Trial Outcomes & Findings for Multi-center Prospective Study Determining the Sustainability of Pain Relief and Psychosocial and Functional Responses When Utilizing a Multiple Waveform Enabled Neurostimulator (NCT NCT03082261)
NCT ID: NCT03082261
Last Updated: 2021-07-08
Results Overview
The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
COMPLETED
NA
269 participants
Baseline to 6 Months
2021-07-08
Participant Flow
A total of 269 subjects were enrolled at 22 investigational sites. The enrollment of the first subject was on 03 March 2017 and the last subject was on 13 February 2018. The last follow-up visit occurred on 26 August 2020.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG).
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
269
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
149
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
120
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG).
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Implant of dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG) device
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Insurance denial
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Peripheral lead added
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
Subject did not meet screening inclusion/exclusion criteria
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Subject implanted with device other than study device
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Subject moved to a different state
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Subject non-compliance
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Subject participation terminated by investigator
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Subject participation terminated by sponsor
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
System explant
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
Unable to place lead(s)
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Unsuccessful trial evaluation period
|
19
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=269 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=269 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
166 Participants
n=269 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
103 Participants
n=269 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
7 participants
n=269 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
210 participants
n=269 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Finland
|
12 participants
n=269 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
8 participants
n=269 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
|
1 participants
n=269 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
5 participants
n=269 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
26 participants
n=269 Participants
|
|
Duration of Experiencing Chronic Pain
|
9.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 • n=269 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
|
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
6 months
|
4.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
EQ5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. EQ5D Index scores range from - 0.594 (min) to 1 (max). An EQ-5D summary index is derived by applying a formula that attaches values (weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. Higher values represent better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline
|
0.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
6 months
|
0.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
0.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The PCS is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain). Subjects answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain (i.e., not at the current moment). The scale includes 13 statements concerning pain experiences that are rated on a scale between 0 'not at all' and 4 'always'. The scale is self-administered and takes 5 minutes to complete. A higher score indicated a higher level of catastrophizing. PCS total scores range from 0 (min) to 52 (max). Three sub-scales consists of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Rumination scores range from 0 (min) to 16 (max), Magnification scores range from 0 (min) to 12 (max), and helplessness scores range from 0 (min) to 24 (max). The total PCS score is the sum of the three subscales.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline
|
25.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
6 months
|
13.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.2
|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
11.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The State-Trait Anxiety inventory is a self-administered screening for anxiety. The STAI has 40 items, 20 items allocated to each of the S-Anxiety and T-Anxiety subscales. All items are rated on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. It clearly differentiates between the temporary condition of "state anxiety" and the more general and long-standing quality of "trait anxiety" by providing a score for each. Higher scores suggest greater levels of anxiety. The range of possible scores for the STAI varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80 on both the trait and state subscales. The total score is the sum of the two subscales. STAI total scores range from 40 to 160.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Baseline
|
87.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.1
|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
6 months
|
77.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.7
|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
10.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The PHQ9 is a multipurpose, validated instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. The questionnaire consists of 9 questions that rate the frequency of the symptoms of depression. A follow up non-scored question screens and assigns weight to the degree to which depressive problems have affected the patient's level of function. The responses range between 4 choices (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day). Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of major depression. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 (min) to 27 (max).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Baseline
|
10.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
6 months
|
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The TSK is a 11-item self-report checklist using a 4-point Likert scale that was developed from the original 17-item checklist (Miller, Kopri \& Todd, 1991) as a measure of fear or movement or (re)injury. The scale is based on the model of fear avoidance, fear of work related activities, fear of movement and fear of re-injury. The TSK has also been linked to elements of catastrophic thinking. The scale can be useful in measuring unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about pain in people with chronic pain. Total TSK-11 scores range from 11-44 points. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
3.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.7
|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Baseline
|
28.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.8
|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
6 months
|
24.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The MOS sleep scale is intended to assess the extent of sleep problems and measures 6 dimensions of sleep, including initiation, maintenance, quantity, adequacy, drowsiness and respiratory impairments. It includes 12 questions with the first question assessing how long it takes the subject to fall asleep. The second question asks how many hours each night the subject slept. The remaining 10 questions have a range of 6 responses from 1="all of the time" to 6="none of the time". The scale is self-administered and validated. MOS Sleep scale scores range from 0 (min) to 100 (max). Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=180 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Baseline
|
52.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.8
|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
6 months
|
45.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.2
|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at the time of analysis
The PROMIS Physical Function short form is an 8-item instrument designed to measure physical capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. The scale measures universal physical function rather than disease-specific impairment and assesses current function rather than function over a specified time period. Each question has five potential response options ranging in value from one to five to give a total score ranging from 8 to 40. Scores are converted into t-scores where the average for the general US population is 50 and the SD is 10. Higher scores indicate better physical function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=171 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Baseline
|
32.9 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.0
|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
6 months
|
36.7 T-score
Standard Deviation 6.8
|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 6 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Change from baseline to 6 months
|
3.8 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
EQ5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. EQ5D Index scores range from - 0.594 (min) to 1 (max). An EQ-5D summary index is derived by applying a formula that attaches values (weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. Higher values represent better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline
|
0.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
12 months
|
0.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Change from baseline to 12 months
|
0.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
EQ5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. EQ5D Index scores range from - 0.594 (min) to 1 (max). An EQ-5D summary index is derived by applying a formula that attaches values (weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. Higher values represent better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline
|
0.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
18 months
|
0.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Change from baseline to 18 months
|
0.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
EQ5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. It provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. EQ5D Index scores range from - 0.594 (min) to 1 (max). An EQ-5D summary index is derived by applying a formula that attaches values (weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. Higher values represent better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Baseline
|
0.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
24 months
|
0.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
|
Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) Questionnaire
Change from baseline to 24 months
|
0.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PCS is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain). Subjects answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain (i.e., not at the current moment). The scale includes 13 statements concerning pain experiences that are rated on a scale between 0 'not at all' and 4 'always'. The scale is self-administered and takes 5 minutes to complete. A higher score indicated a higher level of catastrophizing. PCS total scores range from 0 (min) to 52 (max). Three sub-scales consists of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Rumination scores range from 0 (min) to 16 (max), Magnification scores range from 0 (min) to 12 (max), and helplessness scores range from 0 (min) to 24 (max). The total PCS score is the sum of the three subscales.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline
|
25.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
3 months
|
14.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.3
|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Change from baseline to 3 months
|
10.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.4
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PCS is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain). Subjects answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain (i.e., not at the current moment). The scale includes 13 statements concerning pain experiences that are rated on a scale between 0 'not at all' and 4 'always'. The scale is self-administered and takes 5 minutes to complete. A higher score indicated a higher level of catastrophizing. PCS total scores range from 0 (min) to 52 (max). Three sub-scales consists of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Rumination scores range from 0 (min) to 16 (max), Magnification scores range from 0 (min) to 12 (max), and helplessness scores range from 0 (min) to 24 (max). The total PCS score is the sum of the three subscales.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline
|
25.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
12 months
|
14.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Change from baseline to 12 months
|
11.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PCS is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain). Subjects answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain (i.e., not at the current moment). The scale includes 13 statements concerning pain experiences that are rated on a scale between 0 'not at all' and 4 'always'. The scale is self-administered and takes 5 minutes to complete. A higher score indicated a higher level of catastrophizing. PCS total scores range from 0 (min) to 52 (max). Three sub-scales consists of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Rumination scores range from 0 (min) to 16 (max), Magnification scores range from 0 (min) to 12 (max), and helplessness scores range from 0 (min) to 24 (max). The total PCS score is the sum of the three subscales.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline
|
25.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
18 months
|
14.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.5
|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Change from baseline to 18 months
|
12.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PCS is a validated scale that measures the magnitude of catastrophizing (negative thoughts and feelings while a patient is experiencing pain). Subjects answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain (i.e., not at the current moment). The scale includes 13 statements concerning pain experiences that are rated on a scale between 0 'not at all' and 4 'always'. The scale is self-administered and takes 5 minutes to complete. A higher score indicated a higher level of catastrophizing. PCS total scores range from 0 (min) to 52 (max). Three sub-scales consists of rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Rumination scores range from 0 (min) to 16 (max), Magnification scores range from 0 (min) to 12 (max), and helplessness scores range from 0 (min) to 24 (max). The total PCS score is the sum of the three subscales.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline
|
25.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
24 months
|
13.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
|
Mean Change in Pain Catastrophizing From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Change from baseline to 24 months
|
12.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The State-Trait Anxiety inventory is a self-administered screening for anxiety. The STAI has 40 items, 20 items allocated to each of the S-Anxiety and T-Anxiety subscales. All items are rated on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. It clearly differentiates between the temporary condition of "state anxiety" and the more general and long-standing quality of "trait anxiety" by providing a score for each. Higher scores suggest greater levels of anxiety. The range of possible scores for the STAI varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80 on both the trait and state subscales. The total score is the sum of the two subscales. STAI total scores range from 40 to 160.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Baseline
|
87.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.2
|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
12 months
|
77.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.9
|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Change from baseline to 12 months
|
9.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.2
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The State-Trait Anxiety inventory is a self-administered screening for anxiety. The STAI has 40 items, 20 items allocated to each of the S-Anxiety and T-Anxiety subscales. All items are rated on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. It clearly differentiates between the temporary condition of "state anxiety" and the more general and long-standing quality of "trait anxiety" by providing a score for each. Higher scores suggest greater levels of anxiety. The range of possible scores for the STAI varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80 on both the trait and state subscales. The total score is the sum of the two subscales. STAI total scores range from 40 to 160.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Baseline
|
87.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.2
|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
18 months
|
75.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.9
|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Change from baseline to 18 months
|
11.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.4
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The State-Trait Anxiety inventory is a self-administered screening for anxiety. The STAI has 40 items, 20 items allocated to each of the S-Anxiety and T-Anxiety subscales. All items are rated on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4. It clearly differentiates between the temporary condition of "state anxiety" and the more general and long-standing quality of "trait anxiety" by providing a score for each. Higher scores suggest greater levels of anxiety. The range of possible scores for the STAI varies from a minimum score of 20 to a maximum score of 80 on both the trait and state subscales. The total score is the sum of the two subscales. STAI total scores range from 40 to 160.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Change from baseline to 24 months
|
10.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.7
|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Baseline
|
87.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.2
|
|
Mean Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
24 months
|
75.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.7
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PHQ9 is a multipurpose, validated instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. The questionnaire consists of 9 questions that rate the frequency of the symptoms of depression. A follow up non-scored question screens and assigns weight to the degree to which depressive problems have affected the patient's level of function. The responses range between 4 choices (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day). Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of major depression. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 (min) to 27 (max).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Baseline
|
10.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
12 months
|
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.6
|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Change from baseline to 12 months
|
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PHQ9 is a multipurpose, validated instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. The questionnaire consists of 9 questions that rate the frequency of the symptoms of depression. A follow up non-scored question screens and assigns weight to the degree to which depressive problems have affected the patient's level of function. The responses range between 4 choices (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day). Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of major depression. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 (min) to 27 (max).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Baseline
|
10.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
18 months
|
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8
|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Change from baseline to 18 months
|
3.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PHQ9 is a multipurpose, validated instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. The questionnaire consists of 9 questions that rate the frequency of the symptoms of depression. A follow up non-scored question screens and assigns weight to the degree to which depressive problems have affected the patient's level of function. The responses range between 4 choices (0=not at all to 3=nearly every day). Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of major depression. PHQ-9 scores range from 0 (min) to 27 (max).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Baseline
|
10.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
24 months
|
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
|
|
Mean Change in Depression From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)
Change from baseline to 24 months
|
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The TSK is a 11-item self-report checklist using a 4-point Likert scale that was developed from the original 17-item checklist (Miller, Kopri \& Todd, 1991) as a measure of fear or movement or (re)injury. The scale is based on the model of fear avoidance, fear of work related activities, fear of movement and fear of re-injury. The TSK has also been linked to elements of catastrophic thinking. The scale can be useful in measuring unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about pain in people with chronic pain. Total TSK-11 scores range from 11-44 points. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=191 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Baseline
|
28.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
3 months
|
24.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Change from baseline to 3 months
|
3.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The TSK is a 11-item self-report checklist using a 4-point Likert scale that was developed from the original 17-item checklist (Miller, Kopri \& Todd, 1991) as a measure of fear or movement or (re)injury. The scale is based on the model of fear avoidance, fear of work related activities, fear of movement and fear of re-injury. The TSK has also been linked to elements of catastrophic thinking. The scale can be useful in measuring unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about pain in people with chronic pain. Total TSK-11 scores range from 11-44 points. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Baseline
|
28.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
12 months
|
24.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Change from baseline to 12 months
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The TSK is a 11-item self-report checklist using a 4-point Likert scale that was developed from the original 17-item checklist (Miller, Kopri \& Todd, 1991) as a measure of fear or movement or (re)injury. The scale is based on the model of fear avoidance, fear of work related activities, fear of movement and fear of re-injury. The TSK has also been linked to elements of catastrophic thinking. The scale can be useful in measuring unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about pain in people with chronic pain. Total TSK-11 scores range from 11-44 points. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Baseline
|
28.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
18 months
|
24.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Change from baseline to 18 months
|
4.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The TSK is a 11-item self-report checklist using a 4-point Likert scale that was developed from the original 17-item checklist (Miller, Kopri \& Todd, 1991) as a measure of fear or movement or (re)injury. The scale is based on the model of fear avoidance, fear of work related activities, fear of movement and fear of re-injury. The TSK has also been linked to elements of catastrophic thinking. The scale can be useful in measuring unhelpful thoughts and beliefs about pain in people with chronic pain. Total TSK-11 scores range from 11-44 points. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=139 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Baseline
|
28.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
24 months
|
25.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5
|
|
Mean Change in Fear Avoidance From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Change from baseline to 24 months
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The MOS sleep scale is intended to assess the extent of sleep problems and measures 6 dimensions of sleep, including initiation, maintenance, quantity, adequacy, drowsiness and respiratory impairments. It includes 12 questions with the first question assessing how long it takes the subject to fall asleep. The second question asks how many hours each night the subject slept. The remaining 10 questions have a range of 6 responses from 1="all of the time" to 6="none of the time". The scale is self-administered and validated. MOS Sleep scale scores range from 0 (min) to 100 (max). Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=162 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Baseline
|
50.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.6
|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
12 months
|
45.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.5
|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Change from baseline to 12 months
|
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The MOS sleep scale is intended to assess the extent of sleep problems and measures 6 dimensions of sleep, including initiation, maintenance, quantity, adequacy, drowsiness and respiratory impairments. It includes 12 questions with the first question assessing how long it takes the subject to fall asleep. The second question asks how many hours each night the subject slept. The remaining 10 questions have a range of 6 responses from 1="all of the time" to 6="none of the time". The scale is self-administered and validated. MOS Sleep scale scores range from 0 (min) to 100 (max). Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=116 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Baseline
|
50.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.6
|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
18 months
|
43.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.8
|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Change from baseline to 18 months
|
9.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.6
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The MOS sleep scale is intended to assess the extent of sleep problems and measures 6 dimensions of sleep, including initiation, maintenance, quantity, adequacy, drowsiness and respiratory impairments. It includes 12 questions with the first question assessing how long it takes the subject to fall asleep. The second question asks how many hours each night the subject slept. The remaining 10 questions have a range of 6 responses from 1="all of the time" to 6="none of the time". The scale is self-administered and validated. MOS Sleep scale scores range from 0 (min) to 100 (max). Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=139 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Baseline
|
50.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.6
|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
24 months
|
43.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.1
|
|
Mean Change in Sleep From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale
Change from baseline to 24 months
|
10.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.7
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PROMIS Physical Function short form is an 8-item instrument designed to measure physical capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. The scale measures universal physical function rather than disease-specific impairment and assesses current function rather than function over a specified time period. Each question has five potential response options ranging in value from one to five to give a total score ranging from 8 to 40. Scores are converted into t-scores where the average for the general US population is 50 and the SD is 10. Higher scores indicate better physical function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=155 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Baseline
|
33.0 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
12 months
|
36.3 T-score
Standard Deviation 6.6
|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Change from baseline to 12 months
|
3.2 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PROMIS Physical Function short form is an 8-item instrument designed to measure physical capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. The scale measures universal physical function rather than disease-specific impairment and assesses current function rather than function over a specified time period. Each question has five potential response options ranging in value from one to five to give a total score ranging from 8 to 40. Scores are converted into t-scores where the average for the general US population is 50 and the SD is 10. Higher scores indicate better physical function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=110 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Baseline
|
33.0 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
18 months
|
37.1 T-score
Standard Deviation 6.3
|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Change from baseline to 18 months
|
3.7 T-score
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PROMIS Physical Function short form is an 8-item instrument designed to measure physical capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. The scale measures universal physical function rather than disease-specific impairment and assesses current function rather than function over a specified time period. Each question has five potential response options ranging in value from one to five to give a total score ranging from 8 to 40. Scores are converted into t-scores where the average for the general US population is 50 and the SD is 10. Higher scores indicate better physical function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=134 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Baseline
|
33.0 T-score
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
24 months
|
36.9 T-score
Standard Deviation 7.6
|
|
Mean Change in Physical Function From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale
Change from baseline to 24 months
|
3.8 T-score
Standard Deviation 6.8
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to end of trial system evaluation, approximately 5 to 7 days of BurstDR stimulationPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=244 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to End of Trial System (Post-permanent Implant), Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
|
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to End of Trial System (Post-permanent Implant), Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
End of trial
|
3.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to End of Trial System (Post-permanent Implant), Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to end of trial
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
|
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
3 months
|
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 3 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to 3 months
|
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
|
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
12 months
|
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 12 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to 12 months
|
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=145 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
|
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
18 months
|
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 18 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to 18 months
|
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The pain NRS consists of 1 question that will be asked by interviewing the subjects. Patients will be asked to rate, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), their average pain over the past 24 hours specific to the area(s) of chronic pain being treated. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline
|
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
24 months
|
4.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
|
Mean Change in Pain From Baseline to 24 Months Post-permanent Implant, Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Change from baseline to 24 months
|
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: End of trial system evaluation, approximately 5 to 7 days of BurstDR stimulationPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=244 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at End of Trial System Evaluation
Very Satisfied
|
125 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at End of Trial System Evaluation
Satisfied
|
94 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at End of Trial System Evaluation
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at End of Trial System Evaluation
Dissatisfied
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at End of Trial System Evaluation
Very Dissatisfied
|
8 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
Very Satisfied
|
72 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
Satisfied
|
75 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
|
31 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
Dissatisfied
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 3 Months
Very Dissatisfied
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Very Satisfied
|
67 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Satisfied
|
68 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
|
34 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Dissatisfied
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Very Dissatisfied
|
1 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months
Very Satisfied
|
58 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months
Satisfied
|
75 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months
Dissatisfied
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 12 Months
Very Dissatisfied
|
2 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=145 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 18 Months
Very Satisfied
|
63 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 18 Months
Satisfied
|
57 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 18 Months
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 18 Months
Dissatisfied
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 18 Months
Very Dissatisfied
|
1 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Patient satisfaction will be summarized by count and percentage of participants
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 24 Months
Very Dissatisfied
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 24 Months
Very Satisfied
|
55 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 24 Months
Satisfied
|
63 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 24 Months
Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Patient Satisfaction at 24 Months
Dissatisfied
|
4 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: End of trial system evaluation, approximately 5 to 7 days of BurstDR stimulationPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=244 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
Almost the Same
|
7 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
No Change
|
18 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
Better
|
103 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
A Great Deal Better
|
45 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
A little Better
|
6 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
Somewhat Better
|
12 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Trial System Evaluation
Moderately Better
|
53 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
Somewhat Better
|
22 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
No Change
|
13 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
Almost the Same
|
12 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
A little Better
|
20 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
Moderately Better
|
45 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
Better
|
50 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 3 Months
A Great Deal Better
|
30 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
Moderately Better
|
39 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
Somewhat Better
|
21 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
No Change
|
12 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
Almost the Same
|
16 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
A little Better
|
15 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
Better
|
56 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 6 Months
A Great Deal Better
|
22 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
No Change
|
9 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
Almost the Same
|
8 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
A little Better
|
15 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
Somewhat Better
|
22 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
Moderately Better
|
34 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
Better
|
48 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12 Months
A Great Deal Better
|
27 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=145 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
No Change
|
7 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
Almost the Same
|
10 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
A little Better
|
11 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
Somewhat Better
|
8 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
Moderately Better
|
37 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
Better
|
47 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 18 Months
A Great Deal Better
|
25 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The PGIC is a categorical rating scale used to evaluate the subject's impression of change in his/her condition since the beginning of the study treatment. The subject rates their overall change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life related to his/her condition on a seven-point categorical scale via an interview technique. The categories are as follows: 1-no change, 2-almost the same, 3-a little better, 4-somewhat better, 5-moderately better, 6-better, and 7-a great deal better. Although this tool does not specify the area of change (e.g., pain, function, quality of life, etc.), it allows for an overall integrated assessment from the prospective of the subject. PGIC values of 6 or 7 are reported to correlate best with actual change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
No Change
|
5 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
Almost the Same
|
4 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
A little Better
|
12 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
Somewhat Better
|
13 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
Moderately Better
|
39 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
Better
|
40 Participants
|
|
Rate of Global Improvement of the Patient by Using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 24 Months
A Great Deal Better
|
27 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Medication usage measured as decrease in chronic pain related medication intake since baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Analgesic
|
37 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Anti-convulsant
|
25 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Muscle Relaxant
|
7 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug
|
10 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Opioid Medication
|
60 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Psychiatric Medication
|
10 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Medication usage measured as decrease in chronic pain related medication intake since baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Analgesic
|
44 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Anti-convulsant
|
31 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Muscle Relaxant
|
4 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug
|
12 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Opioid Medication
|
62 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Psychiatric Medication
|
11 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Medication usage measured as decrease in chronic pain related medication intake since baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Analgesic
|
45 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Anti-convulsant
|
31 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Muscle Relaxant
|
6 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug
|
13 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Opioid Medication
|
61 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Psychiatric Medication
|
11 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Medication usage measured as decrease in chronic pain related medication intake since baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=145 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Analgesic
|
44 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Anti-convulsant
|
31 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Muscle Relaxant
|
11 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug
|
15 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Opioid Medication
|
60 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Psychiatric Medication
|
16 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Medication usage measured as decrease in chronic pain related medication intake since baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=140 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Analgesic
|
42 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Anti-convulsant
|
29 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Muscle Relaxant
|
9 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug
|
15 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Opioid Medication
|
51 Participants
|
|
Rate of Medication Usage Measured as Number of Participants With Decrease in Chronic Pain Related Medication Intake Since Baseline
Psychiatric Medication
|
14 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The Stimulation Assessment Form includes questions to identify the sensations experienced when stimulation is used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Burning
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Buzzing/vibrating/Pulsing
|
23 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Cold
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Heaviness
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Itching
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Massaging/pressure
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Numbness
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Stinging/prickling
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tickling
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tingling
|
27 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Warm
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Other
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The Stimulation Assessment Form includes questions to identify the sensations experienced when stimulation is used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Burning
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Buzzing/vibrating/Pulsing
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Cold
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Heaviness
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Itching
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Massaging/pressure
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Numbness
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Stinging/prickling
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tickling
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tingling
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Warm
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Other
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The Stimulation Assessment Form includes questions to identify the sensations experienced when stimulation is used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Burning
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Buzzing/vibrating/Pulsing
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Cold
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Heaviness
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Itching
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Massaging/pressure
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Numbness
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Stinging/prickling
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tickling
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tingling
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Warm
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Other
|
2 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 18 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The Stimulation Assessment Form includes questions to identify the sensations experienced when stimulation is used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=146 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Burning
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Buzzing/vibrating/Pulsing
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Cold
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Heaviness
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Itching
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Massaging/pressure
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Numbness
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Stinging/prickling
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tickling
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tingling
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Warm
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Other
|
3 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 MonthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
The Stimulation Assessment Form includes questions to identify the sensations experienced when stimulation is used.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=141 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Burning
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Buzzing/vibrating/Pulsing
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Cold
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Itching
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Massaging/pressure
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Numbness
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Stinging/prickling
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tickling
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Tingling
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Warm
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Other
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Stimulation Sensation Assessed by Stimulation Assessment Form
Heaviness
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Participants could choose between two waveforms with different amplitude, pulse width and frequency to stimulate the spinal cord (burst or tonic). Patient waveform preference post-permanent implant is summarized by counts and percentages.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=192 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Burst
|
169 Participants
|
|
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Tonic
|
23 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Participants could choose between two waveforms with different amplitude, pulse width and frequency to stimulate the spinal cord (burst or tonic). Patient waveform preference post-permanent implant is summarized by counts and percentages.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=181 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Burst
|
158 Participants
|
|
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Tonic
|
23 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Participants could choose between two waveforms with different amplitude, pulse width and frequency to stimulate the spinal cord (burst or tonic). Patient waveform preference post-permanent implant is summarized by counts and percentages.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=163 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Burst
|
142 Participants
|
|
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Tonic
|
21 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Participants could choose between two waveforms with different amplitude, pulse width and frequency to stimulate the spinal cord (burst or tonic). Patient waveform preference post-permanent implant is summarized by counts and percentages.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=144 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Burst
|
123 Participants
|
|
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Tonic
|
21 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis
Participants could choose between two waveforms with different amplitude, pulse width and frequency to stimulate the spinal cord (burst or tonic). Patient waveform preference post-permanent implant is summarized by counts and percentages.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=139 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Burst
|
116 Participants
|
|
Number of Patient Waveform Preference
Tonic
|
23 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device
Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=45 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
2-3 times a week
|
8 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Weekly
|
24 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every other week
|
6 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every three week
|
3 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Once a month or less often
|
4 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device
Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=39 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
2-3 times a week
|
8 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Weekly
|
16 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every other week
|
8 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every three week
|
2 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Once a month or less often
|
5 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device
Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=32 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
2-3 times a week
|
4 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Weekly
|
15 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every other week
|
7 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every three week
|
4 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Once a month or less often
|
2 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device
Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=24 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
2-3 times a week
|
3 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Weekly
|
13 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every other week
|
5 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every three week
|
1 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Once a month or less often
|
2 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device
Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=25 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
2-3 times a week
|
3 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Weekly
|
11 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every other week
|
6 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Every three week
|
1 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Frequency of Recharge
Once a month or less often
|
4 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device
Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=45 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
Less than 30 Min
|
2 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
30 Min to 1 Hour
|
13 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
1 to 2 Hours
|
16 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
2 to 3 Hours
|
9 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
3 to 4 Hours
|
3 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
4 to 5 Hours
|
1 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
More than 5 Hours
|
1 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device
Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=39 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
Less than 30 Min
|
1 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
30 Min to 1 Hour
|
6 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
1 to 2 Hours
|
18 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
2 to 3 Hours
|
7 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
3 to 4 Hours
|
5 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
4 to 5 Hours
|
1 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
More than 5 Hours
|
1 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device
Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=32 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
Less than 30 Min
|
0 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
30 Min to 1 Hour
|
1 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
1 to 2 Hours
|
18 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
2 to 3 Hours
|
7 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
3 to 4 Hours
|
4 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
4 to 5 Hours
|
2 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
More than 5 Hours
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device
Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=24 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
Less than 30 Min
|
0 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
30 Min to 1 Hour
|
3 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
1 to 2 Hours
|
10 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
2 to 3 Hours
|
7 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
3 to 4 Hours
|
3 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
4 to 5 Hours
|
1 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
More than 5 Hours
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 monthsPopulation: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects with a rechargeable device
Recharging activities throughout the follow-up period for subjects who were implanted with a rechargeable device will be summarized by count and percentage of participants.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=25 Participants
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
Less than 30 Min
|
0 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
30 Min to 1 Hour
|
4 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
1 to 2 Hours
|
4 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
2 to 3 Hours
|
9 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
3 to 4 Hours
|
4 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
4 to 5 Hours
|
2 Participants
|
|
Recharging Activities- Number of Participants With Duration of Recharge
More than 5 Hours
|
2 Participants
|
Adverse Events
All Enrolled Subjects
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=269 participants at risk
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Acute Respiratory Failure with Flash Pulmonary Edema
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Allergic or Rejection Response to Implant Materials
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Changes in Stimulation or Reduced Pain Relief Due to Lead Migration
|
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hematoma
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infection
|
1.9%
5/269 • Number of events 5 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Keloid Infection
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lead Fracture
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Oversedation
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pain Below the Level of Implant
|
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Persistent Pain at The IPG Site
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Erosion Around the Implant
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Irritation at IPG Site
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stimulation in Unwanted Places/Chest Wall Stimulation
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Weakness, Clumsiness, Numbness or Pain Below the Level of Implant
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute Appendicitis
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute Renal Failure
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Aspiration Pneumonia
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone Fracture
|
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis of Left Upper Extremity
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral Infarction Due to Embolism of Unspecified Cerebral Artery
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystectomy
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Congestive Heart Failure
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
General disorders
Death of Unknown Cause
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Heart Attack
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary Embolism
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staph Infection
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide Ideation
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
General disorders
Syncope and Bleeding After Colonoscopy
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
All Enrolled Subjects
n=269 participants at risk
All subjects enrolled into the study with intent to treat with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI, or Proclaim Elite IPG.
Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG: Subjects will be permanently implanted with either a Prodigy, Prodigy MRI or Proclaim Elite IPG
|
|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Broken Swift Lock Anchors
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Burning Pain at The IPG Site
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Leakage
|
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Changes in Stimulation or Reduced Pain Relief Due to Lead Failure
|
1.5%
4/269 • Number of events 4 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Changes in Stimulation or Reduced Pain Relief Due to Lead Migration
|
1.5%
4/269 • Number of events 4 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Changes in Stimulation or Reduced Pain Relief Due to Loose Electrical Connections
|
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Chronic Pain Exacerbation Due to Battery Depletion
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Damage to Functionality/ Mechanical Integrity of IPG Resulting in Inability to Communicate with IPG
|
0.74%
2/269 • Number of events 2 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Damage to IPG/Leads Causing System Fail Deliver Stimulation/Causing System Deliver Overstimulation
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hematoma
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Inadequate Stimulation
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Increased Pain
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infection
|
1.1%
3/269 • Number of events 3 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Insufficient Pain Relief
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Persistent Pain at The IPG Site
|
1.1%
3/269 • Number of events 3 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Persistent Pain at The Lead Site
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stimulation in Unwanted Places/Chest Wall Stimulation
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Undesirable Changes in Stimulation Which May Be Due to Cellular Changes in Tissue Around Electrodes
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Weakness, Clumsiness, Numbness or Pain Below the Level of Implant
|
0.37%
1/269 • Number of events 1 • 2 years
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER