Trial Outcomes & Findings for Nasal and Bronchial Absorption Sampling in RSV Bronchiolitis (NCT NCT03062917)

NCT ID: NCT03062917

Last Updated: 2019-11-12

Results Overview

To determine the difference in tolerability of nasosorption compared to NPA by assessment of acceptance by infants and families. Samples were collected from participants up to twice daily throughout study involvement, as such each participant could have \>1 sampling visits.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

152 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Throughout symptomatic respiratory infection, up to 1 month

Results posted on

2019-11-12

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Emergency Department
Babies with suspected respiratory tract infection (RTI) in the ED Nasal and Bronchial Sampling: Nasal Absorption sampling, Bronchial sampling, Nasal Pharageal Aspirates, Blood sampling.
Paediatric Wards
Babies with diagnosed RSV infection admitted to paediatric wards Nasal and Bronchial Sampling: Nasal Absorption sampling, Bronchial sampling, Nasal Pharageal Aspirates, Blood sampling.
Paediatric Intensive Care
Babies with diagnosed severe RSV infection in PICU requiring mechanical ventilation Nasal and Bronchial Sampling: Nasal Absorption sampling, Bronchial sampling, Nasal Pharageal Aspirates, Blood sampling.
Health Controls
Babies without respiratory symptoms, attending routine outpatient appointments or undergoing elective surgical procedures Nasal and Bronchial Sampling: Nasal Absorption sampling, Bronchial sampling, Nasal Pharageal Aspirates, Blood sampling.
Controls in Paediatric Intensive Care
Babies without RSV infection but requiring mechanical ventilation in PICU Nasal and Bronchial Sampling: Nasal Absorption sampling, Bronchial sampling, Nasal Pharageal Aspirates, Blood sampling.
Overall Study
STARTED
32
51
49
20
0
Overall Study
COMPLETED
32
51
49
20
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Nasal and Bronchial Absorption Sampling in RSV Bronchiolitis

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Emergency Department
n=32 Participants
Babies with suspected respiratory tract infection (RTI) in the ED Nasal and Bronchial Sampling: Nasal Absorption sampling, Bronchial sampling, Nasal Pharageal Aspirates, Blood sampling.
Paediatric Wards
n=51 Participants
Babies with diagnosed RSV infection admitted to paediatric wards Nasal and Bronchial Sampling: Nasal Absorption sampling, Bronchial sampling, Nasal Pharageal Aspirates, Blood sampling.
Paediatric Intensive Care
n=49 Participants
Babies with diagnosed severe RSV infection in PICU requiring mechanical ventilation Nasal and Bronchial Sampling: Nasal Absorption sampling, Bronchial sampling, Nasal Pharageal Aspirates, Blood sampling.
Health Controls
n=20 Participants
Babies without respiratory symptoms, attending routine outpatient appointments or undergoing elective surgical procedures Nasal and Bronchial Sampling: Nasal Absorption sampling, Bronchial sampling, Nasal Pharageal Aspirates, Blood sampling.
Controls in Paediatric Intensive Care
Babies without RSV infection but requiring mechanical ventilation in PICU Nasal and Bronchial Sampling: Nasal Absorption sampling, Bronchial sampling, Nasal Pharageal Aspirates, Blood sampling.
Total
n=152 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
212 days
n=93 Participants
186 days
n=4 Participants
168 days
n=27 Participants
168 days
n=483 Participants
176 days
n=10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
n=93 Participants
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
15 Participants
n=27 Participants
7 Participants
n=483 Participants
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
53 Participants
n=10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants
n=93 Participants
29 Participants
n=4 Participants
34 Participants
n=27 Participants
13 Participants
n=483 Participants
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
99 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
2 Participants
n=483 Participants
23 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
n=93 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
2 Participants
n=483 Participants
20 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
21 Participants
n=4 Participants
33 Participants
n=27 Participants
10 Participants
n=483 Participants
79 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
6 Participants
n=27 Participants
6 Participants
n=483 Participants
30 Participants
n=10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
32 participants
n=93 Participants
51 participants
n=4 Participants
49 participants
n=27 Participants
20 participants
n=483 Participants
152 participants
n=10 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Throughout symptomatic respiratory infection, up to 1 month

Population: Parents asked at each sampling timepoint on willingness to continue with respiratory sampling, as either: 1) both nasosorption and NPA, 2) just nasosorption, 3) just NPA, 4) discontinue sampling. This analysis includes all non-sedated hospitalised participants as sedation would influence the tolerability of sampling as perceived by parents/carers.

To determine the difference in tolerability of nasosorption compared to NPA by assessment of acceptance by infants and families. Samples were collected from participants up to twice daily throughout study involvement, as such each participant could have \>1 sampling visits.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Wards
n=169 Number of individual sampling visits
None sedated participants recruited from general paediatric wards
Emergency Department
n=64 Number of individual sampling visits
Non-ventilated participants recruited from the emergency department
The Number of Sampling Visits on Which Participants Are Willing to Undergo Nasosorption and/or NPA Sampling
Nasosorption and NPA samples
124 Sampling visits
60 Sampling visits
The Number of Sampling Visits on Which Participants Are Willing to Undergo Nasosorption and/or NPA Sampling
NPA only
0 Sampling visits
0 Sampling visits
The Number of Sampling Visits on Which Participants Are Willing to Undergo Nasosorption and/or NPA Sampling
Discontinue sampling (while remaining in hospital)
0 Sampling visits
0 Sampling visits
The Number of Sampling Visits on Which Participants Are Willing to Undergo Nasosorption and/or NPA Sampling
Nasosorption only
45 Sampling visits
4 Sampling visits

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Throughout symptomatic respiratory infection, up to 1 month

Population: Spearman R score correlation between RSV viral load as measured by nasosorption and NPA. This analysis includes all RSV+ infants independent of recruitment group as no differences in correlation between sample type were anticipated between recruitment group.

To determine the difference in accuracy of nasosorption compared to NPA by assessment of level of viral load (measured by qPCR).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Wards
n=44 Number matched RSV+ nasosorption and NPA
None sedated participants recruited from general paediatric wards
Emergency Department
Non-ventilated participants recruited from the emergency department
Accuracy of Nasosorption for Viral Load Measurement
0.692 Spearman R score

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Throughout symptomatic respiratory infection, up to 1 month

Population: Spearman R score correlation between RSV viral load as measured by bronchosorption and tracheal aspiration. This analysis includes all RSV+ infants independent of recruitment group as no differences in correlation between sample type were anticipated between recruitment group.

To determine the difference in accuracy of bronchosorption (BSAM) compared to tracheal aspirate (TA) by assessment of level of viral load (measured by qPCR).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Wards
n=20 Number matched RSV+ BSAM and TA
None sedated participants recruited from general paediatric wards
Emergency Department
Non-ventilated participants recruited from the emergency department
Accuracy of Bronchosorption for Viral Load Measurement, Compared to Tracheal Aspirate
0.45 Spearman R score

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Throughout symptomatic respiratory infection, up to 1 month

Population: Spearman R score correlation of Interferon-gamma levels in matched nasosorption and NPA samples from any participant. This analysis includes all RSV+ infants independent of recruitment group as no differences in correlation between sample type were anticipated between recruitment group.

Establishing the use of nasal and bronchial sampling to measure the host immune response to RSV. We will determine cytokine and inflammatory mediator concentrations by immunoassay of eluted fluid from nasosorption and compare with NPA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Wards
n=124 Number matched nasosorption and NPA
None sedated participants recruited from general paediatric wards
Emergency Department
Non-ventilated participants recruited from the emergency department
Immune Response
0.0001 Spearman R score

Adverse Events

Emergency Department

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Paediatric Wards

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Paediatric Intensive Care

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Health Controls

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Controls in Paediatric Intensive Care

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Study PI Simon Nadel

Imperial College NHS trust

Phone: 02033126202

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place