Trial Outcomes & Findings for Profound Dermal and SubQ Cartridges for the Treatment of Cellulite (NCT NCT03078647)
NCT ID: NCT03078647
Last Updated: 2019-06-25
Results Overview
Evaluate the improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite in treated areas following a single dermal and/or subcutaneous treatment with Profound, as assessed by study investigators at 1,3 and 6 months post treatment visit. Investigators used the following scale: 0=No Change; 1= 1-24% improvement; 2=25-49% improvement; 3=50-74% improvement; 4=75-100% improvement. The analysis calculates the improvement over 25% (grades 2-4)
COMPLETED
NA
31 participants
1,3 and 6 months post-treatment
2019-06-25
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Treated on the Suprapatellar
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges above the knees areas (on both left and right sides)
|
Treated on the Upper Arms
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the upper arms (on both left and right sides)
|
Treated on the Braline
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the braline areas (on both left and right sides)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
17
|
11
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
17
|
10
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Profound Dermal and SubQ Cartridges for the Treatment of Cellulite
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Treated on the Suprapatellar
n=34 Number Areas
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges above the knees areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Upper Arms
n=22 Number Areas
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the upper arms (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Braline
n=6 Number Areas
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the braline areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
Total
n=62 Number Areas
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=5 Participants
|
53.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 • n=7 Participants
|
46.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6 • n=5 Participants
|
50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1,3 and 6 months post-treatmentPopulation: Suprapatellar areas- 17 subjects, 8 subjects (16 areas) had one assessment for both sides treated with the same parameters. Upper Arms- 10 Subjects had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters (1 subject dropped after 1 wk FU). Braline areas- 3 subjects, one subject had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters
Evaluate the improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite in treated areas following a single dermal and/or subcutaneous treatment with Profound, as assessed by study investigators at 1,3 and 6 months post treatment visit. Investigators used the following scale: 0=No Change; 1= 1-24% improvement; 2=25-49% improvement; 3=50-74% improvement; 4=75-100% improvement. The analysis calculates the improvement over 25% (grades 2-4)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treated on the Suprapatellar
n=26 Investigator Assessments
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges above the knees areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Upper Arms
n=10 Investigator Assessments
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the upper arms (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Braline
n=5 Investigator Assessments
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the braline areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Improvement in Global Aesthetic Appearance of Cellulite in Treated Areas, as Assessed by Study Investigator Evaluations
Over 25% Improvement at 1 month FU
|
11 Investigator Assessments
|
7 Investigator Assessments
|
4 Investigator Assessments
|
|
Improvement in Global Aesthetic Appearance of Cellulite in Treated Areas, as Assessed by Study Investigator Evaluations
Over 25% Improvement at 3 month FU
|
16 Investigator Assessments
|
10 Investigator Assessments
|
5 Investigator Assessments
|
|
Improvement in Global Aesthetic Appearance of Cellulite in Treated Areas, as Assessed by Study Investigator Evaluations
Over 25% Improvement at 6 month FU
|
15 Investigator Assessments
|
9 Investigator Assessments
|
4 Investigator Assessments
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment visit.Population: Suprapatellar areas- 17 subjects, 8 subjects (16 areas) had one assessment for both sides treated with the same parameters. Upper Arms- 10 Subjects had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters (1 subject dropped after 1 wk FU). Braline areas- 3 subjects, one subject had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters
Evaluate the improvement in skin tightening in treated areas following a single dermal and/or subcutaneous treatment with Profound, as assessed by study investigators at 1 and 6 months post treatment visit. Investigators used the following scale: (0) No tightening/firmness; (1) Slightly visible tightening/firmness; (2) Visible tightening/firmness; (3) Very visible tightening/firmness. The analysis calculates the skin tightening improvement graded: (2) Visible tightening/firmness and (3) Very visible tightening/firmness
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treated on the Suprapatellar
n=17 Participants
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges above the knees areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Upper Arms
n=10 Investigator Assessments
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the upper arms (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Braline
n=5 Investigator Assessments
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the braline areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Improvement in Skin Tightening/Laxity in Treated Areas, as Assessed by Study Investigator Evaluations
Visible + very visible tightening at 1-month FU
|
9 Investigator Assessments
|
3 Investigator Assessments
|
4 Investigator Assessments
|
|
Improvement in Skin Tightening/Laxity in Treated Areas, as Assessed by Study Investigator Evaluations
Visible + very visible tightening at 3-month FU
|
14 Investigator Assessments
|
8 Investigator Assessments
|
4 Investigator Assessments
|
|
Improvement in Skin Tightening/Laxity in Treated Areas, as Assessed by Study Investigator Evaluations
Visible + very visible tightening at 6-month FU
|
15 Investigator Assessments
|
8 Investigator Assessments
|
4 Investigator Assessments
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visitPopulation: Suprapatellar areas- 17 subjects, 8 subjects (16 areas) had one assessment for both sides treated with the same parameters. Upper Arms- 10 Subjects had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters (1 subject dropped after 1 wk FU). Braline areas- 3 subjects, one subject had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters
Evaluate Investigator satisfaction at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visit, using a satisfaction scale \[(-2) Very dissatisfied, (-1) Dissatisfied, (0) No opinion, (1) Satisfied, (2) Very satisfied\]. The analysis quantify investigator satisfaction (grades 1-2)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treated on the Suprapatellar
n=26 Investigator Assessments
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges above the knees areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Upper Arms
n=10 Investigator Assessments
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the upper arms (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Braline
n=5 Investigator Assessments
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the braline areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Investigator Satisfaction - by Questionnaire
Investigator Satisfaction Grades 1-2 at 1mo FU
|
13 Investigator Assessments
|
8 Investigator Assessments
|
4 Investigator Assessments
|
|
Investigator Satisfaction - by Questionnaire
Investigator Satisfaction Grades 1-2 at 3mo FU
|
21 Investigator Assessments
|
10 Investigator Assessments
|
4 Investigator Assessments
|
|
Investigator Satisfaction - by Questionnaire
Investigator Satisfaction Grades 1-2 at 6mo FU
|
17 Investigator Assessments
|
9 Investigator Assessments
|
4 Investigator Assessments
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visitPopulation: Suprapatellar areas- 17 subjects, 8 subjects (16 areas) had one assessment for both sides treated with the same parameters. Upper Arms- 10 Subjects had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters (1 subject dropped after 1 wk FU). Braline areas- 3 subjects, one subject had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters
Evaluate subject satisfaction at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visit, using a satisfaction and improvement scale \[(-2) Very dissatisfied, (-1) Dissatisfied, (0) No opinion, (1) Satisfied, (2) Very satisfied\]. The analysis quantify subject satisfaction (grades 1-2)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treated on the Suprapatellar
n=26 Subject Assessments
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges above the knees areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Upper Arms
n=10 Subject Assessments
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the upper arms (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Braline
n=5 Subject Assessments
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the braline areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Subject Satisfaction and Improvement - by Questionnaire
Subject Satisfaction Grades 1-2 at 1mo FU
|
13 Subject Assessments
|
8 Subject Assessments
|
2 Subject Assessments
|
|
Subject Satisfaction and Improvement - by Questionnaire
Subject Satisfaction Grades 1-2 at 3mo FU
|
20 Subject Assessments
|
10 Subject Assessments
|
2 Subject Assessments
|
|
Subject Satisfaction and Improvement - by Questionnaire
Subject Satisfaction Grades 1-2 at 6mo FU
|
17 Subject Assessments
|
10 Subject Assessments
|
4 Subject Assessments
|
Adverse Events
Treated on the Suprapatellar
Treated on the Upper Arms
Treated on the Braline
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Treated on the Suprapatellar
n=17 participants at risk
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges above the knees areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Upper Arms
n=11 participants at risk
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the upper arms (on both the left and the right side)
|
Treated on the Braline
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the braline areas (on both the left and the right side)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Bruising
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • The period of time over which adverse event data were collected is from treatment visit until 6 month post treatment
The number and severity of adverse events following a single dermal and subcutaneous treatment, with Profound for the Suprapatellar, upper arms or braline, were evaluated at 1-week post treatment, 1 month, 3 and 6 months following the treatment.
|
0.00%
0/11 • The period of time over which adverse event data were collected is from treatment visit until 6 month post treatment
The number and severity of adverse events following a single dermal and subcutaneous treatment, with Profound for the Suprapatellar, upper arms or braline, were evaluated at 1-week post treatment, 1 month, 3 and 6 months following the treatment.
|
0.00%
0/3 • The period of time over which adverse event data were collected is from treatment visit until 6 month post treatment
The number and severity of adverse events following a single dermal and subcutaneous treatment, with Profound for the Suprapatellar, upper arms or braline, were evaluated at 1-week post treatment, 1 month, 3 and 6 months following the treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Itching
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • The period of time over which adverse event data were collected is from treatment visit until 6 month post treatment
The number and severity of adverse events following a single dermal and subcutaneous treatment, with Profound for the Suprapatellar, upper arms or braline, were evaluated at 1-week post treatment, 1 month, 3 and 6 months following the treatment.
|
0.00%
0/11 • The period of time over which adverse event data were collected is from treatment visit until 6 month post treatment
The number and severity of adverse events following a single dermal and subcutaneous treatment, with Profound for the Suprapatellar, upper arms or braline, were evaluated at 1-week post treatment, 1 month, 3 and 6 months following the treatment.
|
0.00%
0/3 • The period of time over which adverse event data were collected is from treatment visit until 6 month post treatment
The number and severity of adverse events following a single dermal and subcutaneous treatment, with Profound for the Suprapatellar, upper arms or braline, were evaluated at 1-week post treatment, 1 month, 3 and 6 months following the treatment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place