Trial Outcomes & Findings for To Evaluate Patient Preference of Movantik and Polyethylene Glycol 3350 for Opioid Induced Constipation (NCT NCT03060512)
NCT ID: NCT03060512
Last Updated: 2018-07-13
Results Overview
The Patient Preference Assessment was conducted at Visit 5 using a 7-point scale in subjects with chronic non-cancer pain. The 3 categories were formed by collapsing the 7-point rating scale to: 1. Prefer Movantik (including Strong preference for Movantik, Moderate preference for Movantik, Slight preference for Movantik), 2. No preference, and 3. Prefer PEG 3350 (including Strong preference for PEG 3350, Moderate preference for PEG 3350, and Slight preference for PEG 3350). The number of subjects in each category is presented for the total number of subjects in the Per-Protocol (PP) Set.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
276 participants
From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).
2018-07-13
Participant Flow
Study was performed in 53 sites in the United States. First subject first visit: 2 March 2017. Last subject completed: 23 August 2017. The entire planned duration of study participation was up to 7 weeks.
350 subjects were screened and 74 subjects failed to meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria. 276 subjects were randomised to a treatment sequence.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Movantik, Then PEG 3350
Subjects received Movantik 25 milligrams (mg) once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Polyethylene Glycol 3350 (PEG 3350) 17 grams (g) of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
Subjects received PEG 3350 17 g of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Movantik 25 mg once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
137
|
139
|
|
Overall Study
Treated With Movantik
|
136
|
135
|
|
Overall Study
Treated With PEG 3350
|
130
|
138
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
130
|
130
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Movantik, Then PEG 3350
Subjects received Movantik 25 milligrams (mg) once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Polyethylene Glycol 3350 (PEG 3350) 17 grams (g) of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
Subjects received PEG 3350 17 g of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Movantik 25 mg once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Non-compliance with study medication
|
1
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
To Evaluate Patient Preference of Movantik and Polyethylene Glycol 3350 for Opioid Induced Constipation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Movantik, Then PEG 3350
n=132 Participants
Subjects received Movantik 25 mg once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received PEG 3350 17 g of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
n=138 Participants
Subjects received PEG 3350 17 g of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Movantik 25 mg once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
Total
n=270 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.38 • n=5 Participants
|
56.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.65 • n=7 Participants
|
56.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.52 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
87 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
176 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
115 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
117 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
232 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
113 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
214 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).Population: The PP Set consisted of the subset of the FAS subjects who completed the Patient Preference Assessment at Visit 5 (end of study), and who completed the treatment sequence in the order as specified by the randomised treatment sequence, and were not excluded due to an important protocol deviation.
The Patient Preference Assessment was conducted at Visit 5 using a 7-point scale in subjects with chronic non-cancer pain. The 3 categories were formed by collapsing the 7-point rating scale to: 1. Prefer Movantik (including Strong preference for Movantik, Moderate preference for Movantik, Slight preference for Movantik), 2. No preference, and 3. Prefer PEG 3350 (including Strong preference for PEG 3350, Moderate preference for PEG 3350, and Slight preference for PEG 3350). The number of subjects in each category is presented for the total number of subjects in the Per-Protocol (PP) Set.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total (PP Set)
n=246 Participants
All subjects in the PP Set, including those randomised to both the Movantik/PEG 3350 treatment sequence and the PEG 3350/Movantik treatment sequence.
|
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
Subjects received PEG 3350 17 g of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Movantik 25 mg once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for Opioid-induced Constipation (OIC) Treatment
Prefer Movantik
|
124 Participants
|
—
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for Opioid-induced Constipation (OIC) Treatment
Prefer PEG 3350
|
118 Participants
|
—
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for Opioid-induced Constipation (OIC) Treatment
No preference
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).Population: The PP Set consisted of the subset of the FAS subjects who completed the Patient Preference Assessment at Visit 5 (end of study), and who completed the treatment sequence in the order as specified by the randomised treatment sequence, and were not excluded due to an important important protocol deviation.
The Patient Preference Assessment was conducted at Visit 5 using a 7-point scale in subjects with chronic non-cancer pain. The following categories were the possible responses: Strong preference for Movantik, Moderate preference for Movantik, Slight preference for Movantik, No preference, Slight preference for PEG 3350, Moderate preference for PEG 3350 and Strong preference for PEG 3350. Prefer Movantik included subjects in the categories Strong preference for Movantik, Moderate preference for Movantik and Slight preference for Movantik. Prefer PEG 3350 included subjects in the categories Strong preference for PEG 3350, Moderate preference for PEG 3350 and Slight preference for PEG 3350. Preference for Period 1 treatment and Preference for Period 2 treatment included subjects who preferred the first and second treatments respectively taken within a given treatment sequence. The number of subjects in each category is presented per treatment sequence for subjects in the PP Set.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total (PP Set)
n=125 Participants
All subjects in the PP Set, including those randomised to both the Movantik/PEG 3350 treatment sequence and the PEG 3350/Movantik treatment sequence.
|
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
n=121 Participants
Subjects received PEG 3350 17 g of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Movantik 25 mg once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence
Strong preference for Movantik
|
37 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence
Moderate preference for Movantik
|
14 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence
Slight preference for Movantik
|
11 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence
No preference
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence
Slight preference for PEG 3350
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence
Moderate preference for PEG 3350
|
15 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence
Strong preference for PEG 3350
|
37 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence
Prefer Movantik
|
62 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence
Prefer PEG 3350
|
61 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence
Preference for Period 1 treatment
|
62 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence
Preference for Period 2 treatment
|
61 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).Population: The PP Set consisted of the subset of the FAS subjects who completed the Patient Preference Assessment at Visit 5 (end of study), and who completed the treatment sequence in the order as specified by the randomised treatment sequence, and were not excluded due to an important protocol deviation.
In order to assess the reason for patient preference of Movantik or PEG 3350, subjects reported on the influence of 5 medication characteristics using a 4-point rating scale. The following were the scale options: efficacy ('worked better to relieve my OIC'), tolerability ('tolerated better'), convenience ('was more convenient'), works quickly ('worked quickly') and works predictably ('worked predictably'). For each characteristic, influence scores were rated as: 0 = No influence, 1 = Mildly influenced, 2 = Moderately influenced or 3 = Strongly influenced. The scale range for each characteristic was from 0 to 3, and the median score for each characteristic is presented for the overall PP Set according to which treatment was preferred. The assessment was only completed by subjects who indicated an overall preference.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total (PP Set)
n=124 Participants
All subjects in the PP Set, including those randomised to both the Movantik/PEG 3350 treatment sequence and the PEG 3350/Movantik treatment sequence.
|
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
n=118 Participants
Subjects received PEG 3350 17 g of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Movantik 25 mg once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Median Scores That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Worked better to relieve my OIC
|
2.0 Score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
2.0 Score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Median Scores That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Tolerated better
|
3.0 Score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
3.0 Score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Median Scores That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Was more convenient
|
3.0 Score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
1.0 Score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Median Scores That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Worked quickly
|
2.0 Score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
2.0 Score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Median Scores That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Worked predictably
|
2.0 Score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
2.0 Score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).Population: The PP Set consisted of the subset of the FAS subjects who completed the Patient Preference Assessment at Visit 5 (end of study), and who completed the treatment sequence in the order as specified by the randomised treatment sequence, and were not excluded due to an important protocol deviation.
In order to assess the reason for patient preference of Movantik or PEG 3350, subjects reported on the influence of 5 medication characteristics using a 4-point rating scale. The following were the scale options: efficacy ('worked better to relieve my OIC'), tolerability ('tolerated better'), convenience ('was more convenient'), works quickly ('worked quickly') and works predictably ('worked predictably'). For each characteristic, influence scores were rated as: 0 = No influence, 1 = Mildly influenced, 2 = Moderately influenced or 3 = Strongly influenced. The scale range for each characteristic was from 0 to 3, and the number of subjects in each characteristic category is presented for the overall PP Set according to which treatment was preferred. The assessment was only completed by subjects who indicated an overall preference.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total (PP Set)
n=124 Participants
All subjects in the PP Set, including those randomised to both the Movantik/PEG 3350 treatment sequence and the PEG 3350/Movantik treatment sequence.
|
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
n=118 Participants
Subjects received PEG 3350 17 g of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Movantik 25 mg once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Efficacy: No Influence
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Efficacy: Mildly Influenced
|
18 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Efficacy: Moderately Influenced
|
40 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Efficacy: Strongly Influenced
|
61 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Tolerability: No Influence
|
14 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Tolerability: Mildly Influenced
|
16 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Tolerability: Moderately Influenced
|
30 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Tolerability: Strongly Influenced
|
63 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Convenience: No Influence
|
5 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Convenience: Mildly Influenced
|
6 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Convenience: Moderately Influenced
|
26 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Convenience: Strongly Influenced
|
86 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Works Quickly: No Influence
|
15 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Works Quickly: Mildly Influenced
|
25 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Works Quickly: Moderately Influenced
|
35 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Works Quickly: Strongly Influenced
|
48 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Works Predictably: No Influence
|
11 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Works Predictably: Mildly Influenced
|
21 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Works Predictably: Moderately Influenced
|
36 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
|
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350
Works Predictably: Strongly Influenced
|
55 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Visit 3 (Day 15) of Treatment Period 1 and Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2.Population: The FAS consisted of all subjects who satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria, received study medication, and attended at least one scheduled visit. Data is presented for subjects with non-missing PGIC data at the end of at least one of the treatment periods.
PGIC was measured on a 7-point scale at the end of each two-week treatment period to assess the subject's impression of the effectiveness of the treatment received for OIC. The scoring was as follows: 1 = No change (or condition has gotten worse); 2 = Almost the same, hardly any change at all; 3 = A little better, but no noticeable change; 4 = Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference; 5 = Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; 6 = Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference; and 7 = A great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference. The score range is from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating the least improvement and 7 indicating the greatest improvement in OIC symptoms. Mean score results are presented for each treatment for Visits 3 and 5.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total (PP Set)
n=267 Participants
All subjects in the PP Set, including those randomised to both the Movantik/PEG 3350 treatment sequence and the PEG 3350/Movantik treatment sequence.
|
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
n=267 Participants
Subjects received PEG 3350 17 g of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Movantik 25 mg once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms
|
4.5 Score
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
4.5 Score
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Visit 3 (Day 15) of Treatment Period 1 and Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2.Population: The FAS consisted of all subjects who satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria, received study medication, and attended at least one scheduled visit. Data is presented for subjects with non-missing PGIC data at the end of at least one of the treatment periods.
PGIC was measured on a 7-point scale at the end of each two-week treatment period to assess the subject's impression of the effectiveness of the treatment received for OIC. The subjects selected one of the following PGIC items as their response: 1 = No change (or condition has gotten worse); 2 = Almost the same, hardly any change at all; 3 = A little better, but no noticeable change; 4 = Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real differences; 5 = Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; 6 = Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference; and 7 = A great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference. The score range is from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating the least improvement and 7 indicating the greatest improvement in OIC symptoms. The number of subjects responding to each PGIC item at Visits 3 and/or 5 is presented for each treatment overall.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total (PP Set)
n=267 Participants
All subjects in the PP Set, including those randomised to both the Movantik/PEG 3350 treatment sequence and the PEG 3350/Movantik treatment sequence.
|
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
n=267 Participants
Subjects received PEG 3350 17 g of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Movantik 25 mg once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
PGIC Questionnaire Individual Item Results to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms
PGIC Item 1
|
23 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
PGIC Questionnaire Individual Item Results to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms
PGIC Item 2
|
30 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
PGIC Questionnaire Individual Item Results to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms
PGIC Item 3
|
21 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
PGIC Questionnaire Individual Item Results to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms
PGIC Item 4
|
38 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
|
PGIC Questionnaire Individual Item Results to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms
PGIC Item 5
|
57 Participants
|
66 Participants
|
|
PGIC Questionnaire Individual Item Results to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms
PGIC Item 6
|
61 Participants
|
65 Participants
|
|
PGIC Questionnaire Individual Item Results to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms
PGIC Item 7
|
32 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline (Visit 2, Day 1) to Visit 3 (Day 15) and Visit 5 (Day 36).Population: The FAS consisted of all subjects who satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria, received study medication, and attended at least one scheduled visit. Data is presented for subjects with non-missing BFI data at the end of at least one of the two week treatment periods.
The BFI is a 3-item questionnaire administered by a study clinician to measure constipation from the subject's perspective (ease of defecation, feeling of complete evacuation, and personal judgment of constipation). For each item the subject was asked to rate their response on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the best response (easy/no diffculty) and 100 the worst response (severe difficulty). The total BFI score was calculated as the mean of the 3 item scores. The mean change from baseline in BFI scores at Visits 3 and/or 5 are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Total (PP Set)
n=267 Participants
All subjects in the PP Set, including those randomised to both the Movantik/PEG 3350 treatment sequence and the PEG 3350/Movantik treatment sequence.
|
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
n=267 Participants
Subjects received PEG 3350 17 g of powder dissolved in 4 to 8 ounces of fluid to be taken once daily for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 1). After a washout period of 1 week, subjects then received Movantik 25 mg once daily on an empty stomach at least 1 hour prior to the first meal of the day or 2 hours after the meal for 2 weeks (Treatment Period 2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline at Visit 3/5 in Bowel Function Index (BFI) Questionnaire Scores to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms
|
-25.0 Score
Standard Deviation 31.64
|
-26.0 Score
Standard Deviation 28.82
|
Adverse Events
Movantik
PEG 3350
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Movantik
n=271 participants at risk
The Movantik treatment-emergent safety set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of Movantik.
|
PEG 3350
n=268 participants at risk
The PEG 3350 treatment-emergent safety set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of PEG 3350.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Salmonellosis
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Movantik
n=271 participants at risk
The Movantik treatment-emergent safety set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of Movantik.
|
PEG 3350
n=268 participants at risk
The PEG 3350 treatment-emergent safety set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of PEG 3350.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymph node pain
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Diastolic dysfunction
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
1.5%
4/268 • Number of events 4 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
5.5%
15/271 • Number of events 17 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
2.2%
6/268 • Number of events 6 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
3.7%
10/271 • Number of events 10 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
1.5%
4/268 • Number of events 4 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal tenderness
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abnormal faeces
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Defaecation urgency
|
0.74%
2/271 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
3.7%
10/271 • Number of events 10 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
1.5%
4/268 • Number of events 4 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.74%
2/271 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Eructation
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
3.3%
9/271 • Number of events 9 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
3.4%
9/268 • Number of events 10 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Frequent bowel movements
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
1.1%
3/271 • Number of events 3 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
1.9%
5/268 • Number of events 5 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhage
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Drug withdrawal syndrome
|
0.74%
2/271 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.74%
2/271 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.74%
2/271 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament rupture
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Investigations
Blood lactic acid increased
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Fluid retention
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Iron deficiency
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.75%
2/268 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fibromyalgia
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.74%
2/271 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.2%
6/271 • Number of events 6 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuralgia
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Grief reaction
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Nervousness
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Panic attack
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.74%
2/271 • Number of events 2 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal dryness
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory tract congestion
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestion
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus pain
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sneezing
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cold sweat
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/271 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.37%
1/268 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.37%
1/271 • Number of events 1 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
0.00%
0/268 • Approximately 5 weeks.
The treatment-emergent safety analysis set included all subjects exposed to at least one dose of either study medication and categorised subjects according to the actual treatment received.
|
Additional Information
Catherine J. Datto, MD, MS, Movantik Medical Head, USMA
AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical LP
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Institution and PIs shall be entitled to publish or make presentations related to the Study within 2 years of completion of the Study with Sponsor's prior written consent. PIs shall provide the Sponsor with copies of any materials at least thirty (30) days in advance of publication, submission or presentation. All such publications or presentations shall be consistent with applicable standards, guidelines and laws, not be false or misleading, and not be made for any commercial purpose.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER