Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Sitagliptin Once-daily as add-on to Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN - CHINA MRCT) (NCT NCT03061214)

NCT ID: NCT03061214

Last Updated: 2021-03-02

Results Overview

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period and 'in trial' observation period. 'On-treatment without rescue medication' observation period: started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first. 'In-trial' observation period: started when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature treatment discontinuation.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

868 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Week 0, week 30

Results posted on

2021-03-02

Participant Flow

The trial was conducted at 65 sites in 5 countries/regions as follows: Region China: 42 sites; Brazil: 3 sites; Republic of Korea: 12 sites; South Africa: 5 sites; Ukraine: 3 sites.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Overall Study
STARTED
288
290
290
Overall Study
Exposed
287
290
290
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set (FAS)
288
290
290
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set (SAS)
287
290
290
Overall Study
COMPLETED
263
262
280
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
25
28
10

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
21
26
9
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
3
1
1
Overall Study
Death
1
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Sitagliptin Once-daily as add-on to Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN - CHINA MRCT)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=288 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=290 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Total
n=868 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
53.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 • n=5 Participants
53.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=7 Participants
53.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=5 Participants
53.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
128 Participants
n=5 Participants
136 Participants
n=7 Participants
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
369 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
160 Participants
n=5 Participants
154 Participants
n=7 Participants
185 Participants
n=5 Participants
499 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
82 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
264 Participants
n=5 Participants
262 Participants
n=7 Participants
260 Participants
n=5 Participants
786 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
243 Participants
n=5 Participants
251 Participants
n=7 Participants
244 Participants
n=5 Participants
738 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
89 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants."Number Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period and 'in trial' observation period. 'On-treatment without rescue medication' observation period: started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first. 'In-trial' observation period: started when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature treatment discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=288 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=290 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in HbA1c
On-treatment without rescue medication obs. period
-1.5 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.1
-1.8 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.9
-1.0 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.9
Change in HbA1c
In-trial observation period
-1.5 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.1
-1.7 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.0
-0.9 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in body weight was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=253 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Body Weight
-3.0 Kilogram (kg)
Standard Deviation 3.8
-4.2 Kilogram (kg)
Standard Deviation 3.7
-0.4 Kilogram (kg)
Standard Deviation 2.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in FPG was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=237 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=253 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
-2.18 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.5
-2.62 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.13
-1.0 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 1.74

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in SMPG mean 7-point profile was evaluated. SMPG was recorded at the following 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point profile was defined as the area under the profile, calculated using the trapezoidal method, divided by the measurement time. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=236 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=251 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) - Mean 7-point Profile
-2.5 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.4
-3.3 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.2
-1.6 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in SMPG mean postprandial increment over all meals was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=234 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=237 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=251 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) - Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals
-1.0 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.2
-1.2 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.1
-0.7 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 2.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in fasting insulin from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting insulin was measured in picomoles per liter (pmol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=229 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=237 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=254 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting Insulin - Ratio to Baseline
1.06 Ratio of fasting insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.6
1.03 Ratio of fasting insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 51.2
1.01 Ratio of fasting insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change in fasting C-peptide from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. C-peptide was measured in nanomoles per liter (nmol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=234 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=254 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting C-peptide - Ratio to Baseline
1.08 Ratio of fasting C-peptide
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.3
1.05 Ratio of fasting C-peptide
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.4
1.0 Ratio of fasting C-peptide
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change in fasting glucagon from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting glucagon was measured in picogram per mililiter (pg/mL). Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=205 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=206 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=221 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting Glucagon - Ratio to Baseline
0.89 Ratio of fasting glucagon
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.4
0.89 Ratio of fasting glucagon
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.1
0.93 Ratio of fasting glucagon
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change in fasting proinsulin from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting proinsulin was measured in picomole per liter (pmol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=234 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=241 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=253 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting Proinsulin - Ratio to Baseline
0.68 Ratio of fasting proinsulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 62.7
0.59 Ratio of fasting proinsulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 65.3
0.81 Ratio of fasting proinsulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 58.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in fasting proinsulin/insulin ratio from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=226 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=237 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=253 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio - Ratio to Baseline
0.63 Ratio of fasting proinsulin/insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50.2
0.57 Ratio of fasting proinsulin/insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.1
0.80 Ratio of fasting proinsulin/insulin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change in fasting HOMA-B (homeostasis model assessment beta-cell function) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=228 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=236 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=252 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting HOMA-B (Beta-cell Function) - Ratio to Baseline
1.81 Ratio of fasting HOMA-B
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57.3
1.95 Ratio of fasting HOMA-B
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.1
1.25 Ratio of fasting HOMA-B
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change in fasting HOMA-IR (homeostasis model assessment insulin resistence) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=228 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=236 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=252 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting HOMA-IR (Insulin Resistence) - Ratio to Baseline
0.81 Ratio of fasting HOMA-IR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 60.9
0.74 Ratio of fasting HOMA-IR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 63.2
0.90 Ratio of fasting HOMA-IR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Short Form (SF)-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey that measures patient's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured 8 domains of functional health \& well-being and 2 component summary scores (physical component summary-PCS and mental component summary-MCS). The 0-100 scale scores (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. In the metric of norm-based scores, 50 and 10 corresponds to the mean and standard deviation respectively of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) in the domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores were evaluated at weeks 30. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the data from the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=246 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=249 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=257 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: SF-36v2™ Score
Physical component summary (PCS)
1.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.9
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.0
0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: SF-36v2™ Score
Physical functioning
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.4
-0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.5
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: SF-36v2™ Score
Role-physical
1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.9
-0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.0
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: SF-36v2™ Score
Bodily pain
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.4
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9
0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: SF-36v2™ Score
General health
3.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
2.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4
2.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: SF-36v2™ Score
Mental component summary (MCS)
1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.4
1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: SF-36v2™ Score
Social functioning
1.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.0
-0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.8
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: SF-36v2™ Score
Role-emotional
1.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.9
1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: SF-36v2™ Score
Vitality
1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8
1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: SF-36v2™ Score
Mental health
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) was evaluated at week 30. The DTSQs items are scored on a 7-point graded response scale ranging from 6 to 0. Higher scores indicate higher levels of treatment satisfaction for DTSQs items 3 -8. For items 1 and 2 a higher score indicates a higher patient perceived experience of high blood sugars and low blood sugars, respectively. Thus, lower scores indicate a perception of blood glucose levels being "none of the time" unacceptably high (item 1) or low (item 2). The domain score of total treatment satisfaction (total treatment satisfaction score) was computed by adding the six items scores 3-8. The score ranges 0-36. A higher treatment satisfaction score indicates a higher level of treatment satisfaction. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=246 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=249 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=257 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: DTSQs Score
1) Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars
-1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
-1.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
-1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: DTSQs Score
2) Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars
-0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
-0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
-0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: DTSQs Score
3) Satisfaction with treatment
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
1.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: DTSQs Score
4) Convenience of treatment
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: DTSQs Score
5) Flexibility of current treatment
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: DTSQs Score
6) Satisfaction with understanding of diabetes
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: DTSQs Score
7) Recommending treatment to others
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: DTSQs Score
8) Satisfaction to continue with present treatment
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: DTSQs Score
Total Diabetic Treatment Satisfaction score
4.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
5.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.3
3.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. High-sensitivity CRP was measured in mg/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=240 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=252 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in High-sensitivity CRP - Ratio to Baseline
0.73 Ratio of high-sensitivity CRP
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 121.2
0.64 Ratio of high-sensitivity CRP
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 108.6
0.96 Ratio of high-sensitivity CRP
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 128.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in waist circumference from baseline (week 0) to week 30 was measured. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=254 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Waist Circumference
-2.7 Centimeter (cm)
Standard Deviation 5.0
-4.0 Centimeter (cm)
Standard Deviation 4.8
-0.7 Centimeter (cm)
Standard Deviation 4.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in body mass index (BMI) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 was measured. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=253 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in BMI
-1.1 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 1.4
-1.6 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 1.4
-0.1 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 0.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in fasting total cholesterol from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting total cholesterol was measured in mmol/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=240 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=252 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline
0.95 Ratio of fasting total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.2
0.95 Ratio of fasting total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.7
1.00 Ratio of fasting total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting LDL was measured in mmol/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=237 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=240 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=250 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline
0.97 Ratio of fasting LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.2
0.99 Ratio of fasting LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.6
1.01 Ratio of fasting LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in fasting very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting VLDL was measured in mmol/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=237 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=240 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=251 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting VLDL Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline
0.86 Ratio of fasting VLDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 44.8
0.82 Ratio of fasting VLDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.8
0.93 Ratio of fasting VLDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in fasting high density lipoprotein (HDL) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting HDL was measured in mmol/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=240 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=251 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline
1.00 Ratio of fasting HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.8
1.02 Ratio of fasting HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.3
1.01 Ratio of fasting HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in fasting triglycerides from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Triglycerides was measured in mmol/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=237 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=240 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=251 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Fasting Triglycerides - Ratio to Baseline
0.86 Ratio of fasting triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.5
0.81 Ratio of fasting triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.9
0.93 Ratio of fasting triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change in free fatty acids from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Free fatty acids was measured in mmol/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=231 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=254 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Free Fatty Acids - Ratio to Baseline
0.78 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 70.4
0.78 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 65.8
0.87 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 61.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=254 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Systolic blood pressure
-3.4 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.7
-6.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.4
-0.9 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.6
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Diastolic blood pressure
-0.7 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.4
-1.5 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.7
-0.8 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c \< 7.0% (53 millimoles per mole \[mmol/mol\]), American Diabetes Association (ADA) target (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=235 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=250 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol), ADA Target, (Yes/no)
Yes
74.5 Percentage of participants
84.0 Percentage of participants
49.6 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol), ADA Target, (Yes/no)
No
25.5 Percentage of participants
16.0 Percentage of participants
50.4 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c ≤6.5% (48 millimoles per mole \[mmol/mol\]), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) target (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=235 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=250 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target, (Yes/no)
Yes
60.4 Percentage of participants
70.6 Percentage of participants
31.6 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤6.5% (48 mmol/Mol), AACE Target, (Yes/no)
No
39.6 Percentage of participants
29.4 Percentage of participants
68.4 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Severe or blood glucose (BG)-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without severe or blood glucose confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia episodes and no weight gain (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=235 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=249 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Percentage of Participants That Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG)-Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia and no Weight Gain
Yes
66.0 Percentage of participants
76.9 Percentage of participants
33.7 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants That Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG)-Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia and no Weight Gain
No
34.0 Percentage of participants
23.1 Percentage of participants
66.3 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Percentage of participants losing ≥5% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=253 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Percentage of Participants That Achieved (Yes/no): Body Weight Loss ≥5%
Yes
36.6 Percentage of participants
52.7 Percentage of participants
5.9 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants That Achieved (Yes/no): Body Weight Loss ≥5%
No
63.4 Percentage of participants
47.3 Percentage of participants
94.1 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 30

Population: Full analysis set comprised of all randomised participants. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Percentage of participants losing ≥10% of baseline body weight (yes/no) is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=253 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Percentage of Participants That Achieved (Yes/no): Body Weight Loss ≥10%
Yes
9.7 Percentage of participants
17.2 Percentage of participants
0.4 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants That Achieved (Yes/no): Body Weight Loss ≥10%
No
90.3 Percentage of participants
82.8 Percentage of participants
99.6 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0 to week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.

A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with onset in the on-treatment observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=287 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=290 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Total Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
729 Events
788 Events
596 Events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0 to week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.

Hypoglycaemic episodes are defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurs within the on-treatment observation period. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=287 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=290 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
3 Episodes
7 Episodes
5 Episodes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0 to week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.

Number of participants with treatment emergent severe or blood glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes. Hypoglycaemic episodes defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurs within the on-treatment observation period. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is an episode that is severe according to the American Diabetes Association classification or blood glucose-confirmed by a plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=287 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=290 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Participants With Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
2 Participants
6 Participants
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in haemoglobin from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Haemoglobin was measured in mmol/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=235 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=266 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Haematological Parameter: Haemoglobin - Ratio to Baseline
1.00 Ratio of haemoglobin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.0
1.00 Ratio of haemoglobin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.6
1.00 Ratio of haemoglobin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in haematocrit from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Haematocrit was measured in percentage. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=235 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=266 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Haematological Parameter: Haematocrit - Ratio to Baseline
1.00 Ratio of haematocrit
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.3
1.00 Ratio of haematocrit
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.3
1.00 Ratio of haematocrit
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in thrombocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Thrombocytes was measured in 10\^9 cells per liter. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=233 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=266 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Hematological Parameter: Thrombocytes - Ratio to Baseline
1.01 Ratio of thrombocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.3
1.01 Ratio of thrombocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.2
0.99 Ratio of thrombocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in erythrocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Erythrocytes were measured in 10\^12 cells per liter. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=235 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=266 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Hematological Parameter: Erythrocytes - Ratio to Baseline
0.99 Ratio of erythrocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.6
0.99 Ratio of erythrocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.4
0.99 Ratio of erythrocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in leukocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Leukocytes were measured in 10\^9 cells per liter. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=235 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=266 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Hematological Parameter: Leukocytes - Ratio to Baseline
1.03 Ratio of leukocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.1
1.01 Ratio of leukocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.7
1.08 Ratio of leukocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in basophils from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Basophils were measured in percentage. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=229 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=230 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=251 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Hematological Parameter (Differential Cell Count of Leukocytes): Basophils - Ratio to Baseline
0.91 Ratio of basophils
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.1
0.80 Ratio of basophils
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 71.3
0.83 Ratio of basophils
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 69.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in neutrophils from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Neutrophils were measured in percentage. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=235 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=266 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Hematological Parameter (Differential Cell Count of Leukocytes): Neutrophils - Ratio to Baseline
1.01 Ratio of neutrophils
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 12.9
1.02 Ratio of neutrophils
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.2
1.02 Ratio of neutrophils
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in eosinophils from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Eosinophils were measured in percentage. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=238 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=234 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=265 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Hematological Parameter (Differential Cell Count of Leukocytes): Eosinophils - Ratio to Baseline
0.98 Ratio of eosinophils
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57.9
1.04 Ratio of eosinophils
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 64.7
1.00 Ratio of eosinophils
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 65.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in monocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Monocytes were measured in percentage. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=235 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=266 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Hematological Parameter (Differential Cell Count of Leukocytes): Monocytes - Ratio to Baseline
0.96 Ratio of monocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.7
0.98 Ratio of monocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 34.7
1.04 Ratio of monocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in lymphocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Lymphocytes were measured in percentage. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=239 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=235 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=266 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Hematological Parameter (Differential Cell Count of Leukocytes): Lymphocytes - Ratio to Baseline
1.01 Ratio of lymphocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.7
0.98 Ratio of lymphocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.6
0.97 Ratio of lymphocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in amylase from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Amylase was measured in units per liter (U/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=242 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=271 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Amylase - Ratio to Baseline
1.17 Ratio of amylase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.6
1.19 Ratio of amylase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.6
1.10 Ratio of amylase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in lipase from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Lipase was measured in units per liter (U/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=243 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=273 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Lipase - Ratio to Baseline
1.33 Ratio of lipase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.9
1.42 Ratio of lipase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 51.2
1.24 Ratio of lipase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in alkaline phosphatase from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Alkaline phosphatase was measured in units per liter (U/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=242 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=271 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase - Ratio to Baseline
0.92 Ratio of alkaline phosphatase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.3
0.91 Ratio of alkaline phosphatase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.3
0.92 Ratio of alkaline phosphatase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in alanine aminotransferase from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Alanine aminotransferase was measured in units per liter (U/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=246 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=241 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=269 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Alanine Aminotransferase - Ratio to Baseline
0.86 Ratio of alanine aminotransferase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 55.7
0.83 Ratio of alanine aminotransferase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.1
0.95 Ratio of alanine aminotransferase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed "= participants with available data.

Change in aspartate aminotransferase from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Aspartate aminotransferase was measured in units per liter (U/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=246 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=242 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=268 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Aspartate Aminotransferase - Ratio to Baseline
0.92 Ratio of aspartate aminotransferase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.9
0.88 Ratio of aspartate aminotransferase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.7
0.99 Ratio of aspartate aminotransferase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in total bilirubin from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Total bilirubin was measured in micromoles per liter (umol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=241 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=269 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Total Bilirubin - Ratio to Baseline
0.93 Ratio of total bilirubin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.8
0.93 Ratio of total bilirubin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.4
0.93 Ratio of total bilirubin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in calcium (corrected) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Calcium was measured in millimoles per litre (mmol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=242 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=271 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Calcium (Corrected)- Ratio to Baseline
1.01 Ratio of calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 3.7
1.01 Ratio of calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 3.2
1.01 Ratio of calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 3.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in total calcium from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Calcium was measured in millimoles per litre (mmol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=242 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=271 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Total Calcium - Ratio to Baseline
1.02 Ratio of total calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.4
1.01 Ratio of total calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 3.8
1.01 Ratio of total calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 3.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in potassium from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Potassium was measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=246 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=242 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=271 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Potassium - Ratio to Baseline
1.01 Ratio of potassium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 7.7
1.00 Ratio of potassium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.4
1.00 Ratio of potassium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in sodium from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Sodium was measured in millimoles per litre (mmol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=246 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=242 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=271 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Sodium - Ratio to Baseline
1.01 Ratio of sodium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.5
1.00 Ratio of sodium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.5
1.00 Ratio of sodium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in albumin from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Albumin was measured in grams per deciliter (g/dL). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=242 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=271 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Albumin - Ratio to Baseline
1.02 Ratio of albumin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.4
1.02 Ratio of albumin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.4
1.01 Ratio of albumin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in creatine kinase from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Creatine kinase was measured in units per liter (U/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=242 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=270 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Creatine Kinase - Ratio to Baseline
1.02 Ratio of creatine kinase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49.1
0.96 Ratio of creatine kinase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.8
1.07 Ratio of creatine kinase
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in Total protein from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Total Protein was measured in grams per deciliter (g/dL). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=242 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=271 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Total Protein- Ratio to Baseline
1.01 Ratio of total protein
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.0
1.00 Ratio of total protein
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.3
1.01 Ratio of total protein
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week -2, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in creatinine from baseline (week -2) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Creatinine was measured in micromoles per lier (umol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=243 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=273 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Creatinine - Ratio to Baseline
1.08 Ratio of creatinine
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 12.6
1.07 Ratio of creatinine
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11.7
1.05 Ratio of creatinine
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 12.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in urea from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Urea was measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=243 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=273 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Urea - Ratio to Baseline
1.01 Ratio of urea
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.6
1.02 Ratio of urea
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.4
1.01 Ratio of urea
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Glomerular filtration rate was measured in milliliter/minute/specific surface area (mL/min/SSA). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=243 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=273 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Biochemistry Parameter: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) - Ratio to Baseline
0.92 Ratio of eGFR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.6
0.92 Ratio of eGFR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.6
0.94 Ratio of eGFR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week -2, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Change in calcitonin from baseline (week -2) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Calcitonin was measured in nanogram per liter (ng/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=246 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=244 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=273 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Calcitonin - Ratio to Baseline
0.96 Ratio of calcitonin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.5
1.00 Ratio of calcitonin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 44.8
0.96 Ratio of calcitonin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 48.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change in urin albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. UACR was measured in milligram/millimole (mg/mmol). Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=155 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=164 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=189 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Urinalysis Parameter - UACR-ratio to Baseline
0.77 Ratio of UACR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 83.5
0.69 Ratio of UACR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 78.4
0.89 Ratio of UACR
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 76.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Glucose in urine was assessed by the investigator and categorised as negative, \[100-249\], \[250-499\], \[500-999\] and \>= 1000. Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0) and week 30 are presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=289 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=287 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Glucose
At week 0 · Negative
189 Participants
187 Participants
176 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Glucose
At week 0 · 100-249
28 Participants
27 Participants
42 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Glucose
At week 0 · 250-499
12 Participants
20 Participants
25 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Glucose
At week 0 · 500-999
20 Participants
25 Participants
21 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Glucose
At week 0 · >= 1000
37 Participants
30 Participants
23 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Glucose
At week 30 · Negative
244 Participants
258 Participants
233 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Glucose
At week 30 · 100-249
7 Participants
15 Participants
23 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Glucose
At week 30 · 250-499
10 Participants
5 Participants
5 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Glucose
At week 30 · 500-999
11 Participants
4 Participants
12 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Glucose
At week 30 · >= 1000
14 Participants
7 Participants
14 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

pH in urine was assessed by the investigator and categorised as 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, \>=9. Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0) and week 30 are presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=289 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=287 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 0 · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 0 · 5.5
17 Participants
15 Participants
14 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 0 · 6
220 Participants
214 Participants
222 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 0 · 6.5
31 Participants
40 Participants
33 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 0 · 7
13 Participants
14 Participants
15 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 0 · 7.5
3 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 0 · 8
0 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 0 · 8.5
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 0 · >= 9
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 30 · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 30 · 5.5
16 Participants
21 Participants
30 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 30 · 6
209 Participants
194 Participants
201 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 30 · 6.5
33 Participants
40 Participants
24 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 30 · 7
24 Participants
30 Participants
22 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 30 · 7.5
2 Participants
3 Participants
5 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 30 · 8
1 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 30 · 8.5
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: pH
At week 30 · >= 9
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Protein in urine was assessed by the investigator and categorised as negative, trace, 30-99, 100-299, Approximately 300, \>=300. Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0) and week 30 are presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=289 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=287 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 0 · Negative
231 Participants
233 Participants
235 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 0 · Trace
31 Participants
32 Participants
30 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 0 · 30-99
17 Participants
18 Participants
15 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 0 · 100-299
6 Participants
4 Participants
6 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 0 · Approximately 300
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 0 · >=300
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 30 · Negative
247 Participants
248 Participants
239 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 30 · Trace
22 Participants
28 Participants
24 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 30 · 30-99
13 Participants
9 Participants
12 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 30 · 100-299
4 Participants
4 Participants
11 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 30 · Approximately 300
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Protein
At week 30 · >=300
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Ketones in urine was assessed by the investigator and categorised as negative, trace, 15-39, 40-79, Approximately 80, \>= 80. Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0) and week 30 are presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=289 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=287 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 0 · Negative
267 Participants
268 Participants
274 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 0 · Trace
11 Participants
17 Participants
9 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 0 · 15-39
8 Participants
3 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 0 · 40- 79
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 0 · Approximately 80
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 0 · >=80
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 30 · Negative
268 Participants
274 Participants
274 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 30 · Trace
12 Participants
12 Participants
11 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 30 · 15-39
6 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 30 · 40- 79
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 30 · Approximately 80
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Ketones
At week 30 · >=80
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Erythrocytes in urine was assessed by the investigator and categorised as negative, trace, small, moderate, large. Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0) and week 30 are presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=289 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=287 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Erythrocytes
At week 30 · Moderate
2 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Erythrocytes
At week 30 · Large
4 Participants
6 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Erythrocytes
At week 0 · Negative
251 Participants
250 Participants
253 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Erythrocytes
At week 0 · Trace
25 Participants
20 Participants
19 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Erythrocytes
At week 0 · Small
5 Participants
8 Participants
9 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Erythrocytes
At week 0 · Moderate
1 Participants
3 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Erythrocytes
At week 0 · Large
4 Participants
8 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Erythrocytes
At week 30 · Negative
258 Participants
259 Participants
252 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Erythrocytes
At week 30 · Trace
18 Participants
13 Participants
22 Participants
Change in Urinalysis Parameter: Erythrocytes
At week 30 · Small
4 Participants
5 Participants
9 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"=participants with available data.

Change in pulse from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=247 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=243 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=273 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Pulse
3.7 Beats per minute (beats/min)
Standard Deviation 10.1
3.7 Beats per minute (beats/min)
Standard Deviation 9.4
0.2 Beats per minute (beats/min)
Standard Deviation 9.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number Analyzed" = participants with available data.

The electrocardiogram (ECG) was assessed by the investigator and categorised as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). Number of participants in each ECG category at baseline and week 30 are presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=290 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Clinical Evaluation: ECG
At week 0 · Normal
191 Participants
196 Participants
185 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: ECG
At week 0 · Abnormal, NCS
72 Participants
68 Participants
76 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: ECG
At week 0 · Abnormal, CS
23 Participants
26 Participants
29 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: ECG
At week 30 · Normal
162 Participants
172 Participants
167 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: ECG
At week 30 · Abnormal, NCS
81 Participants
74 Participants
85 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: ECG
At week 30 · Abnormal, CS
19 Participants
18 Participants
26 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Eye examination was performed by the investigator and the results of the examination were interpreted for each eye (left/right) are categorised as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0) and at week 30 are presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=286 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=290 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 0, Left eye · Normal
202 Participants
222 Participants
202 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 0, Left eye · Abnormal, NCS
40 Participants
32 Participants
47 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 0, Left eye · Abnormal, CS
44 Participants
36 Participants
41 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 30, Left eye · Normal
162 Participants
184 Participants
174 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 30, Left eye · Abnormal, NCS
26 Participants
18 Participants
32 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 30, Left eye · Abnormal, CS
42 Participants
31 Participants
41 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 0, Right eye · Normal
210 Participants
222 Participants
201 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 0, Right eye · Abnormal, NCS
37 Participants
31 Participants
47 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 0, Right eye · Abnormal, CS
39 Participants
37 Participants
42 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 52, Right eye · Normal
161 Participants
180 Participants
172 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 52, Right eye · Abnormal, NCS
27 Participants
19 Participants
31 Participants
Change in Clinical Evaluation: Eye Examinations
At week 52, Right eye · Abnormal, CS
42 Participants
34 Participants
43 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week -2, week 30

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Number Analyzed" = participants with available data.

Physical examination parameters are categorised as general appearance; nervous system (central and peripheral); cardiovascular system; gastrointestinal system; skin; respiratory system; lymph node palpation; thyroid gland; left foot; right foot; left leg and right leg. The number of participants assessed as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinically significant (CS) at baseline (week -2) and week 30 are presented. Results are based on the 'on-treatment' observation period. On-treatment observation period is defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=287 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=290 Participants
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, General Appearance · Normal
282 Participants
283 Participants
281 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, General Appearance · Abnormal, NCS
3 Participants
7 Participants
8 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, General Appearance · Abnormal, CS
2 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, General Appearance · Normal
252 Participants
250 Participants
270 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, General Appearance · Abnormal, NCS
3 Participants
3 Participants
5 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, General Appearance · Abnormal, CS
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Nervous System · Normal
277 Participants
287 Participants
279 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Nervous System · Abnormal, NCS
5 Participants
1 Participants
8 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Nervous System · Abnormal, CS
5 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Nervous System · Normal
247 Participants
250 Participants
268 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Nervous System · Abnormal, NCS
4 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Nervous System · Abnormal, CS
5 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Cardiovascular System · Normal
276 Participants
281 Participants
278 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Cardiovascular System · Abnormal, NCS
9 Participants
6 Participants
10 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Cardiovascular System · Abnormal, CS
2 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Cardiovascular System · Normal
245 Participants
246 Participants
265 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Cardiovascular System · Abnormal, NCS
8 Participants
4 Participants
10 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Cardiovascular System · Abnormal, CS
3 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Gastrointestinal System · Normal
280 Participants
285 Participants
280 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Gastrointestinal System · Abnormal, NCS
6 Participants
5 Participants
10 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Gastrointestinal System · Abnormal, CS
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Gastrointestinal System · Normal
251 Participants
250 Participants
264 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Gastrointestinal System · Abnormal, NCS
5 Participants
2 Participants
11 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Gastrointestinal System · Abnormal, CS
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Musculoskeletal System · Normal
281 Participants
283 Participants
282 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Musculoskeletal System · Abnormal, NCS
6 Participants
5 Participants
6 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Musculoskeletal System · Abnormal, CS
0 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Musculoskeletal System · Normal
252 Participants
247 Participants
270 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Musculoskeletal System · Abnormal, NCS
3 Participants
4 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Musculoskeletal System · Abnormal, CS
1 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Skin · Normal
253 Participants
252 Participants
254 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Skin · Abnormal, NCS
28 Participants
37 Participants
29 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Skin · Abnormal, CS
6 Participants
1 Participants
7 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Skin · Normal
226 Participants
217 Participants
240 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Skin · Abnormal, NCS
25 Participants
33 Participants
31 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Skin · Abnormal, CS
5 Participants
3 Participants
5 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Head,Ears,Eyes,Nose, Throat, Neck · Normal
273 Participants
281 Participants
277 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Head,Ears,Eyes,Nose, Throat, Neck · Abnormal, NCS
12 Participants
7 Participants
7 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Head,Ears,Eyes,Nose, Throat, Neck · Abnormal, CS
2 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Head,Ears,Eyes,Nose, Throat, Neck · Normal
245 Participants
244 Participants
263 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Head,Ears,Eyes,Nose, Throat, Neck · Abnormal, NCS
9 Participants
7 Participants
8 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Head,Ears,Eyes,Nose, Throat, Neck · Abnormal, CS
2 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Respiratory System · Normal
287 Participants
288 Participants
287 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Respiratory System · Abnormal, NCS
0 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Respiratory System · Abnormal, CS
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Respiratory System · Normal
255 Participants
250 Participants
274 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Respiratory System · Abnormal, NCS
1 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Respiratory System · Abnormal, CS
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Lymph Node Palpation · Normal
284 Participants
284 Participants
285 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Lymph Node Palpation · Abnormal, NCS
2 Participants
5 Participants
4 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Lymph Node Palpation · Abnormal, CS
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Lymph Node Palpation · Normal
255 Participants
250 Participants
271 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Lymph Node Palpation · Abnormal, NCS
1 Participants
3 Participants
5 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Lymph Node Palpation · Abnormal, CS
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Thyroid Gland · Normal
280 Participants
285 Participants
281 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Thyroid Gland · Abnormal, NCS
6 Participants
3 Participants
9 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week -2, Thyroid Gland · Abnormal, CS
1 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Thyroid Gland · Normal
253 Participants
249 Participants
270 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Thyroid Gland · Abnormal, NCS
2 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants
Change in Physical Examination
At week 30, Thyroid Gland · Abnormal, CS
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: week 30, week 35

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"=participants with available data.

This outcome measure is only applicable for the semaglutide arms. Anti-semaglutide antibody level at week 30 and week 35 are presented. Antibody levels were measured in percentage of bound radioactivity-labelled semaglutide/total added radioactivity-labelled semaglutide (%B/T; B =Bound, T = Total). Evaluation was based on 'in trial' observation period, which is the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature treatment discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=3 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Anti-semaglutide Antibody Levels
At week 30
2.8 %B/T
Standard Deviation 0.2
Anti-semaglutide Antibody Levels
At week 35
3.3 %B/T
Standard Deviation 0.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 16, week 30, week 35

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

This outcome measure is only applicable for the semaglutide arms. Development of anti-semaglutide antibodies was evaluated in participants during the study. The number of participants who were positive/ negative for anti-semaglutide antibodies were presented. Evaluation was based on 'in trial' observation period, which is the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature treatment discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=287 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies (Yes/no)
At week 0 · Yes (positive for antibody)
0 Participants
1 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies (Yes/no)
At week 0 · No (negative for antibody)
285 Participants
288 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies (Yes/no)
At week 16 · Yes (positive for antibody)
1 Participants
0 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies (Yes/no)
At week 16 · No (negative for antibody)
284 Participants
290 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies (Yes/no)
At week 30 · Yes (positive for antibody)
0 Participants
2 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies (Yes/no)
At week 30 · No (negative for antibody)
257 Participants
261 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies (Yes/no)
At week 35 · Yes (positive for antibody)
0 Participants
3 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies (Yes/no)
At week 35 · No (negative for antibody)
262 Participants
261 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 16, week 30, week 35

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

This outcome measure is only applicable for the semaglutide arms. Development of anti-semaglutide antibodies with in-vitro neutralising effect was evaluated in participants during the study. The number of participants who were positive/ negative for anti-semaglutide antibodies with in vitro neutralising effect are presented. Evaluation was based on in-trial observation period, which is the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature treatment discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=287 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies With In-vitro Neutralising Effect (Yes/no)
At week 0 · Yes (positive for antibody)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies With In-vitro Neutralising Effect (Yes/no)
At week 0 · No (negative for antibody)
285 Participants
289 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies With In-vitro Neutralising Effect (Yes/no)
At week 16 · Yes (positive for antibody)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies With In-vitro Neutralising Effect (Yes/no)
At week 16 · No (negative for antibody)
285 Participants
290 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies With In-vitro Neutralising Effect (Yes/no)
At week 30 · Yes (positive for antibody)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies With In-vitro Neutralising Effect (Yes/no)
At week 30 · No (negative for antibody)
257 Participants
263 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies With In-vitro Neutralising Effect (Yes/no)
At week 35 · Yes (positive for antibody)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies With In-vitro Neutralising Effect (Yes/no)
At week 35 · No (negative for antibody)
262 Participants
264 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 35

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

This outcome measure is only applicable for the semaglutide arms. Development of anti-semaglutide antibodies cross reacting with endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) was evaluated in participants. The number of participants who were positive/ negative for anti-semaglutide antibodies cross reacting with endogenous GLP-1 are presented. Evaluation was based on in-trial observation period, which is the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature treatment discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=262 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=264 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies Cross Reacting With Endogenous GLP-1 (Yes/no)
Yes (positive for antibody)
0 Participants
1 Participants
Occurence of Anti-semaglutide Antibodies Cross Reacting With Endogenous GLP-1 (Yes/no)
No (negative for antibody)
262 Participants
263 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 35

Population: Safety analysis set comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" = participants with available data.

This outcome measure is only applicable for the semaglutide arms. Development of cross reacting antibodies with in-vitro neutralising effect to endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) was evaluated in participants. The number of participants who were positive/ negative for anti-semaglutide antibodies with in vitro neutralising effect to endogenous GLP-1 are presented. Evaluation was based on in-trial observation period, which is the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature treatment discontinuation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=262 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=264 Participants
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Occurence of Cross Reacting Antibodies With in Vitro Neutralising Effect to Endogenous GLP-1 (Yes/no)
Yes (positive for antibody)
0 Participants
0 Participants
Occurence of Cross Reacting Antibodies With in Vitro Neutralising Effect to Endogenous GLP-1 (Yes/no)
No (negative for antibody)
262 Participants
264 Participants

Adverse Events

Semaglutide 0.5 mg

Serious events: 18 serious events
Other events: 135 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Semaglutide 1.0 mg

Serious events: 19 serious events
Other events: 139 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Sitagliptin

Serious events: 12 serious events
Other events: 89 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=287 participants at risk
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 participants at risk
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=290 participants at risk
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Anal abscess
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Cardiac disorders
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biliary colic
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Cervical dysplasia
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis chronic
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Chronic hepatitis B
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
General disorders
Death
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Eye disorders
Diabetic retinopathy
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Eye disorders
Diplopia
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal ulcer
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
General disorders
Facial pain
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Nervous system disorders
Facial paralysis
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.70%
2/287 • Number of events 2 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Haemangioma
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalisation
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Endocrine disorders
Hyperaldosteronism
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint injury
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Lung abscess
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanoma
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Mixed deafness
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Surgical and medical procedures
Neurosurgery
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oedematous pancreatitis
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia bacterial
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.69%
2/290 • Number of events 2 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Soft tissue injury
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal fracture
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
General disorders
Sudden death
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Vascular disorders
Venous aneurysm
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo positional
0.35%
1/287 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
0.00%
0/287 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.00%
0/290 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Semaglutide 0.5 mg
n=287 participants at risk
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
n=290 participants at risk
Participants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Sitagliptin
n=290 participants at risk
Participants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
2.8%
8/287 • Number of events 9 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
5.2%
15/290 • Number of events 16 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
0.34%
1/290 • Number of events 1 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
7.3%
21/287 • Number of events 21 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
7.9%
23/290 • Number of events 23 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
1.4%
4/290 • Number of events 4 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Eye disorders
Diabetic retinopathy
6.3%
18/287 • Number of events 18 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
4.8%
14/290 • Number of events 14 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
3.4%
10/290 • Number of events 10 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
20.2%
58/287 • Number of events 94 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
16.9%
49/290 • Number of events 99 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
6.9%
20/290 • Number of events 24 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Investigations
Lipase increased
7.7%
22/287 • Number of events 30 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
4.5%
13/290 • Number of events 15 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
7.6%
22/290 • Number of events 30 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
5.9%
17/287 • Number of events 21 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
3.1%
9/290 • Number of events 12 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
3.8%
11/290 • Number of events 15 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
7.7%
22/287 • Number of events 24 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
13.4%
39/290 • Number of events 54 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
1.7%
5/290 • Number of events 7 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
9.8%
28/287 • Number of events 37 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
13.1%
38/290 • Number of events 45 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
14.8%
43/290 • Number of events 64 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
4.9%
14/287 • Number of events 16 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
6.6%
19/290 • Number of events 22 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.
1.0%
3/290 • Number of events 5 • From the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to end of treatment (week 30) + post treatment follow-up of 5 weeks.
Evaluation of safety was based on safety analysis set (SAS) comprised of all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment observation period (the period when participants were exposed to trial product) were considered treatment-emergent.

Additional Information

Clinical Reporting Anchor and Disclosure (1452)

Novo Nordisk A/S

Phone: (+1) 866-867-7178

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee At the end of the trial, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER