Extended Analysis for Leukemia/Lymphoma Treatment

NCT ID: NCT03096821

Last Updated: 2021-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

143 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-30

Study Completion Date

2020-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with relapsed/ refractory acute leukemia and relapsed/ refractory aggressive lymphoma harboring an activating genetic alteration (gene mutation, gene fusion) or drug-able biomarker / activated signal transduction pathway and resistant to any approved treatment modality will be eligible for this study.

The investigators aim to combine DNA sequencing-based molecular profiling with an ex vivo high-throughput drug screening strategy. For the latter method, viable cells are obtained from the individual patient's lymphoma or leukemia in order to determine i)the expression of relevant therapeutic target molecules and ii)the ex vivo response of the patient's cancer cells to a panel of agents with anticancer activity. In addition, analysis of tumor stroma cells will provide information about the differential target expression and cellular sensitivity aiming at the evaluation of a therapeutic safety window. Thereby, biological material will have to be accessed within 4 weeks before onset of individualized treatment (real-time biopsy). Bioinformatic data-management based on a Bayesian statistical approach will support individualized treatment decisions in this controlled clinical approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and rationale for the trial Etiological concepts on cancer development, malignant growth and tumor propagation have led to the discovery of various molecular driver mechanisms. Based on these advances, medical oncology has started to enter an era of individualized medicine where treatment selection is becoming tailored to drug-able molecular pathways. This individualized treatment concept is mainly based on molecular and genetic characterization of the tumors including biomarker technology, which allow us to align the most appropriate treatment according to the patient's disease. Although there is a general acceptance towards such individualized approach thereby stratifying and subgrouping patients to improve the quality of clinical care in oncology, molecular profiling has just started to assist prediction of the drug's clinical benefit by identifying the most responsive patient subgroup. Recently, excellent demonstrations of the utility of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers have emerged. Von Hoff and co-workers have recently demonstrated that molecular profiling of patients' tumors is an efficient approach to identify potential targets and select treatments for their treatment-refractory cancers(Von Hoff, Stephenson et al. 2010). Such a tailored treatment strategy revealed to be an effective approach to increase progression free survival (PFS), when compared to the patients' most recent standard treatment regimen. Another example for individualized treatment of patients is given by the recently published BATTLE trial (Biomarker-integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination), a prospective biomarker and biopsy driven trial in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (Kim, Herbst et al. 2011). By this Bayesian approach, the authors demonstrated that targeting individually analyzed molecules of the patient's tumor might represent an efficient therapeutic approach in the treatment of an incurable disease. While these examples suggest a benefit for individual tumor characterization for selection of a tailored treatment concept, currently novel targeted agents in the treatment of cancer are rather approved for a certain subtype of cancer, but not for patients based on the expression or activity of respective target lesions. Therefore, the need of an extension of clinical protocols focusing on molecular profile-based treatment decisions, rather than on anatomic cancer-subtypes is mandatory. Based on this concept the current protocol was designed. The investigators hypothesize that molecular profiling of a patient's tumor might not only predict treatment response, but also leads to an individualized treatment protocol resulting in clinical benefit for the individual patient. Therefore, this project aims to assess the feasibility of an individualized treatment concept for pre-defined patient's benefit.

Design, methodology, statistical considerations and organization The Medical University of Vienna will be clinical sponsor and clinical center of this investigator-initiated open-label single center single-arm, exploratory phase II study. The individualized treatment concept is determined to be biopsy-mandated and biomarker-based. Bio-data analysis will be supported by a software, which is generated by the Center of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems.

Study design and methodology Patients with relapsed/ refractory acute leukemia and relapsed/ refractory aggressive lymphoma harboring an activating genetic alteration (gene mutation, gene fusion) or drug-able biomarker / activated signal transduction pathway and resistant to any approved treatment modality will be eligible for this study.

The investigators aim to combine DNA sequencing-based molecular profiling with an ex vivo high-throughput drug screening strategy. For the latter method, viable cells are obtained from the individual patient's lymphoma or leukemia in order to determine i)the expression of relevant therapeutic target molecules and ii)the ex vivo response of the patient's cancer cells to a panel of agents with anticancer activity. In addition, analysis of tumor stroma cells will provide information about the differential target expression and cellular sensitivity aiming at the evaluation of a therapeutic safety window. Thereby, biological material will have to be accessed within 4 weeks before onset of individualized treatment (real-time biopsy). Bioinformatic data-management based on a Bayesian statistical approach will support individualized treatment decisions in this controlled clinical approach.

Number of patients. A sample size of 49 patients achieves ≥ 80% power to detect a difference of 15% between the null hypothesis proportion P0 (PFS ratio ≥ 1.3) = 10% and the alternative proportion P1(PFS ratio ≥ 1.3) = 25% using a one-sided exact binomial test at a significance level of 0.0250. The null hypothesis can be rejected, if at least 10 out of 50 patients treated show a PFS ratio ≥ 1.3. The investigators therefore aim to enroll 49 leukemia patients and 49 lymphoma patients.

Target population. Patients with relapsed/ refractory acute leukemia and relapsed/ refractory aggressive lymphoma after standard treatment. Standard treatment is defined according to actual National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician\_gls/f\_guidelines.asp) and/or local guidelines. 49 acute leukemia subjects and 49 lymphoma subjects will be screened for enrolment in the trial. Deviations from inclusion criteria are not allowed because they can potentially jeopardize the scientific integrity of the study, regulatory acceptability or subject safety. Therefore, adherence to the criteria as specified in the protocol is essential. Inclusion criteria as well as exclusion criteria must be respected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Relapsed Hematologic Malignancy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ngFDS selected treatment

Treatment with commercially available treatments (per package insert instructions) chosen via next-generation functional drug screening (ngFDS).

ngFDS selected treatment

Intervention Type DRUG

Treatment based on next-generation functional drug screening (ngFDS). Treatment with commercially available treatments (per package insert instructions) selected by functional drug screening. For drug screening tumor cells from bone marrow aspirates, peripheral blood, pleural effusion, or excised lymph node samples are purified over Ficoll gradient (bone marrow, peripheral blood, pleural effusion) (GE healthcare) or homogenized and filtered (lymph tissue).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ngFDS selected treatment

Treatment based on next-generation functional drug screening (ngFDS). Treatment with commercially available treatments (per package insert instructions) selected by functional drug screening. For drug screening tumor cells from bone marrow aspirates, peripheral blood, pleural effusion, or excised lymph node samples are purified over Ficoll gradient (bone marrow, peripheral blood, pleural effusion) (GE healthcare) or homogenized and filtered (lymph tissue).

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Treatment based on ngFDS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. There are no further standard treatments available for the patient;
2. The patient has undergone at least two lines of previous therapy;
3. Cancer cell-containing biopsies are obtainable;
4. Informed consent from the patient was given;
5. candidate treatments identified by ngFDS are clinically available and considered safe given the patient health state.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Presence of further treatment options, as defined by NCCN guidelines or Austrian guidelines representing a possible further treatment-related response by conventional therapies according to generally accepted medical evidence.
2. No fresh and viable tumor material available.
3. Unresolved toxicity of National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0) Grade 2 or higher from previous anti-cancer therapy, except alopecia.
4. Presence of active gastrointestinal disease or other condition that will interfere significantly with the absorption of drugs.
5. A history of known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection.
6. A history of known glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency.
7. History of other malignancy. Subjects who have been disease-free for 5 years, or subjects with a history of completely resected non-melanoma skin cancer or successfully treated in situ carcinoma are eligible.
8. Uncontrolled medical conditions (i.e, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, etc), psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical conditions that do not permit compliance with the protocol; or unwillingness or inability to follow the procedures required in the protocol.
9. Pregnant or lactating females.
10. History of alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to screening.
11. No informed consent available.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Vienna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Philipp Staber, MD, PhD

Assoc.Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philipp B Staber, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Liebers N, Bruch PM, Terzer T, Hernandez-Hernandez M, Paramasivam N, Fitzgerald D, Altmann H, Roider T, Kolb C, Knoll M, Lenze A, Platzbecker U, Rollig C, Baldus C, Serve H, Bornhauser M, Hubschmann D, Muller-Tidow C, Stolzel F, Huber W, Benner A, Zenz T, Lu J, Dietrich S. Ex vivo drug response profiling for response and outcome prediction in hematologic malignancies: the prospective non-interventional SMARTrial. Nat Cancer. 2023 Dec;4(12):1648-1659. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00645-5. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37783805 (View on PubMed)

Snijder B, Vladimer GI, Krall N, Miura K, Schmolke AS, Kornauth C, Lopez de la Fuente O, Choi HS, van der Kouwe E, Gultekin S, Kazianka L, Bigenzahn JW, Hoermann G, Prutsch N, Merkel O, Ringler A, Sabler M, Jeryczynski G, Mayerhoefer ME, Simonitsch-Klupp I, Ocko K, Felberbauer F, Mullauer L, Prager GW, Korkmaz B, Kenner L, Sperr WR, Kralovics R, Gisslinger H, Valent P, Kubicek S, Jager U, Staber PB, Superti-Furga G. Image-based ex-vivo drug screening for patients with aggressive haematological malignancies: interim results from a single-arm, open-label, pilot study. Lancet Haematol. 2017 Dec;4(12):e595-e606. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30208-9. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29153976 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1830/2015

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EXALT1.1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.