Trial Outcomes & Findings for Multi-center Prospective Study Determining the Sustainability of Pain Relief and Psychosocial and Functional Responses When Utilizing a Multiple Waveform Enabled Neurostimulator (NCT NCT03082261)

NCT ID: NCT03082261

Last Updated: 2021-07-08

Results Overview

The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

269 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to 6 Months

Results posted on

2021-07-08

Participant Flow

A total of 269 subjects were enrolled at 22 investigational sites. The enrollment of the first subject was on 03 March 2017 and the last subject was on 13 February 2018. The last follow-up visit occurred on 26 August 2020.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG). Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Overall Study
STARTED
269
Overall Study
COMPLETED
149
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
120

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG). Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Overall Study
Death
4
Overall Study
Implant of dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG) device
1
Overall Study
Insurance denial
1
Overall Study
Peripheral lead added
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
40
Overall Study
Subject did not meet screening inclusion/exclusion criteria
2
Overall Study
Subject implanted with device other than study device
1
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
14
Overall Study
Subject moved to a different state
1
Overall Study
Subject non-compliance
2
Overall Study
Subject participation terminated by investigator
9
Overall Study
Subject participation terminated by sponsor
4
Overall Study
System explant
19
Overall Study
Unable to place lead(s)
2
Overall Study
Unsuccessful trial evaluation period
19

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=269 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Age, Continuous
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=269 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
166 Participants
n=269 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
103 Participants
n=269 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
7 participants
n=269 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
210 participants
n=269 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
12 participants
n=269 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
8 participants
n=269 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
1 participants
n=269 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
5 participants
n=269 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
26 participants
n=269 Participants
Duration of Experiencing Chronic Pain
9.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 • n=269 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis

The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
6 months
4.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to 6 months
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis

EQ5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. EQ5D Index scores range from - 0.594 (min) to 1 (max). An EQ-5D summary index is derived by applying a formula that attaches values (weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. Higher values represent better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline
0.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
6 months
0.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Change from baseline to 6 months
0.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis

The PCS is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain). Subjects answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain (i.e., not at the current moment). The scale includes 13 statements concerning pain experiences that are rated on a scale between 0 'not at all' and 4 'always'. The scale is self-administered and takes 5 minutes to complete. A higher score indicated a higher level of catastrophizing. PCS total scores range from 0 (min) to 52 (max). Three sub-scales consists of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Rumination scores range from 0 (min) to 16 (max), Magnification scores range from 0 (min) to 12 (max), and helplessness scores range from 0 (min) to 24 (max). The total PCS score is the sum of the three subscales.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline
25.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.9
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
6 months
13.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.2
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Change from baseline to 6 months
11.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis

The State-Trait Anxiety inventory is a self-administered screening for anxiety. The STAI has 40 items, 20 items allocated to each of the S-Anxiety and T-Anxiety subscales. All items are rated on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. It clearly differentiates between the temporary condition of "state anxiety" and the more general and long-standing quality of "trait anxiety" by providing a score for each. Higher scores suggest greater levels of anxiety. The range of possible scores for the STAI varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80 on both the trait and state subscales. The total score is the sum of the two subscales. STAI total scores range from 40 to 160.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Baseline
87.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.1
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
6 months
77.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.7
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Change from baseline to 6 months
10.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis

The PHQ9 is a multipurpose, validated instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. The questionnaire consists of 9 questions that rate the frequency of the symptoms of depression. A follow up non-scored question screens and assigns weight to the degree to which depressive problems have affected the patient's level of function. The responses range between 4 choices (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day). Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of major depression. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 (min) to 27 (max).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Baseline
10.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
6 months
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Change from baseline to 6 months
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis

The TSK is a 11-item self-report checklist using a 4-point Likert scale that was developed from the original 17-item checklist (Miller, Kopri \& Todd, 1991) as a measure of fear or movement or (re)injury. The scale is based on the model of fear avoidance, fear of work related activities, fear of movement and fear of re-injury. The TSK has also been linked to elements of catastrophic thinking. The scale can be useful in measuring unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about pain in people with chronic pain. Total TSK-11 scores range from 11-44 points. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Change from baseline to 6 months
3.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.7
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Baseline
28.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.8
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
6 months
24.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis

The MOS sleep scale is intended to assess the extent of sleep problems and measures 6 dimensions of sleep, including initiation, maintenance, quantity, adequacy, drowsiness and respiratory impairments. It includes 12 questions with the first question assessing how long it takes the subject to fall asleep. The second question asks how many hours each night the subject slept. The remaining 10 questions have a range of 6 responses from 1="all of the time" to 6="none of the time". The scale is self-administered and validated. MOS Sleep scale scores range from 0 (min) to 100 (max). Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Baseline
52.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.8
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
6 months
45.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.2
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Change from baseline to 6 months
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis

The PROMIS Physical Function short form is an 8-item instrument designed to measure physical capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. The scale measures universal physical function rather than disease-specific impairment and assesses current function rather than function over a specified time period. Each question has five potential response options ranging in value from one to five to give a total score ranging from 8 to 40. Scores are converted into t-scores where the average for the general US population is 50 and the SD is 10. Higher scores indicate better physical function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=171 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Baseline
32.9 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.0
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
6 months
36.7 T-score
Standard Deviation 6.8
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Change from baseline to 6 months
3.8 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

EQ5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. EQ5D Index scores range from - 0.594 (min) to 1 (max). An EQ-5D summary index is derived by applying a formula that attaches values (weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. Higher values represent better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline
0.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
12 months
0.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Change from baseline to 12 months
0.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

EQ5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. EQ5D Index scores range from - 0.594 (min) to 1 (max). An EQ-5D summary index is derived by applying a formula that attaches values (weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. Higher values represent better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline
0.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
18 months
0.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Change from baseline to 18 months
0.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

EQ5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. EQ5D Index scores range from - 0.594 (min) to 1 (max). An EQ-5D summary index is derived by applying a formula that attaches values (weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. Higher values represent better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline
0.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
24 months
0.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Change from baseline to 24 months
0.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PCS is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain). Subjects answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain (i.e., not at the current moment). The scale includes 13 statements concerning pain experiences that are rated on a scale between 0 'not at all' and 4 'always'. The scale is self-administered and takes 5 minutes to complete. A higher score indicated a higher level of catastrophizing. PCS total scores range from 0 (min) to 52 (max). Three sub-scales consists of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Rumination scores range from 0 (min) to 16 (max), Magnification scores range from 0 (min) to 12 (max), and helplessness scores range from 0 (min) to 24 (max). The total PCS score is the sum of the three subscales.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline
25.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
3 months
14.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.3
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Change from baseline to 3 months
10.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PCS is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain). Subjects answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain (i.e., not at the current moment). The scale includes 13 statements concerning pain experiences that are rated on a scale between 0 'not at all' and 4 'always'. The scale is self-administered and takes 5 minutes to complete. A higher score indicated a higher level of catastrophizing. PCS total scores range from 0 (min) to 52 (max). Three sub-scales consists of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Rumination scores range from 0 (min) to 16 (max), Magnification scores range from 0 (min) to 12 (max), and helplessness scores range from 0 (min) to 24 (max). The total PCS score is the sum of the three subscales.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline
25.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
12 months
14.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Change from baseline to 12 months
11.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PCS is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain). Subjects answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain (i.e., not at the current moment). The scale includes 13 statements concerning pain experiences that are rated on a scale between 0 'not at all' and 4 'always'. The scale is self-administered and takes 5 minutes to complete. A higher score indicated a higher level of catastrophizing. PCS total scores range from 0 (min) to 52 (max). Three sub-scales consists of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Rumination scores range from 0 (min) to 16 (max), Magnification scores range from 0 (min) to 12 (max), and helplessness scores range from 0 (min) to 24 (max). The total PCS score is the sum of the three subscales.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline
25.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
18 months
14.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.5
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Change from baseline to 18 months
12.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.8

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PCS is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain). Subjects answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain (i.e., not at the current moment). The scale includes 13 statements concerning pain experiences that are rated on a scale between 0 'not at all' and 4 'always'. The scale is self-administered and takes 5 minutes to complete. A higher score indicated a higher level of catastrophizing. PCS total scores range from 0 (min) to 52 (max). Three sub-scales consists of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Rumination scores range from 0 (min) to 16 (max), Magnification scores range from 0 (min) to 12 (max), and helplessness scores range from 0 (min) to 24 (max). The total PCS score is the sum of the three subscales.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline
25.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
24 months
13.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.6
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Change from baseline to 24 months
12.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.8

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The State-Trait Anxiety inventory is a self-administered screening for anxiety. The STAI has 40 items, 20 items allocated to each of the S-Anxiety and T-Anxiety subscales. All items are rated on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. It clearly differentiates between the temporary condition of "state anxiety" and the more general and long-standing quality of "trait anxiety" by providing a score for each. Higher scores suggest greater levels of anxiety. The range of possible scores for the STAI varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80 on both the trait and state subscales. The total score is the sum of the two subscales. STAI total scores range from 40 to 160.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Baseline
87.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.2
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
12 months
77.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.9
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Change from baseline to 12 months
9.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The State-Trait Anxiety inventory is a self-administered screening for anxiety. The STAI has 40 items, 20 items allocated to each of the S-Anxiety and T-Anxiety subscales. All items are rated on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. It clearly differentiates between the temporary condition of "state anxiety" and the more general and long-standing quality of "trait anxiety" by providing a score for each. Higher scores suggest greater levels of anxiety. The range of possible scores for the STAI varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80 on both the trait and state subscales. The total score is the sum of the two subscales. STAI total scores range from 40 to 160.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Baseline
87.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.2
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
18 months
75.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.9
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Change from baseline to 18 months
11.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The State-Trait Anxiety inventory is a self-administered screening for anxiety. The STAI has 40 items, 20 items allocated to each of the S-Anxiety and T-Anxiety subscales. All items are rated on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. It clearly differentiates between the temporary condition of "state anxiety" and the more general and long-standing quality of "trait anxiety" by providing a score for each. Higher scores suggest greater levels of anxiety. The range of possible scores for the STAI varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80 on both the trait and state subscales. The total score is the sum of the two subscales. STAI total scores range from 40 to 160.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Change from baseline to 24 months
10.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.7
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Baseline
87.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.2
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
24 months
75.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.7

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PHQ9 is a multipurpose, validated instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. The questionnaire consists of 9 questions that rate the frequency of the symptoms of depression. A follow up non-scored question screens and assigns weight to the degree to which depressive problems have affected the patient's level of function. The responses range between 4 choices (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day). Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of major depression. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 (min) to 27 (max).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Baseline
10.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
12 months
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.6
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Change from baseline to 12 months
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PHQ9 is a multipurpose, validated instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. The questionnaire consists of 9 questions that rate the frequency of the symptoms of depression. A follow up non-scored question screens and assigns weight to the degree to which depressive problems have affected the patient's level of function. The responses range between 4 choices (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day). Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of major depression. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 (min) to 27 (max).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Baseline
10.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
18 months
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Change from baseline to 18 months
3.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PHQ9 is a multipurpose, validated instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. The questionnaire consists of 9 questions that rate the frequency of the symptoms of depression. A follow up non-scored question screens and assigns weight to the degree to which depressive problems have affected the patient's level of function. The responses range between 4 choices (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day). Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of major depression. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 (min) to 27 (max).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Baseline
10.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
24 months
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Change from baseline to 24 months
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The TSK is a 11-item self-report checklist using a 4-point Likert scale that was developed from the original 17-item checklist (Miller, Kopri \& Todd, 1991) as a measure of fear or movement or (re)injury. The scale is based on the model of fear avoidance, fear of work related activities, fear of movement and fear of re-injury. The TSK has also been linked to elements of catastrophic thinking. The scale can be useful in measuring unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about pain in people with chronic pain. Total TSK-11 scores range from 11-44 points. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=191 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Baseline
28.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
3 months
24.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Change from baseline to 3 months
3.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The TSK is a 11-item self-report checklist using a 4-point Likert scale that was developed from the original 17-item checklist (Miller, Kopri \& Todd, 1991) as a measure of fear or movement or (re)injury. The scale is based on the model of fear avoidance, fear of work related activities, fear of movement and fear of re-injury. The TSK has also been linked to elements of catastrophic thinking. The scale can be useful in measuring unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about pain in people with chronic pain. Total TSK-11 scores range from 11-44 points. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Baseline
28.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
12 months
24.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Change from baseline to 12 months
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The TSK is a 11-item self-report checklist using a 4-point Likert scale that was developed from the original 17-item checklist (Miller, Kopri \& Todd, 1991) as a measure of fear or movement or (re)injury. The scale is based on the model of fear avoidance, fear of work related activities, fear of movement and fear of re-injury. The TSK has also been linked to elements of catastrophic thinking. The scale can be useful in measuring unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about pain in people with chronic pain. Total TSK-11 scores range from 11-44 points. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Baseline
28.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
18 months
24.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.4
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Change from baseline to 18 months
4.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The TSK is a 11-item self-report checklist using a 4-point Likert scale that was developed from the original 17-item checklist (Miller, Kopri \& Todd, 1991) as a measure of fear or movement or (re)injury. The scale is based on the model of fear avoidance, fear of work related activities, fear of movement and fear of re-injury. The TSK has also been linked to elements of catastrophic thinking. The scale can be useful in measuring unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about pain in people with chronic pain. Total TSK-11 scores range from 11-44 points. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=139 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Baseline
28.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
24 months
25.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Change from baseline to 24 months
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The MOS sleep scale is intended to assess the extent of sleep problems and measures 6 dimensions of sleep, including initiation, maintenance, quantity, adequacy, drowsiness and respiratory impairments. It includes 12 questions with the first question assessing how long it takes the subject to fall asleep. The second question asks how many hours each night the subject slept. The remaining 10 questions have a range of 6 responses from 1="all of the time" to 6="none of the time". The scale is self-administered and validated. MOS Sleep scale scores range from 0 (min) to 100 (max). Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Baseline
50.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.6
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
12 months
45.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.5
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Change from baseline to 12 months
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The MOS sleep scale is intended to assess the extent of sleep problems and measures 6 dimensions of sleep, including initiation, maintenance, quantity, adequacy, drowsiness and respiratory impairments. It includes 12 questions with the first question assessing how long it takes the subject to fall asleep. The second question asks how many hours each night the subject slept. The remaining 10 questions have a range of 6 responses from 1="all of the time" to 6="none of the time". The scale is self-administered and validated. MOS Sleep scale scores range from 0 (min) to 100 (max). Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Baseline
50.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.6
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
18 months
43.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.8
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Change from baseline to 18 months
9.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.6

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The MOS sleep scale is intended to assess the extent of sleep problems and measures 6 dimensions of sleep, including initiation, maintenance, quantity, adequacy, drowsiness and respiratory impairments. It includes 12 questions with the first question assessing how long it takes the subject to fall asleep. The second question asks how many hours each night the subject slept. The remaining 10 questions have a range of 6 responses from 1="all of the time" to 6="none of the time". The scale is self-administered and validated. MOS Sleep scale scores range from 0 (min) to 100 (max). Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=139 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Baseline
50.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.6
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
24 months
43.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.1
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Change from baseline to 24 months
10.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.7

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PROMIS Physical Function short form is an 8-item instrument designed to measure physical capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. The scale measures universal physical function rather than disease-specific impairment and assesses current function rather than function over a specified time period. Each question has five potential response options ranging in value from one to five to give a total score ranging from 8 to 40. Scores are converted into t-scores where the average for the general US population is 50 and the SD is 10. Higher scores indicate better physical function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=155 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Baseline
33.0 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.2
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
12 months
36.3 T-score
Standard Deviation 6.6
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Change from baseline to 12 months
3.2 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PROMIS Physical Function short form is an 8-item instrument designed to measure physical capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. The scale measures universal physical function rather than disease-specific impairment and assesses current function rather than function over a specified time period. Each question has five potential response options ranging in value from one to five to give a total score ranging from 8 to 40. Scores are converted into t-scores where the average for the general US population is 50 and the SD is 10. Higher scores indicate better physical function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=110 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Baseline
33.0 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.2
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
18 months
37.1 T-score
Standard Deviation 6.3
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Change from baseline to 18 months
3.7 T-score
Standard Deviation 6.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PROMIS Physical Function short form is an 8-item instrument designed to measure physical capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. The scale measures universal physical function rather than disease-specific impairment and assesses current function rather than function over a specified time period. Each question has five potential response options ranging in value from one to five to give a total score ranging from 8 to 40. Scores are converted into t-scores where the average for the general US population is 50 and the SD is 10. Higher scores indicate better physical function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=134 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Baseline
33.0 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.2
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
24 months
36.9 T-score
Standard Deviation 7.6
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Change from baseline to 24 months
3.8 T-score
Standard Deviation 6.8

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to end of trial system evaluation, approximately 5 to 7 days of BurstDR stimulation

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=244 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to End of Trial System (Post-permanent Implant), Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to End of Trial System (Post-permanent Implant), Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
End of trial
3.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to End of Trial System (Post-permanent Implant), Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to end of trial
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
3 months
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to 3 months
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
12 months
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to 12 months
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=145 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
18 months
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to 18 months
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
24 months
4.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to 24 months
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: End of trial system evaluation, approximately 5 to 7 days of BurstDR stimulation

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=244 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at End of Trial System Evaluation
Very Satisfied
125 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at End of Trial System Evaluation
Satisfied
94 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at End of Trial System Evaluation
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at End of Trial System Evaluation
Dissatisfied
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at End of Trial System Evaluation
Very Dissatisfied
8 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
Very Satisfied
72 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
Satisfied
75 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
31 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
Dissatisfied
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
Very Dissatisfied
0 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Very Satisfied
67 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Satisfied
68 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
34 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Dissatisfied
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Very Dissatisfied
1 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months
Very Satisfied
58 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months
Satisfied
75 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months
Dissatisfied
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months
Very Dissatisfied
2 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=145 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 18 Months
Very Satisfied
63 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 18 Months
Satisfied
57 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 18 Months
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 18 Months
Dissatisfied
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 18 Months
Very Dissatisfied
1 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 24 Months
Very Dissatisfied
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 24 Months
Very Satisfied
55 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 24 Months
Satisfied
63 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 24 Months
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 24 Months
Dissatisfied
4 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: End of trial system evaluation, approximately 5 to 7 days of BurstDR stimulation

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=244 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
Almost the Same
7 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
No Change
18 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
Better
103 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
A Great Deal Better
45 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
A little Better
6 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
Somewhat Better
12 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
Moderately Better
53 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
Somewhat Better
22 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
No Change
13 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
Almost the Same
12 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
A little Better
20 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
Moderately Better
45 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
Better
50 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
A Great Deal Better
30 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
Moderately Better
39 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
Somewhat Better
21 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
No Change
12 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
Almost the Same
16 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
A little Better
15 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
Better
56 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
A Great Deal Better
22 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
No Change
9 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
Almost the Same
8 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
A little Better
15 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
Somewhat Better
22 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
Moderately Better
34 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
Better
48 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
A Great Deal Better
27 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=145 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
No Change
7 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
Almost the Same
10 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
A little Better
11 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
Somewhat Better
8 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
Moderately Better
37 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
Better
47 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
A Great Deal Better
25 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
No Change
5 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
Almost the Same
4 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
A little Better
12 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
Somewhat Better
13 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
Moderately Better
39 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
Better
40 Participants
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
A Great Deal Better
27 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Medication usage measured as decrease in chronic pain related medication intake since baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Analgesic
37 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Anti-convulsant
25 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Muscle Relaxant
7 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug
10 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Opioid Medication
60 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Psychiatric Medication
10 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Medication usage measured as decrease in chronic pain related medication intake since baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Analgesic
44 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Anti-convulsant
31 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Muscle Relaxant
4 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug
12 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Opioid Medication
62 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Psychiatric Medication
11 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Medication usage measured as decrease in chronic pain related medication intake since baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Analgesic
45 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Anti-convulsant
31 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Muscle Relaxant
6 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug
13 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Opioid Medication
61 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Psychiatric Medication
11 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Medication usage measured as decrease in chronic pain related medication intake since baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=145 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Analgesic
44 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Anti-convulsant
31 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Muscle Relaxant
11 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug
15 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Opioid Medication
60 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Psychiatric Medication
16 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Medication usage measured as decrease in chronic pain related medication intake since baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Analgesic
42 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Anti-convulsant
29 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Muscle Relaxant
9 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug
15 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Opioid Medication
51 Participants
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Psychiatric Medication
14 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The Stimulation Assessment Form includes questions to identify the sensations experienced when stimulation is used.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Burning
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Buzzing/vibrating/Pulsing
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Cold
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Heaviness
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Itching
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Massaging/pressure
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Numbness
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Stinging/prickling
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tickling
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tingling
27 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Warm
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Other
0 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 6 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The Stimulation Assessment Form includes questions to identify the sensations experienced when stimulation is used.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Burning
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Buzzing/vibrating/Pulsing
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Cold
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Heaviness
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Itching
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Massaging/pressure
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Numbness
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Stinging/prickling
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tickling
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tingling
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Warm
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Other
0 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The Stimulation Assessment Form includes questions to identify the sensations experienced when stimulation is used.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Burning
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Buzzing/vibrating/Pulsing
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Cold
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Heaviness
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Itching
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Massaging/pressure
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Numbness
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Stinging/prickling
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tickling
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tingling
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Warm
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Other
2 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 18 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The Stimulation Assessment Form includes questions to identify the sensations experienced when stimulation is used.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=146 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Burning
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Buzzing/vibrating/Pulsing
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Cold
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Heaviness
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Itching
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Massaging/pressure
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Numbness
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Stinging/prickling
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tickling
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tingling
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Warm
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Other
3 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 24 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

The Stimulation Assessment Form includes questions to identify the sensations experienced when stimulation is used.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=141 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Burning
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Buzzing/vibrating/Pulsing
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Cold
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Itching
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Massaging/pressure
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Numbness
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Stinging/prickling
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tickling
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tingling
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Warm
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Other
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Heaviness
0 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Participants could choose between two waveforms with different amplitude, pulse width and frequency to stimulate the spinal cord (burst or tonic). Patient waveform preference post-permanent implant is summarized by counts and percentages.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Burst
169 Participants
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Tonic
23 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Participants could choose between two waveforms with different amplitude, pulse width and frequency to stimulate the spinal cord (burst or tonic). Patient waveform preference post-permanent implant is summarized by counts and percentages.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Burst
158 Participants
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Tonic
23 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Participants could choose between two waveforms with different amplitude, pulse width and frequency to stimulate the spinal cord (burst or tonic). Patient waveform preference post-permanent implant is summarized by counts and percentages.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Burst
142 Participants
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Tonic
21 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Participants could choose between two waveforms with different amplitude, pulse width and frequency to stimulate the spinal cord (burst or tonic). Patient waveform preference post-permanent implant is summarized by counts and percentages.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=144 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Burst
123 Participants
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Tonic
21 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 24 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

Participants could choose between two waveforms with different amplitude, pulse width and frequency to stimulate the spinal cord (burst or tonic). Patient waveform preference post-permanent implant is summarized by counts and percentages.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=139 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Burst
116 Participants
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Tonic
23 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device

Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=45 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
2-3 times a week
8 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Weekly
24 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every other week
6 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every three week
3 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Once a month or less often
4 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device

Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=39 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
2-3 times a week
8 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Weekly
16 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every other week
8 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every three week
2 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Once a month or less often
5 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device

Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=32 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
2-3 times a week
4 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Weekly
15 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every other week
7 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every three week
4 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Once a month or less often
2 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device

Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=24 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
2-3 times a week
3 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Weekly
13 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every other week
5 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every three week
1 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Once a month or less often
2 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 24 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device

Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=25 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
2-3 times a week
3 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Weekly
11 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every other week
6 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every three week
1 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Once a month or less often
4 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device

Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=45 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
Less than 30 Min
2 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
30 Min to 1 Hour
13 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
1 to 2 Hours
16 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
2 to 3 Hours
9 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
3 to 4 Hours
3 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
4 to 5 Hours
1 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
More than 5 Hours
1 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device

Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=39 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
Less than 30 Min
1 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
30 Min to 1 Hour
6 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
1 to 2 Hours
18 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
2 to 3 Hours
7 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
3 to 4 Hours
5 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
4 to 5 Hours
1 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
More than 5 Hours
1 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device

Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=32 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
Less than 30 Min
0 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
30 Min to 1 Hour
1 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
1 to 2 Hours
18 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
2 to 3 Hours
7 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
3 to 4 Hours
4 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
4 to 5 Hours
2 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
More than 5 Hours
0 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device

Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=24 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
Less than 30 Min
0 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
30 Min to 1 Hour
3 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
1 to 2 Hours
10 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
2 to 3 Hours
7 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
3 to 4 Hours
3 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
4 to 5 Hours
1 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
More than 5 Hours
0 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 24 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device

Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=25 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
Less than 30 Min
0 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
30 Min to 1 Hour
4 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
1 to 2 Hours
4 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
2 to 3 Hours
9 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
3 to 4 Hours
4 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
4 to 5 Hours
2 Participants
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
More than 5 Hours
2 Participants

Adverse Events

All Enrolled Subjects

Serious events: 18 serious events
Other events: 27 other events
Deaths: 4 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=269 participants at risk
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Acute Respiratory Failure with Flash Pulmonary Edema
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Allergic or Rejection Response to Implant Materials
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Changes in Stimulation or Reduced Pain Relief Due to Lead Migration
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hematoma
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infection
1.9%
5/269 • Number of events 5 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Keloid Infection
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lead Fracture
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Oversedation
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pain Below the Level of Implant
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Persistent Pain at The IPG Site
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Erosion Around the Implant
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Irritation at IPG Site
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stimulation in Unwanted Places/Chest Wall Stimulation
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Weakness, Clumsiness, Numbness or Pain Below the Level of Implant
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Infections and infestations
Acute Appendicitis
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute Renal Failure
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Infections and infestations
Aspiration Pneumonia
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone Fracture
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis of Left Upper Extremity
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral Infarction Due to Embolism of Unspecified Cerebral Artery
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystectomy
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Cardiac disorders
Congestive Heart Failure
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
General disorders
Death of Unknown Cause
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
General disorders
Fever
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Cardiac disorders
Heart Attack
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary Embolism
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Infections and infestations
Staph Infection
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide Ideation
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
General disorders
Syncope and Bleeding After Colonoscopy
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Infections and infestations
Infection
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
All Enrolled Subjects
n=269 participants at risk
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG. Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Broken Swift Lock Anchors
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Burning Pain at The IPG Site
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Leakage
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Changes in Stimulation or Reduced Pain Relief Due to Lead Failure
1.5%
4/269 • Number of events 4 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Changes in Stimulation or Reduced Pain Relief Due to Lead Migration
1.5%
4/269 • Number of events 4 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Changes in Stimulation or Reduced Pain Relief Due to Loose Electrical Connections
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Chronic Pain Exacerbation Due to Battery Depletion
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Damage to Functionality/ Mechanical Integrity of IPG Resulting in Inability to Communicate with IPG
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Damage to IPG/Leads Causing System Fail Deliver Stimulation/Causing System Deliver Overstimulation
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hematoma
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Inadequate Stimulation
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Increased Pain
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infection
1.1%
3/269 • Number of events 3 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Insufficient Pain Relief
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Persistent Pain at The IPG Site
1.1%
3/269 • Number of events 3 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Persistent Pain at The Lead Site
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stimulation in Unwanted Places/Chest Wall Stimulation
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Undesirable Changes in Stimulation Which May Be Due to Cellular Changes in Tissue Around Electrodes
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Weakness, Clumsiness, Numbness or Pain Below the Level of Implant
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years

Additional Information

Robyn Capobianco

Abbott

Phone: +15129343941

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER