Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
55 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-04-03
2017-10-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Topical Lidocaine to Decrease Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration
NCT02396537
A Comparison of Intranasal Midazolam and Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Minimal Sedation for Minor Procedures in a Pediatric Emergency Department
NCT03085563
Volumes of Administration for Intranasal Midazolam
NCT01948908
IN Ketamine vs IN Midazolam and Fentanyl for Laceration Repair
NCT03528512
Intranasal Fentanyl in Combination With Midazolam Versus Midazolam Alone for Pediatric Facial Laceration Repair
NCT04745260
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary outcome measures of pain and distress associated with IN midazolam administration will include the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS); the Faces-LegsActivity-Crying-Consolability (FLACC) scale; and cry duration. These are all continuous measures that will be analyzed using the independent samples t-test.We will also evaluate parental and provider satisfaction across various domains using a 5-point Likert scale (see attached document for questions to be asked). Responses will be dichotomized into "agree" (i.e. if respondent answers "agree" or "strongly agree") or "disagree" (i.e. if respondent responds "undecided", "disagree", or "strongly disagree") and analyzed using the chi square test.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PREMED
Patients will receive 0.25 mL of IN 4% lidocaine (10 mg) in each naris (total of 0.5 mL/20 mg for both nares) preceding adminstration of IN midazolam.
Lidocaine
Lidocaine will be administered before administration of midazolam.
Midazolam
Midazolam will be administered either after lidocaine, or as a mixture with lidocaine.
PREMIX
Patients will receive midazolam mixed with 0.5 mL of 4% lidocaine (20 mg).
Lidocaine and midazolam (PREMIX)
Lidocaine will be administered as a mixture with midazolam.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lidocaine
Lidocaine will be administered before administration of midazolam.
Lidocaine and midazolam (PREMIX)
Lidocaine will be administered as a mixture with midazolam.
Midazolam
Midazolam will be administered either after lidocaine, or as a mixture with lidocaine.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Undergoing a laceration repair
3. Treating physician has determined that patient requires intranasal midazolam to facilitate the laceration repair
Exclusion Criteria
2. Known allergy to Lidocaine or Midazolam
3. Does not speak English or Spanish
4. Nasal injury precluding IN medication delivery
5. Presence of intranasal obstruction (mucous/blood) not easily cleared with suction or nose blowing
6. Baseline motor neurological abnormality (e.g. motor deficit, cerebral palsy)
7. Developmental delay, autism, autism spectrum disorder
6 Months
7 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel S Tsze, MD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at CUMC
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel S Tsze, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tsze DS, Steele DW, Machan JT, Akhlaghi F, Linakis JG. Intranasal ketamine for procedural sedation in pediatric laceration repair: a preliminary report. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):767-70. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182624935.
Tsze DS, Ieni M, Fenster DB, Babineau J, Kriger J, Levin B, Dayan PS. Optimal Volume of Administration of Intranasal Midazolam in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017 May;69(5):600-609. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.450. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
Fenster DB, Dayan PS, Babineau J, Aponte-Patel L, Tsze DS. Randomized Trial of Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Morphine for Abscess Incision and Drainage. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Sep;34(9):607-612. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000810.
Godambe SA, Elliot V, Matheny D, Pershad J. Comparison of propofol/fentanyl versus ketamine/midazolam for brief orthopedic procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2003 Jul;112(1 Pt 1):116-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.1.116.
Lee-Jayaram JJ, Green A, Siembieda J, Gracely EJ, Mull CC, Quintana E, Adirim T. Ketamine/midazolam versus etomidate/fentanyl: procedural sedation for pediatric orthopedic reductions. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Jun;26(6):408-12. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181e057cd.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAAQ6408
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.