Patient-Reported Outcomes Integrated in the Follow-up of Patients With Hematological Cancer

NCT ID: NCT03056469

Last Updated: 2017-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

225 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study investigates if integration of patient-reported outcomes in the follow-up of patients with newly diagnosed, not curable, chronic hematological cancer changes the number and kind of supportive care interventions. Furthermore, this study investigates if the patients feel that they are more involved in a positive way when patient-reported outcomes are integrated in the follow-up of their cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a multimethod study. It has a quantitative and a qualitative part. The patient-reported outcome questionnaire European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C-30) and the patient-reported outcome and patient-reported experience questionnaire The Outcomes and Experiences Questionnaire (OEQ) are completed by the included patients within one week before a patient-physician consultation at the outpatient clinic at one single department of hematology. Baseline is different for different patient groups; 1) for participants receiving a primary treatment baseline is defined as the first patient-physician consultation after the primary treatment ended, 2) for patients continuously receiving medical treatment baseline is defined as the first patient-physician consultation after starting medical treatment, and 3) for patients followed using a watch and wait strategy baseline is defined as the first patient-physician consultation after deciding the watch and wait strategy. Each patient completes the questionnaires for 2 years. The questionnaires can be completed online or on paper depending on the patients choice. Answers from both questionnaires are eligible to all health care professionals in the outpatient clinic in an internet-based tool. A summary of scores from the EORTC QLQ C-30, and the answers and the score from the OEQ, are written in the medical record.

This study investigates, if use of the patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires are useful in the assessment of the patients needs and health care providers decision making regarding supportive care interventions. It investigates, if completion of PRO questionnaires changes the number and kind of supportive care interventions.

Observations of patient-physician consultations and individual interviews with patients are used to capture the impact of the questionnaires on the consultations and patients evaluation of the use of the questionnaires.

This study also investigates, if patients completion of PRO questionnaires and health care professionals use of the questionnaires in clinical decision making changes the number of contacts between patients and a department of hematology and the number of paraclinical interventions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hematological Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers
In one randomization arm the participants submit patient-reported outcomes, and the care providers have access to the patient-reported outcomes. In another randomization arm the participants submit patient-reported outcomes, but the care providers do not have access to the patient-reported outcomes. In the last randomization arm the participants are randomized to standard follow-up, do not complete PRO questionnaires and are thus controls.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Care providers do have access to PROs

Participants complete patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires. Care providers do have access to the PROs and use them in clinical decision making.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Completion of patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires are completed at home within one week before a patient-physician consultation at the outpatient clinic. The questionnaires are submitted online or on paper depending on the participants choice.

Care providers do not have access to PROs

The participants complete patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires. Care providers do not have access to the PROs.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Completion of patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires are completed at home within one week before a patient-physician consultation at the outpatient clinic. The questionnaires are submitted online or on paper depending on the participants choice.

Control group

Standard follow-up. The participants do not complete PRO questionnaires.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Completion of patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires are completed at home within one week before a patient-physician consultation at the outpatient clinic. The questionnaires are submitted online or on paper depending on the participants choice.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients newly diagnosed with not curable, chronic hematological cancer
* ≥18 years old
* oral and written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* participation in another intervention study
* psychological or physiological conditions that may prevent compliance/adherence to the study
* patients do not wish to be included in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zealand University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hans Hasselbalch, professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Hematology, Zealand University Hospital, Vestermarksvej 9, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Hematology, Zealand University Hospital

Roskilde, Region Sjælland, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nana Brochmann, MD

Role: CONTACT

+4522833458 ext. +4522833458

Hans Hasselbalch, professor

Role: CONTACT

+4526223678 ext. +4526223678

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nana Brochmann, MD

Role: primary

+4522833458 ext. +4522833458

Hans Hasselbalch, professor

Role: backup

+4526223678 ext. +4526223678

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Thestrup Hansen S, Kjerholt M, Friis Christensen S, Brodersen J, Holge-Hazelton B. Nurses' Experiences When Introducing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in an Outpatient Clinic: An Interpretive Description Study. Cancer Nurs. 2021 Mar-Apr 01;44(2):E108-E120. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000808.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32217877 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REG-72-2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Darbepoetin Alfa and Anemia of Cancer
NCT00989092 TERMINATED PHASE2