Comparison Between Axial- and Lateral-viewing Capsule Endoscopy in Celiac Disease

NCT ID: NCT03095573

Last Updated: 2017-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-01

Study Completion Date

2019-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is recommended as the gold standard in small bowel exploration. The efficiency of the axial-viewing (Given, Imaging) has been widely reported. The CapsoCam capsule (Capsovision, California, USA) has four cameras allowing the exploration of the small bowel through 360 degree lateral viewing. Celiac disease is the most common autoimmune enteropathy in Western countries, and is usually associated with a good response to the gluten free diet and an excellent prognosis. However, a minority of patients develop complications of the disease, such as refractory celiac disease, ulcerative jejunoileitis and neoplastic complications such as adenocarcinoma of the small bowel and enteropathy associated T cell lymphoma. In recent years, the detection of small bowel lesions has dramatically improved thank to the availability of capsule endoscopy exploration. The aim of this study was to evaluate detection rate and diagnostic concordance of the axial view capsule and CapsoCam capsules in the same patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will involve 25 patients with suspected complicated celiac disease , which for clinical reasons are referred for an evaluation of the small intestine by means of capsule endoscopic in order to screen/identify complications. Furthermore, patients under regular follow-up for a known complication of celiac disease (i.e. refractory celiac disease, ulcerative jejunoileitis) will also be enrolled.

Patients reffered to the Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of celiac disease at the research Hospital "Fondazione Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico" in Milan will be prospectively evaluated and consecutively enrolled in the study.

In agreement with international Guidelines, the diagnosis of celiac disease will be based on Presence of atrophy in the duodenal biopsy sampling (Marsh-Oberhuber type 3) and positive serology or genetic compatibility (in case of seronegative patients at diagnosis).

Patients at high risk of celiac disease complications are defined as

* subjects older than 50 years at the time of celiac disease diagnosis
* subjects with persistence / recurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms after at least 6 months of gluten-free diet
* subjects reporting poor compliance to the gluten-free diet
* subjects with alarm signs at diagnosis or during follow-up.

All enrolled patients will undergo examination of the small bowel by means of both endoscopic capsule devices (the axial-view PillCam SB3 and the lateral-view CapsoCam) on the same day at approximately 3 hours interval from one another, according to a protocol already validated in terms of security in other studies. The order of administration of the two different capsules, will be determined by a specific randomization sequence.

At the end of the examination, recorded data from the capsules will be acquired according to the following steps:

* For the axial-view capsule: removal of the recorder after 10 hours recording and/or after checking that the capsule has reached the cecum. The patient will also be instructed to retrieve the capsule from the stools in the hours / days following the examination as per standard protocol.
* For the lateral-view capsule, the patient will be given a specific kit for its retrieval and conservation. The recorded data will be downloaded after retrieval of the capsule.

The 50 videos will be reviewed by three experts operators (L.E., F.B. G.E.T.), blinded and in randomized order. The operators will evaluate the number of lesions detected by the two different types of capsule system (Primary endpoint) and the mean extension of the lesions detected, expressed as percentage of the total transit time of the capsule in the small intestine (Secondary endpoint)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Celiac Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Each enrolled patients will undergo examination of the small bowel by means of both endoscopic capsule devices (the axial-view PillCam SB3 and the lateral-view CapsoCam) on the same day at approximately 3 hours interval from one another. The order of administration of the two different capsules will be determined by a specific randomization sequence.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The videos will be reviewed by three experts operators blinded about the sequence of capsule examination administration

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lateral-viewing capsule

Examination of the small bowel by means of the lateral-viewing CapsoCam device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lateral-viewing CapsoCam device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Small bowel capsule endoscopy examination with the Lateral-viewing CapsoCam device

Axial-viewing capsule

Examination of the small bowel by means of the axial-viewing capsule

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Axial-viewing capsule

Intervention Type DEVICE

Small bowel capsule endoscopy examination with the Axial-viewing capsule device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lateral-viewing CapsoCam device

Small bowel capsule endoscopy examination with the Lateral-viewing CapsoCam device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Axial-viewing capsule

Small bowel capsule endoscopy examination with the Axial-viewing capsule device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients with celiac disease at high risk of complication (see above for a detailed description)

Exclusion Criteria

* presence of Pacemaker or Defibrillator
* suspected small bowel obstruction
* impaired swallowing
* pregnancy
* presence of contraindications to a capsule endoscopy examination
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luca Elli

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luca Elli, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondazione IRCCS Ca´Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Irccs Policlinico San Donato

San Donato Milanese, MI, Italy

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Luca Elli, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+390255033384

Federica Branchi, MD

Role: CONTACT

+390255033384

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Luca Elli, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+390255033384

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Volta U, Bellentani S, Bianchi FB, Brandi G, De Franceschi L, Miglioli L, Granito A, Balli F, Tiribelli C. High prevalence of celiac disease in Italian general population. Dig Dis Sci. 2001 Jul;46(7):1500-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1010648122797.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11478502 (View on PubMed)

Green PH, Fleischauer AT, Bhagat G, Goyal R, Jabri B, Neugut AI. Risk of malignancy in patients with celiac disease. Am J Med. 2003 Aug 15;115(3):191-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00302-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12935825 (View on PubMed)

Catassi C, Bearzi I, Holmes GK. Association of celiac disease and intestinal lymphomas and other cancers. Gastroenterology. 2005 Apr;128(4 Suppl 1):S79-86. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.027.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15825131 (View on PubMed)

Culliford A, Daly J, Diamond B, Rubin M, Green PH. The value of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with complicated celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jul;62(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)01566-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15990820 (View on PubMed)

Daum S, Wahnschaffe U, Glasenapp R, Borchert M, Ullrich R, Zeitz M, Faiss S. Capsule endoscopy in refractory celiac disease. Endoscopy. 2007 May;39(5):455-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966239.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17516353 (View on PubMed)

Rondonotti E, Spada C, Cave D, Pennazio M, Riccioni ME, De Vitis I, Schneider D, Sprujevnik T, Villa F, Langelier J, Arrigoni A, Costamagna G, de Franchis R. Video capsule enteroscopy in the diagnosis of celiac disease: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1624-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01238.x. Epub 2007 Apr 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17459022 (View on PubMed)

Rostom A, Murray JA, Kagnoff MF. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2006 Dec;131(6):1981-2002. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.004. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17087937 (View on PubMed)

Rondonotti E, Soncini M, Girelli C, Ballardini G, Bianchi G, Brunati S, Centenara L, Cesari P, Cortelezzi C, Curioni S, Gozzini C, Gullotta R, Lazzaroni M, Maino M, Mandelli G, Mantovani N, Morandi E, Pansoni C, Piubello W, Putignano R, Schalling R, Tatarella M, Villa F, Vitagliano P, Russo A, Conte D, Masci E, de Franchis R; AIGO, SIED and SIGE Lombardia. Small bowel capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a multicenter 7-year survey. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Nov;22(11):1380-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283352ced.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20173646 (View on PubMed)

Bardella MT, Elli L, De Matteis S, Floriani I, Torri V, Piodi L. Autoimmune disorders in patients affected by celiac sprue and inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Med. 2009;41(2):139-43. doi: 10.1080/07853890802378817.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18777226 (View on PubMed)

Leighton JA. The role of endoscopic imaging of the small bowel in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;106(1):27-36; quiz 37. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.410. Epub 2010 Oct 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20978483 (View on PubMed)

Pioche M, Vanbiervliet G, Jacob P, Duburque C, Gincul R, Filoche B, Daudet J, Filippi J, Saurin JC; French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED). Prospective randomized comparison between axial- and lateral-viewing capsule endoscopy systems in patients with obscure digestive bleeding. Endoscopy. 2014 Jun;46(6):479-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358832. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24285122 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Capsocam

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.