 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
10.9%
12/110 • Number of events 14 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
7.9%
10/127 • Number of events 11 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.4%
3/124 • Number of events 3 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
6.3%
8/127 • Number of events 10 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
10.5%
13/124 • Number of events 16 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
9.6%
9/94 • Number of events 12 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
12.7%
14/110 • Number of events 15 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.5%
7/127 • Number of events 8 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
4.8%
6/124 • Number of events 9 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
10.6%
10/94 • Number of events 11 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
10.0%
11/110 • Number of events 11 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
8.7%
11/127 • Number of events 11 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
4.0%
5/124 • Number of events 7 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
8.5%
8/94 • Number of events 9 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
8.2%
9/110 • Number of events 15 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
9.4%
12/127 • Number of events 15 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
7.3%
9/124 • Number of events 10 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
10.6%
10/94 • Number of events 10 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
3.6%
4/110 • Number of events 5 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
8.7%
11/127 • Number of events 11 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
4.8%
6/124 • Number of events 6 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
6.4%
7/110 • Number of events 7 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
14.2%
18/127 • Number of events 22 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
8.9%
11/124 • Number of events 11 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
7.4%
7/94 • Number of events 8 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
11.8%
13/110 • Number of events 13 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
6.3%
8/127 • Number of events 8 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.4%
3/124 • Number of events 3 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
8.7%
11/127 • Number of events 13 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
10.5%
13/124 • Number of events 14 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
4.3%
4/94 • Number of events 4 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
7.3%
8/110 • Number of events 8 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
10.2%
13/127 • Number of events 19 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
3.2%
4/124 • Number of events 5 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
3.2%
3/94 • Number of events 3 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
10.9%
12/110 • Number of events 12 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
5.5%
7/127 • Number of events 7 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/94 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/110 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
15.0%
19/127 • Number of events 21 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
12.9%
16/124 • Number of events 17 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
10.6%
10/94 • Number of events 12 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
8.2%
9/110 • Number of events 9 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
11.0%
14/127 • Number of events 16 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
17.7%
22/124 • Number of events 25 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
9.6%
9/94 • Number of events 10 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
7.3%
8/110 • Number of events 8 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Photosensitivity reaction
|
6.3%
8/127 • Number of events 9 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
8.2%
9/110 • Number of events 12 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
7.1%
9/127 • Number of events 12 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
5.6%
7/124 • Number of events 8 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
8.5%
8/94 • Number of events 10 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
14.5%
16/110 • Number of events 19 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.1%
2/94 • Number of events 2 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
7.3%
8/110 • Number of events 8 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
9.1%
10/110 • Number of events 12 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
1.1%
1/94 • Number of events 1 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
7.3%
8/110 • Number of events 9 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/127 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/124 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
7.4%
7/94 • Number of events 9 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
2.7%
3/110 • Number of events 3 • Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28 in the double-blind period From the Follow-up Visit at Week 28 through the follow-up period of 12 Months in the open-label treatment period
The safety population was defined as all participants with at least one intake of pirfenidone or placebo, i.e., at least one record in the drug-log of the double-blind period with a non-zero dose. Participants in the safety population were assigned to a treatment arm according to the actual treatment they received.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER