CMV Specific T Cell Therapy After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

NCT ID: NCT03067155

Last Updated: 2022-12-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-31

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Viral infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), especially after myelo-ablative conditioning and if the donor is antigen-mismatched or haplo-identical.. In the described setting the patient's own immune system has been destroyed by the necessary highly immuno- and myelo-ablative conditioning and all memory against infections has been deleted. Therefore, there is a high risk for several viral infections and other infectious organisms.Both primary viral infections and reactivations can occur, and patients can become refractory to antiviral treatments, or in some cases an adequate antiviral treatment is unavailable or too toxic. In this study, the investigators will target CMV, as refractory CMV infection and disease is accompanied by an extremely high mortality rate and therefore the development of new treatment approaches is required. Despite the available antiviral drugs, a considerable number of patients are facing an insufficient control of CMV reactivation after SCT. Because reconstitution of CMV-specific T cells confer protection against the development of CMV disease after SCT, attempts have been made to restore antiviral immunity by direct infusion of CMV-specific T cells. Most clinical cellular immunotherapy protocols for CMV treatment have used CMV-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell lines generated by repetitive in vitro stimulation with CMV antigens with success. Despite the proven efficacy, use of cellular therapy in the clinic has been limited, because the approach is time and labor consuming and requires specialized facility allowing handling of the therapeutic cells according to good manufacturing practice. In addition, no sustained response was seen after adoptive transfer that involved only cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. This phenomenon is supported by the fact that recall responses to latent infections depend on the presence of CD4+ T cells to help cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. An alternative approach for the transfer of T-cell immunity is the isolation of Ag-specific T cells ex vivo from the blood of CMV seropositive donors, based on interferon γ (IFN-γ) secretion of T cells after in vitro stimulation with viral Ag, resulting in a combination of CD4+ T helper and cytotoxic CD8+ CMV specific T cells. Using this strategy, a short-term ex vivo protocol was developed for the isolation of pp65 (CMV immunodominant protein)-specific T cells. Since then, several centers have used this protocol in the clinic, infusing low numbers of pp65-specific T cells, that were able to restore protective T-cell immunity against CMV in a post SCT setting in patients with refractory CMV disease or viremia. For this protocol the investigators have set up and validated this method of CMV-specific T-cell generation in the Ghent University Hospital and the investigators will make it available for other Belgian transplant centers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hematological Malignancies CMV Infection

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

allogeneic stem cell transplantation CMV reactivation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment group

The patients for which a suitable donor product can be obtained will be included in the treatment arm of the protocol. Treatment consists of the administration of CMV-specific T-cells, administered through intravenous transfusion. Depending on response in viral load and GVHD status, a second and/or third administration is possible.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CMV-specific T cells

Intervention Type GENETIC

Control group

Patients for which the investigator can't obtain a suitable donor product, will be included in the control group consisting of standard anti-viral treatment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard anti-viral therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Continue with the anti-viral treatment as per standard of care.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CMV-specific T cells

Intervention Type GENETIC

Standard anti-viral therapy

Continue with the anti-viral treatment as per standard of care.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients:

1. All underlying diseases that form an indication for allogeneic stem cell transplantation
2. Underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation with a donor that fulfills the following criteria:
* CMV-seropositive at the time of transplant and
* Age 18-70 years 3) Having a CMV reactivation or primary infection or disease with the following characteristics: CMV PCR at least twice positive AND CMV infection relapsing after 3 successful treatment episodes with gancyclovir OR Refractory to treatment with available antiviral drugs which is defined as follows: Persistent positive CMV PCR \> detection limit 14 days after initiation of antiviral treatment OR increasing CMV viral load 7 days after initiation of antiviral treatment 4) Informed consent given
* Donor:

1. Is identical to donor of the previous stem cell transplant
2. The donor will be pre-screened for the presence of sufficient numbers of CMV-specific T cells:
* IFNgamma producing T cells upon CMVpp65 stimulation are at least twice the background level (unstimulated cells)
* At least 10 events of IFNgamma positive T cells are measured
* IFNgamma producing T cells upon CMVpp65 stimulation are equal or higher than 0,1% of the viable CD4+ and CD8+ cell population If the donor shows sufficient number of circulating CMV-specific cells, according to the test described in 2 3) Only if the donor shows sufficient number of circulating CMV-specific cells, according to the test described in 2:
* Donor has positive IgG serology for CMV, IgM negative or positive
* Donor has signed informed consent for the donation of donor lymphocyte cells
* Donor is found fit for donation by a medical doctor according to selection criteria conform KB annex II (C-2009/18414)
* Donor is negative for infectious disease markers including HCV, HBV and HIV-NAT testing: HBs antigen, HBc/HBs antibodies, Syphilis (TPHA or equivalent), HVC and HIV antibodies.
* Additional testing should be performed and negative when relevant: malaria, west nile virus, trypanosomiasis, HTLV conform KB annex II (C-2009/18414)
* HCG negative within 7 days of apheresis

* Donor:

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients:

1. HIV, HCV, HBV positive (HbSAg positivity after vaccination is allowed)
2. Life expectancy severely limited by disease other than malignancy or viral infection
3. Administration of cytotoxic agent(s) for cytoreduction within three weeks prior to initiation of the treatment or to be expected within 8 weeks after administration of the treatment
4. Terminal organ failure except for renal failure (dialysis acceptable)
5. Uncontrolled other infection than the one being treated
6. Karnofsky performance score \< 60%
7. Patient is a fertile man or woman who is unwilling to use contraceptive techniques during and for 12 months following treatment
8. Patient is a female who is pregnant or breastfeeding
9. Patient with active aGVHD grade 3 or more
10. Patient with severe chronic GVHD
11. Patient on corticosteroids \> 0.5mg/kg. Patient can still be on therapeutic doses of immunosuppressive therapy, but these will be tapered to the lowest possible dose, as is part of standard care in case of CMV reactivation.
12. Patient that has received ATG \< 1 month prior to infusion or Campath \< 1 year prior to infusion
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tessa Kerre, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

ZNA Stuivenberg

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

AZ Sint-Jan Brugge

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Institut Jules Bordet

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Université de Liège

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis Roeselare

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Geurten C, Ghinai R, Munford H, Lawson S. Efficacy of Cytomegalovirus Specific Immunoglobulins to Reduce CMV Reactivation in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2023 Jan 1;45(1):e82-e86. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002553. Epub 2022 Sep 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36162011 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-004953-26

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BHS-TC13

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BHS-TJT1401

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id