Evaluation of Tendon-to-Bone Healing Potential in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Through Biological Stimulation

NCT ID: NCT03060928

Last Updated: 2017-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Evaluation of clinical and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair with standard treatment compared to patients receiving biological stimulation with micro-perforations or with the combination of micro-perforations and use of Artelon® Tissue Reinforcement, a synthetic device based on degradable polyurethaneurea.

The investigators believe that this kind of tendon-to-bone healing stimulation with the two proposed methods can increase the repair quality by significantly decreasing the lesion recurrence rate (currently described for 15% of patients) and can improve various parameters such as pain, range of motion and strength, thereby hastening the return to daily activities and psycho-physical well-being.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rotator Cuff Tear

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Rotator Cuff Tear Artelon®

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Double Blind

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair with standard treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Experimental 1

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair with standard treatment + biological stimulation with micro-perforations

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Micro-perforations

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Biological stimulation with micro-perforations

Experimental 2

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair with standard treatment + biological stimulation with the combination of micro-perforations and use of Artelon® Tissue Reinforcement

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Micro-perforations

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Biological stimulation with micro-perforations

Artelon®

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Biological stimulation with Artelon® Tissue Reinforcement

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Micro-perforations

Biological stimulation with micro-perforations

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Artelon®

Biological stimulation with Artelon® Tissue Reinforcement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* a medium rotator cuff tear (from 1 to 3 cm, according to Cofield Classification) with an indication for arthroscopic repair
* signed informed consensus

Exclusion Criteria

* previous fractures
* diabetes
* subscapularis tears
* tears \< 1cm or \> 3 cm
* reduced passive range of motion
* infections
* known mental or neurological disorders unwilling or unable to follow the post-surgery instructions
* conditions that contraindicate arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery
* patients without complete osteogenesis
* pregnant or breastfeeding women
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Roberto Leo

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Roberto Leo

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Roberto Leo

Role: primary

Valentina Fogliata

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

753_2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id