Trial Outcomes & Findings for IX-01 Effect on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Patient Reported Outcomes and Safety in Men With Premature Ejaculation (PE) (NCT NCT03055806)
NCT ID: NCT03055806
Last Updated: 2019-10-07
Results Overview
Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was recorded by the patient or partner using the stopwatch provided.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
239 participants
Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
2019-10-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
48
|
48
|
71
|
72
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
42
|
41
|
58
|
57
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
7
|
13
|
15
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal of consent to continue drug
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal of consent to continue study
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Partner not willing to try intercourse
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
IX-01 Effect on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Patient Reported Outcomes and Safety in Men With Premature Ejaculation (PE)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
n=48 Participants
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
n=68 Participants
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
n=69 Participants
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
Total
n=231 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.13 • n=5 Participants
|
41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.28 • n=7 Participants
|
40.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.78 • n=5 Participants
|
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.63 • n=4 Participants
|
41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.29 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
231 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
189 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · White
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
190 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Other
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
46 participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 participants
n=7 Participants
|
68 participants
n=5 Participants
|
69 participants
n=4 Participants
|
231 participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselinePopulation: Results presented for modified Intent to treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).
Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was recorded by the patient or partner using the stopwatch provided.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
n=46 Participants
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
n=65 Participants
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
n=64 Participants
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period
|
42.6 Seconds
Standard Error 10.9
|
39.7 Seconds
Standard Error 10.6
|
44.5 Seconds
Standard Error 9.0
|
29.2 Seconds
Standard Error 9.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselinePopulation: Results presented for modified Intent to treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).
Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was recorded using the stopwatch provided.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
n=46 Participants
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
n=65 Participants
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
n=64 Participants
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline
|
1.77 Fold change
Standard Error 0.11
|
1.56 Fold change
Standard Error 0.11
|
1.79 Fold change
Standard Error 0.09
|
1.54 Fold change
Standard Error 0.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselinePopulation: Results presented for modified Intent to treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).
Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was measured using the stopwatch provided.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
n=46 Participants
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
n=65 Participants
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
n=64 Participants
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline
|
0.30 Proportion of participants
|
0.20 Proportion of participants
|
0.26 Proportion of participants
|
0.20 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)Population: Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).
7 point scale ranging from much worse (-3) to much better (3). The proportion refers to the proportion of patients who had the best 2 possible responses \[better (2) or much better (3)\] on this scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
n=46 Participants
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
n=65 Participants
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
n=64 Participants
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients Rating Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as Improved Per the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire
Better
|
0.12 Proportion of participants
|
0.05 Proportion of participants
|
0.07 Proportion of participants
|
0.07 Proportion of participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Rating Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as Improved Per the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire
Much better
|
0 Proportion of participants
|
0.02 Proportion of participants
|
0.12 Proportion of participants
|
0 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)Population: Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).
Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer). A mean change in category of ≥1 or ≥2 corresponds to improving control from 'very poor' to 'fair', 'good', or 'very good'; or from 'poor' to 'fair', 'good', or 'very good'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
n=44 Participants
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
n=61 Participants
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
n=62 Participants
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire.
|
0.35 Proportion of participants
|
0.18 Proportion of participants
|
0.33 Proportion of participants
|
0.18 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)Population: Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).
Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement. A change in category of ≥1 or ≥2 corresponds to improving distress from 'extremely' to 'moderately', 'a little bit' or 'not at all'; or from 'quite a bit' to 'moderately', 'a little bit' or 'not at all'; or from 'moderately' to 'a little bit' or 'not at all'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
n=44 Participants
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
n=61 Participants
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
n=62 Participants
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire
|
0.37 Proportion of participants
|
0.25 Proportion of participants
|
0.39 Proportion of participants
|
0.23 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)Population: Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).
Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
n=46 Participants
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
n=65 Participants
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
n=64 Participants
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients Achieving Change in Category of ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation and Achieving Change in Category of ≥1 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress at End of Treatment
|
0.13 Proportion of participants
|
0.11 Proportion of participants
|
0.25 Proportion of participants
|
0.08 Proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselinePopulation: Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).
Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP question on control of timing is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from very poor (this is the worst answer scored as 0) to very good (this is the best answer scored as 4).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
n=46 Participants
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
n=65 Participants
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
n=64 Participants
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Control of Ejaculation
|
0.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.938
|
0.46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.837
|
0.58 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.868
|
0.32 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.619
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselinePopulation: Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).
Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
n=46 Participants
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
n=65 Participants
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
n=64 Participants
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress
|
0.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.139
|
0.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.036
|
0.58 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.933
|
0.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.898
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
IX-01 400 mg
IX-01 800 mg
IX-01 1200 mg
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=46 participants at risk
Three placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 400 mg
n=48 participants at risk
400 mg dose comprising one 400 mg caplet and two placebo caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 800 mg
n=68 participants at risk
800 mg dose comprising two 400 mg caplets and one placebo caplet administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
IX-01 1200 mg
n=69 participants at risk
1200 mg dose comprising three 400 mg caplets administered orally at least 1 hour before or after food and 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.5%
3/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
4.2%
2/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.9%
2/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.9%
2/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypersomnia
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Memory impairment
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Parosmia
|
2.2%
1/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Poor quality sleep
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.1%
1/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.2%
1/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.1%
1/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.9%
2/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.1%
1/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea cruris
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
4.3%
2/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Abnormal dreams
|
2.2%
1/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed mood
|
2.2%
1/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.1%
1/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Libido decreased
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.1%
1/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Libido increased
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.1%
1/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium increased
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
2.2%
1/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Investigations
Haematocrit increased
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count increased
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Investigations
Red blood cell count increased
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Investigations
Red blood cells urine positive
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.1%
1/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.1%
1/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Faeces discoloured
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Concussion
|
2.2%
1/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
|
2.2%
1/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stress fracture
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
2.2%
1/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint hyperextension
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
2.2%
1/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.9%
2/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
General disorders
Energy increased
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.1%
1/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
2.1%
1/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
|
2.2%
1/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
|
2.2%
1/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.4%
1/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
0.00%
0/46 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/48 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
1.5%
1/68 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
0.00%
0/69 • Adverse event data were collected from Baseline (Week 0) to the Follow-Up visit (Week 10).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Sponsor may chose to collaborate on authorship, and sponsor's agent has 60-day review.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER