Reinforcement Method in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT ID: NCT03051919
Last Updated: 2017-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
118 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-03-31
2014-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Staple-line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Three Different Techniques: a Randomized Trial
NCT01459471
Comparison of Staple Line Suturing in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT04323696
Does Antrum Size Matter in Sleeve Gastrectomy?
NCT04323072
Comparison of Omentopexy and Clips on the Staple Line During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT06219668
Standard Sleeve Pouch Versus Relatively Wide Pouch With Plication
NCT04144361
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The resected stomach specimens were treated in the same manner of reinforcement as used in the surgeries of the corresponding patients and then insufflated until a burst occurred. The burst pressures of the resected stomach specimens and postoperative events of the patients were recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
no reinforcement
Group I: 25 patients; no reinforcement (NoR) Observation : Patients would be followed up for any signs of leaks. If any, treatment would be offered appropriataly but the results of treatment are not affiliated as a part in the study.
observation
fibrin glue
Group II: 26 patients; fibrin glue (FG) Observation : Patients would be followed up for any signs of leaks. If any, treatment would be offered appropriataly but the results of treatment are not affiliated as a part in the study.
observation
suture reinforcement
Group III: 44 patients; suture reinforcement with 2-0 polypropylene suture (S) Observation : Patients would be followed up for any signs of leaks. If any, treatment would be offered appropriataly but the results of treatment are not affiliated as a part in the study.
observation
biological buttressing materaia
Group IV: 14 patients; biological buttressing material Observation : Patients would be followed up for any signs of leaks. If any, treatment would be offered appropriataly but the results of treatment are not affiliated as a part in the study.
observation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
observation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
M.Timucin Aydin
Attending Surgeon, Department of Surgery
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FSMTRH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.