PECS Block: Plasma Bupivacaine Level

NCT ID: NCT03059498

Last Updated: 2021-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-06

Study Completion Date

2017-11-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine peak plasma bupivacaine concentrations in a similar fashion for PECS I/II blocks. The investigators hypothesis is that the mean peak plasma levels for patients undergoing PECS I/II blocks will be less than the levels reported to cause early neurotoxicity of \[2.2 (0.9) micrograms/ml\]6 in patients receiving intravenous bupivacaine infusions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Regional anesthesia techniques are common modalities used to provide analgesia following both upper and lower extremity surgeries. It is also often used for truncal procedures for the same purpose. A relatively new truncal block, first described in 2012 by Blanco, called the pectoralis nerve block (PECS I and II block) has been used successfully for breast surgery1-3. Despite its description and success in clinical practice, the extent of systemic absorption from this truncal plane block has not been described to date. However, in a study published in the British Journal of Anesthesia, this has been done for another truncal plane block, the transverse abdominus plane (TAP) block where the local anesthetic was noted to peak and had a mean total concentration of ropivacaine occurring at 30 minutes after the block4. During this study, samples were taken at 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes. The investigators anticipate that since this is a similar truncal plane block, absorption will be comparable in terms of timing. However, the concentration of drug absorbed may be different given the proximity to the ribs, intercostal and thoracic vasculature, and a higher concentration of local given the smaller plane for local anesthetic spread. Given that the investigators want to find the peak of the curve and the peak concentration of bupivacaine from the PECS block, the investigators feel will need 5 samples at the times outlined below. This number of samples was chosen to approximate a study published in 2004 where ten subjects received ropivacaine for scalp blocks and serum ropivacaine levels were measured at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes5. The investigators feel that the 120 minute measurement is well beyond the peak plasma level of bupivacaine given the findings in the TAP and scalp studies. Therefore,the investigators will collect the following samples at these times after the block is completed: 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 90 minutes. The purpose of this study is to determine peak plasma bupivacaine concentrations in a similar fashion for PECS I/II blocks. The investigators hypothesis is that the mean peak plasma levels for our patients undergoing PECS I/II blocks will be less than the levels reported to cause early neurotoxicity of \[2.2 (0.9) micrograms/ml\]6 in patients receiving intravenous bupivacaine infusions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nerve Blocks

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

unilateral PECS block patients

unilateral PECS I and II block using bupivacaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Unilateral PECS I and II block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A truncal block called the pectoralis nerve block (PECS I and II block). Unilateral. Using Bupivacaine

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine solution 0.25%. At the PECS I site each patient will receive 10 cc of local anesthetic solution, and at the PECS II site an additional 20 cc of local anesthetic solution will be placed.

bilateral PECS block patients

bilateral PECS I and II block using bupivacaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bilateral PECS I and II block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A truncal block called the pectoralis nerve block (PECS I and II block). Bilateral. Using Bupivacaine.

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine solution 0.25%. At the PECS I site each patient will receive 10 cc of local anesthetic solution, and at the PECS II site an additional 20 cc of local anesthetic solution will be placed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Unilateral PECS I and II block

A truncal block called the pectoralis nerve block (PECS I and II block). Unilateral. Using Bupivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bilateral PECS I and II block

A truncal block called the pectoralis nerve block (PECS I and II block). Bilateral. Using Bupivacaine.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bupivacaine

Bupivacaine solution 0.25%. At the PECS I site each patient will receive 10 cc of local anesthetic solution, and at the PECS II site an additional 20 cc of local anesthetic solution will be placed.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients receiving a unilateral PECS I and II block for any surgery being provided by Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with contraindications to regional anesthesia, such as a history of allergy to amide local anesthetics,
* presence of a progressive neurological deficit,
* a pre-existing coagulopathy,
* infection at site of injection.
* or the following conditions:
* patient receiving any other additional local anesthetic from another procedure
* infection over site of block
* patient refusal
* significant renal or liver dysfunction on laboratory analysis
* weight \<60 kg
* pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

J. Douglas Jaffe, DO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00042325

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id