Trial Outcomes & Findings for BIO4 Clinical Case Study: Cervical Spine (NCT NCT03077204)
NCT ID: NCT03077204
Last Updated: 2022-01-14
Results Overview
This will be used to monitor the fusion status at 1 year post-op. The fusion states was reported as the number of patients who fused. If fused, then we say "Yes". We counted the number of patients who fused. If all 20 patients fused then we said there were 20 "yes".
COMPLETED
PHASE4
20 participants
Post-op 1 year
2022-01-14
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
Participants were treated as per the protocol.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Treatment group consisted of patient undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
16 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
4 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.4 years
n=20 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
|
Visual Analog Scale
|
4.7 units on a scale
n=20 Participants
|
|
Neck Disability Index
|
35 units on a scale
n=20 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 1 yearPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
This will be used to monitor the fusion status at 1 year post-op. The fusion states was reported as the number of patients who fused. If fused, then we say "Yes". We counted the number of patients who fused. If all 20 patients fused then we said there were 20 "yes".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Radiological Assessment : Fusion Status
|
20 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 1 yearPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Anterior-Posterior (AP), lateral and dynamic flexion-extension cervical spine x-rays will be used to access arthrodesis rates at different time intervals. We counted the number of patients who developed arthrodesis. The arthrodesis rate was calculated as the number of patients who developed arthrodesis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Arthrodesis Rates
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 2~4 weeksPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
As needed, any post-operative surgical revision rates will be accessed. The revision rate was described as the number of patients who had to undergo revision post index surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Revision Rates (if Any)
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 3 monthsPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
As needed, any post-operative surgical revision rates will be accessed. The revision rate was described as the number of patients who had to undergo revision post index surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Revision Rates (if Any)
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 6 monthsPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
As needed, any post-operative surgical revision rates will be accessed. The revision rate was described as the number of patients who had to undergo revision post index surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Revision Rates (if Any)
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 1 yearPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
As needed, any post-operative surgical revision rates will be accessed. The revision rate was described as the number of patients who had to undergo revision post index surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Revision Rates (if Any)
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-opPopulation: Patients treated with BIO4
Patient reported VAS will be collected at different time intervals. The revision rate was described as the number of patients who had to undergo revision post index surgery. VAS: 0-10 (0=better, 10=worst)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
VAS
|
4.7 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 8.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 2 ~ 4 weeksPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Patient reported VAS will be collected at different time intervals. VAS: 0-10 (0=better, 10=worst)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
VAS
|
2.9 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 3 monthsPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Patient reported VAS will be collected at different time intervals. VAS: 0-10 (0=better, 10=worst)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
VAS
|
2.4 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 6 monthsPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Patient reported VAS will be collected at different time intervals. VAS: 0-10 (0=better, 10=worst)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
VAS
|
2 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 5.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 1 yearPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Patient reported VAS will be collected at different time intervals. VAS: 0-10 (0=better, 10=worst)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
VAS
|
1.2 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-opPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Patient reported NDI will be collected at different time intervals. NDI: 0-100 (0=better, 100=worst)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
NDI
|
35 units on a scale
Interval 6.0 to 68.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 2~4 weeksPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Patient reported NDI will be collected at different time intervals NDI: 0-100 (0=better, 100=worst)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
NDI
|
19.1 units on a scale
Interval 8.0 to 60.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 3 monthsPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Patient reported NDI will be collected at different time intervals. NDI: 0-100 (0=better, 100=worst)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
NDI
|
20.7 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 48.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 6 monthsPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Patient reported NDI will be collected at different time intervals. NDI: 0-100 (0=better, 100=worst)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
NDI
|
18.7 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 58.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 1 yearPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Patient reported NDI will be collected at different time intervals. NSI: 0-100 (0=better, 100=worst)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
NDI
|
9.1 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 36.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-opPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Anterior-Posterior (AP), lateral and dynamic flexion-extension cervical spine x-rays will be used to access arthrodesis rates at different time intervals. The arthrodesis rate was calculated as the number of patients who developed arthrodesis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Arthrodesis Rates
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 2~4 weeksPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Anterior-Posterior (AP), lateral and dynamic flexion-extension cervical spine x-rays will be used to access arthrodesis rates at different time intervals. The arthrodesis rate was calculated as the number of patients who developed arthrodesis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Arthrodesis Rates
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 3 monthsPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Anterior-Posterior (AP), lateral and dynamic flexion-extension cervical spine x-rays will be used to access arthrodesis rates at different time intervals. The arthrodesis rate was calculated as the number of patients who developed arthrodesis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Arthrodesis Rates
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-op 6 monthsPopulation: Patients who underwent ACDF using BIO4
Anterior-Posterior (AP), lateral and dynamic flexion-extension cervical spine x-rays will be used to access arthrodesis rates at different time intervals. The arthrodesis rate was calculated as the number of patients who developed arthrodesis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 Participants
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Arthrodesis Rates
|
0 participants
|
Adverse Events
BIO4 Treatment
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 participants at risk
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
We reviewed mortality in all our 20 patients
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
BIO4 Treatment
n=20 participants at risk
Patients undergoing ACDF using BIO4
|
|---|---|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Respiratory distress post-surgery
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
We reviewed mortality in all our 20 patients
|
Additional Information
Devender Singh, Research Scientist
Ascension Texas Spine and Scoliosis
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place