Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Assess the Efficacy of a Heterologous Prime/Boost Vaccine Regimen of Ad26.Mos4.HIV and Aluminum Phosphate-Adjuvanted Clade C gp140 in Preventing Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) -1 Infection in Women in Sub-Saharan Africa (NCT NCT03060629)
NCT ID: NCT03060629
Last Updated: 2023-04-18
Results Overview
Number of participants with HIV-1 infection diagnosed between Month 7 to Month 24 post enrollment was reported. The data represents the cumulative incidence of HIV-1 infections.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
2636 participants
Month 7 up to Month 24
2023-04-18
Participant Flow
For Participant Flow below, data were summarized based on assigned treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1313
|
1323
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
78
|
88
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1235
|
1235
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
4
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
50
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
Unable to Adhere to Visit Schedule
|
21
|
23
|
|
Overall Study
Participant Relocate
|
15
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
Unable to Contact Participant
|
34
|
23
|
|
Overall Study
Investigator Decision
|
7
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Study Terminated by Sponsor
|
1100
|
1123
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
4
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Assess the Efficacy of a Heterologous Prime/Boost Vaccine Regimen of Ad26.Mos4.HIV and Aluminum Phosphate-Adjuvanted Clade C gp140 in Preventing Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) -1 Infection in Women in Sub-Saharan Africa
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1313 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1323 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Total
n=2636 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
22 years
n=5 Participants
|
23 years
n=7 Participants
|
23 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1313 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1323 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2636 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
1313 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1323 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2636 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
1302 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1317 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2619 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Colored/Mixed
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Indian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
MALAWI
|
78 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
157 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
MOZAMBIQUE
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
SOUTH AFRICA
|
882 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
892 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1774 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
ZAMBIA
|
164 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
165 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
329 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
ZIMBABWE
|
166 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
165 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
331 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 7 up to Month 24Population: Per protocol (PP) population set included participants from the full analysis set (FAS; all randomized participants who received at least one study vaccine administration) who were HIV-1 uninfected 4 weeks after the third vaccination visit, who received all planned vaccinations at the first 3 vaccination visits within the respective visit windows and had no other major protocol deviations that were judged to possibly impact the efficacy of the vaccine.
Number of participants with HIV-1 infection diagnosed between Month 7 to Month 24 post enrollment was reported. The data represents the cumulative incidence of HIV-1 infections.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1080 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1108 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Human Immuno Deficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Infection Diagnosed Between Month 7 to Month 24 Post Enrollment
|
54 Participants
|
65 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 7 days after first vaccination on Day 0 (Day 7)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. The safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received after the first vaccination. Hence, one participant from Group 2 was analyzed in Group 1 for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with local reactogenicity signs and symptoms after first vaccination were reported. Local reactogenicity events (solicited local adverse events) were defined as events at the injection site. Local reactogenicity signs and symptoms included pain and/or tenderness proximal to the injection site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1316 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1320 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms After First Vaccination
|
34.2 Percentage of participants
|
9.4 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 7 days after second vaccination on Day 84 (Day 91)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with local reactogenicity signs and symptoms after second vaccination was reported. Local reactogenicity events (solicited local adverse events) were defined as events at the injection site. Local reactogenicity signs and symptoms included pain and/or tenderness proximal to the injection site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1190 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1215 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms After Second Vaccination
|
20.0 Percentage of participants
|
8.1 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 7 days after third vaccination on Day 168 (Up to Day 175)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with local reactogenicity signs and symptoms after third vaccination was reported. Local reactogenicity events (solicited local adverse events) were defined as events at the injection site. Local reactogenicity signs and symptoms included pain and/or tenderness proximal to the injection site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1160 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1188 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms After Third Vaccination
|
25.2 Percentage of participants
|
8.9 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 7 days after fourth vaccination on Day 364 (Up to Day 371)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with local reactogenicity signs and symptoms after fourth vaccination was reported. Local reactogenicity events (solicited local adverse events) were defined as events at the injection site. Local reactogenicity signs and symptoms included pain and/or tenderness proximal to the injection site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1099 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1111 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Local Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms After Fourth Vaccination
|
25.7 Percentage of participants
|
8.6 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 7 days after first vaccination on Day 0 (Day 7)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. The safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received after the first vaccination. Hence, one participant from Group 2 was analyzed in Group 1 for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with systematic reactogenicity signs and symptoms after first vaccination was reported. Systemic reactogenicity events (solicited systemic adverse events) defined as events occurred in a predefined post-vaccination period for which the subject was specifically questioned. Systemic reactogenicity signs and symptoms included increased body temperature, malaise and/or fatigue, myalgia, headache, chills, arthralgia, nausea, and vomiting.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1316 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1320 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Systematic Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms After First Vaccination
|
52.9 Percentage of participants
|
40.9 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 7 days after second vaccination on Day 84 (Day 91)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with systematic reactogenicity signs and symptoms after second vaccination was reported. Systemic reactogenicity events (solicited systemic adverse events) defined as events occurred in a predefined post-vaccination period for which the subject was specifically questioned. Systemic reactogenicity signs and symptoms included increased body temperature, malaise and/or fatigue, myalgia, headache, chills, arthralgia, nausea, and vomiting.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1190 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1215 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Systematic Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms After Second Vaccination
|
33.2 Percentage of participants
|
28.6 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 7 days after third vaccination on Day 168 (Up to Day 175)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with systematic reactogenicity signs and symptoms after third vaccination was reported. Systemic reactogenicity events (solicited systemic adverse events) defined as events occurred in a predefined post-vaccination period for which the subject was specifically questioned. Systemic reactogenicity signs and symptoms included increased body temperature, malaise and/or fatigue, myalgia, headache, chills, arthralgia, nausea, and vomiting.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1160 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1188 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Systematic Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms After Third Vaccination
|
31.5 Percentage of participants
|
26.8 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 7 days after fourth vaccination on Day 364 (Up to Day 371)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with systematic reactogenicity signs and symptoms after fourth vaccination was reported. Systemic reactogenicity events (solicited systemic adverse events) defined as events occurred in a predefined post-vaccination period for which the subject was specifically questioned. Systemic reactogenicity signs and symptoms included increased body temperature, malaise and/or fatigue, myalgia, headache, chills, arthralgia, nausea, and vomiting.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1099 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1111 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Systematic Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms After Fourth Vaccination
|
29.4 Percentage of participants
|
23.6 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 days after first vaccination on Day 0 (Up to Day 30)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. The safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received after the first vaccination. Hence, one participant from Group 2 was analyzed in Group 1 for this outcome measure.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a study product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. The most frequent unsolicited AEs were upper respiratory tract infection, back pain, cough, and hypertension.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1316 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1320 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs) for 30 Days After First Vaccination
|
16.6 Percentage of participants
|
14.8 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 days after second vaccination on Day 84 (Up to Day 114)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a study product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. The most frequent unsolicited AEs were upper respiratory tract infection, back pain, cough, and hypertension.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1190 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1215 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs for 30 Days After Second Vaccination
|
17.1 Percentage of participants
|
15.1 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 days after third vaccination on Day 168 (Up to Day 198)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a study product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. The most frequent unsolicited AEs were upper respiratory tract infection, back pain, cough, and hypertension.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1160 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1188 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs for 30 Days After Third Vaccination
|
39.8 Percentage of participants
|
40.3 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 days after fourth vaccination on Day 364 (Up to Day 394)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a study product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. The most frequent unsolicited AEs were upper respiratory tract infection, back pain, cough, and hypertension.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1099 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1111 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited AEs for 30 Days After Fourth Vaccination
|
63.5 Percentage of participants
|
62.5 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Month 36 (up to end of the study)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. The safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a study product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1317 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1319 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
|
3.7 Percentage of participants
|
2.8 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Month 36 (up to end of the study)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. The safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received.
Percentage of participants with AESIs was reported. Immune-mediated diseases were considered as AESIs in this study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1317 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1319 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
|
0.2 Percentage of participants
|
0.2 Percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Month 36 (up to end of the study)Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. The safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received.
Percentage of participants with AEs leading to early participant withdrawal or early discontinuation of study product were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a study product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1317 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1319 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With AEs Leading to Early Participant Withdrawal or Early Discontinuation of Study Product
|
0.2 Percentage of participants
|
0.2 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 24Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) analysis set included participants in the FAS who were HIV-1 uninfected on the date of first vaccination.
Number of participants with HIV-1 infection diagnosed from enrollment (baseline) through month 24 post enrollment was reported. The data represents the cumulative incidence of HIV-1 infections.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1311 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1319 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HIV-1 Infection Diagnosed From Enrollment (Baseline) Through Month 24 Post Enrollment
|
91 Participants
|
102 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 36 (End of study)Population: MITT analysis set included participants in the FAS who were HIV-1 uninfected on the date of first vaccination.
Number of participants with HIV-1 infection diagnosed from enrollment (baseline) through Month 36 post enrollment was reported. The data represents the cumulative incidence of HIV-1 infections.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1311 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1319 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HIV-1 Infection Diagnosed From Enrollment (Baseline) Through Month 36 (End of Study) Post Enrollment
|
115 Participants
|
127 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 13 up to Month 24Population: Full immunization set (FIS) included participants in the FAS who were HIV-1 uninfected 4 week after the fourth vaccination visit and who received all planned vaccinations within the respective visit windows.
Number of participants with HIV-1 infection diagnosed from Month 13 through Month 24 post enrollment was reported. The data represents the cumulative incidence of HIV-1 infections.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=981 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=995 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HIV-1 Infection Diagnosed From Month 13 Through Month 24 Post Enrollment
|
32 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 13 up to Month 36 (End of study)Population: FIS included participants in the FAS who were HIV-1 uninfected 4 week after the fourth vaccination visit and who received all planned vaccinations within the respective visit windows.
Number of participants with HIV-1 infection diagnosed from Month 13 through Month 36 (end of study) post enrollment was reported. The data represents the cumulative incidence of HIV-1 infections.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=981 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=995 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With HIV-1 Infection Diagnosed From Month 13 Through Month 36 (End of Study) Post Enrollment
|
53 Participants
|
58 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 0, 7, 13 and 24Population: FIS included participants in the FAS who were HIV-1 uninfected 4 weeks after the fourth vaccination visit and who received all planned vaccinations within the respective visit windows. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
A weighted geometric mean of the binding antibody responses to HIV envelope (ENV) gp140 Clade C 97ZA protein analyzed by ELISA was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=50 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Geometric Mean of Binding Antibody Responses to HIV Envelop (ENV) Clade (gp140) C (ZA) Analyzed by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Month 0
|
53 ELISA Units per milliliter (EU/mL)
Interval 45.0 to 63.0
|
43 ELISA Units per milliliter (EU/mL)
Interval 37.0 to 49.0
|
|
Geometric Mean of Binding Antibody Responses to HIV Envelop (ENV) Clade (gp140) C (ZA) Analyzed by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Month 7
|
38834 ELISA Units per milliliter (EU/mL)
Interval 26484.0 to 56942.0
|
43 ELISA Units per milliliter (EU/mL)
Interval 37.0 to 49.0
|
|
Geometric Mean of Binding Antibody Responses to HIV Envelop (ENV) Clade (gp140) C (ZA) Analyzed by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Month 13
|
66147 ELISA Units per milliliter (EU/mL)
Interval 50523.0 to 86602.0
|
62 ELISA Units per milliliter (EU/mL)
Interval 36.0 to 109.0
|
|
Geometric Mean of Binding Antibody Responses to HIV Envelop (ENV) Clade (gp140) C (ZA) Analyzed by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Month 24
|
5920 ELISA Units per milliliter (EU/mL)
Interval 4559.0 to 7688.0
|
49 ELISA Units per milliliter (EU/mL)
Interval 33.0 to 72.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 0, 7, 13 and 24Population: FIS included participants who were HIV-1 uninfected 4 week after the fourth vaccination visit and who received all planned vaccinations within the respective visit windows. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants who were analyzed at specified timepoints.
Geometric mean of IFN-gamma T-cells responses analyzed by ELISpot were reported. A weighted geometric mean of the number of spot-forming cells (SFC) per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) producing Interferon-gamma upon stimulation with potential T-cell epitope (PTE) ENV peptide pools analyzed by ELISpot was reported. Reported responses are the sum of the number of SFCs/10\^6 PBMCS for PTE Env1, Env2 and Env3 sub-pools.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=50 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Geometric Mean of Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) T-Cells Responses Analyzed by Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay (ELISpot)
Month 0
|
33.5 SFC/million PBMCs
Interval 29.7 to 33.7
|
30.0 SFC/million PBMCs
Interval 30.0 to 30.0
|
|
Geometric Mean of Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) T-Cells Responses Analyzed by Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay (ELISpot)
Month 7
|
241.2 SFC/million PBMCs
Interval 168.0 to 346.2
|
33.9 SFC/million PBMCs
Interval 26.7 to 43.0
|
|
Geometric Mean of Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) T-Cells Responses Analyzed by Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay (ELISpot)
Month 13
|
287.1 SFC/million PBMCs
Interval 201.3 to 409.5
|
33.2 SFC/million PBMCs
Interval 28.8 to 38.2
|
|
Geometric Mean of Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) T-Cells Responses Analyzed by Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay (ELISpot)
Month 24
|
172.7 SFC/million PBMCs
Interval 117.0 to 254.8
|
30.8 SFC/million PBMCs
Interval 29.2 to 32.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 7 up to Month 24Population: PP population set included participants from the FAS; all randomized participants who received at least one study vaccine administration) who were HIV-1 uninfected 4 weeks after the third vaccination visit, who received all planned vaccinations at the first 3 vaccination visits within the respective visit windows and had no other major protocol deviations that were judged to possibly impact the efficacy of the vaccine.
Number of participants with viral sequences were reported. Viral sequencing was conducted on the earliest available plasma specimens with positive HIV-1 ribose nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction (RNA PCR) tests from study participants who were diagnosed with HIV-1 infection.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1080 Participants
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1108 Participants
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Viral Sequences
|
51 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
Group 2: Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1317 participants at risk
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1319 participants at risk
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal mass
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Congenital anomaly in offspring
|
0.15%
2/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.15%
2/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Irritable bowel syndrome
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.15%
2/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gonococcal pelvic inflammatory disease
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Malaria
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pelvic inflammatory disease
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.15%
2/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary tuberculosis
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Salmonella sepsis
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.15%
2/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound sepsis
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental exposure to product
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.15%
2/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Chemical poisoning
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Concussion
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Crush injury
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Eye injury
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.15%
2/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fibula fracture
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fractured sacrum
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Gun shot wound
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Jaw fracture
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Multiple injuries
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Soft tissue injury
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stab wound
|
0.15%
2/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Alcohol intolerance
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.23%
3/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 1 diabetes mellitus
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral cyst
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
0.15%
2/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Psychogenic seizure
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tension headache
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion incomplete
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
|
0.30%
4/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.15%
2/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Anembryonic gestation
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Ectopic pregnancy
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
False labour
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Foetal death
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Maternal death during childbirth
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Pre-eclampsia
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Preterm premature rupture of membranes
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Alcoholic psychosis
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Intentional self-injury
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.15%
2/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Major depression
|
0.08%
1/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.15%
2/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.08%
1/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.15%
2/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
0.00%
0/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Group 1: Ad26.Mos.HIV Vaccine
n=1317 participants at risk
Participants received adenovirus serotype 26-Mosaic-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (Ad26.Mos4.HIV) 5\*10\^10 virus particles (vp) per 0.5 milliliter (mL) via Intramuscular (IM) injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Clade C glycoprotein (gp) 140 (250 \[micrograms\] mcg) mixed with aluminum phosphate adjuvant 425 mcg per 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
Group 2: Placebo
n=1319 participants at risk
Participants received Placebo matching to Ad26.Mos4.HIV as 0.5 mL via IM injection at Months 0, 3, 6, and 12 and Placebo matching to Clade C gp140/aluminum phosphate adjuvant as 0.5 mL IM injection at Months 6 and 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Genitourinary chlamydia infection
|
40.1%
528/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
40.0%
527/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Genitourinary tract gonococcal infection
|
20.4%
269/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
21.8%
288/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Syphilis
|
5.2%
69/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
6.0%
79/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
6.0%
79/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
5.8%
77/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vulvovaginitis trichomonal
|
18.6%
245/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
18.1%
239/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal discharge
|
7.7%
102/1317 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
8.6%
113/1319 • Up to Month 36
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccine administration. Here, N (total number of participants at risk) signifies participants who were assessed for AEs as safety analyses were performed based on the actual treatment that the participants received. Therefore, number of participants affected for all-cause mortality are different in participant flow section and adverse event section.
|
Additional Information
CLINICAL FRANCHISE LEADER
Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER