The Impact of Diabetes on REvascularization

NCT ID: NCT03085524

Last Updated: 2024-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

215 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-01

Study Completion Date

2022-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The presence of foot symptoms at rest or tissue necrosis in patients with peripheral artery disease is a medical urgency and represents a state of critical limb ischemia (CLI) where the risk of amputation, in the absence of revascularization, is high. No trial conducted to date in peripheral revascularization has determined the effect of diabetes on mechanism of revascularization failure. Therefore, this trial represents a unique opportunity to investigate the mechanisms by which diabetes affects surgical and endovascular revascularization procedures with the long-term goal of improving outcomes in CLI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Peripheral artery disease is a condition defined by marked accumulation of atherosclerotic plaque below the distal aorta that reduces lower limb arterial perfusion. Blood flow reductions may be inadequate for exercising limbs and cause ischemic muscle pain, called intermitted claudication, or, in severe cases, the reduction may be inadequate for basal metabolism and cause pain at rest, ulceration, or gangrene. The presence of symptoms at rest or tissue necrosis is a medical urgency and represents a state of critical limb ischemia (CLI) where the risk of amputation, in the absence of revascularization, is high. The ageing of the population and the increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus ensures this population will continue to grow in the foreseeable future. The impact of diabetes, however, is not limited to PAD incidence. Diabetic patients represent a particularly vulnerable subset of PAD patients and have a four-fold risk of CLI compared to non-diabetic patients. Indeed, in previous studies of CLI, more than half of patients have diabetes. As a result, the combination of diabetes and PAD accounts for more than half of non-traumatic amputations in the United States. Diabetic patients often present with foot ulcerations as their first manifestation of PAD and have challenging anatomy for revascularization. Failed vascular reconstructions, both endovascular or surgical, often result in additional tissue loss and transtibial amputations. Despite these challenges, the mechanisms of restenosis and the impact of diabetes have not been well explored for both types of revascularization in patients with CLI. The BEST-CLI trial is a multi-center, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial comparing open surgical bypass therapy to endovascular therapy in CLI patients with a composite clinical endpoint denoted as Major Adverse Limb Event free survival (MALE-free survival). However, the BEST-CLI trial does not study the mechanisms by which revascularization may fail. This proposal will extend the novel clinical work of the BEST-CLI trial by studying the mechanisms of bypass vein graft and stent failure. The investigators will adjudicate the mode of revascularization (vein graft or stent) in a central core laboratory, measure systemic markers of diabetic dysmetabolism including inflammation, insulin resistance, adverse adipokine expression, poor nutrition, and renal dysfunction, and begin to study the association of these factors with graft failure. Indeed, no trial conducted to date in either coronary or peripheral revascularization has determined the mechanism of revascularization failure, the impact of diabetes, nor the relationship between conduit patency and clinical outcomes. Therefore, this trial represents a unique opportunity to investigate the mechanisms by which diabetes affects surgical and endovascular revascularization procedures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Arterial Disease Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgical Bypass

Subjects in the BEST-CLI trial assigned to surgical revascularization.

Platelet function testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The investigators will test platelet reactivity at the beginning and midpoint of the first year after revascularization

Vascular ultrasonography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The investigators will test bypass graft and stent patency at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year.

Endovascular

Subjects in the BEST-CLI trial assigned to endovascular revascularization.

Platelet function testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The investigators will test platelet reactivity at the beginning and midpoint of the first year after revascularization

Vascular ultrasonography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The investigators will test bypass graft and stent patency at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Platelet function testing

The investigators will test platelet reactivity at the beginning and midpoint of the first year after revascularization

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Vascular ultrasonography

The investigators will test bypass graft and stent patency at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female, age 35 years or older
* Atherosclerotic, infrainguinal PAD
* CLI, defined as arterial insufficiency with gangrene, non-healing ischemic ulcer, or rest pain, consistent with Rutherford classes 4-6
* Candidate for either open or endovascular infrainguinal revascularization as judged by the treating investigators
* Adequate inflow into the index femoral artery
* Adequate popliteal, tibial, or pedal revascularization target
* Willing to comply with protocol, attend follow-up appointments, complete all study assessments, and provide informed consent
* Endovascular revascularization with a stent
* Surgical revascularization with a vein graft-

Exclusion Criteria

* Femoropopliteal disease pattern consistent with TASC IIA
* Complete occlusion of the iliac artery
* Aortoiliac occlusive disease or severe common femoral artery disease
* Presence of a femoral, popliteal or tibial aneurysm of the index limb
* Life expectancy less than 2 years
* Deemed excessive risk for surgical bypass
* A vascular disease prognosis that includes an anticipated above ankle amputation on index limb within 4 weeks of index procedure
* Renal dysfunction defined as MDRD eGFR ≤ 30ml/min/173 m2 at the time of screening
* Currently on dialysis or history of a renal transplant
* A documented hypercoagulable state
* Nonatherosclerotic occlusive disease
* Any prior infrainguinal revascularization
* Current immuno-suppressive medication, chemotherapy or radiation therapy
* Absolute contraindication to iodinated contrast
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Carelon Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joshua Beckman

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Long Beach VA Medical Center

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Keck Medical Center of USC

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco VA Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

University of California San Francisco Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Hospital

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Yale New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Loyola University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Decatur Memorial Hospital

Decatur, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Iowa Heart Center

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University Health System: LSU Health Sciences

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Massachusetts Medical School

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Michigan Vascular Center

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Michigan Heart - St. Joseph Mercy Health System

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Deborah Heart and Lung Center

Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Rutgers University Hospital

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New Mexico Heart Institute

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albany Medical Center

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Westchester Medical Center

Valhalla, New York, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina Hospitals

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest Baptist Health

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Toledo Medical Center

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health and Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greenville Memorial Hospital

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Harborview Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Gunderson Health System

La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin - Madison

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

St. Boniface General Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Sciences

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Chu de Quebec, St-Francois d'Assise Hospital

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Helsinki University Hospital

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Finland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sullivan AE, Huang S, Kundu S, Thomas VE, Clair DG, Aday AW, Menard MT, Farber A, Rosenfield K, Newman JD, Berger JS, Wells QS, Freiberg MS, Linton MF, Beckman JA. Association of Lipoprotein(a) With Major Adverse Limb Events and All-Cause Mortality Following Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Substudy of the BEST-CLI Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e041177. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.041177. Epub 2025 May 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40401600 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

161402

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.